Ethics watchdog flags senator helping wife rake in millions for nonprofit
FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., is being accused of violating ethics rules after backing laws that financially benefited his wife's environmental organization.
The Democratic senator and climate hawk voted for key laws that provided funding for grants to the environmental non-profit group that works with his wife, Sandra Whitehouse, and pays her through a consulting firm.
The ethics watchdog, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), is asking the Senate Select Committee on Ethics Chairman James Lankford, R-Okla., and Vice Chairman Chris Coons, D-Del., to investigate Whitehouse "to determine whether he violated the Senate ethics rules on conflicts of interest." The group works primarily to draw attention to potential Democratic lawmaker ethics violations.
Trump Tax Cut Plan Hits Turbulence Ahead Of House Vote As Republicans Split
Whitehouse's wife, Sandra, is employed as president of consulting firm Ocean Wonks LLC and has been since 2017, per her LinkedIn page. Before that, she was a direct employee of Ocean Conservancy, serving as Senior Policy Adviser beginning in 2008.
Ocean Conservancy has received more than $14.2 million in federal grants since 2008, per USASpending.gov. During 2024 alone, it was given two sizable grants, one for $5.2 million from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for marine debris cleanup in September and another for $1.7 million from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), again to assist with marine debris cleanup.
Read On The Fox News App
The former was funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) championed by the Biden administration and voted for by Sen. Whitehouse. The latter was funded through the EPA's annual appropriations bill, which Whitehouse also voted for.
Following Key Wins, Trump Poised For Cabinet Completion In Record Time
"While these two grants alone appear to be a conflict of interest, it is even more egregious in the context of Senator Whitehouse's long history of working on legislation being lobbied for by organizations tied to his wife," wrote FACT Executive Director Kendra Arnold.
"Altogether, Ocean Conservancy has spent millions on federal lobbying expenses over the years on issues relating to oceans, climate change, and environmental cleanup—issues directly championed by Senator Whitehouse, a longtime member (and current Ranking Member) of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee and the co-founder of the Senate's so-called 'Oceans Caucus."
Since 2010, Ocean Conservancy has paid Whitehouse a total of $2,686,800 either directly or through her firm, per tax documents.
Senate Border Budget Triumphs After All-night Session While Trump-backed House Bill Lags
"Dr. Sandra Whitehouse, a well-respected marine ecologist and ocean policy consultant, has not received compensation from these federal grants allocated to Ocean Conservancy," Ocean Conservancy's Vice President of External Affairs Jeff Watters told Fox News Digital in a statement.
"For 40 years, Ocean Conservancy has been a global leader in marine debris cleanup through our signature initiative, the International Coastal Cleanup. The marine debris cleanup grants Ocean Conservancy received from NOAA came from laws passed with broad bipartisan support that then went through a competitive, independent selection process which designated Ocean Conservancy to be one among hundreds of NGOs to receive funding. Ocean Conservancy's selection was based on our decades of expertise in addressing marine debris and protecting the ocean."
Scoop: Republican Daniel Cameron Blasted By Likely Gop Opponent As Mcconnell Successor Fight Begins
"With the support of these bipartisan federal funds, Ocean Conservancy plans to remove hundreds of thousands of pounds of trash from beaches and waterways around the U.S., which will not only protect these places for generations of Americans to enjoy but improve the health of our fishing and tourism industries," he said.
Watters further pointed to the notable Republican support both the BIL and the EPA appropriations bill received in the Senate.
Whitehouse, Lankford and Coons did not provide comment to Fox News Digital in time for publication.Original article source: Ethics watchdog flags senator helping wife rake in millions for nonprofit
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
MAGA Splitting Over Israel's Strikes on Iran Poses 'Dilemma' for Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States will back Israel's strikes against Iran, according to President Donald Trump, who faces criticism from his supporters that this stance opposes his "America First" policy. Trump's comments on Sunday came as he rebuffed criticism from conservative TV host Tucker Carlson about his support for Israel, a sentiment expressed by MAGA (Make America Great Again) Republicans. Trump supporter Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on social media that those pushing for the U.S. to become fully involved in the escalating conflict in the Middle East cannot also say they back MAGA or any policy of America First. U.S. foreign policy expert Jonathan Monten told Newsweek that Trump faces a "dilemma" in balancing his desire to appear strong on the world stage with his constituency's reluctance to engage in foreign conflicts. "He's trying to have it both ways," he said. Newsweek reached out to the White House, Greene, and Carlson for comment. Why It Matters Israel launched strikes on Iran as part of "Operation Rising Lion" in response to intelligence it said showed Tehran could produce up to 15 nuclear bombs. But Trump's backing for Israel's actions has raised concerns that the U.S. could be pulled into the war via attacks by Iran or its proxy forces on U.S. personnel in the region. This is causing a rift between the president's advisers and political base over the prospect of yet further American engagement in foreign wars, possibly mirroring the splits in the Democratic Party over the previous administration's response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. The spat comes as Trump rejected Israel's proposal to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to U.S. officials, cited by the Associated Press and Reuters, which noted how such a plan could destabilize the region. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. Tasos Katopodis What To Know While leaving for the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada, Trump told reporters Sunday that the U.S. would keep supporting Israel's airstrikes on Iran. He also batted away a question over whether he had called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop the attacks, but praised their relationship. During an interview with ABC News, Trump had raised the possibility of U.S. involvement in the conflict, a position which has been criticized by some of his biggest supporters. Greene posted on X (formerly Twitter) that "we are sick and tired of foreign wars and that "Real America First/MAGA wants world peace for all people." Her post did not mention Trump by name but also said "everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake." Carlson, a Trump ally, wrote in a newsletter to subscribers, "politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it." He accused Trump of being "complicit" in Israel's "act of war," although the U.S. president has denied that the U.S. had any involvement in the attack on Iran. When asked about the comments by the former Fox News anchor, Trump told The Atlantic that "America First" means whatever he says it does and that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear bomb. Monten, director of the International Public Policy Program at University College London (UCL), told Newsweek that Trump "wants to be seen as a player on the world stage." However, he has "cultivated a constituency of support around non-involvement in foreign conflicts." "The dilemma he faces is that he's trying to play both roles at the same time," he said. This is the same dilemma he has faced in other foreign policy issues involving the potential use of force, such as his pronouncements on acquiring Greenland, the Panama Canal, and Canada, Monten said. Avi Melamed, a former Israeli intelligence official, told Newsweek that from Trump's perspective, as long as the U.S. is not directly militarily involved, there is an advantage to Israel's military action aimed at forcing Tehran back to negotiations over its nuclear program from a significantly weaker position. Dialogue between the U.S. and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program was shelved following Israel's attacks. But Melamed added that Trump acts according to considerations that do not necessarily align with those of the Israeli government. The U.S. president's declarations and policy can change quickly, like the sudden halt of the American offensive against the Houthis in Yemen, he said. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, 2025. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, an analysis published Sunday, Trita Parsi, co-founder of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said Israel's seeking Trump's approval is easier than requesting direct American involvement. But Parsi also said Trump likes winners, and by asking him to intervene, Israel is signaling that it's losing, having as of the weekend, not eliminated Iran's regime or cripple its nuclear program "Why would Trump risk American lives, endanger his presidency, and join a war he didn't start?" Parsi wrote. "Trump prefers to take credit for victories, not inherit blame for someone else's potential fiasco." What People Are Saying Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, on X: "Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA." Tucker Carlson, to newsletter subscribers: "Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." President Donald Trump told The Atlantic: "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, very simple. Regardless—Israel or not Israel—Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb." What Happens Next Iranian missiles again penetrated Israel's Iron Dome defense system overnight Sunday, and Iran's state media reported there were new Israeli strikes in the west of the country on Monday. Hamidreza Azizi, an expert on Iran and visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told Newsweek that Tehran is trying to influence Israel's calculations by demonstrating that it will not hesitate to escalate and will go as far as necessary. Much depends on Iran's actual capabilities—what it has already destroyed and what it may target, but Tehran's regime views Israel's strikes as existential, which is why it appears willing to use whatever resources it has, he added.
Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The Trump family's next venture, a mobile phone company
NEW YORK — The Trump family said it is licensing its name to a new mobile phone service, the latest in a string of ventures that have been announced while Donald Trump is in the White House despite ethical concerns that the U.S. president could mold public policy for personal gain .
