Strengthening intellectual property enforcement
The most strategic response to trade restrictions and tariff pressures lies not in retaliation, but in strengthening Intellectual Property enforcement – signaling Pakistan's commitment to a principles-based, innovation-driven economy. The 2025 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers released by the U.S.
Trade Representative (USTR) presents a clear assessment of the challenges international businesses face when operating in Pakistan.
While several issues are noted – ranging from customs irregularities to foreign exchange constraints – one area that continues to stand out is the enforcement of Intellectual Property (IP) rights.
Pakistan has made notable strides in reforming its IP landscape over the past few years. The creation of specialized IP tribunals and increased engagement with international stakeholders are commendable steps. However, as the report points out, implementation remains uneven, and enforcement mechanisms require further strengthening.
Counterfeiting, piracy, and inconsistent legal interpretations continue to undermine the confidence of both domestic innovators and foreign investors. These issues are not just technical; they reflect deeper structural weaknesses that limit industrial expansion, foreign direct investment, and export diversification.
Moreover, IP enforcement must be taken seriously by regulatory bodies and enforcement agencies. The role of relevant and qualified professionals – especially within IP tribunals – cannot be overstated.
In mature legal systems, domain experts represent Banking, Corporate, Taxation, Consumer Courts and IP matters alike. Pakistan must adopt a similar model, appointing technically proficient personnel who understand the economic implications of intellectual capital.
The concept of Intellectual Property is not new to Pakistan. As a Commonwealth nation, we enforced the Trademarks Act of 1940 and the Patents Act of 1919, post-Pakistan's independence. The legacy exists – it is the modernization that now demands our attention. Relevant and comprehensive training for adjudicators, examiners, and enforcement officials is essential to restoring credibility and efficiency.
At a time when Pakistan is seeking to stabilize its economy, boost exports, and attract technology-led investment, the role of a strong IP regime becomes even more vital. IP enforcement should not be viewed in isolation – as a legal or administrative concern – but as a strategic lever for national development.
Addressing the concerns highlighted in the USTR report – particularly those related to enforcement capacity and institutional transparency – can go a long way in reshaping Pakistan's image as a reliable trade partner. A commitment to consistent, fair, and transparent IP enforcement will send a powerful message: that Pakistan is ready to compete in a knowledge-based global economy.
A constructive dialogue among the business community, policymakers, and enforcement bodies is incumbent. This may well be our final opportunity to take Intellectual Property seriously – not as a compliance issue, but as a foundational pillar for innovation, investment, and inclusive economic growth. The moment to act is now.
Karimullah Adeni, Karachi
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Only 14% MNAs attend all sittings of 16th NA session
Two supplementary resolutions were adopted by the house which were about paying tributes to the sacrifices of the armed forces on Defence Day and condemning terrorism in Quetta and Mardan. PHOTO: FAFEN The 16th session of the National Assembly that spanned over 13 sittings between May 5 and 22, 2025, saw only 14% members making 100% attendance, while 9% of the members were absent during the entire session, the Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN) said in its report on Thursday. Fafen is a civil society network focused on strengthening democracy. It said in its latest report that consistent with the previous sessions, female attendance was generally higher than that of their male counterparts during the session last month. "The highest attendance was recorded during the first sitting, with 237 members (76%) present. During this sitting, the House suspended its regular agenda to discuss the recent Pakistan-India conflict," the report said. The lowest attendance was recorded during the last sitting, with 174 members (55%) present. This sitting was initially adjourned after just 13 minutes because of the lack of quorum. The House reconvened after 15 minutes and passed The Off the Grid (Captive Power Plants) Levy Bill, 2025. Fafen said that 150 members of the National Assembly (MNAs) skipped sittings without advance leave request; 118 (44%) submitted a leave application, including 25 (21%) in advance and 37 (31%) applied ex-post facto after returning from their leave. It added that 268 members (86%) missed at least one sitting during the current session. The report said that 16 female MNAs, including 14 on reserved seats, attended all the sittings, while five female MNAs, including two on the reserved seats, recorded zero attendance. Region-wise, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Islamabad Capital Territory lawmakers recorded the highest percentage of MNAs attending more than half of the sittings, it said, adding that majority of lawmakers from the SIC, the PML-N, the JUI, and independents attended more than half of the sittings. A lack of ministerial presence weakened legislative oversight, Fafen said in the report. Among the 29 federal ministers, who were expected to be present during the Question Hour to respond to queries from lawmakers, only 15 (52%) were marked present during the sittings.
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bilawal briefs US lawmakers about India's belligerence
WASHINGTON: A high-level parliamentary delegation from Pakistan, headed by former foreign minister and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari met with members of US House Foreign Affairs Committee led by Chairman Brian Mast and Ranking Member Gregory Meeks to discuss regional peace, the recent crisis in South Asia, and avenues for strengthened US-Pakistan relations. Bilawal briefed the committee on India's recent provocations and military strikes targeting civilians, warning that the escalating conflict poses a grave threat to regional stability. He described India's unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty as a flagrant violation of international law, endangering the livelihoods of millions in Pakistan and setting a dangerous precedent for the weaponization of vital resources. He also highlighted the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), reiterating Pakistan's long-standing position that the people of IIOJK must be granted their internationally recognized right to self-determination. Pakistan's delegation engages US congress on regional tensions Commending the United States for its past role in facilitating de-escalation between India and Pakistan, he reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to peace through diplomacy. The delegation also emphasised the importance of enhancing trade and economic cooperation between Pakistan and the United States. The members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee welcomed the delegation's insights and reaffirmed their strong support for the people and Government of Pakistan. Meanwhile, Pakistani delegation held a productive meeting with Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Allison Hooker. The members of delegation appreciated the role played by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in facilitating the Pakistan-India ceasefire. They expressed hope that it would create space for sustainable peace and stability in South Asia through dialogue. The delegation shared its concern over India's unprovoked aggression, continued hostile rhetoric, and unlawful suspension of Indus Waters Treaty.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'Isolating' Pakistan not in US interest: think tank
A US think tank has advised the Trump administration to pursue a pragmatic and interest-driven relationship with Pakistan, emphasising that isolating the South Asian nation is counterproductive to American national security interests. "Isolating Pakistan is not in the United States' national security interests. Pakistan's cooperation, even if selective and limited, is better than its intransigence," reads a report of Hudson Institute, a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Titled "Engaging Pakistan in a New Era of US Foreign Policy", the report is the product of the US-Pakistan Study Group, comprising seasoned diplomats and analysts. Contributors include Former Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Sahar Khan, Michael Kugelman, Ambassador Cameron Munter, Ambassador Anne Patterson, Ambassador Robin Raphel, Harlan Ullman, Dr Marvin Weinbaum, and Uzair Younus. The report says the United States and Pakistan have a long history of working together. Moving forward, both countries could benefit from identifying common interests and cooperating accordingly. Even selective or limited cooperation from Pakistan is seen as more valuable than disengagement. The report says the recent India-Pakistan crisis reportedly brought the two nuclear-armed South Asian countries to the brink of war before the United States intervened and pulled them back. "This crisis highlights the need for continued US engagement with Pakistan, a critical country in a geostrategic location with which Washington has historically had a complex relationship," it adds. The relationship between Pakistan and the United States has weathered many ups and downs. In the opening months of his second term, President Donald Trump has indicated that he intends to adopt a more pragmatic foreign policy, one that maintains relations even with countries that hold beliefs or values different from his own, according to the report. As a result, the relationship between the United States and Pakistan has a better chance of improvement than it has enjoyed in recent yearsif both countries' leaders are able to focus on shared interests rather than ideological differences. In the aftermath of the 2025 crisis, US policymakers are emphasising the importance of engaging with both India and Pakistan to prevent and manage crises between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. Given the serious threat posed by any future conflict or nuclear escalation in South Asia, the United States is encouraged to take an active role in mediation efforts during such crises. The experience of past administrations has shown that Pakistan's strategic calculus about India is unlikely to change through either incentives or pressure. Instead, a more realistic approach is advisedone that accepts Pakistan's self-perception and works within that framework rather than attempting to reshape it. Another area of mutual interest is counterterrorism. While the United States continues to monitor terrorist groups, Pakistan also faces internal threats from militant extremist organizations.
