logo
Hezbollah commander assassinated as calls grow for terror group to join war on Israel

Hezbollah commander assassinated as calls grow for terror group to join war on Israel

Telegraph6 hours ago

A leading Hezbollah commander has been assassinated in Israel's deadliest attack on Lebanon in recent days.
Amid its latest conflict with Iran, the Israeli military said it had eliminated a 'threat' by killing Mohammad Ahmad Khreiss in an air strike. An official said he headed an anti-tank unit in southern Lebanon, where the border with Israel remains disputed.
Israel's near-daily attacks have been a breach of a ceasefire agreed with Hezbollah and brokered by the US and France last year.
It came as Tom Barrack, the US special envoy for Syria and ambassador to Turkey, told Hezbollah not to get involved in the fight between Iran and Israel, saying that doing so 'would be a very bad decision'.
He issued the warning during an official visit to Beirut, Lebanon's capital, where the conflict with Iran has raised fears of a renewed war with Israel.
However, Hezbollah, the centrepiece of Iran's 'axis of resistance', has so far resisted getting involved.
The terror group has been decimated by Israeli attacks, including one which killed Hassan Nasrallah, its leader, last September. But supporters say the group is ready to fight if called upon.
Even with its reduced operational capacity, Hezbollah could still mount attacks that would distract and expend Israeli military resources that would otherwise be used in its war against Iran – partly because the group's Lebanon base is the closest in terms of physical proximity to Israel.
Israel's air strikes have hit densely populated urban areas, including Dahieh, a stronghold of Hezbollah, as recently as June 5. At least nine buildings were levelled in the bombing.
The Telegraph visited the area earlier this week under the supervision of a representative from Hezbollah.
'We are with Hezbollah in our hearts,' said Abbas Rachiiene. 'If it gets to a point where we need to get involved, physically and materially, then we will do so. Every time the Israelis hit us, our love for Hezbollah grows even bigger.'
'Israel keeps hitting us despite ceasefire'
Mr Rachiiene, 39, lost his home two weeks ago when Israeli bombs rained down from the sky, levelling the multi-story apartment block where he lived.
He now climbs atop the rubble daily to assess the progress of the cranes tasked with clearing away the debris so that rebuilding can eventually begin.
'Israel keeps hitting us despite the ceasefire, and I don't know why,' said Amal al-Zeinn, 39, who is overseeing the clean-up operation. 'Israel has no regard for the feelings of the people who lose their homes.'
It is the kind of anger and groundswell of support for Hezbollah that could push its fighters into war against Israel, yet again.
The prospect of being 'martyred' is almost glamorised in posters dotted around Dahieh, put up in memory of young men who died in battle against the 'Zionist enemy'.
There are also pictures of the late Nasrallah too, showing him beam down on the public while flanked by Hezbollah's yellow-and-green flag.
'When the community sees that there is a need for us to get involved, I'm sure we will take it,' said Fauzi Ahmar, 28, a salesman at a shop across the street from where Mr Rachiiene's home was.
'Hezbollah has the power to fight'
'Yes, I believe Hezbollah has the power to fight. We are sure,' said Faten Kheir, 34, a school teacher, who lived in the same building as Mr Rachiiene, and also lost her home.
'Many people will say outwardly – I wish that Hezbollah will not share in the fighting [now], but really, they wish on the inside for Hezbollah to join,' she said, emphasising her point by waving her phone, the back of which held a picture of Nasrallah's hands, instantly recognisable by the iconic ring he used to wear.
On Thursday, Hezbollah issued a statement pledging its continued commitment to Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, and stating that it stood by the regime 'in confronting the Israeli-American aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran.'
It added: 'America will soon realise it has plunged into a deep abyss due to its tyrannical support for the brutal Israeli aggression against Gaza, the resistance in the region, and the Islamic Republic of Iran.'
However, Lebanese ministers have made thinly veiled overtures to Hezbollah to hold fire because the country needs time to rebuild after a crippling economic crisis and two years of an interim government due to political deadlock.
Both Joseph Aoun, the country's president, and Nawaf Salam, the prime minister, who has only been in place since January, underscored this week that Lebanon needed to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict.
But ideology alone may not be enough to push Hezbollah into the fray, given broader concerns regarding its political future.
On top of its militant activities, the organisation is also active politically, with members in parliament and responsibilities to supporters – including paying contributions to families who lost sons and husbands at war, and to farmers whose livestock and crops were burnt in battle.
Such pledges have been increasingly tough for Hezbollah to abide by as the group has been hit by Lebanon's sweeping economic crisis and disruption to its Iran-supported funding networks.
The air strikes earlier this month in Dahieh came as many families were sitting down to their evening meal.
Mr Rachiiene was manning his shop when the first alert came that an attack was incoming, prompting him to rush home to check on his family.
'I was so worried about them,' he said, running upstairs, throwing open the front door to thankfully find that they had all already gone downstairs to shelter.
In survival mode, he did not think to save anything from home, instead hurrying back down to find his car, into which he gathered as many elderly people and children as he could fit as he helped them get out of the area. In the end, nobody in his family was killed.
'At first, I was so mad the Israelis took our home,' Mr Rachiiene said. 'But now, Iran took theirs, and that makes me feel better. We feel that Iran took revenge for us; right now, we feel Israel is living what we have lived.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action
Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action

David Lammy will travel to Geneva on Friday for talks with the Iranian foreign minister and European allies as the UK presses for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran conflict. The Foreign Secretary is set to meet Abbas Araghchi alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' Earlier on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had urged the US to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.

Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes
Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes

NBC News

time36 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is increasingly relying on a small group of advisers for critical input as he weighs whether to order U.S. military action in Iran targeting its nuclear program, according to two defense officials and a senior administration official. At the same time, another senior administration official said, Trump has been crowdsourcing with an array of allies outside the White House and in his administration about whether they think he should greenlight strikes in Iran — a question that has divided his core supporters. Despite routinely asking a broader group of people what they think he should do, Trump tends to make many decisions with just a handful of administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also the interim national security adviser, the senior administration official said. Trump also leans on his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, when he weighs decisions that fall under his portfolio, the official said. As he decides whether to directly involve the United States in a war with Iran, Trump has expanded his circle in some ways while shrinking it in others. He has sidelined National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who opposes U.S. strikes in Iran, and he has not been routinely turning to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as part of his decision-making process, according to the two defense officials and the senior administration official. Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell pushed back against the notion that Hegseth has not been heavily involved. "This claim is completely false. The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week," Parnell said in a statement. "Secretary Hegseth is providing the leadership the Department of Defense and our Armed Forces need, and he will continue to work diligently in support of President Trump's peace through strength agenda." Trump is listening to Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Gen. Erik Kurilla, the commander of U.S. Central Command; and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, the two defense officials and a former administration official said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that Trump will decide whether the United States should get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict within the next two weeks. In contrast to virtually every president before him since World War II, Trump does not rely on senior officials to carefully prepare foreign policy and military options and then discuss them with him in a structured, deliberate way, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter. He discusses foreign policy with officials in his administration, as well as a myriad of foreign leaders and contacts outside the government. But those discussions are more informal and freewheeling. As a result, there are arguably fewer opportunities for officials or senior military commanders to question his assumptions or raise concerns about a course of action, the two sources said. When Trump announced last month that he was lifting sanctions on Syria after he met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, senior officials were taken by surprise, the two sources with knowledge of the matter said. Treasury Department officials had no warning that he would make such an announcement, and no technical preparations had been made to carry out a step that required discussions with foreign banks and Syrian government officials, the sources said. Since he returned to the White House in January, Trump has drastically scaled back the National Security Council, which traditionally collaborates with other federal agencies to craft policy options and outline their possible consequences, particularly when it comes to possible military action.

Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action
Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action

Powys County Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action

David Lammy will travel to Geneva on Friday for talks with the Iranian foreign minister and European allies as the UK presses for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran conflict. The Foreign Secretary is set to meet Abbas Araghchi alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' Earlier on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had urged the US to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store