
Rajat Verma: I was typecast as the boy next door, but I broke the pattern by choosing characters that weren't always likeable
Rajat Verma
, who has been part of shows such as
Beyhadh 2
, Dahej Daasi, Ishq Par Zor Nahi, and was last seen as the male lead in
Jamuniya
, says he has often been
typecast
in the industry. The actor adds that it took him a while to break out of a particular kind of role and truly showcase his versatility.
He says, 'The industry loves a good label — the boy next door, the Laxman-like brother. For a while, I played along, as I was new to the industry. Then I broke the pattern by saying yes to characters that weren't necessarily likable but were relatable — the roles that were refining my craft. I let my work do the rebellion, not my words. Every time they tried to define me, I redefined myself on screen.'
He adds, 'I'm just too hungry to explore my craft.
I find myself drawn to characters that challenge me as an actor and move something inside me. Maybe someday I'll be content with the fight within and begin a new journey — one that challenges societal norms.'
When asked what kind of stories or characters he believes Indian entertainment needs more of, he replies, 'We need stories where men can cry without shame and women don't need to be rescued. We need more flawed women, more quiet men, more love stories that aren't just about falling in love but about growing through it.
We need fathers who fail, sons who forgive, lovers who aren't perfect, and friendships that don't always survive.
We need narratives that move beyond stereotypes and dive into the beautifully messy middle of the human experience. We need nuance, not just noise.'
In fact, he ensures he doesn't take up roles or stories that he doesn't personally align with. 'Fame is tempting, but peace of mind is non-negotiable. Saying no is my way of protecting the storyteller in me. I'd rather wait for the right silence than speak the wrong words,' he says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Pink Villa
7 hours ago
- Pink Villa
Param Sundari: 5 times Sidharth Malhotra gave us full-on Shah Rukh Khan energy
Param Sundari's trailer is out, and it has left Sidharth Malhotra and Janhvi Kapoor's fans in awe. Their sizzling chemistry, North-South tadka, soothing music, performances and of course, the picturesque locations of Kerala have left fans excited for the movie. Ever since the trailer was released, Sidharth's character has been the talk of the town. Fans were quick to notice how the actor paid tribute to Shah Rukh Khan in several ways and won hearts. 5 times Sidharth Malhotra gave us full-on Shah Rukh Khan energy Param channelled Shah Rukh Khan's energy and wit as he responded quickly to Sundari during a discussion about mosquitoes in the room. Param Sachdev, a North Indian from Delhi, has SRK-like swag and style and carries an extroverted energy. Sidharth Malhotra's character Param pays tribute to King Khan by delivering his iconic dialogue 'Haarke jeetne waale ko baazigar kehte hain' and reminds Sundari about the film Baazigar. Just like Shah Rukh Khan, Sidharth nailed the on-screen romance with Sundari, aka Janhvi Kapoor, leaving everyone mesmerized. Not only Sidharth, but Janhvi Kapoor's energy in the trailer was also quite impressive. Her popular monologue narrating the differences between South Indian states, languages and actors, is going viral like wildfire. Everything about Param Sundari Param Sundari 's trailer was released on August 12, and it has been making waves since then. While Sidharth Malhotra plays Param Sachdev, an extroverted North Indian residing in Delhi, Sundari is a bold, beautiful and clever South Indian from Kerala. The film follows the love tale of what happens when two people from different states fall in love with each other. The story unfolds when Param visits Kerala and stays at a property owned by Sundari's family, leading to an unexpected romance. Originally slated for a July 25 premiere, Param Sundari has been rescheduled and will release in theaters on August 29, 2025. Along with Janhvi and Sidharth, the movie also stars Renji Panicker, Siddhartha Shankar, Manjot Singh, Sanjay Kapoor, and Inayat Verma in key roles. The film is directed by Tushar Jalota and presented by Dinesh Vijan.


Indian Express
21 hours ago
- Indian Express
Is Farah Khan an accidental Marxist? What her end credits reveal about Bollywood's hidden labour
I love the ending of Main Hoon Na (2004). What's not to love? It's a 'happily ever after' of epic proportions. Ram is reunited with Laxman. Raghvan's own hubris destroyed him. All the romance comes to fruition, and perhaps most surreal of all, India and Pakistan are seen extending olive branches to each other (a true fairytale moment). But as heartwarming as all of this is, my most rewatched three minutes of the film come after it ends. When, instead of fading into the usual scrolling crawl of white text over black, it cuts to a song. There is singing and dancing and sheer joy in the air as every member of the cast and crew gets their moment in the sun. It's not just Shah Rukh Khan and Sushmita Sen grinning into the lens, but the spot boys, the assistant choreographers, the sound engineers, the drivers — an entire army of people who, until this moment in the film, have been invisible. In Om Shanti Om (2007), filmmaker Farah Khan does it again. The film ends, but instead of a curtain call, there's somewhat of a curtain lift, and she extends a backstage pass to her audience. Every crew member is pulled out of anonymity for just a few seconds so they can dance down the red carpet. Since it's a film about the constructedness of cinema, it is even more fitting to celebrate the people who did the said 'constructing'. (It does take a village!) Considering Khan's long history of work as a choreographer and technician before she ever became a household name, this gesture seems genuine and logical. Its silliness is infectious and you can't help but smile as you leave the theatre (or shut your laptop, to be accurate). But these end credits also serve a different, bigger purpose: They accidentally interrogate the way films — and capitalism itself — are structured. One of my favourite lectures on Marxism in college explored the idea of commodity fetishism. Commodity fetishism, in Marxist theory, describes how, under capitalism, we treat commodities as if they have intrinsic value and power, obscuring the messy human labour that produced them. The social relationships (who made it? under what conditions? for what pay?) get buried under the somewhat magical, mystical aura of the object itself. We see the diamond ring, not the miner; the handbag, not the seamstress; the new iPhone, not the assembly-line worker in Shenzhen. In short, under capitalism, we alienate the product from the means of its production. Take, for instance, a bag stitched by a human being. In its material form, it's just a bag. Then Louis Vuitton or Prada slaps their label on it and suddenly, the bag is worth a thousand times more. The brand gives it a status symbol — a means of gaining power or social standing. The craftsperson remains anonymous and their skill unrecognised in proportion to the bag's price. The label accrues the glamour. Films work the same way. The end product — the movie — is marketed and consumed as a singular, almost magical thing, its value disproportionately tied to the 'brand' most visible on the poster: usually a star, sometimes a director or the producer. But cinema is inherently collective. Actors, directors and even DOPs do not work in a vacuum, and their talent does not function in isolation. Every scene is the result of hundreds of invisible contributions — gaffers, focus pullers, location scouts, dressmen, and post-production assistants. And yet, to most of us, these people are as abstract as the hands that built our phones or stitched our H&M clothes. Bollywood, if anything, amplifies this hierarchy. Star culture has been its organising principle for decades. There are 'above the line' names and 'below the line' names, and the effort-to-reward disparity is disgusting to behold. That is why meta-narratives are slightly rarer — because Bollywood thrives on preserving glamour, not dismantling it. Khan's end-credit sequences join a tradition of films that examine the machinery of cinema itself. In Hollywood, Singin' in the Rain (1952) remains a cherished early example, chronicling the birth of the talkies while revelling in the messy, sweaty labour behind them. More recently, films like Quentin Tarantino's Once Upon a Time in… Hollywood (2019) and David Leitch's The Fall Guy (2024) both weave stories around stunt performers, centring their experiences as a lens to examine Hollywood's labour politics among other themes. Hugo (2011), La La Land (2016), and even The Studio (2025) may be love letters to films, but they also serve to demystify and deconstruct the business of movie-making by giving us alternate perspectives and unexpected truths. Closer to home, Guru Dutt's Kaagaz Ke Phool (1959) is a bittersweet eulogy to the film world, drawn from Dutt's own heartbreak, while Zoya Akhtar's Luck by Chance (2009) is a sharp insider's look at the bit players, assistants, and fixers who keep the illusion alive. Hardik Mehta's Kaamyaab (2020) — a tender, meta story about a character actor chasing one last memorable role after a lifetime in the background — carries forward this tradition. And of course, one can't forget Om Shanti Om, the mother of all self-referential Bollywood spectacles, turning the film industry into both a playground and a parody. These end-credit sequences are, in a minuscule way, doing what unions and strikes try to do on a structural level: assert that there is no movie without the people who make it. But it's still only just a crumb. Visibility for the people behind the scenes remains the exception, not the rule. As the recent Salim–Javed documentary, Angry Young Men, reminds us, Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar were the first screenwriters in Hindi cinema to acquire a star-like persona — something unheard of for writers. The same could be said of figures like A R Rahman or Gulzar in music. But such names are rare; most of the labour that sustains the industry remains anonymous. The Film Employees' Federation of South India (FEFSI) and the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) have, for decades, fought to establish minimum wages, enforce working-hour limits, and secure accident compensation for crew members. The FWICE represents 32 different craft associations, from lightmen to sound technicians. In 2008, a major strike by FWICE brought Mumbai's film and television industry to a halt for weeks, forcing producers to negotiate better pay structures and break schedules. But these victories have been partial and fragile. Unorganised and freelance labour still makes up a huge portion of the workforce, leaving many without benefits, job security, or bargaining power. Stars still command astronomical fees while everyone else earns barely enough to survive Mumbai rents. The fetishism is structural, and no amount of singing and dancing can obscure the exploitation behind it. To move from symbolism to substance would require larger conversations about profit-sharing structures, pay parity, enforceable caps on working hours that actually get upheld and accountability mechanisms strong enough to protect workers from the industry's entrenched hierarchies. That sounds utopian — and in the current climate, it probably is. But things usually begin with shifts in perception. For me, the trigger was stepping onto a set for the first time and finding out there are 'A caterers' and 'B caterers' that serve vastly different food to different segments of people on the set. For you, it could be reading this article. Khan's end credits (and films) don't answer the big questions, but they do make it fun to notice and recognise that the film we just watched wasn't conjured into being by SRK alone, but by a network of human beings whose names you now know, and whose faces you might just remember. And maybe next time, when the credits roll, you will keep watching.


Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
NCT's Renjun and TXT‘s HueningKai show off their friendship in NEW PIC leaving fans shocked
K-pop fans were recently treated to a surprising and heartwarming display of friendship between two major idols: NCT's Renjun and TXT's HueningKai. In a post that instantly went viral, Renjun shared a series of photos of the two stars posing together, revealing a previously unknown bond that has left fans of both groups, affectionately known as NCTzens and MOAs, completely shocked and delighted. The new pictures are now circulating widely online, celebrating the unexpected connection between the two popular artists. Let's take a closer look. Renjin and HueningKai's unexpected bond Renjun recently revealed in an online post that he and HueningKai are friends, and also shared how the two unlikely idols ended up getting close. He mentioned how he was already looking for new friends amongst other idols, and that HueningKai looked very kind. RENJUN revealed that he became friends with hueningkai because he seemed very nice 🥹 he set to meet him at a cafe through a mutual friend and they talked like it was a blind date 😭🤍 they both were shy but they went for a walk at the han river and hung out at kai's place ♡ — all huening kai (@HNKMEDIA) August 10, 2025 The idol shared, 'Huening Kai seemed so kind. He gave off a slightly Jisung-like vibe. So, I got introduced through a friend, and we decided to meet at Starbucks and chat, kind of like a blind date'. He then also delved into how nice the meeting was; however, since Kai was a bit introverted, it seemed a little awkward. He then also recalled how a fan ended up recognising both of them at the cafe and even came up to them to ask how they knew each other. He ended the post by saying, 'So we went for a walk along the Han River and even hung out at his dorm'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo About the idols TXT is a group that debuted in 2019 under the same label as BTS. Their debut brought forth a lot of buzz as they were the first idols to debut after BTS from that label. They started their journey in the entertainment industry with the song 'Crown'. Since then, they have released one hit after another, and have a total of 7 extended plays so far. About NCT NCT is one of the most unique K-pop groups that debuted in 6666. The group works on the concept of having many separate subunits that focus on different elements, themes and charms. Currently, the main group has around 6 subunits, namely NCT U, NCT 127, NCT Dream , WayV, NCT DoJaeJung, and NCT WISH.