Kim Jong Un tours new North Korean warship - months after 'criminal' botched launch
The North Korean leader inspected the 5,000-tonne destroyer Choe Hyon, first unveiled in April, at the western port of Nampo.
He was pictured on deck, in the captain's office, sitting on a bunk bed and on the ship's bridge. The backdrop of some of the images was blurred to obscure the equipment in the background.
North Korean state media said the Choe Hyon would enter service in 2026 and could accommodate an array of weapons systems - including nuclear-capable cruise and ballistic missiles.
Mr Kim is said to have been satisfied with the progress of work on the ship and ordered performance tests for October, Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported.
Monday's trip appeared to go smoothly - a contrast to May when another destroyer, Kang Kon, was damaged in a launch ceremony he called "criminal".
Mr Kim, who witnessed the incident, said at the time it "brought the dignity and self-respect of our state to a collapse".
The regime has claimed the ship was relaunched in June after being repaired - and a third Choe Hyon-class destroyer is also said to be set for completion in the next few months.
The battleship visit came as the North Korean leader criticised the start of US-South Korea military drills, saying it showed hostility and their "will to ignite a war", KCNA reported.
He claimed the annual drills had become more provocative as they included a "nuclear element", meaning the North had to respond with "proactive and overwhelming" countermeasures.
"The security environment around the DPRK is getting more serious day by day and the prevailing situation requires us to make a radical and swift change in the existing military theory and practice and rapid expansion of nuclearisation," KCNA paraphrased Mr Kim as saying.
Around 21,000 troops - including 18,000 South Koreans - will take part in the 11-day-long Ulchi Freedom Shield, which began on Monday.
US and South Korean officials say it's a defensive exercise but will include "several large-scale, live-fire training events", as well as lessons from recent conflicts including drone warfare, GPS jamming and cyber attacks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pete Hegseth is requiring so much security it's taking officers off of criminal investigations
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's security requirements are so extensive that it is placing a strain on the U.S. Army 's Criminal Investigation Division, according to a report. The Washington Post reports that the CID, which is responsible for protecting top Pentagon officials as well as serving as the Army's law enforcment arm, has been forced to draft agents who would otherwise be investigating criminal offenses concerning members of the Armed Forces to help watch over Hegseth's family and their properties in D.C., Minnesota and Tennessee. 'I've never seen this many security teams for one guy,' one official told the newspaper. 'Nobody has.' The CID reportedly maintains around 1,500 agents in total, around 150 of whom are typically assigned to VIP security details. But since Hegseth took office in January, the number shifted over into personal protection roles has risen to between 400 and 500, according to two differing estimates the paper received. One CID official quoted by the Post expressed their frustration with the situation by saying agents were being prevented from 'doing what we are supposed to be doing' in order to 'sit on luggage' or 'sit in the cars on the driveway.' Others complained of having to shepherd the secretary's children to school or patrol the perimeter of his properties. 'It is literally taking away from [CID's] law enforcement mission,' they said. 'You are taking hundreds of people out of the field to provide this level of protection.' One of the reasons for the heightened security surrounding the secretary is the fact that he received a bomb threat at his Tennessee home late last year shortly after he was nominated to his post by President Donald Trump, which came a matter of months after two attempts were made on Trump's own life during the campaign, the first of which saw the Secret Service heavily criticized. Another is the complexity of Hegseth's blended family, which includes one child from his marriage to Jennifer Hegseth as well as three from her previous marriage and another three from his. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell reacted angrily to the Post 's reporting and warned in a statement that the media scrutinizing a cabinet secretary's security arrangements 'puts lives at risk,' adding that Hegseth's were 'appropriate' and that 'any action pertaining to the security of Secretary Hegseth and his family has been in response to the threat environment and at the full recommendation of the Army Criminal Investigation Division.' The Independent has also reached out to the Department of Defense for additional comment. Hegseth's reign as the nation's top defense official has been tumultuous so far, with U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin's departure on Monday only the latest in an ongoing shake-up that has seen the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the chief of naval operations, the commandant of the Coast Guard, and the vice chief of staff of the Air Force all changed in recent months. The secretary has also struggled to replace his own chief of staff, spokesman and senior aides after they left and found himself caught up in the 'Signalgate' scandal, which erupted in March when Trump's short-lived national security adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a group chat in which top secret information about an upcoming bombing raid on Houthi rebels in Yemen was discussed. In addition, Hegseth, a former Fox News weekend host, has been caught up in a number of culture war issues, from the renaming of the U.S.S. Harvey Milk to questions arising from his decision to post a video on X in which a Christian nationalist pastor expressed his support for depriving women of the vote.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Staff shortages at India's aviation regulator and air traffic control threaten safety, lawmakers say
NEW DELHI, Aug 20 (Reuters) - An Indian parliamentary committee on aviation has warned that staffing shortages at the country's air safety regulator and lack of air traffic controllers pose a threat to safety in one of the world's fastest growing, opens new tab aviation markets. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation is grappling "with a profound and persistent shortage of technical and regulatory personnel," with almost half of its posts unfilled, the committee said in a report on Wednesday. Lawmakers were reviewing aviation safety in India in the aftermath of the deadly Air India Boeing Dreamliner crash that killed 260 people in June, the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade. A few days before the crash, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had addressed an annual global meeting of airlines in New Delhi, underscoring how India is banking on a boom in aviation to support wider development goals. Staffing shortages at the DGCA were "an existential threat to the integrity of India's aviation safety system," said the transport, tourism and culture committee report that also followed several helicopter accidents in northern India. It said the root of the crisis lay in an outdated recruitment model under which a recruitment agency hires personnel on behalf of the DGCA. The civil aviation ministry, which houses the regulator, has described the process as "slow and inflexible," according to the report and the DGCA faces a challenge in attracting and retaining highly skilled professionals. The ministry and the DGCA did not respond to emailed requests for comment. Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu told lawmakers last month that the government would fill up 190 of the more than 500 unfilled positions in the DGCA by October. The parliamentary committee recommended launching a focused recruitment campaign and suggested a new regulatory authority could be created to replace the DGCA. The committee also said India's air traffic controllers were under immense pressure due to staffing shortages caused by failures in workforce planning. Some air traffic controllers were not adequately trained, the committee added. The report criticised the Airports Authority of India and the DGCA for a "deeply troubling practice" of not following duty time limitations for the controllers, saying that raised the risk of fatigue and increased the chances of a controller error.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jimmy Lai has ‘unwavering intent' to solicit foreign sanctions, Hong Kong court told
Prosecutors in Jimmy Lai's marathon national security trial have wrapped up their closing arguments in Hong Kong, telling the court that the elderly media mogul and activist had 'unwavering intent' to solicit foreign sanctions. Lai has pleaded not guilty to two charges of conspiring to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-designed national security law, and another charge under the colonial-era sedition laws of conspiring to publish seditious materials. Prosecutors say Lai used his media outlet and foreign political connections to lobby for governments to impose sanctions and other punitive measures against Chinese and Hong Kong authorities. The prosecutor Anthony Chau told the court that Lai showed 'unwavering intent to solicit [sanctions, blockade, or hostile activities] from foreign countries'. 'These collaborations are long-term and persistent,' Chau added. The 77-year-old faces life in jail if found guilty. The closing arguments were scheduled to begin last Thursday but the court was delayed by bad weather for a day, and then further postponed over health concerns related to Lai's heart. Lai's lawyer, Robert Pang, told the court last week that the tycoon had experienced heart 'palpitation' and episodes that felt like 'collapsing' while in jail. Lai appeared healthy as he entered the dock on Monday, and he smiled and waved to his family at the public gallery. The national security trial has stretched for more than 140 days – beyond the 80 originally set down – and years after his arrest in 2020. Over three days the prosecution summarised their arguments, including that articles published in Lai's pro-democracy tabloid newspaper, Apple Daily, falsely portrayed Chinese authorities as oppressors of Hong Kong freedoms, in order to lobby for foreign intervention after the crackdown on the pro-democracy movement. Chau told the court the articles published in Apple Daily were not 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations, nor did they 'venture to suggest any solutions'. He said the paper's criticisms of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere. However his argument received some pushback from the judges overseeing the case, who questioned whether that amounted to sedition. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' judge Esther Toh said, appearing to reference a recent issue with local drinking water. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill – which was the original focus of the 2019 protests – to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill … was that not a suggested solution?' Lee added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition'. Chau said that even after Beijing's national security law in the city was passed, Lai did not stop his alleged collaborators, including members of the overseas activist group Stand With Hong Kong (SWHK), which Lai is accused of backing financially, and the Interparliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), from continuing to lobby for sanctions. Chau said 'Lai knew exactly what IPAC was doing at the time', and that he had maintained ties with current and former US government and military officials after the passage of the law. During the trial, prosecutors had presented as evidence a network of mostly foreign politicians, including Donald Trump, his former vice-president Mike Pence, and senior members of his first administration. Taiwan's former president Tsai Ing-wen and a number of UK, US and Taiwan activists, academics, politicians and journalists were also listed. In November, Lai told the court he had met some, but he denied asking for any concrete action beyond speaking in support of Hong Kong. He said he had never met, spoken to or exchanged messages with Trump, but believed the US president had been briefed about him. Lai's defence team's closing arguments are expected to finish early next week, before the three-judge panel retires to decide on their ruling. A verdict is expected before November, due to the start of another national security trial, but no date is set. The trial of the so-called 'Hong Kong 47' took more than five months between the end of hearings and a verdict, and another five for sentencing.
