logo
Air Force pauses M18 pistol use after airman's death at Wyoming base

Air Force pauses M18 pistol use after airman's death at Wyoming base

The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command has paused the use of a handgun following the death of a Security Forces airman at a base in Wyoming.
The use of the M18 pistol, a variant of another gun that has been the target of lawsuits over unintentional discharge allegations, was paused Monday 'until further notice' following the 'tragic incident' on Sunday at the F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Cheyenne, the command said in a statement. Security Forces combat arms airmen at all command bases 'will conduct 100% inspections of the M18 handguns to identify any immediate safety concerns,' it said.
The name of the active-duty airman, who was assigned to the 90th Security Forces Squadron, 90th Missile Wing at the base, and details of what happened have not been released. The missile wing said it was an isolated incident and there is no threat to the base or community. Security Forces specialists protect Air Force bases.
The gun is made by New Hampshire-based manufacturer Sig Sauer, which is defending itself against multiple lawsuits alleging that its popular related gun, the P320 pistol, can go off without the trigger being pulled. Sig Sauer denies the claims, saying the P320 is safe and the problem is user error. It has prevailed in some cases.
The P320 was adopted by the U.S. military as M17 and M18 pistols, and the M18 is now the official sidearm of all branches of the U.S. military, Sig Sauer says on its website. In 2019, Sig Sauer announced it had delivered its 100,000th M17 and M18s to the U.S. military.
The pause is so far limited to the Global Strike Command, which includes more than 33,700 Airmen and civilians. The rest of the Air Force and the other armed services have not announced any orders to avoid using the pistols.
'Our hearts are with the service members and families impacted by the recent reported event at the F.E. Warren Air Force Base,' Sig Sauer said Wednesday in a statement posted on Facebook.
The Air Force Office of Special Investigations is in charge of the investigation. The command's statement says it collaborating with the Air Force Security Forces Center and Headquarters Air Force Security Forces 'to conduct a thorough review of the M18 and develop appropriate corrective measures.' Sig Sauer said it has offered to assist.
The P320 was introduced in 2014. Sig Sauer offered a 'voluntary upgrade' in 2017 to reduce the weight of the trigger, among other features. Lawyers for people who have sued the gunmaker, many of them law enforcement officers, say the upgrade did not stop unintentional discharges.
Earlier this year, Sig Sauer appealed a ban of the P320, M17 and M18 pistols by the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission, arguing that it appears to be based on inaccurate and incomplete information. The commission banned the weapons after a recruit said his P320 discharged while he was drawing it, even though his finger was not on the trigger.
And just this month, Sig Sauer announced that the Michigan State Police is adopting the M18 as its primary sidearm.
Several large multi-plaintiff cases have been filed since 2022 in New Hampshire's federal court, representing nearly 80 people who accuse Sig Sauer of negligence and defective product design and marketing. That's in addition to lawsuits filed in other states, including one in Pennsylvania last year alleging a wrongful death.
They say the P320 design requires an external mechanical safety, a feature that is optional. The most recent New Hampshire case, representing 22 plaintiffs in 16 states, was filed in March. A judge heard arguments Monday on Sig Sauer's motions to dismiss the lawsuit or break it up and transfer it to districts where the plaintiffs live.
There also was discussion of a 2-month-old law in New Hampshire, created in response to the lawsuits, that prohibits product liability claims against Sig Sauer and other gun makers based on the 'absence or presence' of the external safety and several other optional features. Claims can still be filed over manufacturing defects. The law hasn't yet been incorporated into the case.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook
Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook

Vancouver Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook

Families of victims of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas invasion of southern Israel have filed a class-action suit against Facebook parent Meta for failing to block the distribution of footage of the murder, abduction and torment of their loved ones. The lawsuit, filed in Tel Aviv District Court, seeks 4 billion shekels (approximately US$1.1 billion) in damages. This comprises 200,000 shekels (approximately US$58,000) for each October 7 victim whose suffering was documented and shared online; 200,000 shekels to their immediate family members and close friends who saw the footage and 20,000 shekels (approximately US$5,800) for each Israeli exposed to the footage, Calcalist reported on Monday. According to the plaintiffs, which also include some survivors, the footage turned Facebook and Instagram into 'an integral part of the terrorist attack on Israel.' Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'For many hours, in real time and long after the terrorist attack, horrific documentation from the attack (to put it mildly) was disseminated, showing innocent civilians — children, elderly, women, and men — subjected to atrocities that even paper cannot bear to describe,' the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote in the claim, Calcalist reported. The footage included 'murder, extreme violence' and 'abduction of civilians and soldiers, both living and dead,' among other brutal scenes. The plaintiffs are represented by the Givatayim-based law firm of Matri, Meiri, Wacht & Co. The attorneys from the firm argue that the videos were allowed to remain online for weeks in many cases, contradicting Meta's stated policies, Calcalist reported. Mor Baider, one of the lead plaintiffs, discovered his grandmother's death through a Facebook post by the terrorists. Baider's grandmother, Bracha Levinson, was a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz. 'Grandma was murdered on Facebook,' Baider said during an interview marking the first anniversary of the attack. The plaintiffs say Meta did not activate its live content monitoring systems, deploy its rapid response team or remove the content quickly, 'nor long thereafter (and in fact — to this very day,' according to the claim. 'The Respondent acted contrary to its policy, its commitments, and its obligations, allowing its social networks to serve as a weapon, as an inseparable part of the terrorist attack on the State of Israel,' according to the claim. According to Calcalist, Meta responded: 'Our hearts go out to the families affected by Hamas terrorism. Our policy designates Hamas as a proscribed organization, and we remove content that supports or glorifies Hamas or the October 7 terrorist attack. 'Following the attacks, we established dedicated teams that work around the clock to remove content that violates our policy, while ensuring our platforms remain available for condemning Hamas and raising awareness for the victims, including the hostages held in Gaza.'

Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook
Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook

Edmonton Journal

time6 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook

Families of victims of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas invasion of southern Israel have filed a class-action suit against Facebook parent Meta for failing to block the distribution of footage of the murder, abduction and torment of their loved ones. Article content The lawsuit, filed in Tel Aviv District Court, seeks 4 billion shekels (approximately US$1.1 billion) in damages. This comprises 200,000 shekels (approximately US$58,000) for each October 7 victim whose suffering was documented and shared online; 200,000 shekels to their immediate family members and close friends who saw the footage and 20,000 shekels (approximately US$5,800) for each Israeli exposed to the footage, Calcalist reported on Monday. Article content Article content Article content Article content 'For many hours, in real time and long after the terrorist attack, horrific documentation from the attack (to put it mildly) was disseminated, showing innocent civilians — children, elderly, women, and men — subjected to atrocities that even paper cannot bear to describe,' the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote in the claim, Calcalist reported. Article content The footage included 'murder, extreme violence' and 'abduction of civilians and soldiers, both living and dead,' among other brutal scenes. Article content The plaintiffs are represented by the Givatayim-based law firm of Matri, Meiri, Wacht & Co. Article content The attorneys from the firm argue that the videos were allowed to remain online for weeks in many cases, contradicting Meta's stated policies, Calcalist reported. Article content Article content Mor Baider, one of the lead plaintiffs, discovered his grandmother's death through a Facebook post by the terrorists. Baider's grandmother, Bracha Levinson, was a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz. Article content Article content 'Grandma was murdered on Facebook,' Baider said during an interview marking the first anniversary of the attack. Article content The plaintiffs say Meta did not activate its live content monitoring systems, deploy its rapid response team or remove the content quickly, 'nor long thereafter (and in fact — to this very day,' according to the claim. Article content 'The Respondent acted contrary to its policy, its commitments, and its obligations, allowing its social networks to serve as a weapon, as an inseparable part of the terrorist attack on the State of Israel,' according to the claim. Article content According to Calcalist, Meta responded: 'Our hearts go out to the families affected by Hamas terrorism. Our policy designates Hamas as a proscribed organization, and we remove content that supports or glorifies Hamas or the October 7 terrorist attack.

Montreal's GardaWorld green lit to bid up to US$138M on ‘Alligator Alcatraz' ICE contracts
Montreal's GardaWorld green lit to bid up to US$138M on ‘Alligator Alcatraz' ICE contracts

Montreal Gazette

timea day ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Montreal's GardaWorld green lit to bid up to US$138M on ‘Alligator Alcatraz' ICE contracts

A U.S. subsidiary of GardaWorld, the Montreal-based security giant reportedly helping staff the Florida detention site known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' has been cleared to bid up to US$138 million on ICE contracts. GardaWorld Federal Services, a Virginia-based arm of GardaWorld, was among dozens of companies shortlisted by ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) under an emergency procurement programme, government records show. ICE's agreement with GardaWorld's U.S. subsidiary sets a limit of US$138 million (CAN$190 million) on the value of contracts the company can compete for, The Gazette has confirmed. It was first reported by The Globe and Mail. The contracts are part of a sweeping effort by U.S. President Donald Trump to expand detention capacity across the country. GardaWorld was already contracted to provide security and correctional staff at 'Alligator Alcatraz, ' a remote facility in Ochopee, Florida. It is expected to house up to 3,000 detainees. The site has drawn growing criticism from rights groups, who warn of poor oversight, overcrowding and unsafe conditions. It gained notoriety after Trump visited in July and jokingly referred to its swampy surroundings by saying there were 'a lot of police officers in the form of alligators.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Monday that 'Alligator Alcatraz' would serve as a model for future state-run migrant detention centres. She also said she hopes to launch similar facilities in the coming months, including in airports and jails. According to the Miami Herald, GardaWorld was awarded a separate contract worth US$8 million to provide staffing for the Florida facility. In July, The Gazette reported that GardaWorld was seeking armed guards for 'a remote part of southern central Florida,' offering US$25 per hour, plus travel, meals and accommodation. The posting outlined strict requirements for applicants: candidates were required to hold Florida gun and security licences, have at least one year of armed experience, and legally own a registered semi-automatic handgun. GardaWorld provides a wide range of private security services in Canada and abroad, including airport screening, cash transport and personal protection. The company was founded by Stephan Crétier in Montreal, where he used a $30,000 mortgage on his house to launch the business. Today, it remains headquartered in Montreal, though Cretier is now based in Dubai. He is worth nearly $4 billion, according to The Gazette's Rich List. In 2022, Quebec's provincial investment agency, Investissement Québec, invested $300 million in GardaWorld. A provincial spokesperson has previously said the investment was unrelated to the company's U.S. contracts. Twelve people have died in ICE custody so far this year, including Canadian Johnny Noviello, who died at a Miami detention facility in June. This story was originally published

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store