logo
Coffee prices retreat but your morning cup isn't getting cheaper anytime soon

Coffee prices retreat but your morning cup isn't getting cheaper anytime soon

Mint2 days ago
NEW DELHI
:
Cocoa bean prices have retreated from their peak, but that is unlikely to make coffee cheaper anytime soon as uncertainty persists and some packaged goods makers are saddled with costlier inventory.
'While global coffee prices have softened, we are still in a wait-and-watch mode due to mixed feedback from the market and news of potential frost-climatic disturbances in Brazil's crop," said Praveen Jaipuriar, CEO, CCL Products (India) Ltd, which makes and exports instant coffee.
CCL increased the prices of its in-house coffee brands and bulk supplies to other businesses by around 30-35% on average in FY25. The company procures green coffee beans from major producing regions worldwide.
'Although probable, there is still uncertainty in the potential stabilization of coffee prices this year," Jaipuriar said. 'While demand has not been heavily impacted, had the prices been lower, the demand acceleration in developing economies would perhaps have been better owing to coffee acceptance."
Arabica and Robusta bean prices have been volatile since the beginning of 2025. Arabica remains roughly 45–50% higher than last year, though it's showing signs of moderation. Robusta has pulled back modestly year-on-year, and is down roughly 4% despite recent futures strength still reflecting in elevated historic levels.
Also Read: Tata Consumer Reports Coffee Prices Decline Amid Ongoing Volatility
'Coffee prices have come down recently, but that doesn't have an impact on those in the specialty coffee business, because we book all of our coffee during the harvest period. Rates get locked anywhere from December through March. We've already bought inventory for this upcoming year," said Matt Chitharanjan, chief executive officer and co-founder, Blue Tokai Coffee Roasters.
'If these lower rates stay through to the next harvest, then we'd definitely be in a position to lower rates, but we don't have to raise prices any further," said Chitharanjan.
Blue Tokai, which primarily uses Arabica, raised prices of its retail packets in July by about 10-20%, along with a 'small" increase in its cafe prices in April. While the coffee chain raises prices at its cafes almost annually, the prices of its packaged coffee are usually revised every other year, except this time.
'Coffee prices this year went up by 60% (starting January this year) compared to the previous year—we cannot pass on the entire increase. So we have absorbed more than half of it and passed on the rest," Chitharanjan said.
Hope from Vietnam
While India is largely a tea-drinking market, coffee consumption is rising both at home and outside. A rise in international prices directly translates to higher costs for local roasters and retailers.
Also Read: FTA to bring modest dip, not a steep dive, prices of UK spirits
Last week, Nestlé India said it expects coffee prices to remain range-bound at the current low levels as the upcoming Vietnamese crop appears to be normal. In the June quarter, the company's coffee portfolio (Nescafé) grew in double digits,
Tata Consumer Products Ltd said the ongoing volatility warrants close monitoring. The company has a packaged coffee business in the US; an extractions business, along with plantations; and a branded coffee business in India under Tata Coffee Grand.
'The biggest impacts for us is in the US market where coffee prices have been coming down," Sunil D'Souza, managing director and CEO at Tata Consumer, said in an interview with Mint. "We've taken pricing in line with coffee prices…In June quarter, we grew 33% in volumes (coffee) and 67% value growth in India."
Tariff threat
Price hikes have not hurt demand. 'Coffee is too small in the scheme of things today and playing with the social-economic group, which can afford it," said D'Souza. 'Out-of-home coffee consumption has recovered, and in-home consumption will continue to grow," he said.
However, impending tariffs have added another layer of uncertainty to the global coffee market.
There are reports of a potential 50% tariff by the US on imports from Brazil, the world's largest coffee producer, effective 1 August. Such a move could significantly impact supply chains and further elevate prices for consumers.
Also Read: ITC bets on new growth engines, expands food-tech and wellness play
D'Souza said globally, coffee prices will be dictated by what will happen in Brazil and Vietnam. 'In Brazil, especially if the 50% tariffs kick in, then the whole scenario is different. We've drawn up two or three different playbooks to … react to the situation," he said. 'I'm not in a position to forecast what is going to happen on coffee. The trend is downwards, but this tariff trigger could change the trajectory."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India expands Consular services in U.S. with nine new application Centers
India expands Consular services in U.S. with nine new application Centers

The Hindu

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

India expands Consular services in U.S. with nine new application Centers

India's Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra, has announced a major expansion of consular services across the United States. Beginning on August 1, 2025, nine new Indian Consular Application Centers will open in cities including Boston, Columbus, Dallas, Detroit, Edison, Orlando, Raleigh, San Jose, and Los Angeles. All centers will now operate on Saturdays to improve accessibility. Several miscellaneous consular services will also be streamlined and offered through these centers. Kwatra emphasized that the expansion aims to strengthen India-U.S. people-to-people ties. This article is published in an arrangement with 5WH.

Breakout stocks to buy or sell: Sumeet Bagadia recommends five shares to buy today despite Trump's tariffs on India
Breakout stocks to buy or sell: Sumeet Bagadia recommends five shares to buy today despite Trump's tariffs on India

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

Breakout stocks to buy or sell: Sumeet Bagadia recommends five shares to buy today despite Trump's tariffs on India

Breakout stocks to buy or sell: The Indian stock market endured a volatile trading session as market participants digested the implications of US President Donald Trump's imposition of a 25% tariff and punitive measures on India. The benchmark indices—Nifty 50 and Sensex—opened on a weak note, slipping nearly 1%, before staging a sharp intraday recovery to reclaim the 24,900 mark. However, renewed selling pressure in the final hour of trade dragged the indices back into negative territory. The Nifty 50 ultimately settled with a cut of 86.70 points, or 0.35%, at 24,768.35. Sectoral breadth was broadly negative, with all major indices ending in the red barring the Nifty FMCG index, which bucked the trend and gained 1.3%. The outperformance in FMCG names was driven by defensive buying amid heightened volatility and upbeat commentary from sector heavyweight Hindustan Unilever. US President Donald Trump signed a sweeping executive order on Thursday, imposing reciprocal 25% tariffs on Indian imports. The order became effective today as the Indian and US governments failed to reach a consensus on the India-US trade deal. Interestingly, India's neighbour, Pakistan, has signed a trade deal with the US, and the US government has imposed a 19% trade tariff on the Islamic state. Sumeet Bagadia, Executive Director at Choice Broking, believes the Indian stock market sentiment is cautious as the Nifty 50 index is facing a hurdle at 24,900. As Trump's tariffs on India have become effective today, the market is expected to react, and hence, 24,500 support and 24,950 resistance for the key benchmark index would be crucial. Speaking on the outlook of the Nifty 50 today, Sumeet Bagadia said, "The Indian stock market sentiment is cautious as the Nifty 50 index is facing a hurdle at 24,900. After Trump's tariffs on India were imposed, the market is expected to remain cautious. If the Nifty 50 sustains above its 24,500, we can expect some relief; otherwise, there can be panic selling if the key benchmark index slips below 24,500. Similarly, the key benchmark index is facing a hurdle at 24,950, and the index may see selling pressure around these levels." 1] Alkyl Amines Chemicals: Buy at ₹ 2348, Target ₹ 2515, Stop Loss ₹ 2265; 2] IXIGO: Buy at ₹ 233.78, Target ₹ 254, Stop Loss ₹ 223; 3] Vimta Labs: Buy at ₹ 693.45, Target ₹ 742, Stop Loss ₹ 669; 4] Belrise Industries: Buy at ₹ 138.13, Target ₹ 148, Stop Loss ₹ 133; and 5] Max India: Buy at ₹ 217.93, Target ₹ 234, Stop Loss ₹ 210. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or brokerage companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

P Chidambaram on Trump's tariffs: ‘We do not have to bend over or be defiant… It is difficult but we must persevere'
P Chidambaram on Trump's tariffs: ‘We do not have to bend over or be defiant… It is difficult but we must persevere'

Indian Express

time35 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

P Chidambaram on Trump's tariffs: ‘We do not have to bend over or be defiant… It is difficult but we must persevere'

The sudden announcement of President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on Indian goods from August 1, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia has put a lot of stress on the Narendra Modi government. This move, coming just ahead of an impending trade agreement, could pull down the economy and cast a shadow on India-US ties, experts say. Former Union Minister and senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, who has served as Finance minister for four terms and was also the Commerce and Industry minister, talks to The Indian Express of the tightrope that India must now walk on the negotiations. He speaks of the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament as well. Excerpts: How do you see President Trump's tariffs and penalty on certain imports from Russia? He (Trump) has set August 1 as a deadline. What I gather is the negotiations are not going forward in the way that we expect. But he is a very impulsive President. Therefore, he announced it two days before the August 1 deadline. Be that as it may… I just read that in the last few hours, he has said 'Whether we will charge the tariff that I announced' and 'We will let you know by this week'… Whatever he meant by that. Therefore, although he has announced a 25% tariff, whether he will stick to that, I cannot say. How does India navigate ties with a President who you call impulsive? France, the UK and some Latin American countries are dealing with President Trump and the United States. They do not take a defiant attitude. At the same time, they do not bend over. We have to maintain our position and tell the United States that we are willing to negotiate. Negotiating a trade agreement with the United States is not easy. It is painstaking. The big obstacle is that we had — and in many cases still have — is high tax. As a result of that, the trade balance between the United States and India is almost $45 billion in our favour. We can say the same thing about our trade with other countries, where the trade balances in favor of the other country. But that is part of the world of commerce… We will have to deal with it. We do not have to bend over. At the same time, we do not have to be defiant. Japan and Korea have trade deals with the US. Is that the best way to navigate the situation? There is a difference. Japan is a developed country. South Korea is a developed country. They have a wider basket of exports. They have also freed imports to a large extent. Therefore, it is easier for them to open up a little more in exchange for the United States opening up a little more. We were a closed economy. In fact, when I took over as Commerce minister, we were completely closed. We have opened it significantly but not to the extent of developed countries. It is more difficult for us to enter into a trade agreement with the United States than Japan and South Korea. There are other countries in the same league as India. They will also find it difficult to enter into trade agreements with the United States. But we have to persevere, and we have to go through the exercise. Some countries have announced reciprocal tariffs. Those are bargaining chips. China has done it. That is a kind of a bluff or bravado which President Trump also indulges in. So, should India avoid that route? No, we are not in the position to do that. We have to negotiate. We have to make it plain that we will negotiate. Coming to the debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor and its aftermath… How do you see the discourse? And are there unanswered questions after three days of debate? The unanswered question is: Why did we accept the ceasefire immediately and without conditions? See the Armed forces have made sacrifices, fought bravely and made sacrifices. They may not have lost any lives, but they have lost military hardware. If the Armed forces made some military gains, no doubt about it. I acknowledged it in my intervention in Parliament… But if you accepted a ceasefire — let us assume voluntarily — why did you accept it immediately and without conditions? That is the question I would ask. What conditions? I do not know. The military must be involved. The Foreign Ministry must be involved. The Home Ministry must be involved. And the Water Ministry must be involved. And we should have made a list of demands and told Pakistan 'you indicate whether these demands can be met partially or wholly, and then we will agree to a ceasefire'. But without being in government, without knowing the actual situation on the ground… How can I spell out the conditions… But an unconditional ceasefire and an immediate ceasefire… Seems to me, we are frittering away the military gains. The Opposition alleges US president played a role in bringing about a ceasefire? That is a separate question. I do not want to jump to that conclusion, but that is a separate question. Here is a President of the United States saying — for the 31st time today — that he is the one who brought about the end of the war and the ceasefire. Now, the government rebukes the Opposition. I do not want you to rebuke President Trump, at least rebut him. This is the demand. Stand up in Parliament and say 'President Trump did not speak to me, did not mediate, did not bring about a ceasefire. It is our decision, one we took voluntarily'. Of course, President Trump will say something after that, but at least for Indian parliament and Indian public opinion, that statement must be made. So, Mr Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right. He is saying that it should be said in Parliament. That is all. In Lok Sabha, Home Minister Amit Shah referred to a recent interview you gave to The Quint in which you said the BJP administration was giving a clean chit to Pakistan. You said that the Pahalgam attackers could be homegrown terrorists. What did I say? What has the NIA (National Investigation Agency) investigation revealed? They are unwilling to disclose what the NIA has done all these weeks. Have they identified the terrorists? And I said give us what the NIA has found. That is not doubting the NIA… Just asking for information. I know — and I believe — that there are infiltrating terrorists. I said so in the Rajya Sabha. There are Pakistani infiltrating terrorists, but they are also India-based terrorists. Take Pahalgam… On April 26, the J&K administration demolished a number of houses on the ground that were owned by terrorists. Now, who are those terrorists? If they own houses in India, they must be India-based terrorists. Secondly, in June, the NIA arrested two people. The names have come out today… On the ground, they were harboring the three suspected infiltrating terrorists. Who are those two guys? They are India-based terrorists, or India based extremists. The Mumbai Suburban train attack (in 2006)… Who committed that? India-based militants. Mumbai Zaveri Bazaar (blast) in 2011 was India-based terrorists. Therefore, I maintain that there are infiltrating terrorists as well as India-based terrorists. Just tell us what the NIA has found. The government has now neutralised three people, and the Home Minister announced it in Parliament. I accepted. During the debate in both the Houses, senior ministers hit out at the Congress to argue that the party had always been soft on Pakistan and terrorism. How do you see that kind of a counter attack? This is not a counter attack. For the people of India, these are completely irrelevant. You start from 1947 and say Congress gave away Pakistan. Anybody who makes that statement has no idea of the historical events between 1942 to 1947. Then, you say we gave away PoK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). Again, the person who says that has no understanding, no knowledge, of historical events. At the end of this three-day debate on Operation Sindoor, is the Opposition satisfied? As many members have said… Not only the Congress, but the DMK, TMC, CPM, AAP, RJD… They have asked a number of questions, and according to them, they have not been answered satisfactorily. *This week, there were acquittals in two big terror cases — the Mumbai train bombings and the Malegaon bomb blast. It was under your tenure as Home Minister that NIA was set up. How do you see the challenge when high-profile terror cases fall like this in courts. Because I was in the Home ministry, I have said that no political comment is required in a criminal court proceeding. I am a trained lawyer. I believe that the judiciary is independent. The prosecution is independent. The investigating officer is independent. In these cases, the cases were registered and investigated initially by the Maharashtra police. I think one case was transferred to the NIA. So, where is the political comment on the criminal court proceeding or the outcome of the criminal court case?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store