logo
‘Massacre law': Türkiye upholds ruling to cull stray dogs

‘Massacre law': Türkiye upholds ruling to cull stray dogs

Euronews08-05-2025
Türkiye's top court rejected a request on Wednesday to annul a contentious law designed to remove millions of stray dogs from the streets.
Critics said the measure could lead to mass killings of the animals.
The main opposition party had sought the overturn of the legislation that was enacted last year, arguing that it violated animal rights and the right to life.
The Constitutional Court, however, has ruled that the provisions are legally valid and for it to continue to be implemented.
Dozens of animal rights activists had gathered near the Constitutional Court to press the court to repeal the law, holding up posters reading "cancel the blood-ridden law" and shouting anti-government slogans.
The government has estimated that some four million stray dogs roam Türkiye's cities and countryside.
While many of the dogs are harmless, the government moved to tighten legislation on stray animals, following incidents of dog attacks, including cases involving children.
The law requires municipalities to round up stray dogs and relocate them into shelters where they would be vaccinated, neutered and spayed before making them available for adoption.
Dogs that are in pain, terminally ill or pose a health risk to humans would be euthanised.
Animal-lovers strongly oppose the ruling, dubbing it the 'massacre law'. They fear it will lead to widespread culling or dogs ending up in disease-ridden and overcrowded shelters.
They have also raised concerns about how financially-strained municipalities will secure funding to construct the additional shelters.
They fear that, instead of allocating resources to care for the stray dogs, some municipalities may resort to euthanising them under the pretext of illness.
Animal rights advocates have also claimed that many street animals were indiscriminately killed after the passage of the law last August.
The Ankara Bar Association, an organisation for lawyers, claims that since its implementation, "hundreds of animals have died due to this law, which does not serve the public interest."
Last year, the Humane Society International (HSI) criticised Türkiye's approach to managing its stray dog population.
'I think it's really a step back in progressive ways of thinking about healthy cities, progressive cities, managing dogs in a humane way,' said Katherine Polak, the vice president of companion animals and engagement at HSI, as quoted by Vox.
The latest court ruling is likely to increase pressure on municipalities to enforce the law.
Methane emissions from EU coal mines have dropped for the first time, according to the latest annual report from the International Energy Agency (IEA).
The region is the first to officially constrain this major source of pollution after adopting a Methane Regulation last year. Coal mine methane emissions decreased by 8 per cent in 2024 compared to 2023.
But the greenhouse gas - which is responsible for around 30 per cent of the rise in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution - remains a huge problem in Europe and around the world.
Record production of oil, gas and coal has kept emissions above 120 million tonnes (Mt) annually, according to the IEA's 2025 Global Methane Tracker. The analysts included abandoned wells and mines for the first time - finding that these sources contributed around 8 Mt to emissions in 2024.
The EU Methane Regulation was the world's first regulation to set a threshold on how much active underground mines, as well as abandoned and closed underground mines, can emit.
It forces the fossil fuel industry to follow measurement, reporting and verification requirements; bans routine flaring and venting; sets leak detection and repair (LDAR) mandates for all oil and gas facilities; and limits venting in thermal coal mines.
'2025 marks a pivotal year for methane mitigation, with coal mine emissions decreasing for the first time as the EU Methane Regulation for the energy sector takes effect,' says Dr Sabina Assan, methane analyst at global energy think tank Ember.
The new regulation also stipulates that by 2027, importers must demonstrate that imported fossil energy meets the same requirements.
'By ensuring that all fossil fuels meet the same methane standards, the regulation will create a level playing field between importers and domestic producers, extending the regulations' impact far beyond European coal mines,' adds Dr Assan.
This is significant, as most of the methane emissions from fossil fuels used in Europe are tied to imports.
In 2024, according to IEA's tracker, methane emissions from the supply chain for oil, gas and coal imports were around 6 Mt - nearly four times what Europe emits within its own fossil fuel sector.
Around 55 per cent of the fossil fuel methane emissions that occur within Europe come from the oil and gas sector, mostly from downstream operations. 45 per cent come from coal mines, mainly in Poland and Ukraine.
Upstream oil and gas operations are responsible for the majority of emissions in Romania and the UK. Norway and the Netherlands have the lowest upstream intensities in the world, it says, while most other countries in the region perform near the global average.
Abandoned underground coal mines constitute a significant and overlooked source of methane emissions.
Methane gas is generated when organic matter turns to coal and is buried underground in these coal seams. When mining creates a route to the surface, much of the methane escapes. If it is not plugged, these emissions can continue for decades after a mine is abandoned.
Globally, the IEA estimates that abandoned coal mines emitted nearly 5 Mt of methane in 2024, and abandoned oil and gas wells released just over 3 Mt. Combined, these sources would be the world's fourth-largest emitter of fossil fuel methane - after China, the US and Russia, and ahead of Iran, Turkmenistan and India.
Since most emissions result from mines and wells that have recently been abandoned, timely action is critical, the IEA urges. Options include plugging and monitoring wells that are no longer in use, sealing abandoned coal mines, and directing methane flows for energy use.
In total, the energy sector – including oil, natural gas, coal and bioenergy – accounts for more than 35 per cent of methane emissions from human activity.
The agriculture and waste sectors are also major sources of methane emissions, but fossil fuel supply offers the greatest potential for immediate reductions in methane emissions, the IEA notes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Electoral authorities strip Bosnian Serb leader Dodik of presidency
Electoral authorities strip Bosnian Serb leader Dodik of presidency

Euronews

time07-08-2025

  • Euronews

Electoral authorities strip Bosnian Serb leader Dodik of presidency

Bosnia's electoral authorities stripped Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik of his presidency Wednesday after a state-level appeals chamber upheld a verdict sentencing him to a six-year ban from politics. The late February ruling by the Sarajevo-based Court of BiH over anti-constitutional conduct triggered a prolonged high-tension political crisis in the Western Balkan country that has since simmered down to a steady boil. However, the heat was back on after the court's appeals chamber confirmed the original verdict against Dodik, who holds the office of president of the Republika Srpska (RS), one of Bosnia and Herzegovina's main administrative units. This meant that the Central Electoral Committee, or CIK, had to open the procedure under electoral law of removing him from office and calling snap elections in the RS to fill the vacated position within 90 days. Dodik, who reacted to Wednesday's decision by stating it was "yet another sh*tshow from Sarajevo", can appeal the electoral body's decision. "There's no surrender or giving up. Surrender is not an option," Dodik said in a post on X. He has vowed to stay on as entity president regardless of CIK's dismissal. Dodik's legal representatives have already announced he will also open a separate case against the original ruling in front of the state-level Constitutional Court. It is unclear how long these processes might take. A general election in Bosnia is set for autumn 2026. Meanwhile, Dodik has attempted to rally all Bosnian Serb political actors to stand behind him in defiance of the court decisions. However, the opposition parties have largely refused to do so so far. The EU's diplomatic service (EEAS) spokesperson said last Friday that the Court of BiH's "verdict is binding and must be respected." "The EU calls on all parties to acknowledge the independence and impartiality of the court, and to respect and uphold its verdict," the statement said. In turn, Dodik has received support from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova. Months-long pushback Since February, Dodik has repeatedly rejected the verdict of one year in prison and barred him from politics for six years for going against the decisions of the country's international peace envoy, Christian Schmidt, which constitutes a criminal act. In the RS, he introduced new laws meant to ban the operation of state-level security and judicial institutions in what comprises about half of the Western Balkan country's territory. The decisions have been temporarily suspended by the state-level Constitutional Court. "As far as I'm concerned, that verdict doesn't exist, and it is null and void," Dodik told Euronews Serbia in a June interview. Dodik has also continuously questioned the legitimacy of High Representative Schmidt, saying he acted against "imposed decisions" by the envoy whose mandate, Dodik claims, contradicts the Dayton Agreement, signed in 1995 to end the war in the country. The agreement brought about the end of the war between the country's three main ethnic groups — Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats — that began in 1992 during the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, deemed as the bloodiest conflict on European soil since World War II. The High Representative is meant to act as the chief arbiter in high-profile disputes and the key figure overseeing the implementation of the deal. The peace agreement, parts of which act as the country's constitution, split the country into two main administrative units, or entities: the Serb-majority RS and the Bosniak-Croat Federation of BiH (FBiH), partially overseen by an umbrella state-level government. Meant to appease the former belligerents, it created a complicated system of checks and balances, said to be the world's most complex democracy. Dodik, who has served in various top roles, including the state-level presidency, for decades, has repeatedly called for the independence of the RS from the rest of Bosnia, fuelling fears of instability. He has been placed under US and British sanctions for his actions, but has had the steady support of Moscow. Test of post-war stability Dodik's ongoing challenge to the High Representative and state-level institutions' authority has been deemed to be the EU membership hopeful's biggest test of post-war stability. The Court of BiH issued a nationwide arrest warrant for Dodik in March. Since then, he travelled to neighbouring Serbia, Israel and Russia, where he attended the 9 May Victory Day celebrations in Moscow, organised by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Back home, tensions flared up once again in late April after state-level security agency inspectors tried to arrest Dodik, but were prevented from doing so. While the details around the incident remained unclear, domestic media reported that SIPA agents left after 'talking' to the RS police. Dodik later said he felt 'fine and safe". The crisis over his potential arrest was somewhat defused in July, when Dodik voluntarily came in for questioning at the state-level prosecutor's office, after which the warrant was dropped. According to Bosnian law, Dodik can pay a fine for each day of his one-year prison sentence instead of serving time in jail. The European peacekeeping force in Bosnia, EUFOR, had stepped up the number of its troops in response to the tensions earlier this year. In March, NATO's Secretary General Mark Rutte pledged the military alliance's "unwavering" support for Bosnia's territorial integrity. "Three decades after the Dayton Peace Agreement, I can tell you: NATO remains firmly committed to the stability of this region and to the security of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Rutte said at the time. "We will not allow hard-won peace to be jeopardised."

Fact check: Has Italy just passed an anti-LGBT surrogacy law?
Fact check: Has Italy just passed an anti-LGBT surrogacy law?

Euronews

time17-07-2025

  • Euronews

Fact check: Has Italy just passed an anti-LGBT surrogacy law?

Several social media posts shared over recent weeks — some racking up millions of views and thousands of likes and shares — allege that Italy has just introduced a law aimed at banning same-sex couples from having children via surrogacy. Many of the posts contain words such as "Breaking" and a siren emoji to suggest that the measure has just been introduced, while others invite social media users to share whether they support it, prompting a slew of anti-LGBT responses. The posts typically share generic, stock photos of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and some sort of LGBT rainbow flag with a red cross or "banned" sign. However, none of the posts provide any extra information or links to articles or government announcements, which is our first clue that all is not as it seems. Italy has effectively banned LGBT people from having children through surrogacy, but not so recently: back in October, the country criminalised citizens who go abroad to have children via surrogacy. Critics argued this was discriminatory to same-sex couples as it shut down one of the last viable paths for them to become parents. The measure extended a surrogacy ban that had already been in place in Italy since 2004. This prohibited the practice on Italian soil and introduced jail sentences of up to two years and fines of up to €1 million for any Italian seeking surrogacy in countries such as the United States or Canada, where it's legal. The ban and its extension apply equally to both heterosexual and same-sex couples, so it is incorrect to call it a ban on LGBT surrogacy specifically. However, critics argue it is discriminatory in practice as it disproportionately targets LGBT couples, who can't get married or adopt children either. Italy's adoption law typically only allows married couples to adopt, and as the country only allows same-sex couples to enter into civil partnerships, they are excluded by default. Nevertheless, Italy's Constitutional Court ruled in May that two women can register as parents on a child's birth certificate, affirming that parental rights can't be limited to the biological mother. The court ruled that it was unconstitutional for city registrars to deprive children born to same-sex parents of recognition by both the biological mother and the woman who consented to the medically assisted pregnancy of her partner and assumed parental responsibilities. LGBT advocates celebrated the ruling as a step in the right direction. But ultimately, it didn't change the surrogacy laws, with strong restrictions still in place, and naturally, it does not cover male same-sex couples. Italy is one of the only European Union countries that bans surrogacy abroad, but many others ban the practice at home, including France, Germany and Spain. Conversely, there are provisions for it in the likes of Portugal, Greece and Belgium.

South Korean court issues new arrest warrant for ex-president Yoon
South Korean court issues new arrest warrant for ex-president Yoon

France 24

time10-07-2025

  • France 24

South Korean court issues new arrest warrant for ex-president Yoon

A South Korean court early Thursday approved a fresh arrest warrant for disgraced former President Yoon Suk Yeol and placed him in custody, days after special investigators renewed efforts to detain him over his failed martial law bid. Yoon was released from detention in March after the Seoul Central District Court overturned his January arrest, allowing him to stand trial for insurrection without being held in custody. In April, Yoon was formally removed from office after his impeachment was upheld by the country's Constitutional Court. South Korea's special counsel prosecutors on Sunday sought a new arrest warrant for Yoon on charges including abuse of power and obstruction of official duties, among others. Nam Se-jin, a senior judge at Seoul's Central District Court, issued an arrest warrant for Yoon over concerns that he could "destroy evidence" in the case. 06:41 Prosecutor Park Ji-young, a member of the special counsel, also told reporters: "We've just checked and confirmed that the warrant has been issued." The former president, 64, is already on trial for insurrection, personally appearing in court to contest the charges. However, Yoon has refused several summonses from a special counsel launched by parliament to investigate his martial law attempt, prompting prosecutors to seek his arrest on June 24. That request was initially denied after the court noted Yoon had since signaled a willingness to cooperate. But on Sunday, the special counsel filed a fresh warrant request, claiming his detention was deemed necessary. Yoon had attended a hearing on Wednesday that lasted about seven hours, during which he rejected all charges, before being taken to a detention centre near the South Korean capital. There, he waited for the court's decision in a holding room. Once the warrant was issued, Yoon was placed in a solitary cell at the facility, where he can be held for up to 20 days as prosecutors prepare to formally indict him including on additional charges. If formally indicted, Yoon could remain in custody for up to six months pending an initial court ruling. During the hearing, Yoon's legal team criticised the detention request as unreasonable, stressing that Yoon has been ousted and "no longer holds any authority". Earlier this month, the special counsel questioned Yoon about his resistance during a failed arrest attempt in January, as well as accusations that he authorised drone flights to Pyongyang to help justify declaring martial law. The former president also faces charges of falsifying official documents related to the martial law bid. Yoon has defended his martial law attempt as necessary to "root out" pro-North Korean and "anti-state" forces. But the Constitutional Court, when ousting Yoon from office on April 4 in a unanimous decision, said his acts were a "betrayal of people's trust" and "denial of the principles of democracy". South Korea's current president, Lee Jae Myung, who won the June snap election, approved legislation launching sweeping special investigations into Yoon's push for martial law and various criminal accusations tied to his administration and wife. Lee inherited a nation deeply fractured by the political crisis triggered by Yoon, whose attempt to subvert civilian rule -- which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament -- sent shock waves through South Korean democracy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store