
Survey says more than half of Pixel 9 owners aren't always happy with their camera
My conclusion was that the Pixel camera seems to be working extra hard to fake a white balance that isn't there, at any cost. In search of a balanced image, it forgets that I'm in an environment that isn't balanced and tries to force a second reality. This results in flatter photos, lacking depth, color, and punch. Worse yet, these do the opposite of what the Pixel camera has prided itself on for years: showing reality. The end image is not what I'm seeing with my own eyes; it's just fake.
I included a survey in the article, asking you, Pixel 9 Pro owners, whether you were happy with your phone's photos. And the results of nearly 4500 votes are, to say the least, interesting.
What jumps out at me the most here is that only 42.5% of 4500 responders said they love the photos produced by the Pixel 9 Pro. Unfortunately, we don't have similar surveys from previous years, but I'd bet you that if we had asked this question in the golden era of the Pixel 2, Pixel 4, or even Pixel 6 and 7, we'd have seen a much higher number of satisfied users.
On the other end of the spectrum, 22% or more than one in five Pixel users say they're not happy and were expecting more from their cam. Yikes. In the middle, there's another big chunk of 35.5% who, like me, are mitigated and say the camera gets things right sometimes but fails other times. Overall, 57.5% of Pixel 9 Pro owners aren't always happy with their camera. That should make Google go back to the drawing board, right?
More telling than the votes are the comments from similarly frustrated users. I didn't expect to receive over 100 comments on this article, much less that the grand majority would echo my sentiments, agree with my experience, and validate my results. Usually, the internet is much angrier with me when I dare to critique Pixels…
I'm so sick and tired of these over processed pictures after my pixel 3. So that I end up carrying around my huge dinosaur DSLR because I can't get photos that look natural with my pixel 9.
Even those who hadn't noticed it went in to test it and saw this issue right away.
Today I tried to take photos and the result didn't always match what I saw in the preview. I don't know when it changed and I don't take photos that often. I only have this problem occasionally on the P6a and when I took photos a while ago, I can confirm that the photos had more color and warmth and today only some are lifeless and others are fine 🤷🏻. You're right and Google's software is to blame and I'm very curious when it will be fixed 🤔.
Many commenters said this issue had made them return the phone and switch to Samsung, Apple, or Xiaomi devices instead.
It's so true Rita! I had pixel for many years (since the Nexus 6P / Pixel 2XL). Noticed it a little on my Pixel 7 Pro, when I decided to upgrade to a Pixel 9 pro, it was even worse, terrible! I ended up returning the phone and sticking with my iPhone 15 pro max until I got a S25 ultra, best smartphone camera system by far. […]
I really do want to go back to a Pixel, hopefully with the P10 Pro. I will give them another chance, but the colour thing drives me crazy…yes even more than Samsung's motion blur gaps.
Some also added that the Pixel camera wasn't giving sunsets and golden hours their due, which is another good example I'd forgotten to mention.
100% been so disappointed with my Pixel 9 Pro – sunsets, and especially landscapes shot at Golden Hour lose all that rich orange and yellow
Wood tones were another example that came up. This commenter even made a report in the Issue Tracker for it.
Same story with my Pixel 6. Anything wooden, the camera strips it out with its appealing warm undertones.
I have reported it in Google Issue Tracker, but then they deemed it as obsolete with no explanation whatsoever. However, they did state that it will be shared with relevant teams.
If you're interested, take a look at the report here: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/413648777
I even performed A/B comparisons with the first-generation Google Pixel. Spoiler alert: The Google Pixel 1 wins the night photos with the Pixel 6 showing very desaturated color and dynamics.
And clearly, this wasn't limited to the Pixel 9 Pro. Pixel 8, 7, and 6 users were complaining about it, too, with some providing similar evidence of the processing issue and swearing not to go back to a Pixel unless this is fixed.
This is the reason why i ditched my Pixel 8. It could never capture the right colour of my kitchen wall no matter how many times I tried. Took a screen recording of the same which shows how much the colour shifts post processing. https://youtube.com/shorts/c9-HyOa9XAI?si=xQgaH_v5CJgBw050
Btw, Pixel cameras have always been unreliable (extremely inaccurate) in terms of white balance, starting from Pixel 1 and continuing till Pixel 5. However, that was limited to night time shots only. From Pixel 6, they changed the camera hardware, and the problem started happening in all lighting conditions not only night time.
Owned 4 pixels thus far. Not coming back unless google fixes this.
Many, like me, had noticed that this problem had been there on previous Pixels, but it had taken an absurd turn on the Pixel 9 Pro. As the previous commenter said, this was mostly a night mode issue before, where the phone would try to add light and remove warmth to get the brightest possible snap in super dark environments. But now it's happening in decently-lit situations, too, without triggering night mode.
Yea. This is a big problem for me too!
I came from the pixel 7 to the 9 pro.
It was a problem in my P7 but the 9 Pro has taken it to new levels. I hate how washed out low light photos are.
Other people even mentioned that well-lit shots also seem a bit whitish and not as vibrant as what they were seeing in the preview.
Yeah true..
Even photos in sunlight seems whitish. I have pixel 7 and I must say, the photos in preview doesn't match the output. Also the front camera video quality is awful.
Some, like me, had tried to bring the brightness slider down to force the phone to capture a moodier photo, only to see it refuse and take a bright snap instead. This, to be fair, is one of my biggest peeves now: I shouldn't need to use a slider, but still, why have a brightness slider in the cam if it's going to ignore what I set it to?
Same on 9Pro, coming from 2XL that's sad to slide the brightness slider way down and still see the image getting bright after post processing
The article was also shared on Reddit and in that thread, u/DiplomatikEmunetey shared many examples they've captured with their Pixel 4a and other cameras for comparisons. They highlighted purple and green as two big misses for the Pixel camera, and the fact that simply tilting the phone and changing frames results in different white balance and color processing.
Some tried to explain this issue by blaming it on Real Tone for faces and the Pixel's goal to depict more accurate colored skin, though that doesn't explain why wood, sunsets, and other non-people photos suffer from the same symptoms.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chime reports first earnings since IPO
The neobank fintech Chime released its first earnings report since the company went public earlier this summer. Revenue for the quarter was $528 million, a 37% increase from $384 million a year earlier. Chime CEO Chris Britt attributed the revenue growth on the company earnings call to "an acceleration relative to our seasonally strong Q1, when tax refund activity [drove] higher levels of re-engaged active members, purchase volume and revenue." Even though the company's main product line involves money management through digital high-yield savings and checking accounts, Britt emphasized to investors on the company earnings call that Chime is not a bank. "Our member deposits reside in regulated FDIC insured accounts at our partner banks," he said. Chief Financial Officer Matt Newcomb asserted that the lack of brick-and-mortar locations serves as a competitive advantage for the neobank. "In contrast to incumbent banks, the [digital] platform allows us to efficiently scale our services over a growing active member base without needing to make massive investments in infrastructure or people," he said in the earnings call. Chime currently serves 8.7 million active members, or consumers who have initiated a money movement transaction on the platform within the last month. According to the earnings report, 67% of those consumers rely on Chime for their primary financial relationship, a term the company defines as describing a consumer "who made 15 or more purchases using their Chime cards in the past calendar month or who had at least one qualifying direct deposit of $200 or more through Chime." A William Blair analyst report said that "investors should build Chime positions and see the company rapidly standing up a traditional bank alternative focused on spending, savings, and short-term liquidity products. … We see Chime as the top destination for individuals making up to $100,000 seeking to switch direct deposit relationships." The fintech's net income came out to -$923 million for the quarter, and diluted earnings per share came out to -$7.29 for the quarter. Chime gives employees a "double-trigger" stock option as part of their compensation plans, and those stocks vested due to the IPO. The stock-based compensation expenses and related payroll taxes resulted in a one-time operating expense of $928 million for the company. Chime's stock went down by 14% in trading on Friday. Chime's successful IPO opening day in June set the stage for other fintechs considering or starting IPOs this year. The company also signaled a soft reopening of the IPO window for the U.S. market when it became the first fintech to file after the uncertainty of April's tariff announcements, particularly after Klarna delayed its IPO due to tariff-induced market volatility at the time. Chime also debuted a series of consumer and back-end technology products within the last year, including $500 "instant loans" and an in-house processor referred to by the company as ChimeCore. In May 2024, Chime was ordered by the CFPB to pay out $4.5 million in fines and remedies for failing to give consumers timely refunds when their accounts were closed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy the Post-Earnings Dip in Pinterest Stock?
Pinterest (PINS) shares slipped as much as 15% on Friday after the social media firm recorded $0.33 a share of earnings for its second quarter (Q2) – short of the $0.35 per share expected. Investors were spooked also because the company said tariffs and the related uncertainty remained a lingering concern for advertisers in the second half of 2025. More News from Barchart Robinhood Stock Seemingly Can't Be Stopped in 2025. Is It Too Late to Buy HOOD Here? Cathie Wood Is Buying Shares of This Little-Known Ethereum Treasury Company. Should You? Dear Ford Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendar for August 11 Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Pinterest stock has been in a sharp uptrend over the past four months. Despite today's plunge, it's up nearly 50% versus its low set in late April. Here's Why the Q2 Release Is Still Positive for Pinterest Stock While the NYSE-listed firm did come in slightly shy of the EPS estimate for its Q2, the company's financial release was, nonetheless, largely positive for long-term investors. For starters, Pinterest continued to grow its user base at an exciting pace, ending the quarter with 578 million monthly active users (MAUs), up some 3.5 million sequentially. More importantly, the San Francisco-headquartered company guided for $1.033 billion to $1.053 billion in revenue for its current financial quarter, handily beating analysts at $1.025 billion. Together, this suggests the post-earnings decline in PINS shares may be a buying opportunity, especially if you plan on owning them for the long term. BofA Recommends Buying the Dip in PINS Shares Bank of America analyst Justin Post recommends buying Pinterest shares on the post-earnings decline since the company's revenue grew a more than expected 17% to nearly $1 billion in Q2. According to him, AI-powered advertising tools like Performance+ will likely unlock significant further upside in PINS stock in the back half of 2025. Additionally, Pinterest stands to benefit from expanding partnerships with the likes of Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN), the BofA analyst told clients in his research note today. The social media firm's transformation into a personalized shopping and ad platform positions it to capture more market share and boost monetization, he added. Post raised his price target on Pinterest stock this morning to $44, indicating potential upside of well over 20% from here. Wall Street Has a 'Strong Buy' Rating on Pinterest Note that Wall Street analysts remain largely positive on PINS stock after its Q2 earnings release. The consensus rating on Pinterest shares sits at 'Strong Buy' with the mean target of roughly $42 suggesting potential upside of just under 20% from current levels. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on


Android Authority
25 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Google wants you charting your meme coins right on its Finance page
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Google is testing a redesigned Finance page in the US with AI and advanced charts to track your investments. Traders will be able to access technical indicators and candlestick views directly on the platform. The update also includes real-time news, plus live market data for stocks, commodities, and more cryptocurrencies. Forget firing up five tabs to keep an eye on your favorite meme coins — Google wants you to do it all from its Finance page. The company is testing a major redesign of Google Finance in the US, adding AI assistance, advanced charting tools, and more crypto coverage. In a new blog post, Google said the new Finance will roll out over the coming weeks with a toggle to switch between the fresh look and the classic design. Traders might welcome the upgraded charting features, which include candlestick views, technical indicators like moving averages, and other tools to analyze price action. Whether you're tracking your Tesla nest egg or your Dogecoin moon shot, Google is aiming to cater to your needs. Google Google Finance might look more like a trading platform. AI also plays a big role in the overhaul. You'll be able to ask complex finance questions from 'How do rising oil prices affect airlines?' to 'Which sectors are seeing the most growth?' and get detailed responses alongside links to relevant sources. Crypto gets a bigger seat at the table too, with live market data for more coins, plus commodities, stocks, and other assets. All of it feeds into a real-time news stream so you can follow price spikes, market moves, and hopefully not a rug pull. The new experience is being tested in the US first and rolling out over the coming weeks, so you might not see it right away. Whether it'll be a one-stop shop for your next big trade remains to be seen. Follow