Teacher incentives, math education bills become law in Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA CITY — Longtime Oklahoma teachers will continue earning annual salary increases for an extra 10 years, and their children will qualify for a major state-funded scholarship under new laws the governor signed this week.
Gov. Kevin Stitt approved House Bill 1087 on Tuesday to extend the teacher salary schedule, which grants annual incremental pay raises, up to 35 years. The bill also adds one day to the minimum length of an Oklahoma school year, stretching it to 181 instructional days in public schools.
HB 1727, which Stitt also signed Tuesday, opens the Oklahoma's Promise college scholarship to the children of classroom teachers with at least 10 years of experience. Oklahoma's Promise pays an amount equal to full resident tuition at a public college or university.
The state's largest teacher union, the Oklahoma Education Association, celebrated both bills as ways to retain veteran educators.
Offering scholarship funds to educators' children is a 'powerful step for Oklahoma valuing its teachers and their households,' OEA President Cari Elledge said.
'By granting Oklahoma's Promise Scholarship to children of certified educators with at least a decade of service, this bill eases the college burden on our families while incentivizing long-term commitment to our schools,' Elledge, a former Norman teacher, said. 'OEA championed this from committee rooms to the governor's desk because addressing the educator shortage requires meaningful investment.'
The governor also signed a bill offering grants to school districts that are trying to boost the pipeline of new teachers.
Senate Bill 235 offers matching funds to districts that have established Grow Your Own Educator programs, which give undergraduate college tuition assistance or loan repayment to aspiring teachers.
The bill's author, Sen. Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, said lawmakers set aside $5 million for these grants.
Pugh, who leads the Senate Education Committee, said the slate of school-focused bills the Legislature passed this year are 'building a stronger foundation for Oklahoma's future.'
'Each of these measures reflects our commitment to supporting students, empowering teachers and ensuring every child in our state has access to a high-quality education,' Pugh said in a statement.
Multiple bills emphasizing math also passed.
Stitt approved HB 1287, giving $3 million to the University of Oklahoma for a math tutoring program assisting the lowest-performing ninth graders. Qualifying students must attend a school district with enrollment of at least 30,000 or a public charter school.
The governor also signed on Tuesday the Oklahoma Math Achievement and Proficiency Act, also known as SB 140. It's expected to cost $1 million, according to a fiscal impact estimate from legislative staff.
The new law requires public schools to screen students' math proficiency three times a year in grades 2-5. Schools must create a math intervention plan for children who score below their grade level and could receive extra funds dedicated for these students. Struggling students also must be screened for dyscalculia, a learning disability affecting comprehension of arithmetic.
Those who screen above their grade level in math must be offered advanced learning opportunities.
'Senate Bill 140 is a critical step forward in improving math outcomes across our state,' the bill's author, Sen. Ally Seifried, R-Claremore, said. 'By identifying students who need additional help or more advanced instruction, they will now have personalized support to ensure every child can succeed.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 days ago
- Fox News
Federal court rejects challenge to Oklahoma law banning gender transition treatment for minors
A federal appeals court upheld an Oklahoma law banning gender transition medical treatment for minors. The law, Senate Bill 613, makes it a felony for health care workers to provide gender transition treatment such as puberty-blocking drugs and hormones to a minor. The bill was passed by the state's Republican-controlled legislature and signed into law by GOP Gov. Kevin Stitt in 2023. Five families of transgender children and a physician challenged the state's law, arguing it violated their constitutional rights. The plaintiffs, represented by Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Oklahoma, argued that lawmakers approved the law with discriminatory intent, pointing to a 2022 law that froze pandemic relief funding for the hospital system OU Health unless Oklahoma Children's Hospital halted gender transition treatment for minors. A federal judge declined to block the law from taking effect in 2023, writing that transgender medical care for children is "an area in which medical and policy debate is unfolding" and the state "can rationally take the side of caution before permitting irreversible medical treatments of its children." The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld a similar Tennessee ban on transgender-related treatment, a ruling relied upon when the 10th Circuit issued its ruling in Oklahoma on Wednesday, when a three-judge panel ruled unanimously that Oklahoma's law is constitutional. The laws in Tennessee and Oklahoma "are functionally indistinguishable," Circuit Judge Joel M. Carson, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote in the order. The order says Oklahoma's law does not violate the Constitution and was not intended to discriminate against transgender children. "We recognize the importance of this issue to all involved," Carson wrote. "But this remains a novel issue with disagreement on how to assure children's health and welfare. We will not usurp the legislature's judgment when it engages in 'earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality, and practicality' of gender transition procedures for minors." "While we respect that Plaintiffs disagree with the legislature's assessment of such procedures' risks, that alone does not invalidate a democratically enacted law on rational-basis grounds," the judge added. Oklahoma's Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond praised the court's ruling in a post on social media. "For years, radical left activists pushed the lie of 'gender transition' procedures for minors. The truth is much simpler: there is no such thing," he wrote Thursday on X. "Today, here in Oklahoma, we celebrate a new decision from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals that recognizes this truth and protects our children. I am proud to have fought this battle and won. This is a victory for our children, for our Constitution, and for common sense." Attorneys for the plaintiffs, on the other hand, described Wednesday's ruling as "a devastating outcome for transgender youth and their families across Oklahoma and another tragic result of the Supreme Court's errant and harmful ruling" in the Tennessee case. "Oklahoma's ban is openly discriminatory and provably harmful to the transgender youth of this state, putting political dogma above parents, their children, and their family doctors," the attorneys said in a joint statement. "While we and our clients consider our next steps, we want all transgender people and their families across Oklahoma to know we will never stop fighting for the future they deserve and their freedom to be themselves."
Epoch Times
04-08-2025
- Epoch Times
Oklahoma Governor Details Steps to Secure State Against CCP Influence
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt said China has been trying to exert influence at the state level across the United States, which he has rejected while also creating his own international strategy to avoid reliance on China-made imports. 'They're going to the states now because Congress is so dysfunctional. It's so political. It's so partisan that they're literally coming directly to the states,' Stitt said in an interview with ' American Thought Leaders ' that aired on Aug. 1.
Yahoo
28-07-2025
- Yahoo
Oklahoma's education department wants to hide resignation letters. They've always been public.
State Superintendent Ryan Walters' name plate and gavel sit on the meeting table of the Oklahoma State Board of Education on May 23, 2024, in Oklahoma City. (Photo by Nuria Martinez-Keel/Oklahoma Voice) Ryan Walters and his merry band of administrative leaders should not be operating the State Department of Education like their own private fiefdom, oblivious to the laws that govern public access. Yet our state superintendent and those leaders he's entrusted to serve us appear to be happily doing just that in denying access to one of the most basic records that's long been released through our state's Open Records Act — resignation letters. And Attorney General Gentner Drummond's office, which is supposed to help enforce open records laws, has strangely — and inexplicably — been sitting on the sidelines like a stupified observer as this continues to play out. Walters has seen a number of senior employees exit stage left for greener pastures. He also leads an agency whose administrators have proven that they're not the strongest champions of laws that govern public access. After all, they lost a lawsuit that accused agency leaders of violating First Amendment rights related to public meeting access and face another that contends the Education Department is not complying with the Open Records Act. The latest dustup involves a request Oklahoma Voice filed earlier this year seeking access to all employee resignation letters submitted since Jan. 1. The agency issued a blanket denial, citing a provision of law that it claims bars the release to protect employee privacy and one that allows public bodies to keep documents private if they pertain to an internal personnel investigation. As far as we can tell, there's no indication that any of these employees are subject to any investigation, and for any state agency to inaccurately cite a provision of law inferring such would be reckless and potentially damaging to someone's reputation. One would also hope that there weren't personnel investigations into multiple high-level employees because that would indicate Walters' is making really bad hires. Normally resignation letters are as dry as parched earth, and pretty much every other state agency I can think of typically releases them without issue. Even the State Department of Education used to do so without batting an eye. I've never seen a blanket denial like this. That's why it's so odd that the Department of Education has chosen this hill to die on, and that Drummond's office, which lawmakers have empowered to help the public fight for open records access, has sat idly by, seemingly wringing its hands. A recently leaked scathing resignation letter may shine some light on why the Education Department is so reluctant to release them. The Education Department's former chief compliance officer wrote in her resignation letter that the agency has 'fundamental operational issues' and 'senior leadership attitudes' that will need to be addressed in order to 'achieve the outcomes that Oklahoma students deserve.' She also leveled accusations of 'manipulation of school accreditation and deleting employee review processes,' but did not include specifics. In short, the letter portrays a very unflattering portrait of the inner workings of an agency that receives over $3.8 billion in annual state appropriations and raises questions about its operational integrity. That's something the public deserves to know. And it's why the access to resignation letters should be an undisputed right. Our state is one that believes — or at least used to — that 'people are vested with the inherent right to know and be fully informed about their government.' And that access to government records helps Oklahomans 'efficiently and intelligently exercise their inherent political power.' That's straight from the state's Open Records Act. It's also why Oklahoma agencies have done the right thing and provided resignation letters without argument, particularly for high-ranking officials. It boggles the mind that the Attorney General's Office, which is supposed to have a public records ombudsman to fight for public access, has refused to intervene in this issue and insist upon their release. It's even stranger because last year, Drummond took a swipe at Walters following what he called an 'alarming number of complaints' of his agency's poor compliance with the state's records act and sent a sign he wasn't going to stand for it. But ahead of the publication of our story highlighting our records battle, the Attorney General's Office and its 'public access counselor' refused to comment or address our complaint because of a pending lawsuit involving a single resignation letter. I could see not releasing a single letter that's subject to litigation, but to allow an agency to issue a blanket denial to withhold all undisputed ones is nuts. There seems to be no reason Drummond couldn't have advocated to release the rest. Unless, that is, his office wants to keep our government shrouded in secrecy or he doesn't believe the public should view resignation letters written by public employees. The fight over resignation letters at the state Department of Education proves why lawmakers need to further strengthen public access laws, not water them down. If there's any lingering doubt that these are public, maybe they need to spell it out. This also highlights how critical strong advocacy from the Attorney General's Office is in this realm. Because it's never a good idea to give a government bureaucrat absolute power to determine if the public is entitled to records. In the wrong hands that power can lead to unintended consequences, making government less accountable and accessible to the very people it is supposed to serve. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
