Afghan women to get support from refugee fund
Female cricketers from Afghanistan are to become the first recipients of support from a Global Refugee Cricket Fund.
The fund, established by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and its charitable foundation, will raise money for Pitch Our Future, a programme supporting exiled Afghan women's cricketers in Australia.
More than 20 members of the former Afghanistan women's national team have been in Australia since the Taliban's return to power in 2021, because female participation in sport in the country has effectively been outlawed.
On Thursday an Afghanistan Women's XI played an exhibition match in Melbourne, their first match as a collective since fleeing to Australia.
The England and Wales Cricket Board has made an initial donation of £100,000 to the Global Refugee Fund.
The fund is looking to provide refugees with access to facilities, offer education, promote advocacy and build both high-performance and community programmes.
In 2020, 25 players were given professional contracts by the Afghanistan Cricket Board but after the Taliban returned and they could no longer play or train safely, they had asked the International Cricket Council (ICC) for permission to play as a refugee team. The request was denied.
The ICC has now been invited to take part in a steering group that will ensure what the MCC is calling a "sustained and structured approach".
Afghan cricketers play first match since fleeing Taliban
Get cricket news sent straight to your phone
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the US. Here's what to know
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy of his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East. The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Here's what to know about the new rules: How Trump justified the ban Since returning to the White House, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The travel ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. The aim is to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes,' the administration said. In a video posted on social media, Trump tied the new ban to a terrorist attack Sunday in Boulder, Colorado , saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas . The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa . Who is exempt from the ban 1. Green card holders 2. Dual citizens, including U.S. citizens who also have citizenship of one of the banned countries 3. Some athletes: athletes and their coaches traveling to the U.S. for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the U.S. secretary of state 4. Afghans who worked for the U.S. government or its allies in Afghanistan and are holders of Afghan special immigrant visas 5. Iranians belonging to an ethnic or religious minority who are fleeing prosecution 6. Certain foreign national employees of the U.S. government who have served abroad for at least 15 years, and their spouses and children 7. People who were granted asylum or admitted to the U.S. as refugees before the ban took effect 8. People with U.S. family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents 9. Diplomats and foreign government officials on official visits 10. Those traveling to U.N. headquarters in New York solely on official U.N. business 11. Representatives of international organizations and NATO on official visits in the U.S. 12. Children adopted by U.S. citizens. Which countries are affected Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on special immigrant visas, who were generally the people who worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. The list can be changed, the administration said in a document, if authorities in the designated countries make 'material improvements' to their own rules and procedures. New countries can be added 'as threats emerge around the world.' Reactions to Trump's order International aid groups and refugee resettlement organizations roundly condemned the ban. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The African Union Commission expressed concern about the 'the potential negative impact' of the ban on educational exchanges, business ties and broader diplomatic relations. It urged the Trump administration to adopt 'a more consultative approach' with the affected countries. The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the nation's largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, called the order 'unnecessary, overbroad and ideologically motivated.' The National Immigration Law Center said it was 'outraged,' saying the ban is ' laced with unsubstantiated legal justifications.' 'The impact of this new ban will be deeply racialized, as it will effectively bar hundreds of millions of Black and Brown people from entering the United States,' the group said in a statement. In Haiti, radio stations received a flurry of calls Thursday from angry listeners, including many who said they were Haitians living in the U.S. and who accused Trump of being racist. 'Most of the countries he attacked are countries that have a lot of Black people,' one caller said. How the ban is different from 2017 Early in Trump's first term, he issued an executive order banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty, as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. ___ Associated Press reporters Evens Sanon in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and Dánica Coto in San Juan, Puerto Rico, contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Pakistan to play in Sri Lanka at India-hosted Women's World Cup
Pakistan will play their matches at this year's Women's Cricket World Cup in Sri Lanka under an International Cricket Council deal that allows them to avoid playing in host nation India. The refusal of India to travel to Pakistan for the men's Champions Trophy earlier this year resulted in the ICC introducing neutral venues to tournaments hosted by either of the neighbouring countries. Nuclear-armed India and Pakistan were last month involved in a four-day military conflict, their worst since 1999, before a ceasefire was agreed. Sri Lanka's Colombo will join Indian host cities Bengaluru, Guwahati, Indore and Visakhapatnam in staging matches from September 30 until the final of the 50-over tournament on November 2, the ICC announced late on Monday. Colombo will be Pakistan's home for seven group games. The first semi-final will take place in either Guwahati or Colombo, if Pakistan progress that far, on October 29 with the second semi-final a day later in Bengaluru. The final will be in either Bengaluru or Colombo on Sunday, November 2. "The venues for the knockouts are dependent on Pakistan qualifying", the ICC said in a statement. "Two alternative venues have been identified for one semi-final and the final." Eight teams will contest the World Cup -- Australia, Bangladesh, England, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Africa and Sri Lanka. Australia beat England by 71 runs in the final of the last Women's World Cup, hosted by New Zealand in 2022. pjm/dh
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Surprise as Klaasen retires from international cricket
Hours after Australia's Glenn Maxwell confirmed his retirement, one-day international cricket lost another big hitter when Heinrich Klaasen called time. The South Africa wicketkeeper announced his retirement from international cricket on Monday, to spend more time with his family. Klaasen's decision comes as a surprise given his importance to South Africa and his impact in franchise leagues around the world. It comes just less than a year after he was South Africa's top scorer in their T20 World Cup final defeat by India. "It took me a long time to decide what's best for me and my family for the future. It was truly a very difficult decision but also one that I have absolute peace with," Klaasen said, adding that he was looking forward to more time with his family. Klaasen ranks fourth on the all-time list for ODI strike rates. With 2,141 runs in 60 ODIs, at a rate of 117.05, Klaasen trails only Andre Russell (130.22), Maxwell (126.70), and Lionel Cann (117.06). A Proteas batting sensation who redefined the art of power-hitting 💥Heinrich Klaasen draws curtains on a memorable career 👏More here ➡️ — ICC (@ICC) June 2, 2025 The 33-year-old last played for South Africa in their defeat against New Zealand in the semi-final of the Champions Trophy in March. In all, he played 122 games for South Africa across all formats, but in April he was left off South Africa's list of players on central contracts for 2025 and 2026. Cricket South Africa said at the time that talks on his future were ongoing. Klaasen had previously retired from Test cricket last year. "Heinrich has been a fantastic ambassador for South African cricket, both on and off the field. His performances in the green and gold have brought joy to many South Africans, and his legacy will undoubtedly inspire the next generation," Cricket South Africa chief executive Pholetsi Moseki said. "We thank him for his contributions over the years and wish him everything of the best for the future."
