logo
Court grants bail to Maharashtra man accused of killing girlfriend's father

Court grants bail to Maharashtra man accused of killing girlfriend's father

India Today2 days ago
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to a 29-year-old Maharashtra's Solapur resident, Chaitanya Kanchan Kamble, who was accused of conspiring to kill his girlfriend's father, Mahendra Shah, following the latter's opposition to their relationship.Justice Ashwin D Bhobe, on July 22, 2025, ruled in favour of Kamble, observing that 'Kamble's continued incarceration was not warranted, given the nature of the allegations and the fact that the prosecution had not attributed any role to accused Chaitanya Kanchan Kamble in the crime.'advertisementThe case traces back to August 7, 2023, when Mahendra Shah was allegedly assaulted with wooden and fiber rods. He succumbed to septic shock on January 8, 2025, almost 16 months after the incident, leading authorities to add murder charges under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
'The cause of death of Mahendra Shah, as per the Medical Report, is 'septic shock'. Prosecution will have to prove and establish that the death of Mahendra Shah was a result of assault, as alleged in the crime,' the bench noted in its order.According to the prosecution, the assault was part of a premeditated plan orchestrated by Shah's daughter, Sakshi Shah, and Kamble due to the elder Shah's disapproval of their relationship. Kamble, however, was not named as a direct assailant.Kamble had been in custody since August 8, 2023, just a day after the incident. His counsel, Advocate Ganesh Gupta, argued that Kamble was not present at the scene and had no role in the assault. Gupta also said that Kamble had no prior criminal record and that the trial had not yet commenced.Despite the prosecution's claim that the attack was deliberate and linked to Shah's objections to his daughter's relationship, the court found insufficient evidence to justify Kamble's prolonged detention.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC stays PMLA trial as chargesheet in predicate case pending for 7 yrs
SC stays PMLA trial as chargesheet in predicate case pending for 7 yrs

Business Standard

time11 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

SC stays PMLA trial as chargesheet in predicate case pending for 7 yrs

The Supreme Court has stayed a trial against four women accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) because a chargesheet in the original criminal case has not been filed even after seven years, Live Law reported. The order came from a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, after hearing arguments by Senior Advocate PB Suresh. He appeared for the petitioners and pointed out that they were not named in the original offence (called the predicate offence). He questioned how the PMLA trial could proceed when no chargesheet had been filed in that base case. While staying the trial for the four petitioners, the Supreme Court also issued notices to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Indian Bank, which is the complainant in the original case. What is the case? In 2018, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy), Section 406 (criminal breach of trust), Section 420 (cheating), Section 468 (forgery), and Section 471 (using forged documents) of the Indian Penal Code. This was based on a complaint by Indian Bank against Cethar Limited and others, the news report said. Following this, the Enforcement Directorate filed a money laundering case (ECIR) based on the same FIR, which brought the petitioners under investigation. The four women approached the trial court asking to be discharged from the PMLA case, but their plea was rejected. They then filed a criminal revision petition, which was also dismissed by the Madras High Court. Left with no other option, they approached the Supreme Court. What did the petitioners say? All four petitioners are women and family members of the former Chairman and Managing Director of Cethar Limited. They claim they had no role in the company's financial or operational decisions. According to petitioners, they have been accused only because of their relationship with the former MD. They also pointed out that they are not named in the original FIR by the CBI and that there is no proof showing they received or controlled any "proceeds of crime". Despite this, their jewellery and other belongings have been seized, and the company itself is now under liquidation, Live Law reported. Similar cases cited To support their plea, the petitioners referred to the Telangana High Court's decision in Bharathi Cement Corporation Pvt. Ltd vs Directorate of Enforcement. In that case, the high court had paused the PMLA trial until the main case (predicate offence) was decided by the special court. That case involved alleged bribery and irregular allotment of mining leases to Bharathi Cement Corporation, linked to the Andhra Pradesh government. The ED had filed a money laundering case against the company and others, including Bharathi Reddy, wife of former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy. While the case had reached the Supreme Court, it was later withdrawn at the ED's request.

Chandigarh: Zirakpur man loses 5.5L to overseas job fraud
Chandigarh: Zirakpur man loses 5.5L to overseas job fraud

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Chandigarh: Zirakpur man loses 5.5L to overseas job fraud

A Mohali-based man allegedly duped a Zirakpur resident of ₹5.5 lakh under the pretext of arranging work permits for Italy and Hungary. A case was registered at Sector-17 Police Station under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act. (HT photo for representation) The accused, identified as Gulshan Tyagi, resident of Phase 7, Mohali, claimed to be a licensed immigration consultant, but failed to provide any valid work visa or refund the money. The complainant, Abhinav Dogra, a resident of Dhakoli, Zirakpur, who runs FA Education Centre in Mohali, stated that Tyagi allegedly introduced himself as a partner in multiple immigration consultancies located at SCO 85-86, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh, and TDI Centre, Kharar, portraying himself as a genuine and licensed consultant. Dogra made multiple payments between January 2024 and August 2024, amounting to ₹5,50,000, through both UPI transfers and cash instalments. However, despite repeated assurances, Tyagi neither arranged valid work permits nor returned the money. A case was registered at the Sector-17 police station under Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 24 of the Immigration Act against Gulshan Tyagi. In a similar case, A 28-year-old man from Haryana was allegedly cheated of ₹1 lakh by a Chandigarh-based consultancy promising a lucrative security guard job in Dubai. A case of visa fraud has been registered against the owner and others of Fast Move Education Centre, SCO No. 60-62, 4th Floor, Sector 17-C. The complainant, Gaurav, a resident of Kurukshetra (Haryana), stated that he came across an online advertisement by the centre promising employment opportunities in Dubai. The ad claimed direct company contacts and easy visa processing for security guard jobs in the Gulf country. Gaurav contacted the centre through the given mobile number and later visited their Chandigarh office on August 20, 2023, where he met two representatives, Navjeet and Rohit. They assured him that his Dubai visa and job placement would be arranged for ₹1 lakh. However, even after several follow-ups, neither the promised job ticket nor valid visa documents were provided. Gaurav later discovered that the visa issued to him had already expired and was invalid. Repeated attempts to contact the accused yielded no results as they kept delaying the matter. Based on the findings, the police registered an FIR under sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code at the Sector-17 police station, against the owner and others of Fast Move Education Centre.

Job at govt mint highly sensitive, says court, rejects pre-arrest bail pleas of 2
Job at govt mint highly sensitive, says court, rejects pre-arrest bail pleas of 2

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Job at govt mint highly sensitive, says court, rejects pre-arrest bail pleas of 2

Agreeing with the police's contention that a job in a government mint is a highly sensitive position, a sessions court recently rejected the anticipatory bail application of two employees booked for allegedly using dummy candidates to appear for an online exam for the job. The court was told that departmental inquiry is ongoing against the two and at least five others after it came to light that their photographs of the persons who appeared in the online exam did not match the accused persons, who work at the government mint. The MRA Marg police station of the Mumbai Police had filed an FIR on allegations of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy of the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at University Board and other Specified Examination, Act. Lokendra Kumar and Aditya Kumar — both residents of Uttar Pradesh — sought anticipatory bail, stating that they are innocent and there is no material to prove that they were involved in such an offence. They also submitted that since a departmental inquiry is already ongoing, their custodial interrogation by the police is not required. Police opposed their pleas stating that the mint is a very important office where coins, commemorative coins, medals, and medallions are produced and gold stocks are held. Police sought to probe whether those named are involved in any espionage and who helped them secure the job. It is suspected that the candidates were involved in the exams given from 2019-2023. 'By perusing the application and the prosecution's say, departmental inquiry is going on against the applicant. It is also alleged that the photograph provided at the time of the examination does not match the actual photograph…,' additional sessions judge, Avinash Kulkarni said in the order, rejecting the pre-arrest bail pleas of both the men, on July 19, which was made available on July 21. 'Accordingly, it is alleged that a bogus person appeared for the examination using applicant's Aadhaar card and other identity documents. The position in question is admitted to be highly sensitive,' the order added. The anticipatory bail pleas of two others are pending. The case relates to a complaint from the Human Resources office of the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India. Police said that after CCTV footage of one of the exams revealed that a person who appeared did not match the photograph of the candidate, a probe was conducted into the recruitment held for the posts of junior assistants and other technical posts and a departmental inquiry was ordered against seven.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store