
Un's top court says all countries have to act against climate change. here are the key takeaways
Here are some of the key points from the opinion delivered Wednesday. A healthy planet is a basic human right. In a simple statement that could have profound legal ramifications, the court said everyone is entitled to a habitable planet. 'The human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment is therefore inherent in the enjoyment of other human rights,' court President Yuji Iwasawa said during a two-hour hearing. A livable planet is a human right and is part of international customary law, meaning every country is obliged to protect it, not just countries that have signed climate treaties and other agreements.
Violating international law. A failure to address climate change, the court said, could be a violation of international law. That matters because it applies to all countries and paves the way for legal actions including states returning to the ICJ to hold each other to account, domestic lawsuits, and investment agreements that have to conform to international law. 'With today's authoritative historic ruling, the International Court of Justice has broken with business-as-usual and delivered a historic affirmation: Those suffering the impacts of climate devastation have a right to remedy and full reparation,' said Joie Chowdhury, a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law.
Payback time? The court ruled that some countries or individuals suffering from the effects of climate change could be eligible for compensation. 'For climate damage linked to greenhouse gas emissions, restitution may take the form of reconstructing damaged or destroyed infrastructure and restoring ecosystems and biodiversity,' the court said. If that's not possible, financial compensation could be assessed, though the judges conceded it may be difficult to calculate as there is usually a degree of uncertainty with respect to the exact extent of the damage caused. Activists hailed that part of the decision as a historic turning point in their search for justice. 'The ICJ's decision brings us closer to a world where governments can no longer turn a blind eye to their legal responsibilities. It affirms a simple truth of climate justice: Those who did the least to fuel this crisis deserve protection, reparations, and a future,' said Vishal Prasad, director of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change.
Climate refugees. While the court's opinion is far-reaching, no one expects it to immediately solve the problems created by climate change. The judges noted that people may be forced to flee their homes to escape the dangers posed by climate change, and countries are obliged to not turn away climate refugees when their lives are endangered. 'If a country disappears under rising ocean levels, that country doesn't cease to exist,' they said. For the Pacific Island nations that pushed for the opinion, the threat is real. Since 1993, sea levels around Vanuatu's shores have risen by about 6 millimeters (.24 inches) per year–significantly faster than the global average–and in some areas tectonic activity has doubled that rate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Syrian charged over Berlin Holocaust memorial stabbing
FRANKFURT: A Syrian man who allegedly supports the Daesh group has been charged with attempted murder over the stabbing of a Spanish tourist at Berlin's Holocaust Memorial, prosecutors said Tuesday. The suspect, a refugee partially identified as Wassim Al M., is said to have seriously injured the 30-year-old man at the landmark in the German capital in February. It was one of a series of attacks blamed on foreign nationals that fueled a bitter debate about immigration in the run-up to Germany's general election. The suspect 'shares the ideology of the foreign terrorist organization Islamic State (IS)' and has 'radical Islamist and antisemitic views,' federal prosecutors said in a statement. He had traveled from the eastern city of Leipzig, where he had been living, to Berlin to target 'alleged infidels, whom he regarded as representatives of a Western form of society that he rejected,' prosecutors said. Shortly before the stabbing, the suspect, who was 19 at the time, sent a photo of himself to IS members so the group could claim responsibility for the attack, they said. The tourist, from the Basque Country in northern Spain, was wounded in the neck during the attack at Berlin's Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, a somber grid of concrete steles located near the Brandenburg Gate and the US embassy. The suspect, who was arrested shortly after the attack and is in pre-trial detention, has also been charged with causing serious bodily harm and attempted membership of a foreign terrorist organization. Officials said previously he had arrived in Germany in 2023. The attack was one of several which shocked Germany ahead of the general election, which saw a doubling in the vote-share for the far-right, anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD). The election was won by the center-right CDU/CSU, which has since taken power at the head of a coalition and moved swiftly to introduce stricter curbs on immigration. The new government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has signalled it is trying to resume deportations to Syria, which have been suspended since 2012.


Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
Violent videos draw more French teens into ‘terror' plots, say prosecutors
PARIS: One 14-year-old was allegedly planning to blow up an Israeli embassy, while a 16-year-old was convicted of having plotted to attack far-right bars incensed by 'injustice.' French prosecutors are alarmed at an increasing number of young teenage boys seemingly plotting 'terror' attacks, and say they all share an addiction to violent videos online. As communities worldwide worry about boys being exposed to toxic and misogynistic influences on social media, French magistrates say they are looking into what draws young teens into 'terrorism.' 'Just a few years ago, there were just a handful of minors charged with terror offenses,' France's National Anti-Terror Prosecutor's Office (PNAT) said. 'But we had 15 in 2013, 18 in 2024 and we already had 11 by July 1' this year. They are aged 13 to 18 and hail from all over France, the PNAT said. Lawyers and magistrates told AFP these teens are usually boys with no delinquent past, many of whom are introverts or have had family trouble. The PNAT opened a special branch in May to better examine the profiles of minors drawn into 'terrorism,' but it said it has already noticed they are all 'great users of social media.' 'Most are fans of ultra-violent, war or pornographic content,' it said. In France, 'terrorism' is largely synonymous with extremist Islamist ideas such as those of the Islamic State militant group. Only in recent months has the PNAT taken on cases different in nature — one an adult suspected of a racist far-right killing, and the other an 18-year-old charged with developing a misogynist plot to kill women. A 14-year-old schoolboy who stabbed to death a teaching assistant in June was a fan of 'violent video games,' although his case was not deemed 'terrorist' in nature. In the case of France's youngest 'terror' suspects, a judicial source told AFP, social media provides them with a flow of violent videos that are 'not necessarily linked to terrorism,' such as from Latin American cartels. 'They think they're proving themselves as men by watching them,' the source said. Sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar said the teens were 'neither children nor adults.' This 'leads them to violence in order to be recognized as adults — even if it's a negative adult,' he said. Laurene Renaut, a researcher looking into militant circles online, said social media algorithms could suck adolescents in fast. 'In less that three hours on TikTok, you can find yourself in an algorithm bubble dedicated to the Islamic State' group, she said. You can be bathing in 'war chants, decapitations, AI reconstructions of glorious (according to IS) past actions or even simulations of actions to come,' she said. The algorithms feed users 'melancholic' content to boost their 'feeling of loneliness, with ravaged landscapes, supposed to reflect the soul,' she said. One such teenager said he was motivated by a sense of 'injustice' after seeing a video online of an attack on a mosque in New Zealand. White supremacist Brenton Tarrant went on a rampage, killing 51 worshippers at mosques around Christchurch in March 2019 in the country's deadliest modern-day mass shooting. The French suspect was convicted last year for planning 'terror' attacks on far-right bars. He told investigators it started when he was 13 and playing Minecraft, a video game, on gamer social media platform Discord. 'Someone sent Tarrant's video,' he said. 'I thought it was unjust to see the men, women and children be massacred.' 'I then watched the videos of imams telling people to stay calm and those of terrorists from the far right, and I thought it was unjust,' he added. 'Then I saw those of jihadists urging help,' he said. 'I thought that by defending this cause, my life would make sense.' A French appeals court in July 2024 sentenced him to four years in jail, including two suspended, after he contacted an undercover agent to find out about weapons. The court justified the sentence with the 'gravity' of his planned actions, but noted he lacked signs of 'deeply rooted ideological radicalization.' Rather, it said, the defendant was the child of fighting parents from a very violent neighborhood, who had been 'significantly deprived of affection' and had sought to 'fit in' with Internet users. His lawyer Jean-Baptiste Riolacci told AFP he was an 'essentially lonely, sad and good kid, whose only occupation beyond his computer was gliding around on his scooter.' The judicial source, who spoke anonymously due to the sensitivity of the issue, said the French system favored early intervention through charging youth for associating with 'terrorist' criminals, and then adapting their punishment according to the severity of the accusations. But attorney Pierre-Henri Baert, who defended another teenager, said the system did not work. His client was handed three years behind bars in May for sharing an IS propaganda post calling for attacks against Jewish people as a 16-year-old. 'It's a very harsh sentence considering his very young age, the fact he had no (criminal) record, and was really in the end just accused of statements online,' he said. Another lawyer, who worked on similar cases but asked to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the issue, agreed. 'When the judiciary goes after people for terrorist criminal association, it's basically doing guesswork,' she said, adding that the 'terrorist' label could be very stigmatising. 'There's no differentiation between a kid who sent aggressive messages and a suspect who actually bought weapons,' she added. Two judicial sources said teens prosecuted for alleged 'terrorism' are usually only spotted through their behavior on social media. They are then charged over other actions, such as moving to an encrypted messaging app, sharing recipes to make explosives or looking for funding, the sources said. A Paris court will in September try three teenagers who, aged 14 and 15, allegedly planned to blow up a truck outside the Israeli embassy in Belgium. They had been spotted at high school for their 'radical remarks,' but were then found in a park with 'bottles of hydrochloric acid' containing 'aluminum foil,' a homemade type of explosive, the PNAT said. Their telephones showed they had watched videos of massacres. Jennifer Cambla, a lawyer who represents one of the defendants, said accusations against her client were disproportionate. 'My client may have had the behavior of a radicalized person by consulting jihadist websites, which is forbidden. But he is far from having plotted an attack,' she said. But another lawyer, speaking anonymously, said arresting teenagers 'fantasizing about jihadism' could be an opportunity to turn their lives around — even if it involved 'a monstruous shock.' 'The arrests are tough,' with specialized forces in ski masks pulling sacks over the suspect's head, they said. But 'as minors, they are followed closely, they see therapists. They are not allowed on social media, and they do sport again,' the lawyer said. One of the judicial sources warned it was not clear that this worked. It 'makes it look like they are being rapidly deradicalized, but we do not know if these youth could again be drawn in by extremist ideas,' they said.


Leaders
5 hours ago
- Leaders
Saudi Troika and Two-State Solution: From July Summit to September Peace Conference
By: Magdi Sadek Magdi Sadek For more than eight decades, negotiations toward a two-state solution have stagnated, mired in endless conflict, crises, wars, and destruction—all at the expense of the Palestinian people. Successive cycles of violence have repeatedly crushed any hope of a solution before it could take shape. Now, Saudi diplomacy is stepping into the void—armed with a strategy akin to blitzkrieg (a term of German origin meaning 'lightning war'), characterized by rapid, successive diplomatic strikes. With growing international anticipation, Riyadh is working to chart a concrete path forward for the long-elusive two-state solution, laying the groundwork for a pivotal international peace conference scheduled for the second half of September. Saudi-Led Troika Lays Groundwork in New York At the heart of this push is Saudi Arabia's leadership, represented by Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, who co-chaired a high-level meeting at the United Nations on 28 July alongside French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot. The two-day conference was part of a tripartite initiative—including Egypt, which was absent from the event—to outline a roadmap for the Palestinian cause and to relaunch the two-state solution. As part of their efforts, Saudi Arabia and France secured the transfer of $300 million from the World Bank to support Palestinian institutions. In a speech during the conference, UN Secretary-General António Guterres thanked both nations, calling the summit 'a unique opportunity' to harness international momentum for peace. But the geopolitical stakes are high. U.S. President Donald Trump, during a visit to Scotland, where he toured his golf resorts in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire, was urged by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recognize a Palestinian state. Trump, who once said, 'What matters to me is the humanitarian hunger of the Palestinians,' has thus far remained unmoved. Observers say it's unlikely he will shift his position, particularly after dismissing French President Emmanuel Macron's recognition of a Palestinian state as 'irrelevant.' Trump's own 2020 'Deal of the Century' was widely criticized for favoring Israel. Still, shifts in international policy are possible—even dramatic ones. Trump once promised to bring peace to the Middle East and end the decades-long bloodshed. Could that promise be resurrected? Riyadh's Consistent Support for the Palestinian Cause Saudi Arabia's engagement is grounded in its long-standing support for the Palestinian people and its advocacy for a just and comprehensive peace based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. This commitment, however, needs to be supported by coordinated Arab diplomacy and strong political will to sustain momentum after the upcoming peace conference. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in remarks earlier this year, underscored the suffering of the Palestinian people and called on the international community to end Israel's aggression and create a new reality for Palestine, in line with international resolutions. Historically, Saudi Arabia has played a prominent role in the Palestinian cause, dating back to King Abdulaziz Al Saud's participation in the 1935 London Round Table Conference and his 1945 letter to U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt outlining the Palestinian plight. The Kingdom has participated in numerous Arab League summits, championed the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative under then-Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz, and led regional and international efforts to revive the two-state solution. In September 2023, Saudi Arabia announced the formation of an international coalition for the two-state solution in collaboration with the Arab League, European Union, Egypt, and Jordan. The Kingdom has also provided over $6 billion in humanitarian aid to Palestinians, including $500 million in 2014 to rebuild Gaza. Its support has included initiatives by King Salman—when he was governor of Riyadh—to assist the families of Palestinian fighters and establish a structured honor registry for donations. Challenges Ahead for the September Conference Originally scheduled for June 2025, the New York peace conference was postponed due to escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. It now comes amid a renewed international push for the two-state solution, with the Palestinian Authority stating that it sees 'strong indicators' of growing global support—even as internal divisions, particularly the need for reconciliation between Palestinian factions and the disarmament of Hamas, remain major obstacles. While not explicitly addressed at the July conference, these internal challenges—alongside the external ones—remain key hurdles. Chief among them is the U.S. and Israeli boycott of the initiative. Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi has called on Trump to intervene and end the war in Gaza, as he possesses the necessary capabilities and stature, he is the only one capable of stopping the war and ending this suffering. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, during his meeting with Trump, emphasized that recognizing a Palestinian state would be a concrete step toward lasting peace. Some analysts believe that U.S.-Saudi relations could be leveraged to overcome opposition to the conference's outcomes, though ongoing Israeli settlement expansion and efforts to weaken the Palestinian Authority pose significant challenges. A Historic Opportunity Despite the obstacles, many see the September conference as a potential turning point—a 'decisive platform' to revive and institutionalize momentum for peace. Its outcomes should not end when the summit concludes but must be embedded into international and humanitarian agendas aimed at ending the deadly conflict. Today, more than 140 of the UN's 193 member states recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. France is expected to join them in September during the upcoming peace summit in New York, which will coincide with the high-level meetings of the 80th UN General Assembly. While some speculate the summit could move to Paris, the picture remains fluid. What is clear is that international recognition of a Palestinian state is gathering unprecedented steam—and Saudi Arabia appears determined to ensure that momentum is not lost. Related Topics: GCC-US Summit: Saudi Crown Prince Supports Peaceful Solutions to Conflicts Saudi Arabia Stands Firm Against Palestinian Displacement at OIC Summit Saudi Arabia Supports Palestine with $30mn Package Palestinian President Lauds Saudi Role in France's Recognition of Statehood Short link : Post Views: 139