With Gaza tensions high, Egyptians and Israelis warn of a new war
'Are we going to war?' asks a worried Cairo saleswoman upon learning that she's speaking to a journalist. The ominous question about the prospect of war between Egypt and Israel has crept into many conversations in the country.
These murmurs of war reveal growing concerns among a population worn down by successive economic crises and horrified by the devastation it has seen Israel inflict on Gaza and Lebanon. Over the past few weeks, the diplomatic row over US President Donald Trump's proposal to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt has intensified this anxiety, turning this chatter into fervent debate.
The same question, along with alarming answers, has ricocheted through Egyptian, Arab and Israeli media. An Israeli website published an AI-generated scenario of an attack destroying Egypt's strategic High Dam. And an Egyptian YouTuber posted an AI-generated video of an attack on Israel's nuclear reactor. Keyboard warriors trade accusations and threats on various social media platforms and TV shows debate what they see as evidence of each side's readiness for war.
According to a report in Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, this 'war sentiment' is fueled by misleading information amplified by right-wing outlets in Israel. It debunked many of the claims circulating on social media and TV about an Egyptian military buildup at the border.
Amos Harel, a defense analyst at Israeli newspaper Haaretz, said he doesn't know 'how much (of) this is coordinated and how much is spontaneous,' but added that it may be in the interest of the Israeli far right to 'stir the pot regarding Egypt' to divert attention from domestic criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Families of hostages held in Gaza have accused Netanyahu of wavering on a deal to free the captives in order to appease hardliners in his government, which he has denied. Egypt and other mediators are trying to salvage the ceasefire, which went into effect in January and is now hanging by a thread.
The main point of contention is whether Cairo has deployed more soldiers and military equipment to the Sinai than permitted under the security provisions that followed the 1979 peace treaty with Israel.
The treaty, brokered by the United States, ended decades of war between both countries and set limits on Egypt's military footprint in the Sinai Peninsula that borders Israel. It ushered in an era of close security cooperation between the two, and with the US.
Egypt has been keen to emphasize that it is following the rules. In 2016, while fighting a local ISIS branch, it secured Israel's approval to expand its military presence in the Sinai. When Egypt reinforced its border with Gaza and bolstered its security last year, Egyptian officials insisted the deployment remained within the framework of a 2016 agreement between the two.
In September, Egypt conducted a military drill in Sinai using live ammunition, followed by a military parade in October that was attended by President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi. Media on both sides of the border have aired footage of these events and said they are signs of possible war preparations.
Such alarm hasn't been confined to the media, as Israeli officials have also chimed in.
'We have (seen) bases being built that can only be used for offensive operations,' Israel's ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, told a meeting of American Jewish leaders in January. He alleged Egypt was in 'serious violation' of the peace treaty and that this would be addressed 'very emphatically.'
Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, reportedly asked why Egypt is spending 'hundreds of millions of dollars on military equipment' in an interview with an Israeli radio station. 'This should raise alarm bells. We have learned our lesson. We must monitor Egypt closely and prepare for every scenario,' he said.
Egyptian and Israeli military spokespeople did not respond to CNN questions regarding the alleged deployments and whether they would constitute a violation of the security agreements.
Military analysts on both sides dismiss media reports of Egyptian deployments in Sinai as baseless.
'No (Egyptian) tank enters Sinai without Israel's approval,' said Hossam el-Hamalawy, a Berlin-based Egyptian security analyst, arguing that Egypt's military doesn't have the capacity to enter a war with Israel. Most of the videos of Egyptian military deployment and drills circulating in Arab and Israeli media, he explained, are either old or not filmed in Sinai.
In a rare TV interview with the traditionally media-shy military establishment, a leading Egyptian military commander, Maj. Gen. Ahmad Mahmoud Safi El-Din, told Saudi news channel Al-Hadath on Thursday that Egypt's military expenditure and efforts to modernize its arsenal were meant to 'preserve peace and stability in the region.'
Outgoing Israeli military chief of staff Herzi Halevi also addressed the growing concern in a public address last week but said it was not a priority. 'We think that it is not a threat at the moment, but it could change in an instant,' he said.
With the absence of a stated government position, the matter was left for influential media personalities to interpret.
'We are not on the verge of a war with Israel,' popular Egyptian talk show host Amr Adib told viewers in February. Known for his close ties to the Egyptian government, he was careful to couch his reassurance, saying it only reflects the current moment, 'as in right now, at 10:15 p.m.,' he said, looking at his watch, implying it could quickly change.
Both countries violate the peace treaty, he said, and it would only collapse if one side attacks the other, 'but we are not entering war.'
'Israel understands it would be seriously hurt in such confrontation… If we are destined to fight, we are up to it,' he added.
The creeping threat of war has overshadowed domestic issues facing the leaders of both countries. Yet, analysts also point to a series of events that could potentially undermine the treaty.
'Rational minds do not want the treaty to be at risk. The action taken over the past 15 months have put pressure on the treaty that have never been at this level before,' said Nabil Fahmy, former Egyptian foreign minister and dean emeritus of the School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the American University in Cairo.
What could eventually tip the balance is the potential expulsion of Gazans into Egypt, which Fahmy said would constitute a threat to Egypt's national security.
In the months leading up to Israel's operation in the Gazan border city of Rafah, which started in May, Egypt warned that forcing over 1 million Palestinians sheltering there into Egypt, as proposed by some Israeli officials, would put the treaty at risk.
A year ago, Sisi, the Egyptian president, told reporters and his European counterparts that any such displacement would mean moving the Palestinian fight against Israel to Egyptian territory. 'Sinai would become a base for fighting against Israel… In response, Israel would attack Egyptian territory,' he said.
So, when Trump presented his plan to displace Palestinians to Egypt and Jordan and turn Gaza into a Middle Eastern 'riviera,' this scenario was already in the back of people's minds.
'Israelis did not take the Trump plan seriously. But on the Egyptian side, it was taken deadly seriously,' explained Max Rodenbeck, the Israel/Palestine project director at the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based think tank. Fearing that pressure would build up in Washington D.C. for Cairo to comply, Egyptians had to make a show of political force and indicate that the treaty is at risk, he said.
Arab nations didn't want to directly antagonize the US president by engaging in a media spat. In their rejection of the plan, official statements said they looked forward to cooperation with Trump to achieve peace in the region. Arab leaders are expected to meet in Cairo this week to discuss a counter plan to present to Trump.
Whether Trump backtracks or not, there is a realization among Arab nations that the region, like the rest of the world, is entering uncharted territory under his second term in office.
'Trump's proposal is in complete contradiction with the whole objective of comprehensive peace between Arabs and Israelis,' Fahmy said.
Fahmy, like the security experts who spoke with CNN, downplayed the real-life impact of the media chatter about an impending war, but all were worried by its growing intensity.
There is an underlying fear that the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, the first between an Arab country and the Jewish state – and which has become a bedrock of regional security – might be facing its greatest threat since it was signed 45 years ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News
Wondering if Jennifer Griffin is leaving Fox News? The veteran journalist has reported for the network since 1999 and currently serves as its Chief National Security Correspondent. After a brief absence during major national security coverage, online speculation grew about her status with the network. But is there any truth to the rumors? Here's what we know about Jennifer Griffin's role at Fox News and the facts behind the exit claims. Rumors about Jennifer Griffin leaving Fox News have circulated on social media, but there is no official confirmation from the network. Fox News has made no statements regarding her departure, and Griffin remains active both on air and online. Griffin continues to serve as the Chief National Security Correspondent for Fox News Channel. She has recently reported live on several key national security developments, including Pentagon updates on U.S. and Israeli military operations. On June 12, 2025, she appeared on Fox News @ Night, reporting on the Israel-Iran conflict. Despite temporary speculation after her absence during coverage of the Signal chat leak in March 2025, Mediaite later clarified that Griffin was on vacation when the story broke and returned to work the next day. Griffin also addressed the story directly on X, posting: 'The Trump administration does not deny this Signal group chat about the war planning for the Yemen strikes is real.' Griffin remains active on her verified X account (@JenGriffinFNC), where she regularly shares Pentagon updates, international defense developments, and U.S. military operations. Her page shows continued activity and professional engagement, with 234.8K followers and recent posts from this month. Fox News transcripts confirm that Griffin filed several televised reports in June 2025, including coverage of Iranian nuclear strikes, U.S. troop deployments, and Defense Department hearings. There is no indication that her role in the network has changed. The rumors suggesting her departure are false. No credible source has reported on her leaving, and her continued presence in major Fox News segments, along with her social media activity, confirms she remains in her role. The post No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News – Rumors Explained appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US ready to defend itself, Israel if Iran responds to Israeli air strikes, Trump says
U.S. President Donald Trump said on June 13 that he was aware of Israel's plans to conduct strikes on Iran in advance and that Washington is watching for any signs of retaliation by Tehran, Fox News reported. "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see. There are several people in leadership that will not be coming back," Trump told Fox News' anchor Bret Baier. The comments come after Israel launched heavy air strikes against 100 sites in Iran, targeting the country's nuclear program and reportedly killing Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and other top officials. In a statement released by the State Department, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the United States was not involved in the strikes on Iran, calling it a "unilateral action." The U.S. has reached out to at least one Middle Eastern ally to say that the strike is going to happen, but that Washington was not involved, Fox News reported. Trump said the U.S. military is on high alert and watching for any kind of retaliation, adding that the U.S. will respond to defend itself or Israel if Iran strikes back. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said that Tehran had already launched over 100 drones against Israel, which are expected to reach their targets within the next few hours. Before the attacks, Trump emphasized that despite tensions, he is committed to avoiding conflict and prefers a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear aspirations. "I want to have an agreement with Iran," Trump said, referring to ongoing Iran-U.S. nuclear talks in Oman. Writing on Truth Social, Trump reaffirmed his commitment to a "diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear issue," and insisted that his "entire administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran." Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes and has expressed willingness to accept limited restrictions in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. In contrast, the International Atomic Energy Agency released a report highlighting Iran's failure to comply with its obligations to fully disclose activities at its nuclear facilities. Beyond the Middle East, Iran has emerged as a key ally of Russia in its war against Ukraine, supplying Moscow with drones used in attacks on Ukrainian cities. Read also: Israel launches 'preemptive' air strikes on Iran's nuclear program, IRGC chief killed in attack We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Increased police presence at Israeli Embassy in DC following attack on Iran
The Brief An increased police presence at the Israeli embassy was reported Thursday. It comes after Israel attacked Iran, reportedly targeting its nuclear sites. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action against Iran" and urged Iran not to attempt retaliation against the U.S. WASHINGTON - There's an increased police presence outside of the Israeli embassy in D.C. following Israel's attack on Iran. What we know A Secret Service spokesperson confirmed to FOX 5 on Thursday that additional road closures and increased police presence at the Embassy of Israel because of the attack. The military action was taken as tensions have reached new heights over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. An Israeli military official confirmed that the attack had targeted Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said that his country carried out the attack, without saying what it targeted. "In the wake of the state of Israel's preventive attack against Iran, missile and drone attacks against Israel and its civilian population are expected immediately," he said in a statement. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an address on YouTube that the country launched "a targeted military operation roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival." He added that the attacks will continue "for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." What happened Israel attacked Iran's capital, Tehran, with explosions booming across the city early Friday. Iranian state television says the head of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard is feared dead after an Israeli attack. The report offered few other details about what happened to Gen. Hossein Salami of the Guard. The report on air added that one other top Guard officials, as well as two nuclear scientists were also feared dead. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action against Iran" and that Israel advised the U.S. that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defense. "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement released by the White House. Rubio also issued a warning to Iran that it should not target U.S. interests or personnel. What they're saying Jewish Federation of Greater Washington's CEO, Gil Preuss, released the following statement on the Israeli strikes on Iran:"The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington stands in solidarity with the people of Israel and its leaders in defending the nation against ongoing threats. The situation with Iran remains deeply concerning, and we recognize the difficult decisions Israeli leaders must make to ensure the safety and security of their citizens. Iran's actions continue to pose a serious challenge to regional stability and international security. We remain hopeful for a future guided by diplomacy and peace, but we also acknowledge the imperative of confronting those who endanger lives and fuel violence. Our thoughts are with all those affected by the current crisis." Guila Franklin Siegel, chief operating officer of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, also released a statement. "We are deeply grateful to the on-site security officers and Montgomery County police officers who responded to the incident on Thursday afternoon at the Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School (JDS). The swift actions of law enforcement personnel prevented potential violence and kept students, parents, and staff safe. Video footage of the incident shows the individual — who was allegedly carrying a knife — making anti-Jewish comments, in addition to other hateful language. While the investigation is ongoing, the situation is yet another reminder that Jewish families and institutions remain under near-constant threat. It also demonstrates the importance of state and local governments continuing to make security dollars available to nonprofit institutions that are at risk of attacks. It is precisely because of those dollars that JDS was able to hire the on-site security officers who were on the scene. That investment can and does save lives. JCRC is committed to ensuring that Jewish institutions throughout our region can operate safely, openly, and proudly. We will continue working closely with law enforcement, elected officials, and community partners to protect our institutions and confront antisemitism wherever it appears." The Source The Associated Press contributed to this story.