logo
Schools won't have to notify parents about gender talks

Schools won't have to notify parents about gender talks

Yahoo14-02-2025
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — Most of the 69 representatives in the South Dakota House made clear Thursday that they don't want to establish state requirements for K-12 school employees regarding students' gender ideology.
The legislation from Republican Rep. Logan Manhart sought to require that a school nurse, school counselor, teacher, administrator, or any other staff member employed by a school district or accredited nonpublic school must notify a student's parent or guardian if questions regarding a student's gender confusion or gender dysphoria are discussed with a student.
Bill to end child marriage in SD clears first hurdle
House Bill 1201 as amended by the House Education Committee also would have prohibited them from:
Providing any instruction or presentation to a student with the purpose of studying, exploring, or informing the student about gender identity, gender expression, or the concept that a student's gender may be inconsistent with the student's biological sex at birth;
Encouraging or coercing a student to withhold from the student's parent, legal guardian, or other custodian the fact that the student's perception of the student's gender or sex is inconsistent with the student's sex; or
Withholding from a student's parent, legal guardian, or other custodian, information related to a student's perception that the student's gender or sex is inconsistent with the student's sex.
'This is a parents' rights bill fundamentally,' Manhart said.
Needing 36 yes votes to advance to the Senate, HB 1201 instead failed 28-40.
Republican Rep. Marty Overweg tried to remove the private schools but his amendment failed on a voice vote where the opponents were much louder than the supporters.
'This is an issue we're facing nationwide,' Manhart said in closing. 'It protects parents' rights to know what's going on in their kids' lives.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homer Glen man charged with threatening representative found unfit for trial
Homer Glen man charged with threatening representative found unfit for trial

Chicago Tribune

time9 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Homer Glen man charged with threatening representative found unfit for trial

A Homer Glen man who was charged earlier this year with threatening state Rep. Nicole La Ha was found this week unfit to stand trial in Will County Circuit Court. Steven Brady, 41, of the 13100 block of Rado Drive, faces charges of threatening a public official, a felony, and harassment through electronic communications, a misdemeanor, for allegedly contacting La Ha through her website and saying he would harm the representative and her family. Brady was evaluated by a licensed psychiatrist and he was found unfit to stand trial, but he is likely to be restored to fitness within a year, according to court documents. Brady, who was ordered held after his arrest in May, has been remanded to the custody of the Illinois Department of Human Services for inpatient treatment, Laura Byrne, a spokesperson for the Will County state's attorney's office, said in an email. He will next appear in court Sept. 9 for a status hearing on his fitness. The case is still pending and charges have not been dropped, but the fitness issue needs to be addressed first, Byrne said. The Will County public defender's office, which is representing Brady, did not return a message seeking comment. A spokesman for La Ha released a statement on her behalf. 'I'm relieved this individual is getting the help he needs,' La Ha's statement said. 'My hope is that this leads to a safer outcome for everyone involved.' Illinois State Police arrested Brady May 19 after they were notified of the alleged threat made through La Ha's website on May 15 and 16. Messages contained expletives, accused La Ha of committing crimes, referenced her family and included threats such as 'say goodbye to your old friends and family' and 'orders have been delivered,' according to Will County court documents. When officers came into contact with Brady, he allegedly said 'you got my message' and informed police he wanted political figures arrested for stealing from him, according to court documents. He also confirmed the email address used to submit the threats belonged to him, court documents said. La Ha was a Homer Glen trustee from 2021-2023. She has represented the 82nd District, which includes areas of DuPage, Will and Cook counties, since 2023. La Ha, a Homer Glen Republican, was recognized by the National Foundation for Women Legislators with the '2024 Elected Women of Excellence Award.

Harvard, Trump deal will cause chilling effect if there are no safeguards
Harvard, Trump deal will cause chilling effect if there are no safeguards

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Harvard, Trump deal will cause chilling effect if there are no safeguards

Condemning antisemitism on campus is nonnegotiable. But what's happening at Harvard right now is about much more than confronting hate — it's about whether our universities are for sale to the highest political bidder. The Trump administration has dangled a $500 million settlement to end its feud with Harvard, but the fine print would reshape how the university operates — from what gets taught, to who oversees faculty, to how students are policed. If Harvard takes this deal without ironclad safeguards, it's not just selling out its students and professors. It's setting a precedent: that a White House can use funding as a weapon to force ideological compliance. We've already seen the playbook. Columbia University paid $200 million to make investigations disappear — and in return, accepted an independent monitor reporting directly to the administration, plus sweeping changes to campus governance. As one analysis warned, 'academic freedom is severely threatened with a provost hanging over Middle Eastern studies and another monitor constantly reporting back to Trump.' Translation: the chilling effect will last far longer than the headlines. Brown University fought for — and won — a better outcome. Its $50 million settlement came with guarantees that the administration wouldn't 'dictate Brown's curriculum or the content of academic speech' and no intrusive oversight. Harvard's lawyers are pushing for similar protections, but with 10 times more money on the line, the political pressure is far greater. More than a dozen Democratic members in Congress who attended Harvard cautioned against a settlement on Aug. 1st, warning the university it may warrant 'rigorous Congressional oversight and inquiry.' In a statement, Congressman Sam Liccardo says, 'We urge Harvard to defend its institutional independence and academic integrity from this blatant attempt at political intimidation.' And Congressman Dr. Raul Ruiz notes, 'Harvard must stand firm in defending academic freedom and institutional independence. This is a test of values—and the University has a chance to lead by example.' If Harvard capitulates under financial and political duress, future presidents — Republican or Democratic — will know they can bypass the courts and instead wield federal funding as a blunt instrument to reshape campus life. That path does not just punish one school; it chills scholarship and discourse nationwide. The truth is, research dollars can be recouped in time. But once universities signal they can be coerced into political compliance, reputations, credibility and intellectual freedom are far harder to restore. Harvard is right to be wary. The settlement it accepts now will not only define this chapter of its history, but it will also set the terms for how — and whether — higher education in America can resist political retaliation in the decades to come.

Trump picks Democrat to lead energy regulatory commission
Trump picks Democrat to lead energy regulatory commission

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump picks Democrat to lead energy regulatory commission

President Trump has selected a Democrat to chair the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) – a surprising move that passes over the panel's one Republican member. Trump selected David Rosner, who was nominated to the commission by President Biden as its leader. Rosner is a former aide to then-Sen. Joe Manchin ( who led the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee. 'I am honored to serve as Chairman and excited to continue working with my colleagues on the Commission and FERC's extraordinary staff to enable reliable, affordable, and abundant energy for all Americans,' Rosner said. FERC is an agency that regulates cross-state energy pipelines and power lines as well as gas export terminals. The commission is made up of five commissioners who are appointed by presidents but do not necessarily answer to a particular administration – though the president can select who chairs it. The chair of FERC is in charge of its administrative operations and sets its agenda, deciding what matters get votes. The panel has two Democratic members, Rosner and Judy Chang, and one Republican member, Lindsay See.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store