Lawsuit asks court to halt Haiku Stairs demolition, citing Hawaii agency flip-flop
The suit was filed in district court Thursday by the Friends of Haʻikū Stairs – a nonprofit that has lobbied for retaining all or part of the 50-year-old mountain path that rises more than 2,000 feet offering climbers spectacular views of the Windward Coast.
The city has been trying to dismantle the structure since 2021, but requires the agreement of the State Historic Preservation Division, a branch of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, under Hawaiʻi statutes.
The filing asks the court to permanently halt the demolition, alleging that SHPD failed to require the city to 'conduct adequate historic and archaeological surveys of the full project area,' and allowed the city to reject 'a viable alternative to preserve the Stairs.'
SHPD had previously expressed a preference for preserving and restoring the structure in a 2019 letter to the city, according to the filing.
'SHPD's preferred alternative would be to keep the Haʻikū Stairs and … and restore the damaged section of the stairs,' the letter read.
But on April 9, SHPD wrote to the city's Department of Design and Construction that the demolition could proceed. The Friends of Haʻikū Stairs argue that SHPD's April letter was deficient because it didn't adequately explain why it abandoned its previous support for preservation.
'We just think that SHPD's rapid shift from preservation to demolition without explaining or doing any of the steps necessary under state law was fundamentally wrong and voids the whole process,' Justin Scorza, vice president of the Friends of Haʻikū Stairs, said on Monday.
The group had first appealed the letter April 12 with the Hawaiʻi Historic Places Review Board, but the board lacked a quorum to rule on the legality of the letter, Scorza said.
DLNR spokesman Dan Dennison said Monday he would not comment on pending litigation.
City spokesman Ian Scheuring said the city was confident the Circuit Court does not have jurisdiction over the case and expected the lawsuit to be dismissed.
Demolition Already On Hold Pending Appeal
The lawsuit is the latest installment in the legal maneuvering around Honolulu''s efforts to demolish the stairs citing safety concerns, liability and security costs.
Built during World War II as part of a top-secret naval radio project, the nearly 4,000 stairs remained an off-limits destination for hikers despite being closed in 1987.
In 2019, former Honolulu Mayor Kirk Caldwell had briefly floated the idea that the county's Department of Parks and Recreation take over the stairs and develop a managed access plan, including addressing traffic jams at the trail's residential access point.
But an environmental impact statement in 2020 by the Honolulu Board of Water Supply recommended demolishing the stairs, and the formal decision was made by the Honolulu City Council and Mayor Rick Blangiardi in September 2021.
The demolition was meant to take six months and cost $2.6 million but in August 2023 Friends of Haʻikū Stairs asked a court to halt the plan, arguing that the Board of Water Supplies environmental impact statement was out of date.
Friends of Haʻikū Stairs lost that decision, but nevertheless, a temporary injunction was placed on the project in June last year, pending a decision by the Intermediate Court of Appeals on whether the lower court erred in its finding.
Honolulu filed for an expedited appeal decision in February, saying it had spent nearly $2 million on police overtime to guard the steps from June to December last year. Over 120 arrests for trespass were made during that time, according to the city.
Although there have been no reported deaths on the stairs, emergency workers rescued nearly 200 hikers from the trail from 2010 to 2022, the city said.
___
This story was originally published by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Strong First-Day Attendance at LAUSD Schools Despite Immigration Fears
This article was originally published in EdSource. Four days after a 15-year-old with a disability was mistakenly detained and handcuffed by immigration agents outside of Arleta High School, the first day of the new school year in the Los Angeles Unified School District seemed normal. Students at Arleta High walked through the school's annual red carpet on Thursday as music played and cheerleaders performed. Teachers, like Nicole Patin, greeted them while passing out flyers in English and Spanish to parents and red cards detailing what to do if stopped or detained by an ICE agent. Close friends and former colleagues joined in to welcome the students, including some of Patin's former students. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter 'It was actually even emotional, because they just decided to show up,' said Patin, who also serves as chair of the school's United Teachers Los Angeles chapter. 'People that, at one point, were dear friends that had worked, people that were retired, they all came out to help us kick the year off in the right way.' Similar sentiments reigned across Los Angeles Unified as students returned to school, district officials said during a press conference at Gardena High School. And amid heightened immigration fears, district Superintendent Alberto Carvalho touted a 92% attendance rate districtwide — two percentage points higher than last year, a direct result of outreach that included more than 11,000 phone calls and 1,000 home visits. 'We're very proud of you, and I just want to echo our happiness and congratulations on all the things that you've done today, and we know that you're not going to stop, that this will be a continuation,' State Superintendent of Instruction Tony Thurmond said at the press conference. 'The state of California and our office will continue to support you in your work.' The district's Region South had the lowest rate of attendance, which Carvalho suspected was due to the area being home to more Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity and parents' fears. He did not disclose the number. Related In response to current immigration activity, he said the district would ramp up its iAttend program — where school and district staff knock on the doors of families and encourage students to return to the classroom — from a quarterly to a monthly activity. He also said that following a 300-student increase, or 7% uptick, in virtual academy enrollment last week, about 200 families changed their minds and reenrolled their children in one of LAUSD's regular, in-person campuses 'as a result of increased trust and confidence specific to the protection protocols.' '[Today] was a great day of joy, of happiness, of community that was celebrated by students, parents and staff alike,' Carvalho said. 'The fear is real, that the anxiety is undeniable, that the concern in the minds and hearts of parents is strong. But many parents told us that the steps we took [involving several tiers of protection and safety zones surrounding schools] … created an environment where parents believed that the best place for their children would be the schoolhouse.' ICE activity took place on Tuesday, near several schools, but no closer than two blocks away. The schools were: Danny J. Bakewell Sr., Primary Center and Bret Harte Preparatory Middle School in Region South Mendez High School, Ramon C. Cortines School of Visual and Performing Arts and Castelar Elementary School in Region East Victory Boulevard Elementary and STEAM Magnet in Region North Everyone involved was quick to communicate and respond, and 'no impact was seen or felt by these schools as a result of these federal actions in the neighborhood,' Carvalho said. The superintendent also said the district is working actively with two impacted families. One is the family of an 18-year-old Reseda High School student who was detained while walking his dog and is currently in a detention center in Los Angeles. Carvalho said the boy's mother told him, 'My son is in a small space with 40 men, most of them, if not all of them, much older than he is. He is 18 years old, but he's a kid. He has not been exposed to anything in his life. He drinks water once a day. The food is insufficient.' The second involved a student who was taken to a detention center in Texas but has since been released. 'Armed men in hoods with masks jumping out of vehicles with militarized vests with long guns in hand. … It's shocking for most adults,' Carvalho said. 'Think for a second about the impact that this has on impressionable young children. … I'm a father. I would not want my child to witness that.' He and school board member Tanya Ortiz Franklin urged families to contact their school's principal if they need help with transportation. Carvalho said they have so far met the needs of more than 300 families who have requested special accommodation, including modifications of bus routes and potential door-to-door services. 'In some ZIP codes in our country, the children will never witness [detentions]. Never,' Carvalho said. 'And then there are kids in [other regions who] walk to school. Blocks. … Can we spare, beyond politics, policy and legalities, can we spare our children from that trauma?' Patin, the Arleta High School teacher, said attendance remained strong on her campus and in her classrooms. 'Our campus is very secure. Our office is locked. … There's no strangers or people just dropping in or having access to our campus,' she said. 'That's really never been that way. But we're especially vigilant now.' And while the overall energy was positive, she said the immigration raids have impacted students. Many, she said, had watched violent interactions on social media and feared for themselves or family members. 'When class started, they wanted to talk about all of the people that were out in front of school and the reporters. They had questions,' she said. 'They also wanted to share their own perspective on the experience and what they were feeling. So, we all allowed for that.' More LAUSD students stayed home this summer than usual, Patin said. And many were happy to meet up with their peers after months of being apart. Twelfth grader Andry Estrada was among them, happy to leave home at 6:30 a.m. and greet his classmates as a member of the marching band and as the secretary of the school's Associated Student Body. He said he was excited to be reunited with his classmates, some of whom had stayed home toward the end of the 2024-25 academic year for fear of immigration enforcement. 'I was definitely excited to see my teachers again and build new relationships and friendships that I haven't been able to reach in the summertime,' Estrada said. 'It's overall been a great day.' This story was originally published by EdSource. Sign up for their daily newsletter.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India waives customs duty on cotton imports to support textile sector
This waiver includes the elimination of a 5% Basic Customs Duty (BCD), a 5% Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC), and a 10% Social Welfare Surcharge, which together constituted an 11% import duty on cotton. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) announced this decision with the expectation that it will reduce input costs throughout the textile value chain, including yarn, fabric, garments, and made-ups. The move is anticipated to provide relief to apparel and textile manufacturers and consumers. The exemption may be an advantage for US cotton producers and support India's clothing sector, which is bracing for tariffs close to 60% on its US exports starting later this month, according to Reuters. The textile industry has been advocating for the removal of import duties on cotton due to escalating domestic prices and supply constraints. The Indian government's decision to waive these duties aims to increase raw cotton availability in the domestic market, stabilise prices to curb inflation on textile products, enhance the export competitiveness of Indian textiles by reducing production costs, and protect small and medium-sized enterprises in the textile sector from price volatility, according to the Ministry of Textiles. This initiative is projected to positively impact domestic cotton prices and fortify the health of India's textile and apparel sector — a vital source of employment and exports. Textile associations have expressed their approval of this measure by the government, which exempts all varieties of cotton from an 11% import duty starting 19 August. Earlier this month (August), US President Donald Trump imposed additional tariffs on Indian products as a response to India's purchase of Russian oil, effectively doubling the total duty to 50% on Indian imports into the US from later this month. Prior to the tariff increase by Trump in April, Indian exports were subject to duties ranging from 0-5%, with some textile products facing tariffs between 9% and 13%, reported the news agency. "India waives customs duty on cotton imports to support textile sector" was originally created and published by Just Style, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
10 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
John Deere Hit With Layoffs Amidst Trump's Idiotic Tariffs
Donald Trump's tariff policies are generating billions of dollars for the federal government by sucking it out of American businesses via import duties. Some companies seem to be feeling downstream impacts from the government's unconventional new policies, and it may even be resulting in job losses for the sort of companies that sell to Trump's base. John Deere, the tractor seller, recently announced a raft of layoffs, but right before doing that, it held an unfortunate earnings call during which executives revealed that the company had seen a downturn in profits. Some of that downturn, the call seemed to suggest, could be credited to the climate of uncertainty created by the administration's tariff regime. The Des Moines Register reports: In its earnings report, the company noted that President Donald Trump's tariffs have added to the woes of farm-equipment makers who already were grappling with slow demand. Farmers are opting to rent machinery instead of buying. 'Tariff uncertainty and deflated commodity prices have made farmers increasingly cautious in spending decisions and more hesitant to accept higher machinery prices,' said CFRA Research analyst Jonathan Sakraida. The New Republic reports that, during the company's recent earnings call, Cory Reed, president of John Deere's Worldwide Agriculture and Turf Division, noted that the tariffs were a factor in buying decisions. 'If you have customers that are concerned about what their end markets are going to look like in a tariff environment, they're waiting to see the outcomes of what these trade deals look like,' Reed said. In other words, once again, demographics that Trump claimed he would help (factory workers and farmers) seem to be getting shafted by his policies. The layoffs at John Deere, which were announced on Aug. 18th, will impact 71 workers at its foundry in Iowa and another 167 workers at various locations in Illinois, the Register writes. While the side effects of Trump's tariff regime haven't been quite as apocalyptic as some analysts initially imagined, the economy isn't doing great, and small business owners are clearly feeling the pain from the new economic order. Indeed, recent lawsuits filed by small businesses against the Trump administration have thrown into question the very legal basis of his policies. As we pointed out earlier this month, if the tariffs are deemed illegal in a court of law, it's likely that the government will have to pay back all of that tariff revenue to the businesses it came from. This would be a terrible humiliation for the White House, a logistical nightmare, and a financial disaster for the federal government. Somehow, it's still sorta funny to imagine it happening.
