Brawn GP's 2009 Championship-Winning F1 Car Sold For $3.8 Million At Miami Grand Prix
The Brawn BGP001 chassis 001/01 is one of the only three cars ever built by the team that year and is the only Brawn vehicle to be sold publicly, fetching $3.8 million.
The auction was hosted by Bonhams in collaboration with South Florida Motorsports, the organizers of the Miami Grand Prix, and it took place on Saturday evening right in front of the Miami podium at Hard Rock Stadium.
'This car represents the ultimate Formula 1 fairy tale – a revolutionary design that redefined what was possible,' said Louis Frankel, Miami's head of sales for Bonham|Cars, ahead of the auction.
'Chassis 001/01 is a piece of motorsport history, and its offering at auction is sure to captivate collectors worldwide. We are honoured to present this unrepeatable opportunity over the Miami Grand Prix, a stage befitting its legendary status.'
Chassis 001/01 was used by Rubens Barrichello in all but seven races in 2009 and it was then gifted to world champion Jenson Button at the end of the season.
It is currently equipped with period-correct Bridgestone slick tires and has its race-used 2.4-liter Mercedes-Benz V8 engine but lacks gearbox internals.
Brawn GP has one of the most incredible stories in the history of the sport. It's the only team to have won both the constructors' and drivers' championships in its debut season, having secured both titles in its only year in F1 in 2009 with a minuscule budget compared with its rivals.
A year earlier, in 2008, Honda made a decision to pull the plug on its F1 team which had been running since 2006. The global financial crisis and the lack of much success on the track forced the Japanese marque's hand.
But the struggling team was lucky to have Ross Brawn on board during this tough time. He was brought in by senior manager Nick Fry to serve as the team's technical director.
Brawn was already a big name in motorsport, having led TWR-Jaguar to victory in the Sports Car World Championship in 1991. He then moved to Benetton where he oversaw Michael Schumacher's first two world titles before joining the German legend at Ferrari and witnessing the team secure six titles in a row.
As the clock was ticking down and the new season was fast approaching without an owner in sight, Brawn and Fry decided to take a huge gamble to rescue the team, purchasing Honda's F1 operation for a dirt-cheap price of £1 and rebranding it Brawn GP.
Even though they purchased it for nothing, they still needed funding and deals to get the team back on its feet. They managed to secure a last-minute deal with Mercedes-Benz for engines and signed on a few brave sponsors willing to take such a big risk.
Brawn was able to retain Button and Barrichello's services, and while they had hardly any time to test the cars before the 2009 season began, they put their faith in Brawn and his newly formed squad.
Fortune then smiled upon them when engineer Saneyuki Managawa found a loophole in the 2009 regulations that allowed them to build a double diffuser. They soon knew that they created a beast of a car when they later took the BGP01 chassis 001 - the one sold at auction - to the track to be tested by Button.
In the 2009 season opener in Melbourne, Brawn GP stunned everyone with a one-two finish headed by Button. It wasn't a stroke of luck however as the Brit went on to clinch his second victory of the season in a rain-shortened race in Malaysia, finishing 22.722 seconds ahead of Nick Heidfeld of BMW Sauber.
After securing third in the following round in China, Button brought home four straight wins from Bahrain to Turkey. And while those were his last wins of the season with ten races still to go, Barrichello netted two more victories for the team.
Thanks to 15 podium finishes throughout the season, the outfit claimed its sole constructors' championship with 172 points, beating Red Bull by 18.5 points. Button took home his and the team's first and only drivers' title with 95 points - 11 points clear of Sebastian Vettel.
Brawn GP, the team that was born from the ashes of Honda and achieved the unthinkable, was then sold to Mercedes at the end of the 2009 season.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
AfD Tops Poll as Germany's Most Popular Political Party
Alternative for Germany (AfD) has become the most popular party in the country, according to a poll released on Aug. 12. The poll, conducted by the Forsa Institute for Social Research and Statistical Analysis on behalf of RTL Deutschland, showed that 26 percent of Germans would vote for the AfD. The AfD, an anti-mass immigration party, came second in Germany's national parliamentary elections, earning nearly 21 percent of the vote. The new polling puts the right-wing party ahead of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's mainstream conservative bloc, the Christian Democrats (CDU) and their Bavarian allies, the Christian Social Union (CSU). The CDU/CSU slid to 24 percent, its worst result since the 2021 federal election. Germany's manufacturing sector, the largest in Europe, has had two years of contraction and is expected to broadly stagnate in 2025, according to an EU Commission macroeconomic forecast. Only 14 percent of poll respondents said they expected the economic situation to improve, while 62 percent anticipated a deterioration, which it said was 'the highest pessimism level' of the current year. Germany is also struggling with the loss of affordable Russian gas, historic Volkswagen plant closures, and fierce competition from cheaper Chinese electric vehicles. The country has gone through a major population change, with its net population increasing by more than 3.5 million between 2014 and 2024, driven entirely by migration. During this period, the number of German citizens fell by 2 million to 71.6 million, while the foreign population grew to 13.1 million from around 7.5 million, Statistics Office data showed. In 2015, under Chancellor Angela Merkel, more than 1 million refugees, many of them from Syria, as well as Afghans and Iraqis, arrived in Germany. One hundred days after Merz's election as chancellor, his approval ratings have fallen to a record low, with 67 percent 'dissatisfied' with his work. The poll said that 'dissatisfaction' is particularly pronounced among supporters of the AfD, at 95 percent. In February's general election, Merz fell short of forming a majority government, as is often the case in German politics, and, after lengthy negotiations, formed a coalition with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD). At the time, Merz ruled out the party forming a government with the AfD. Forty-three percent of respondents said they expected the CDU/CSU/SPD coalition to end early. AfD's policies include strong support for traditional marriage between a man and woman, the preservation of national independence in the face of the European Union's increasing power, the preservation of German culture amid 'European integration' and Islamization, and border security, including the expulsion of illegal immigrants. Last year, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk deepened his support for the party, defending it against accusations of extremism and championing its policies as the nation's best path forward during challenging times. Robin Brooks, a senior fellow in the global economy and development program at the Brookings Institution, said in an Aug. 13 X post that 'Germany is in real trouble.' 'Its political center refuses to confront immigration, which is the issue driving relentless AfD growth. Instead, the political center name-calls AfD voters. Dereliction of duty,' he said. Despite gaining considerable proportions of the vote, populist parties such as the AfD in Europe are frozen out of governing in coalitions by political opponents who regard them as extremist. In Austria, conservatives, Social Democrats, and liberals formed a coalition in March to block the anti-immigration and euro-skeptic Freedom Party from taking power, even after it won an electoral victory with 29 percent of the vote in September 2024. French President Emmanuel Macron on June 9, 2024, called a surprise snap parliamentary election following his centrist Renaissance party's poor performance in European Parliament elections, when the populist and nationalist party National Rally (RN) performed very strongly. RN has increased its voter share ahead of the French presidential elections, which are scheduled to be held in or about April 2027, and recently polled at 35 percent.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steps the FIA will take to avoid a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 F1 dominance
Next year, both chassis and power unit regulations will undergo sweeping changes. Several technical directors in the F1 paddock have called it the biggest overhaul of the past 50 years. In addition to concerns from drivers about the racing in general, some fear it could pave the way for long-term dominance by a single manufacturer. Memories go back to 2014, when Mercedes' engine proved significantly superior to the rest of the field and the factory team went on to claim every world title through to 2020. Why the FIA doesn't fear a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 dominance The FIA, however, is confident that history won't repeat itself in F1's new era starting in 2026. 'I don't think that we are going to have a situation where a single manufacturer has such a huge advantage as was the case in 2014,' Nikolas Tombazis told The FIA's single-seater director believes the new engine formula is less complex, despite the substantial increase in electrical power: 'The engines are still not as simple as we would have liked. We would have liked to go further, but we had a lot of resistance against simplifying the regulations more. So there are things that we would have liked to be even simpler, but they are still simpler than the current generation of engines. They don't have the MGU-H, and there are a few things that have tighter limits, so we don't think the gaps will be as big as in 2014.' Back then, the MGU-H proved a major performance differentiator - and a very costly one. For both of those reasons it will disappear in 2026, a change that should provide newcomers with a more level playing field while also reducing development costs. How will the concessions' system work? That said, it cannot be ruled out that one manufacturer may still get out of the blocks significantly better than the rest, especially since the FIA acknowledges not all power unit manufacturers are equally transparent or willing to share data about their new engines. Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W05, leads Nico Rosberg, Mercedes W05, Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F14T, Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari F14T, Nico Hulkenberg, Force India VJM07 Mercedes, and Kevin Magnussen, McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes, at the start But even if one manufacturer dominates next year, the FIA has learned from 2014. The new regulations include a safety net, allowing underperforming brands to close the gap through so-called concessions. 'We do have newcomers, and it is always a risk at the start of a new cycle that there is some divergence initially,' Tombazis said. 'Additionally, we have a cost gap for the PU manufacturers now.' It means that manufacturers who are behind cannot simply throw unlimited money at their engine projects. To still offer them possibilities to catch up, the FIA has included a new system into the 2026 regulations. 'For that reason, there is a concept called ADUO, which is an acronym for Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities,' Tombazis explained. 'This concept has been the product of a lot of work. It was already there from day one of the regulations, but in the last few months more detail has been put into it to define exactly how that is going to operate.' This, of course, raises the key question: how does it work? 'Essentially every five, six races there will be an average performance measured for each PU manufacturer. Those who are below a certain level, and depending on how much below they are, will get that benefit accumulating over the year. That benefit would translate into three things: one is additional development money, some more dyno hours and the possibility to make a new homologation of the engine. So people who are behind will have the opportunity to speed up and catch up.' The 2026 technical regulations specify that this assessment will be made after the first five race weekends each season: 'Over the first five Competitions of each Championship Season in the 2026-2030 period, the FIA will monitor the performance of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) part of all the Power Units supplied by each PU Manufacturer to its customer Competitors. For each ICE supplied by the PU Manufacturers, an average power will be calculated. The methodology to calculate this power can be found in the Appendix to the Regulations. Any PU Manufacturer whose ICE power is more than 3% below that of the highest ICE power recorded amongst all the PU Manufacturers will be granted Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities.' These extra opportunities relate to a table in Appendix 3 of the technical regulations. A special ADUO column lists which components of the ICE may still be improved if a manufacturer is granted the special status by the FIA. Several of these components are otherwise frozen for development over a specific period of time, but with ADUO status, they may still be modified to close the gap. Nikolas Tombazis, FIA Single Seater Director FIA rejects 'absolutely any suggestion' of Balance of Performance The system is designed to prevent long-term dominance, but Tombazis emphasises that it should not be seen as a Balance of Performance, as is used in series like the World Endurance Championship. 'I want to stress that I completely refute any comment about that being a Balance of Performance or anything like that, because first of all, the regulations are exactly the same for everyone. It's not like we are giving them more cubic capacity, more fuel or whatever. 'Secondly, if there was no cost cap, they would throw a lot of money at it. When Honda were behind in 2016, 2017, for a certain period they had to spend a lot more money to catch up. With a cost cap the risk is that you would never be able to do that, and that you would be behind eternally. You would just be humiliated for a whole regulation cycle, and clearly we don't want that. We don't think that would be fair, and I have to say that PU manufacturers have been extremely collaborative on this topic.' Finally, the FIA is working on a safety net for manufacturers who suffer serious reliability issues — something that cannot be ruled out at the start of a new era. 'There is an additional initiative which addresses the situation where a PU manufacturer has huge reliability issues to start with. Imagine somebody who blows up an engine each race weekend and each engine costs a lot of money. They suddenly find that they are eating their cost cap with blown engines. They have to reduce the development to stay below the cost cap, and you can imagine that would be an awful situation. 'So we've got some initiatives, which are going through the same phase of discussion now, and will hopefully be approved quite soon, whereby once you use more than a certain number of engines, you start having a certain cost cap relief. Read Also: What's got drivers so agitated about "strange" 2026 F1 cars? 'Your engines, once you exceed that number, cost very little from a cost cap point of view. Not in terms of real money, of course, they still cost the same unfortunately, but it means that we protect them from a situation where somebody is in an awful position and has no way to react under the cost cap. That would be really unfortunate.' Combined with the slightly simpler power unit formula, this approach should avoid a repeat of 2014 and has to keep the F1 field competitive - at least on the engine side. To read more articles visit our website.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars?
As electric vehicles gain traction in the luxury market, many consumers are weighing the financial benefits of going electric. With volatile gas prices and growing environmental concerns, the question of electric versus gas-powered luxury vehicles has become increasingly relevant. Read More: Find Out: The Rivian R1T pickup and R1S SUV represent premium electric options, but how do their operating costs compare to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi models? Here's how monthly Rivian charging costs compare to fueling traditional luxury vehicles. Rivian Charging Costs The cost to charge a Rivian varies significantly based on location and charging method. Home charging typically costs about half of a gas tank fill-up. Discover Next: Home Charging Economics According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the national average electricity rate is around $0.15 per kWh, though regional variations range from $0.10 to $0.30+ per kWh. The Rivian R1T has battery capacities of 135 kWh (Large pack) or 106 kWh (Standard pack), per Rivian's official specifications. Based on the real-world efficiency of 2.5 miles per kWh: Monthly Home Charging Costs (1,000 miles): At $0.15/kWh: $75-$95 At $0.20/kWh: $100-$125 At $0.30/kWh: $150-$190 Public Charging Electrify America charges around 48 cents per kWh for fast charging. Heavy public charging users can expect $150-$250 monthly costs. Luxury Gas Car Comparison Most luxury vehicles require premium gasoline. According to AAA's Gas Prices, regular gas averages $3.15 per gallon nationally, making premium fuel approximately $3.50-$3.75 per gallon. Monthly Fuel Costs for 1,000 Miles: Luxury SUVs: BMW X5 (19 mpg): $189 Mercedes GLE (20 mpg): $180 Audi Q7 (19 mpg): $189 Luxury Sedans: BMW 5 Series (25 mpg): $144 Mercedes E-Class (26 mpg): $138 Audi A6 (25 mpg): $144 The Bottom Line For drivers charging primarily at home, Rivian offers significant monthly savings: Potential Monthly Savings: vs. Luxury SUVs: $85-$115 vs. Luxury Sedans: $45-$70 Annual savings: $540-$1,380 However, those relying heavily on public charging may find costs approaching efficient luxury sedans. Regional Impact Geographic location significantly affects this comparison. States with low electricity rates and high gas prices heavily favor electric vehicles, while areas with expensive electricity and cheap gas narrow the gap. Beyond Monthly Costs Additional Rivian advantages include minimal maintenance requirements, no oil changes, reduced brake wear, and potential HOV lane access. Traditional luxury cars offer established service networks, no range anxiety, and faster refueling. Conclusion Rivian ownership typically offers $80-$100 monthly savings compared to luxury SUVs for most drivers with home charging access. The key is understanding your usage patterns, local utility rates, and charging infrastructure before making the switch from premium gasoline to premium electrons. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
