Apple Gives Tata India IPhone Repair Business As Partnership Expands: Report
Agency:
Last Updated: June 05, 2025, 16:43 IST
The market for repairs is expected to boom in India, the world's second-biggest smartphone market, as iPhone sales skyrocket.
Apple has brought in Tata Group to handle repairs for iPhones and MacBook devices in its fast-growing Indian market, signalling the Indian conglomerate's deepening role in the U.S. tech giant's supply chain, two people familiar with the matter said.
As Apple looks beyond China for manufacturing, Tata has fast emerged as its key supplier and already assembles iPhones for local and foreign markets at three facilities in south India, with one of them also making some iPhone components.
In its latest partnership expansion, Tata is taking over the mandate from an Indian unit of Taiwan's Wistron, ICT Service Management Solutions, and will carry out such after-sales repairs from its Karnataka iPhone assembly campus, both sources said.
The market for repairs is only going to boom in India, the world's second-biggest smartphone market, as iPhone sales skyrocket. Counterpoint Research estimates around 11 million iPhones were sold in India last year, giving Apple a 7% market share, compared to just 1% in 2020.
The latest contract award signals Apple's growing confidence on Tata as it hopes to win more business from the world's most valuable smartphone company.
'Tata's deepening partnership with Apple could also pave the groundwork for Apple directly selling refurbished devices in India, like how it does in the United States currently," said Prabhu Ram, a vice president at Cybermedia Research.
The takeover from ICT by Tata is currently ongoing, both sources said, who declined to be named as they were not authorized to speak on the matter.
Apple and Wistron did not respond to requests for comment, while a spokesperson for Tata declined to comment.
While Apple's official service centres across India can do basic repairs, they would now ship phones and laptops to Tata's facility for more complex issues.
Swipe Left For Next Video View all
Wistron's ICT however will continue to service other clients excluding Apple, one of the sources said.
Amid an impending threat of US President Donald Trump's tariffs on China, India is also emerging as a favoured destination for iPhone exports. Apple CEO Tim Cook has said the bulk of iPhones sold in the United States during June quarter will be made at factories in India. (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - Reuters) Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates—only on News18. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! News business Apple Gives Tata India IPhone Repair Business As Partnership Expands: Report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
China leaders take reins at TikTok Shop in US as sales miss goal
ByteDance Ltd., TikTok 's parent company, has been replacing US-hired staff near Seattle with leaders connected to China, aiming to replicate its e-commerce success in Asia after sales fell short in America. TikTok Shop initially set a goal to increase its US e-commerce business tenfold last year to $17.5 billion in transaction volume, but the company had to drastically lower that goal, according to people familiar with the plan who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk publicly. TikTok established its Shop business in the Seattle area near Inc., the online retail giant it was aiming to displace. Meetings that used to be held in English are now often conducted in Mandarin and managers increasingly write in Chinese when communicating on Feishu, ByteDance's internal Slack-like app, with English-speaking staff forced to rely on the built-in translation function. More than 100 TikTok Shop employees in the US have been fired or have left amid confusion between leaders that has worsened the work environment, according to people familiar with the company. The cultural transition taking place in the company coincides with its fight for survival in the US — due mainly to the app's Chinese ties. A national security law passed by Congress last year requires TikTok's US business to be spun off from its Chinese parent company or it will face a ban. Lawmakers warned that TikTok's ties to China pose a threat to the safety and security of American users. President Donald Trump has twice delayed the ban — with legal assurances from his attorney general — and another deadline for divestiture looms later this month, though that might also be extended, Wall Street Journal has reported. ByteDance has said it doesn't intend to sell. The TikTok Shop near Seattle in February began requiring workers to be in the office five days a week for eight hours a day, according to a memo reviewed by Bloomberg. The change is in contrast to some other major tech companies that still offer flexible work schedules, and has been particularly burdensome for employees who often join late-night calls with colleagues in Asia after they leave the office, according to former employees. US-based staff require human resources and manager pre-approval to work from home. The changes were introduced after Bob Kang, China-based global head of TikTok's e-commerce division, visited the office in Bellevue, Washington, earlier this year and found there weren't enough staff pressent on a work day, according to multiple people who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. Increasing influence Increasing Chinese influence over TikTok's fastest-growing business may raise questions about its previous corporate promise to distance the US operation from China. After Trump initially tried to ban the app during his first term, the company announced a security plan dubbed 'Project Texas' and vowed to wall off the app's US data and operations from any Chinese oversight. TikTok Shop is the biggest source of revenue for the video-sharing app besides advertising, and it has become a major investment area for ByteDance. Adding full-scale commerce to its eye-catching content and popular influencers sets it apart from rivals like Instagram and YouTube. The company still aims to challenge Amazon in major markets. To better compete, TikTok Shop recruited aggressively near Seattle over the past three years, targeting people with experience at Amazon, according to a review of Linkedin profiles and people who worked at both companies. In some corners of TikTok's Bellevue office of roughly 1,000 employees, the workflow felt like a remix of previous Amazon teams, the people said. But since January, growing tension in the teams below Kang and Nico Le Bourgeois, who oversaw TikTok's e-commerce operations in the US, became a distraction for staff who were often unsure about whose orders to follow, the people said. TikTok's uncertain fate in the US also weighed on morale. The company carried out a round of layoffs in April. A second batch followed in May. In the first round, Le Bourgeois was demoted when Mu Qing, a Chinese executive from ByteDance's e-commerce platform Douyin moved to the Seattle area to run TikTok Shop in the US. After the second bout, Mu sent an internal message saying Le Bourgeois was leaving to pursue other opportunities, according to a copy of the message seen by Bloomberg. Those cuts were intended to improve TikTok's 'efficiency,' according to former employees, though it wasn't clear to staff what factors contributed to a worker's efficiency rating. More like Douyin With these changes, ByteDance leaders are bringing in people who are familiar with what worked for the company in China, where Douyin, its TikTok clone for the Chinese market, has evolved into a $490 billion shopping phenomenon. In addition to Mu, who was the head of Douyin's e-commerce, six other leaders with Chinese backgrounds were appointed in April, according to a different internal memo from Kang viewed by Bloomberg. One challenge is that habits of many American users trend toward passive TikTok scrolling as opposed to making purchases in the app. Some US sellers told Bloomberg that they have also been reluctant to invest in the platform, given the possible ban. The final tally for 2024 sales came in at around $9 billion, according to an estimate by Singapore-based consultancy Momentum Works, far below the internal goal of $17.5 billion in transaction volume. A TikTok spokesperson previously called the $17.5 billion internal goal 'inaccurate.' TikTok Shop's US struggles haven't halted the company's global shopping ambitions. ByteDance in 2021 rolled out e-commerce services in countries including Indonesia, Vietnam and the UK. In Southeast Asia, it's already the region's biggest shopping platform after Shopee, according to Momentum Works. Last year, TikTok Shop opened in five countries in Europe, including Germany and Spain. The Europe expansion was delayed because the company first prioritised US growth, Bloomberg reported. A TikTok spokesperson did not respond to an emailed request for comment for this story. This is a crucial month for TikTok in the US. The company will host merchants and creators in Los Angeles next week for a summit featuring some of the new leaders of the e-commerce unit. The current deadline for ByteDance to sell the TikTok's US operation is June 19 and there have been several interested suitors. The company came close to a possible spin-off in April to a consortium of investors that included Oracle Corp., but the deal was scuttled in part because of Trump's trade war with China. Meanwhile, the churn of e-commerce employment continues in the Seattle area. Current and former TikTok Shop employees told Bloomberg that they get hounded by recruiting messages from Temu , another Chinese e-commerce competitor.
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Thinking AI models collapse in face of complex problems, Apple researchers find
Just days ahead of the much-anticipated Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), Apple has released a study titled 'The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity', which saw researchers testing 'reasoning'; AI models such as Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's o models, DeepSeek R1 and Google's Thinking models to see how far they can scale to replicate human reasoning. Spoiler alert — not as much, as the entire AI marketing pitch, would have you believe. Could this signal what may be in store for Apple's AI conversation ahead of the keynote? The study questions the current standard evaluation of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) using established mathematical and coding benchmarks, arguing they suffer from data contamination and don't reveal insights into reasoning trace structure and quality. Instead, it proposes a controlled experimental testbed using algorithmic puzzle environments. The limitations of AI benchmarking, and need to evolve, is something we had written about earlier. 'We show that state-of-the-art LRMs (e.g., o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1, Claude-3.7-Sonnet-Thinking) still fail to develop generalizable problem-solving capabilities, with accuracy ultimately collapsing to zero beyond certain complexities across different environments,' the researcher paper points out. These findings are a stark warning to the industry — current LLMs are far from general-purpose reasoners. The emergence of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking, and Gemini Thinking, has been hailed as a significant advancement, potentially marking steps toward more general artificial intelligence. These models characteristically generate responses following detailed 'thinking processes', such as a long Chain-of-Thought sequence, before providing a final answer. While they have shown promising results on various reasoning benchmarks, the capability of benchmarks to judge rapidly evolving models, itself is in doubt. The researchers cite a comparison between non-thinking LLMs and their 'thinking' evolution. 'At low complexity, non-thinking models are more accurate and token-efficient. As complexity increases, reasoning models outperform but require more tokens—until both collapse beyond a critical threshold, with shorter traces,' they say. The illustrative example of the Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking illustrates how both models retain accuracy till complexity level three, after which the standard LLM sees a significant drop, something the thinking model too suffers from, a couple of levels later. At the same time, the thinking model is using significantly more tokens. This research attempted to challenge prevailing evaluation paradigms, which often rely on established mathematical and coding benchmarks, which are otherwise susceptible to data contamination. Such benchmarks also primarily focus on final answer accuracy, providing limited insight into the reasoning process itself, something that is the key differentiator for a 'thinking' model compared with a simpler large language model. To address these gaps, the study utilises controllable puzzle environments — Tower of Hanoi, Checker Jumping, River Crossing, and Blocks World — and these puzzles allow for precise manipulation of problem complexity while maintaining consistent logical structures and rules that must be explicitly followed. That structure theoretically opens a window, a glance at how these models attempt to 'think'. The findings from this controlled experimental setup reveal significant limitations in current frontier LRMs. One of the most striking observations is the complete accuracy collapse that occurs beyond certain complexity thresholds across all tested reasoning models. This is not a gradual degradation but a sharp drop to near-zero accuracy as problems become sufficiently difficult. 'The state-of-the-art LRMs (e.g., o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1, Claude-3.7-Sonnet-Thinking) still fail to develop generalizable problem-solving capabilities, with accuracy ultimately collapsing to zero beyond certain complexities across different environments,' note the researchers. These results inevitably challenge any notion that the LRMs truly possess generalisation problem-solving skills, required for planning tasks or multi-step processes. The study also identifies a counter-intuitive scaling limit in the models' reasoning effort (this is measured by the inference token usage during the 'thinking' phase), which sees these models initially spend more tokens, but as complexity increases, they actually reduce reasoning effort closer to the inevitable accuracy collapse. Researchers say that 'despite these claims and performance advancements, the fundamental benefits and limitations of LRMs remain insufficiently understood. Critical questions still persist: Are these models capable of generalizable reasoning, or are they leveraging different forms of pattern matching?,' they ask. There are further questions pertaining to performance scaling with increasing problem complexity, comparisons to the non-thinking standard LLM counterparts when provided with the same inference token compute, and around inherent limitations of current reasoning approaches, as well as improvements that might be necessary to advance toward more robust reasoning. Where do we go from here? The researchers make it clear that their test methodology too has limitations. 'While our puzzle environments enable controlled experimentation with fine-grained control over problem complexity, they represent a narrow slice of reasoning tasks and may not capture the diversity of real-world or knowledge intensive reasoning problems,' they say. They do add that the use of 'deterministic puzzle simulators assumes that reasoning can be perfectly validated' at every step, a validation that may not be feasible to such precision in less structured domains. That they say, would restrict validity of analysis to more reasoning. There is little argument that LRMs represent progress, particularly for the relevance of AI. Yet, this study highlights that not all reasoning models are capable of robust, generalisable reasoning, particularly in the face of increasing complexity. These findings, ahead of WWDC 2025, and from Apple's own researchers, may suggest that any AI reasoning announcements will likely be pragmatic. The focus areas could include specific use cases where current AI methodology is reliable (the research paper indicates lower to medium complexity, less reliance on flawless long-sequence execution) and potentially integrating neural models with traditional computing approaches to handle the complexities where LRMs currently fail. The era of Large Reasoning Models is here, but this 'Illusion of thinking' study is that AI with true reasoning, remains a mirage.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Little Caesars enters India with first outlet in Delhi-NCR this month
Little Caesars, a Detroit, Michigan-based world's third largest pizza chain, is entering the Indian market. India -- one of the fastest growing quick service restaurant markets -- will be the 30th market for Little Caesars, which is also the world's largest family-owned pizza chain, for which it has roped in Harnessing Harvest as its franchise partner. It has planned to open its first outlet in Delhi-NCR in this month, with plans for additional locations to follow, according to a statement from the company. "Launching in India marks an exciting milestone for Little Caesars as we expand into our 30th country. With our delicious pizzas and unbeatable value, we're eagerly anticipating introducing a unique menu that we believe will captivate India," said Paula Vissing, President, Global Retail, Little Caesars Pizza. Its entry into India market reflects the brand's commitment to global growth, bringing its signature menu and exceptional value to a new market, it said. Recently, Little Caesars has launched in markets such as Cambodia and Kuwait as part of its global expansion. Little Caesars, was founded by Mike and Marian Ilitch as a single, family-owned restaurant in 1959 and is headquartered in downtown Detroit, Michigan. The brand is known for its 'hot-n-ready' pizza, crazy puffs, and famed crazy bread in the US market. Its franchise partner, Harnessing Harvest, has nearly nine decades of operations in the Indian food and hospitality industry. According to a report from IMARC Group, the Indian pizza market size reached USD 5.3 billion in 2024. Looking forward, it expects the market to reach USD 11.8 billion by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 9.24 per cent during 2025-2033. The Indian pizza market is led by global QSR brands as Domino's, Pizza Hut operated by their local franchise partners. Besides, several home-grown brands such as La Pino'z, Brik Oven, BOCS Pizza, etc, are also key players in the market.
