Chicago mayor touts youth programs as teen unrest sparks curfew debate
Mayor Brandon Johnson says over 106,000 youth were served through city programs in his Youth Impact Report.
Streeterville residents are urging City Council to impose an earlier teen curfew after recent disturbances.
Johnson opposes the curfew change, saying it doesn't address the root causes of youth unrest.
CHICAGO - Mayor Brandon Johnson on Tuesday released a new report highlighting city efforts to engage and support young people—just as some residents in Streeterville push for stricter curfew rules after a string of chaotic teen gatherings.
What we know
Johnson's Youth Impact Report details programming that reached more than 106,000 young people through the Department of Family and Support Services.
That includes 2,000 year-round youth jobs, 155 "kickback" events aimed at safe recreation, and 50,000 teens connected to 45,000 activities via the city's "My CHI. My Future." platform.
But on the city's Near North Side, a different picture has emerged in recent weeks. Residents in Streeterville say large groups of teens have been gathering outside the AMC Theater, running into traffic and fighting. In one recent incident, a tourist was shot.
In response, Ald. Brian Hopkins has proposed changing the city's teen curfew from 10 p.m. to 8 p.m.—a move that some neighbors support.
Kathy Gregg, a Streeterville resident, plans to address City Council members on Wednesday.
"It's different these last couple of years. It's escalated," Gregg said. "I don't think most of the kids are coming down with guns or tasers. There's just a few."
The other side
Mayor Johnson has pushed back on the idea of a curfew, arguing that it won't address the broader challenges facing Chicago youth.
"I don't believe creating policies for a narrow space in Chicago is the right approach because it's not dealing with the actual issue," Johnson said.
The Source
FOX 32's Nate Rodgers reported on this story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Denser housing near transit stops? L.A. City Council opposes state bill
After a tense and sharply divided debate Tuesday, the Los Angeles City Council voted to oppose a state bill that aims to vastly expand high-density housing near public transit hubs, arguing that the state should leave important planning decisions to local legislators. The council voted 8 to 5 to oppose Senate Bill 79, which seeks to mitigate the state's housing shortage by allowing buildings of up to nine stories near certain train stops and slightly smaller buildings near some bus stops throughout California. 'A one-size-fits-all mandate from Sacramento is not safe, and it's not responsible,' said City Councilmember Traci Park at a news conference before the vote. Park, who was joined at the news conference by Councilmembers Monica Rodriguez and John Lee, said the bill was an attempt by its sponsor, state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), and other state legislators to 'hijack' local planning from the city. Lee, who authored the resolution opposing the bill, called it 'not planning' but 'chaos.' Wiener lamented the City Council's vote. 'Opponents of SB 79 are offering no real solutions to address our housing shortage at the scale needed to make housing more affordable,' Wiener said in a statement. 'California's affordability crisis threatens our economy, our diversity, and our fundamental strength as a state.' In addition to creating more affordable housing, the bill would increase public transit ridership, reduce traffic and help the state meet its climate goals, he said. Councilmember Nithya Raman, who voted against opposing the bill, said the city's housing crisis is so dire that the council needs to work with the drafters of the bill — even if there are elements of it they do not support. 'Overall, we talk a lot about our housing crisis on this body, but our actions have not met the moment,' she said. 'If I thought that this body was acting in good faith to address our housing crisis, I would support this [resolution].' The bill, which passed the Senate and is before the Assembly Appropriations Committee, would allow heights of nine stories near major transit hubs, such as certain Metro train stops in L.A. A quarter-mile from a stop, buildings could be seven stories tall, and a half-mile from a stop, they could be six stories. Single-family neighborhoods within a half-mile of transit stops would be included in the new zoning rules. Near smaller transit stops, such as light rail or bus rapid transit, the allowed heights would be slightly lower. Next week, the Appropriations Committee will determine whether the bill goes to the Assembly floor for a vote. If passed in both chambers, the bill would go to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign by mid-October. The City Council's resolution opposing the bill has no binding effect on the state Legislature but gives the council a platform to potentially lobby in Sacramento against its passage. The resolution also called for the city to be exempt from the bill because it has a state-approved housing plan. 'If they hadn't taken a position on this, the state Legislature would say, 'Well, the city of L.A. doesn't care,'' said Zev Yaroslavsky, a former City Council member and now the director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Mayor Karen Bass has not yet taken a position on the bill. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto came out against it in May, arguing that it would cost the city billions of dollars to upgrade infrastructure such as sewage and electrical systems to handle an influx of residents in previously low-density neighborhoods. Wiener's office said the bill allows for cities to exempt some properties near transit hubs if they meet density guidelines. This year, the City Council passed the Citywide Housing Incentive Program, which provides incentives for developers to build market-rate and affordable units and aims to boost building along commercial corridors and in dense residential neighborhoods. The council passed the ordinance, which left single-family zones largely untouched after pushback from homeowners groups, a week before a state deadline for the city to have a housing plan in place. As part of the plan, the city was required to find land where an additional 255,000 homes could be built.
Chicago Tribune
40 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Chicago's pension investments likely are doing worse than your 401(k). Big problem.
Chicago's woefully underfunded employee pension plans are demanding more from taxpayers each year. City leaders, starting with Mayor Brandon Johnson, point to the need for hundreds of millions if not billions in new revenue to stabilize Chicago's finances. But precious little attention is devoted to an aspect of pension fund management that, if addressed, could help considerably on the long road to digging Chicago out from its worst-in-the-nation status in terms of fulfilling retirement obligations to its municipal employees. That is the investment performance of the billions stashed in those funds. Chicago's pension funds are performing worse than many individual investors' portfolios, making the shortfalls even more striking. None of the four funds for various categories of city employees, nor for that matter the separate pension fund for Chicago Public Schools teachers, match the median annualized return of public pension funds in the U.S. as a whole from 2015 through 2024. For the public pension fund universe, that figure was about 7.18% net of fees, according to the nonprofit Equable Institute, which tracks public pension fund performance. We asked Stuart Loren, managing director at Highland Park-based asset manager Fort Sheridan Advisors, who has testified before Chicago City Council committees on municipal finance challenges, to do some calculations to give us a sense of how much the city is falling short. In recent years, the Chicago pension funds have beaten their own internal targets as markets roared, but over the longer haul they've lagged. The closest any of the city's funds came to the 7.18% median return was the $12.7 billion Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund, which generated a 6.89% annualized return over the 10 years that ended June 30, 2024. Worst performing of the city's four separate pension funds was the Laborers' & Retirement Board Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund, which held $1.2 billion at the end of 2024. The Laborers' fund returned just 6.02% on an annualized basis. In between were the $4.1 billion Municipal Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago (6.35%), the $1.8 billion firefighters pension fund (6.70%) and the $4.3 billion police pension fund (6.74%). In the multibillion-dollar world of pension management, falling short by a percentage point or even half a point means losing out on big money. Between the four city pension funds, the difference between how they performed and how the median public pension fund performed meant more than $1 billion. Public pension funds in general — and the city's pension funds even more so — underperformed plain vanilla investment approaches frequently used by individual investors in their 401(k) plans. The Bloomberg proxy for a conventional portfolio made up 60% of indexed U.S. stocks and 40% indexed bonds returned 8.48% annually over those 10 years. And the Standard & Poor's 500 index returned a whopping 13.1% annually in that time frame. This isn't to say the future retirements of Chicago's municipal workforce ought to be invested entirely in the S&P. No investment adviser would recommend that level of risk. But it to say that management of the city's pension funds has been subpar over many years, and more attention should be paid to the investment approaches the city is using and the managers selected to choose specific investments. With the four city pension funds short as of year-end 2024 by a collective $36 billion of what they need to meet present and future obligations to retirees, the city can't afford to ignore the management of its pension funds. (Since the end of 2024, that pension hole only has grown billions of dollars deeper with Gov. JB Pritzker's signing of a bill making Chicago police and firefighters' pension benefits substantially more generous.) A top-to-bottom review is in order. That likely means shedding long-term asset managers who aren't performing well. It might mean significant changes in the allocations of pension assets to certain investment categories. Chicago's pension funds can and should be generating higher returns. The city is leaving money on the table through its underperformance. A more basic investment approach might be considered. The Public Employees' Retirement System of Nevada, which manages the pensions of state employees and various municipal workers including Las Vegas police officers, has won renown within the institutional investment world for its extraordinarily small staff and simplified approach to investing. Heavily invested in stock funds and government bonds, the fund returned 8.4% on an annualized basis as of June 30, 2024. With nearly $65 billion in assets, Nevada had just 12% of its assets in private assets, with virtually all of that private equity and real estate. By contrast, for example, Chicago's comparatively tiny $4 billion Municipal Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund had 20% of its assets in high-cost hedge funds, private equity and other alternative asset classes. What's noteworthy, too, is that Nevada's fund handles the retirements of a wide variety of public workers, including public school teachers, university personnel, hospital workers and workers for the city of Las Vegas and Clark County. The system has more than 75% of the assets needed to cover the retirements of nearly 221,000 members. Many of Chicago's municipal funds, by contrast, have less than 30% of the assets they need to meet their obligations. Our city might well consider consolidating its municipal pension funds (the teachers' fund is another story given that Chicago is the only municipality in the state that has to fund its own teachers' retirements). A larger fund would reduce costs from management fees and reduce complexity. The point here is that there is room for improvement in this critical aspect of solving Chicago's pension crisis. We don't pretend to have all the answers. But it certainly is past time to ask questions. Johnson and his administration have spent much time and energy — mostly in vain — demanding more money from Pritzker and lawmakers in Springfield, in no small part due to the pressure on city services from having to plow more money into pension funds. The management of those funds is something over which they have direct control. The city needs to make sure every pension dollar works as hard as its taxpayers.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones makes ‘painful decision' to step down due to family crisis
Holding back tears, Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones shared her 'painful decision' to step down after being reelected nearly three years ago. 'I want to be forthright, honest and transparent about the position that I find myself in,' Jones told the Daily Press on Tuesday night. 'Announcing that I'm stepping down was one of the hardest things that I've ever had to do.' Jones said after much prayer and discussion with her husband, Gene, and loved ones, her decision to resign came down to 'putting family first.' During Tuesday night's Victorville City Council meeting, Jones said her service on the council will end following the October 21 meeting, as her family prepares to relocate. Family first Jones explained to the Daily Press that she and her husband, who have been married for 42 years, had been looking for homes in the Banning area for a possible move 'maybe six years down the road.' The couple decided to focus on a single-story home in Sun Lakes Country Club, a gated active adult community in the Riverside County city. 'This summer, we found a home, fell in love with it and were planning on making a move to purchase it,' Jones said. 'After we left Sun Lakes, we ate dinner with my sister and planned to travel back home.' At that time, Gene had a 'medical emergency,' which turned the couple's 'life upside down,' she said. 'Gene is recovering, but living in a two-story house is no longer ideal for him, so we've decided to make the move to the single-story home sooner than later,' according to the councilwoman. Jones said stepping down was difficult because of her love for the community, people in the region, and the many individuals she's worked alongside within other agencies. 'City staff have been wonderful to work with, and I've really enjoyed getting to know them,' Jones said. 'And despite my fellow council members and myself not agreeing on everything, we learned to come alongside each other with the goal of working for the betterment of the city.' Elected positions, achievements Jones was first elected to the Adelanto Elementary School District board in 2010 and was re-elected in 2014. In 2018, she was elected to the Victorville City Council, then reelected in 2022. During that time, she also served as mayor for three years. The city had not made a public announcement about the departure on Tuesday night, however, a personal press release from Jones revealed that she played a key role in strengthening public safety through the voter-approved Measure P. It also stated that she attracted major employers like Amazon and CarMax, and championed compassionate solutions to homelessness. She also helped lead the creation of the Wellness Center in Old Town Victorville, which opened in December 2023. The Wellness Center was the first facility of its kind in San Bernardino County, providing housing, medical care, and wraparound services. Since its opening, Victorville's unsheltered homeless population has dropped 57% compared to last year. Jones also supported the city's ongoing development of a new police station and civic plaza, which will serve as a hub for community activities and events. She served on regional boards including the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority and the Mojave Desert & Mountain Recycling Joint Powers Authority. Jones also serves as an alternate on the Victor Valley Transit Authority and sits on the League of California Cities Revenue and Taxation Committee. 'While it has been a tremendous honor to serve the people of Victorville, this change in our family's circumstances means my time on the Council must come to an end,' Jones said in a written statement. 'Serving as your City Councilmember has been one of the greatest honors of my life, and Victorville will always be my home at heart. I'm proud of the progress we've made together and confident the city will continue to thrive in the capable hands of its leadership and engaged residents. I will always cherish the trust you placed in me and remain deeply committed to Victorville's continued success.' Moving forward Mayor Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Bob Harriman, Councilwoman Leslie Irving and Councilwoman Tiffany Gaudin will be faced with three possible options to deal with Jones' vacant seat, which include: Appointing an interim council member to fill the seat until the General Election in November 2026. Approving a special election to replace Jones until the election. Conducting council meetings with four members through Nov. 2026. The City Council will discuss filling the vacancy at an upcoming meeting in accordance with city policy. Daily Press reporter Rene Ray De La Cruz may be reached at RDeLaCruz@ Follow him on X @DP_ReneDeLaCruz This article originally appeared on Victorville Daily Press: Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones makes 'painful decision' to step down Solve the daily Crossword
