Israel would have killed Khamenei if opportunity arose, says Defence Minister Katz
JERUSALEM, June 27 — Defence Minister Israel Katz told media that Israel would have killed Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the war between the two countries if the opportunity had presented itself.
'If he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' Katz told Israel's public radio station Kan Thursday evening, adding that the military had 'searched a lot'.
'Khamenei understood this, went very deep underground, broke off contact with the commanders... so in the end it wasn't realistic,' Katz told Kan.
He told Israeli television Channel 13 Thursday that Israel would cease its assassination attempts because 'there is a difference between before the ceasefire and after the ceasefire'.
Katz had said during the war that Khamenei 'can no longer be allowed to exist', just days after reports that Washington vetoed Israeli plans to assassinate him.
But on Kan, Katz advised Khamenei to remain inside a bunker.
'He should learn from the late Nasrallah, who sat for a long time deep in the bunker', he said, referring to Lebanese militant group Hezbollah's former leader Hassan Nasrallah, who Israel killed in a Beirut air strike in September 2024.
The movements of the supreme leader, who has not left Iran since he took power, are subject to the tightest security and secrecy.
Katz said Thursday that Israel maintained its aerial superiority over Iran and that it was ready to strike again.
'We won't let Iran develop nuclear weapons and threaten (Israel) with long-range missiles', he said.
In his Channel 12 interview, Katz admitted that Israel does not know the location of all of Iran's enriched uranium, but that its air strikes had destroyed the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment capabilities.
'The material itself was not something that was supposed to be neutralised,' he said of the enriched uranium.
The impact of Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme has been a subject to debate.
A leaked US intelligence assessment estimated the programme to have set Iran back a few months, while Katz and other Israeli and US public figures said the damage would take years to rebuild.
Israel and Iran each claimed victory in a 12-day war that ended with a ceasefire on June 24.
The war erupted on June 13 when Israel launched a bombing campaign that it said aimed to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon — an ambition Iran has consistently denied. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Israel would have killed Iran's Khamenei if given chance: minister
JERUSALEM: Defence Minister Israel Katz told media that Israel would have killed Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during the war between the two countries if the opportunity had presented itself. 'If he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' Katz told Israel's public radio station Kan Thursday evening, adding that the military had 'searched a lot'. 'Khamenei understood this, went very deep underground, broke off contact with the commanders... so in the end it wasn't realistic,' Katz told Kan. He told Israeli television Channel 13 Thursday that Israel would cease its assassination attempts because 'there is a difference between before the ceasefire and after the ceasefire'. Katz had said during the war that Khamenei 'can no longer be allowed to exist', just days after reports that Washington vetoed Israeli plans to assassinate him. But on Kan, Katz advised Khamenei to remain inside a bunker. 'He should learn from the late Nasrallah, who sat for a long time deep in the bunker', he said, referring to Lebanese militant group Hezbollah's former leader Hassan Nasrallah, who Israel killed in a Beirut air strike in September 2024. The movements of the supreme leader, who has not left Iran since he took power, are subject to the tightest security and secrecy. Katz said Thursday that Israel maintained its aerial superiority over Iran and that it was ready to strike again. 'We won't let Iran develop nuclear weapons and threaten (Israel) with long-range missiles', he said. In his Channel 12 interview, Katz admitted that Israel does not know the location of all of Iran's enriched uranium, but that its air strikes had destroyed the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment capabilities. 'The material itself was not something that was supposed to be neutralised,' he said of the enriched uranium. The impact of Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme has been a subject to debate. A leaked US intelligence assessment estimated the programme to have set Iran back a few months, while Katz and other Israeli and US public figures said the damage would take years to rebuild. Israel and Iran each claimed victory in a 12-day war that ended with a ceasefire on June 24. The war erupted on June 13 when Israel launched a bombing campaign that it said aimed to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon -- an ambition Iran has consistently denied.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Israel-Iran was was a wake-up call for Asia's dependence on Middle East oil
JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP): Asia's dependence on Middle East oil and gas - and its relatively slow shift to clean energy - make it vulnerable to disruptions in shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic weakness highlighted by the war between Israel and Iran. Iran sits on the strait, which handles about 20% of shipments of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas, or LNG. Four countries - China, India, Japan and South Korea - account for 75% of those imports. Japan and South Korea face the highest risk, according to analysis by the research group Zero Carbon Analytics, followed by India and China. All have been slow to scale up use of renewable energy. In 2023, renewables made up just 9% of South Korea's power mix - well below the 33% average among other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. In the same year, Japan relied more heavily on fossil fuels than any other country in the Group of Seven, or G7. A truce in the 12-day Israel-Iran war appeared to be holding, reducing the potential for trouble for now. But experts say the only way to counter lingering uncertainty is to scale back reliance on imported fossil fuels and accelerate Asia's shift to clean, domestic energy sources. "These are very real risks that countries should be alive to - and should be thinking about in terms of their energy and economic security,' said Murray Worthy, a research analyst at Zero Carbon Analytics. China and India are the biggest buyers of oil and LNG passing through the potential chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz, but Japan and South Korea are more vulnerable. Japan depends on imported fossil fuels for 87% of its total energy use and South Korea imports 81%. China relies on only 20% and India 35%, according to Ember, an independent global energy think tank that promotes clean energy. "When you bring that together - the share of energy coming through the strait and how much oil and gas they rely on - that's where you see Japan really rise to the top in terms of vulnerability,' said Worthy. Three-quarters of Japan's oil imports and more than 70% of South Korea's oil imports - along with a fifth of its LNG - pass through the strait, said Sam Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Both countries have focused more on diversifying fossil fuel sources than on shifting to clean energy. Japan still plans to get 30-40% of its energy from fossil fuels by 2040. It's building new LNG plants and replacing old ones. South Korea plans to get 25.1% of its electricity from LNG by 2030, down from 28% today, and reduce it further to 10.6% by 2038. To meet their 2050 targets for net-zero carbon emissions, both countries must dramatically ramp up use of solar and wind power. That means adding about 9 gigawatts of solar power each year through 2030, according to the thinktank Agora Energiewende. Japan also needs an extra 5 gigawatts of wind annually, and South Korea about 6 gigawatts. Japan's energy policies are inconsistent. It still subsidizes gasoline and diesel, aims to increase its LNG imports and supports oil and gas projects overseas. Offshore wind is hampered by regulatory barriers. Japan has climate goals, but hasn't set firm deadlines for cutting power industry emissions. "Has Japan done enough? No, they haven't. And what they do is not really the best,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, citing Japan's program to increase use of hydrogen fuel made from natural gas. South Korea's low electricity rates hinder the profitability of solar and wind projects, discouraging investment, a "key factor' limiting renewables, said Kwanghee Yeom of Agora Energiewende. He said fair pricing, stronger policy support and other reforms would help speed up adoption of clean energy. China and India have moved to shield themselves from shocks from changing global energy prices or trade disruptions. China led global growth in wind and solar in 2024, with generating capacity rising 45% and 18%, respectively. It has also boosted domestic gas output even as its reserves have dwindled. By making more electricity at home from clean sources and producing more gas domestically, China has managed to reduce imports of LNG, though it still is the world's largest oil importer, with about half of the more than 11 million barrels per day that it brings in coming from the Middle East. Russia and Malaysia are other major suppliers. India relies heavily on coal and aims to boost coal production by around 42% from now to 2030. But its use of renewables is growing faster, with 30 additional gigawatts of clean power coming online last year, enough to power nearly 18 million Indian homes. By diversifying its suppliers with more imports from the U.S., Russia and other countries in the Middle East, it has somewhat reduced its risk, said Vibhuti Garg of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. "But India still needs a huge push on renewables if it wants to be truly energy secure,' she said. A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could affect other Asian countries, and building up their renewable power generating capacity will be a "crucial hedge' against the volatility intrinsic to importing oil and gas, said Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis Southeast Asia has become a net oil importer as demand in Malaysia and Indonesia has outstripped supplies, according to the Asean Centre for Energy in Jakarta, Indonesia. The 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations still exports more LNG than it imports due to production by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Myanmar. But rising demand means the region will become a net LNG importer by 2032, according to consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. Use of renewable energy is not keeping up with rising demand and production of oil and gas is faltering as older fields run dry. The International Energy Agency has warned that Asean's oil import costs could rise from $130 billion in 2024 to over $200 billion by 2050 if stronger clean energy policies are not enacted. "Clean energy is not just an imperative for the climate - it's an imperative for national energy security,' said Reynolds. -- The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Israeli court denies Netanyahu's request to delay corruption trial, despite Trump's push for cancellation
JERUSALEM, June 27 — An Israeli court on Friday rejected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, after US President Donald Trump said the case should be cancelled. Netanyahu's lawyer on Thursday asked the court to excuse the leader from hearings over the next two weeks, saying he needed to concentrate on 'security issues' after Israel's 12-day war with Iran. The Jerusalem district court said in a judgement published online that 'in its current form (his request) does not provide a basis or detailed justification for the cancellation of the hearings'. Trump on Wednesday described the case against Netanyahu as a 'witch hunt', saying the trial 'should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero'. Netanyahu has thanked Trump for his support in Israel's brief war against Iran, which ended with a ceasefire on June 24. Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and his supporters have described the long-running trial as politically motivated. In a first case, he and his wife, Sara, are accused of accepting more than US$260,000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. During his current term since late 2022, Netanyahu's government has proposed a series of far-reaching judicial reforms that critics say were designed to weaken the courts. Netanyahu has requested multiple postponements in the trial since it began in May 2020, citing the war in Gaza which started in 2023, later fighting in Lebanon and this month the conflict with Iran. — AFP
