Gender row nurse ‘wanted to post bacon through mosque letterbox', tribunal told
She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation.
On Monday, the tribunal also heard that Ms Peggie's legal team were contacted at the weekend by a witness who shared her objections over sharing a changing room with Dr Upton and 'found the courage to come forward'. The team had also been contacted by another potential witness.
Ms Peggie's barrister, Naomi Cunningham, described the case as 'extraordinary', and 'the first case in which the practical working out of the implications of For Women Scotland judgment will have to be addressed in relation to single-sex spaces'.
She said that the way Ms Peggie had been treated by NHS Fife had 'frightened off' other potential witnesses who shared her views, and that the nurse 'has been the only one to find the courage to speak up' until a new witness came forward.
Ms Cunningham said: 'The truth is, we have known of many others. Ms Peggie's evidence is … lots of people agree. The difficulty is persuading anyone to come forward and tell the tribunal. That difficulty is because of the price of speaking up on these issues in NHS Fife.'
She added: 'To this point she has been the single individual; there have been many, but she has been the only one to find the courage to speak up.'
On Monday, emergency nurse practitioner Fiona Wishart, who has worked for NHS Fife for 41 years, told the tribunal she heard Ms Peggie making 'derogatory' remarks about Dr Upton at a lunch on September 4 2023, and making 'offensive' comments about a mosque being built in the town, the tribunal heard.
Ms Wishart said: 'I was at a lunch with fellow colleagues. Sandie had made remarks about Beth at the lunch, derogatory remarks.'
She said she had forgotten details but was told the comments were 'weirdo', 'freak' and 'it', although she also said those terms were not used at the lunch, the tribunal heard.
Ms Wishart said: 'I've heard her make derogatory remarks regarding people of other ethnic origins and people of other sexual orientations… referring to people as 'immigrants who need to go back to their own country', and 'come over here to steal our jobs'.
'These are opinions that don't align with mine.'
Ms Wishart said that at the same lunch, Ms Peggie had commented on a new mosque being built in Fife, and 'made reference to the fact she had a good mind to post bacon through their letterbox', the tribunal heard.
Ms Wishart added: 'I specifically remember it because I found it offensive.'
Counsel for both respondents, Jane Russell KC, said: 'When she said that, how did others respond?'
Ms Wishart said: 'I can't remember, but she made derogatory remarks about Beth, and my colleague that was at the lunch, Lindsey Nicoll, responded, but I cant remember what she said.'
Ms Russell asked: 'Did it go beyond 'weirdo', 'freak', and 'it'?'
The witness said: 'No, I don't think so.'
The tribunal continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
For Woman Scotland intervene in Sandie Peggie tribunal
For Women Scotland (FWS), the group responsible the landmark ruling in April, warned the employment tribunal's judgment could be open to "appeal on any point where Dr Upton's sex is relevant". He made the remarks while overseeing evidence in the tribunal dispute centred around transgender doctor Dr Beth Upton's use of the female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Dundee. During the tribunal, NHS Fife's lawyer Jane Russell KC repeatedly objected to Dr Upton being referred to as a "man" by Ms Peggie's barrister Naomi Cunningham. She described the FWS judgment - which ruled that the terms "sex", "man" and "woman" in the 2010 Equality Act referred to biological sex - as an "abstract case" that only related to the representation of public boards in Scotland. Ms Russell later told the tribunal that "Dr Upton was not a man, she is a transwoman". Ms Peggie's barrister Ms Cunningham referenced the FWS judgment, stating that "legally speaking, a transwoman is a man". Judge Kemp then intervened, stating on July 23: "I think that's a contentious matter, what exactly For Women Scotland says and what it means. "I think it would be appropriate to put this on a hypothesis that you have outlined - on the hypothesis of what you say is correct in law. "That would be appropriate. But until we have had the opportunity of hearing all the submissions and making our decisions on that, this is a point in dispute." Following that exchange, FWS asked for permission to intervene in the employment tribunal. Read more: Clerks from the Dundee Tribunal Hearing Centre wrote to the organisation on Thursday to state neither legal teams objected to the intervention. The submission from FWS's Trina Budge, Marion Calder and Susan Smith, said Ms Russell KC was "simply not factually correct", adding the organisation was "surprised" there was no correction by the tribunal. FWS then condemned the comments by the judge, adding: "This should not be a point in dispute by the court, nor regarded as contentious or a hypothesis to be tested." The organisation said it was "beyond doubt" that the Supreme Court ruled that the term woman was linked to biological sex. The submission said: "It is simply not a stateable argument for Ms Russell to propose that For Women Scotland does not say that Dr Upton is a man. "It may well be a matter for the court to decide whether the Supreme Court judgment has any applicability to the case in hand, but it is not open for Ms Russell, or the tribunal, to contest the findings of the apex court. "We are concerned about two things, firstly that closing submissions may attempt to re-litigate our case and debate the definitions of "sex", "woman", and "man" in the Equality Act, when these are settled matters in law. "And secondly, that if the tribunal does not make it clear to the parties (and the viewing public) that "what exactly For Women Scotland says" is in fact clear and settled in law and not "contentious", "a hypothesis" or "in dispute" then it may render the judgment open to appeal on any point where Dr Upton's sex is relevant." Read more: On Thursday, tribunal clerks wrote to FWS, stating: "The tribunal is not in a position to comment on the matters you raise until all submissions have been made by the parties." The tribunal resumes for oral submissions on September 1 and 2, with both legal teams appearing in person in Dundee. However, it is unlikely a decision will be made on the day, with the judge expected to take a significant period of time to consider the evidence. It could be until December before a judgment is declared. FWS's Supreme Court appealed the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 which aimed to increase the representation of women on public boards. The legislation stated a trans woman with a Gender Recognition Certificate should be treated as a woman. However, the ruling has had significant ramifications on UK-wide policy. The guidance is currently being considered by governments, while the Equality Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said in May that 'trans woman (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men's facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities'. Last week, the Museum Galleries Scotland, which supports 455 non-national museums and is Scottish Government-funded, said these proposals could force some museums to close or leave trans people with no facilities.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The story of NHS Fife's legal fees in Sandie Peggie tribunal
However, the case is complex and NHS Fife do not actually pay the full costs. The taxpayers most likely will. Shared legal team Crucially, NHS Fife is sharing a legal team with Dr Upton, the transgender medic at the forefront of the case. This may sound odd but it is actually standard in NHS legal cases. It is argued that the staff member may only have become exposed to any risk of liability after being sued while doing their job. However, NHS Fife must weigh up the risks in sharing a legal team, including whether there could be any "conflicts of interest". Ms Peggie is suing her employer and Dr Upton after she objected to the trans medic's use of the female changing room on Christmas Eve in 2023 at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. She also made reference to the situation being similar to men being housed in the female prison estate. The nurse was placed on special leave in December 2023 and suspended in January 2024. She was cleared of all misconduct allegations on July 15 2025, including two patient safety complaints. NHS Fife legal team It is important to note that health boards in Scotland do not directly employ their own solicitors. Solicitors in the Central Legal Office (CLO) act exclusively for the NHS. However, the CLO then appointed Jane Russell KC, from the Essex Court of Chambers in London, to represent the case in court. Silks - or King's Counsel (KC) barristers - typically charge between £500 and £1,500 per hour. Given Ms Russell had been at Dundee Tribunal Hearing Centre over 10 days from July 16, with court sitting approximately between 10am and 4pm each day, the recent sessions could have cost the health board in the region of £30,000. However, NHS Fife is a member of the Clinical Negligence and Other Risks Indemnity Scheme (CNORIS). This is a pooling arrangement between Scottish health boards and means NHS Fife will only be required to meet the first £25,000 of the cost. The remaining bill is covered by the scheme, which is paid for through the Scottish Government's Health and Social Care Directorate that underwrites the scheme. Costs so far As of June 30, NHS Fife have accrued £258,831.31 in legal costs associated with the Sandie Peggie case. But the costs are undoubtably set to rise. Research by Murray Blackburn Mackenzie policy collective states: "The decisions which have driven the cost of this case rest formally with NHS Fife, but in practice the CLO also appears to be a relevant decision-maker of some sort, but to what extent and with what oversight from its own senior management, is very difficult to say. "Perhaps the only place it will ever be possible to unpick the full story of who decided what, when and how, will be in front of a parliamentary committee, with the questions asked direct of senior staff and board members for NHS Fife, National Services Scotland and the Scottish Government itself." In a statement published on July 18, NHS Fife said: "As of 30 June 2025, £258,831.31 in legal costs have been recorded as expenditure related to the legal services associated with this case. "NHS Fife is liable for the first £25,000 of costs associated with defending the case." Earlier this year, NHS Fife did not reveal the legal costs, stating that the health board "believed that it did not hold the figures requested as the legal fees were managed through the Central Legal Office (CLO) and National Services Scotland (NSS) who administered the CNORIS Indemnity scheme". Following criticism from the Scottish Information Commissioner, NHS Fife revealed the costs amounted to £220,465.93 up to May 2025.
Daily Record
12 hours ago
- Daily Record
Anas Sarwar says racist posts in Sandie Peggie tribunal case are 'horrific'
The Scottish Labour addressed the row during a tip to President Trump's golf course in Aberdeenshire this week. Anas Sarwar has said racist posts shared by a nurse in a high profile tribunal were 'horrific'. The Scottish Labour leader also said remarks about bacon and a mosque allegedly said by Sandie Peggie were 'unacceptable'. The n urse was suspended by NHS Fife after she complained about having to share a changing room with trans medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy on Christmas Eve in 2023. She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, and cited concerns about 'patient care'. Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief and indirect discrimination. The tribunal has heard claims Peggie told colleagues she wanted to post bacon through the letterbox of a local mosque. Another colleague alleged Peggie shared racist jokes in a WhatsApp chat about the flooding that killed thousands in Pakistan in 2022. In evidence this week, Peggie denied the bacon remark and said the 'distasteful' jokes about the floods were sent in "dark humour" to friends. During a trip to President Trump's golf course in Aberdeenshire on Tuesday, Sarwar said: 'If what's been reported is correct then it is unacceptable and it's horrific and we should call it out as such.' He added: 'But I think it's important to stress that whatever people have agreements or disagreements on, individual things said by any individual, the broader kind of conversation around making sure that our Scottish Government, our health boards, are complying with the Equality Act, is still important and isn't negated. But on those individual comments, of course, completely unacceptable.' Sarwar said that speaking out against Islamophobia, anti-semitism, misogyny and homophobia cannot just be left to the communities most impacted. He added: 'So those particular comments are horrific. As you would expect, I don't find them acceptable. And so we should call it out as such.'
