
Campaigners launch legal challenge over new Mull school
Campaigners on the Isle of Mull have launched a legal challenge over the local authority's decision on where to build a new school.Argyll and Bute Council decided earlier this year to build a new £43m school campus close to the current high school in Tobermory.Many parents wanted a more central location so that pupils in the south of the island would no longer have to travel by ferry to Oban for schooling and stay in hostels during the week.Campaigners say they felt they had "no choice" and have now hired a layer to take the case to a judicial review at the Court of Session.
A judicial review is a type of legal case where a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public authority.Argyll and Bute council have been approached for comment.
Tracy Mayo, chairwoman of the Mull Campus Working Group, told BBC Scotland News: "This is about all our children - it affects the whole of Mull and its future sustainability and its unique island way of life."When we first learnt the terms of the bid for funding in August 2024, we immediately raised our concerns the offer didn't make sense - it seemed irrational."How we define our community appears to differ from that of our council. We have been highlighting flaws in the process for many years as have other communities."Effective partnership working fosters trust and mutual trust. We have stated all the way through this we want to work with our council but not like this."It has taken a huge amount of work to get this far. Volunteers have lost huge swathe of family time, our families have been very patient and supportive and so has the amazing community of Mull."
Mull Campus project
The location of the island's only high school has long been a source of division on Mull.Pupils living in the north go to the school in Tobermory, but the commute is more than 90 minutes for those living in the south, and most travel to Oban on the mainland, staying in hostels during the week.Funding was secured in 2023 to build a new secondary school on the Isle of Mull to replace the depilated Tobermory High School.A number of sites where the new school could be built were identified across the island.
Campaigners argued for a new secondary school to be built in a more central location such as Craignure, while keeping a primary school in Tobermory.But the council said splitting the campus would cost the authority an extra £12m, and that any further delay could jeopardise promised Scottish government funding.Ultimately councillors voted to go ahead with building the new school in the Island's main town of Tobermory, near to the existing school.Campaigners launched a petition and held protests against the decision, and the issue has been debated at Holyrood.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
30 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections
John Swinney said it was a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform UK; some commentators claimed Reform might just sneak it; and Labour was tipped to finish third. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But when the votes were counted in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, it was Labour who emerged as the winners with a majority of 602, overturning the SNP's majority of more than 4,500 in 2021 - a swing of 7.42 per cent from the SNP to Labour. Amid poor poll ratings,and after the party's humiliation in last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, where it lost the seat to Reform, this was a major boost for Labour. Labour's Davy Russell celebrates with Anas Sarwar, Jackie Ballie and Monica Lennon after winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Picture: Jeff| Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And with the Scottish Parliament elections less than a year away, it prompts a rethink of the assumption that the SNP is on course for a fifth term in power at Holyrood. Labour's landslide general election victory last July encouraged hopes that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar could oust John Swinney as First Minister and end nearly two decades of SNP rule next May. But a series of unpopular decisions by the new Labour government at Westminster, including means-testing winter fuel payments, led to plummeting poll figures and seemed to put paid to the party's chances in Scotland. Reacting to the Hamitlon result, Mr Sarwar claimed it showed a rejection of the SNP because of its record in Government, as well as a rejection of Nigel Farage and Reform. But he also acknowledged people wanted the UK Labour government to 'go further and faster in making a difference to people's lives'. The SNP's continuing poll lead after18 years in government cannot be easily dismissed and Reform's 26 per cent of the vote shows it is a serious threat, but Labour nevertheless has good reason to be heartened by the Hamilton victory. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Commentators have warned against reading too much into the win and rightly point out the parties' performances in Hamilton were roughly in line with Scotland-wide polling which shows SNP support 15 points down on the 2021 Holyrood election and Labour support two points down. But the fact remains that Labour has won a fiercely-fought by-election which they were widely expected to lose badly and have taken a seat from the SNP who were seen as more or less certain victors next year. And that gives Labour a new momentum in their drive to win power at Holyrood.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Jamie's Dyslexia Revolution on Ch4: All fired up like an angry Aga, chef Jamie gave the minister a roasting
Jamie's Dyslexia Revolution (Ch4) Has Radio 4's Amol Rajan been coaching Jamie Oliver on how to grill politicians? When the chef confronted Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson at the Houses of Parliament, she barely got a chance to finish a sentence. All fired up like an angry Aga oven, Jamie repeatedly cut her off. Launching his campaign to help schoolchildren with reading difficulties, on Jamie's Dyslexia Revolution, he refused to let her brush him aside with bland excuses. 'We're still quite a relatively new government,' she began, 'and I think we have a real opportunity to make a difference here . . .' and on she waffled with the kind of vacuous verbiage politicians can spout in their sleep. Jamie wasn't having any of it. 'Will we be seeing some radical strategic restructuring of teacher training?' he demanded. Ms Phillipson promised 'longer-term reform', and Jamie jumped on that: 'What does that mean? Like three, four, ten years?' By now, the secretary of state was starting to wriggle like a schoolgirl who realises she's left her homework on the bus. Things got worse when she claimed that children were now screened for dyslexia at eight years old: 'I don't believe that's statutory for every child,' Jamie snapped. The cheeky cook with his boisterous patter and a saucy wink for the grannies was nowhere to be seen. Our Bridget got well and truly bish-bash-boshed. After the confrontation, Jamie joined parents of dyslexic children outside the Palace of Westminster, before delivering a rousing pep talk. 'Write to your MP,' he urged. 'We want some fundamental change to make our schools truly inclusive and make every child count.' It was a triumphant ending to an hour that until then had often meandered and sometimes dragged. There was little explanation of what dyslexia is, just vague talk of how 'words almost look upside-down and backwards, blurry or moved around'. To illustrate this, a few misspelled captions were projected onto a screen — though, since these were not difficult to read, it had the false effect of making dyslexia appear a trivial problem. We were repeatedly told that up to 15 per cent of British children and half of inmates in UK prisons are dyslexic. But Jamie had no clear ideas on how to address this — only that something needed to be done. What suggestions he did have, such as printing text on coloured paper, were left unexplored. His indignation at the way children with dyslexia are frequently left to flounder in lessons was heartfelt — his own schooldays were wretched, and he still struggles with reading. Despite his claim that 'the chips on my shoulder about education are gone,' he clearly still nurses a furious indignation at the way he was treated. Perhaps that anger has fuelled his successful career. If he really expects Bridget Phillipson to improve standards of education, he's going to be disappointed — but if he wants to show parents and children with dyslexia that self-belief beats book-learning, he's made a great start.


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Indian students reconsider US plans amid visa uncertainties
When 26-year-old Umar Sofi received his acceptance letter from Columbia University's School of Journalism, he thought the hardest part of his journey was over. After trying for three years, Mr Sofi had finally been admitted to his dream university and even secured a partial scholarship. He quit his job in anticipation of the big move. But on 27 May, when the US suddenly paused student visa appointments, the ground slipped from beneath his feet."I was numb. I could not process what had happened," Mr Sofi, who lives in Indian-administered Kashmir, told the BBC. Some 2,000km (1,242 miles) away in Mumbai, 17-year-old Samita Garg (name changed on request) went through a similar ordeal. A day after she was accepted into a top US university to study biochemistry - her first step towards becoming a dermatologist - the US embassy halted student visa appointments."It is scary and stressful," Ms Garg told the BBC over the phone. "It feels like I've been left in the lurch, not knowing when this will end."Both Mr Sofi and Ms Garg now have only a few weeks to secure their visas before the academic year begins in August, but little clarity on whether they can go ahead with their plans. Last month President Donald Trump's administration asked US embassies across the world to stop scheduling appointments for student visas and expand social media vetting of wider move followed a crackdown on America's elite universities like Harvard, which Trump accused of being too liberal and of not doing enough to combat antisemitism. Trump's decisions have had far-reaching repercussions in India, which sends more international students to the US than any other country. Over the last month, the BBC spoke with at least 20 students at various stages of their application process, all of whom echoed deep anxieties about their futures. Most chose to remain anonymous, fearing retribution from the US government and worried that speaking out now could hurt their chances of obtaining a visa, or renewing it. Trump's battle on international students explained... in 70 secondsStudents say they 'regret' applying to US universities after visa changesTrump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard More than 1.1 million international students were enrolled in US colleges in the 2023-24 school year, according to Open Doors, an organisation that collects data on foreign students. Nearly a third of them, or more than 330,000, were from consultants report that applications to US universities for the upcoming autumn semester have dropped by at least 30% because of the uncertainty. "Their biggest fear is safety - what if their visas are rejected or they're deported mid-term?" said Nikhil Chopra, founder of TC Global, an international education say many students are now either deferring their plans or switching to countries perceived to be more "stable" like the UK, Germany, Ireland and Australia. Prema Unni (name changed on request) was accepted into three US universities for a master's in data analytics. But instead of preparing for the move, he decided to forgo the opportunity altogether."There's uncertainty at every step - first the visa, then restrictions on internships and part-time work, and the constant surveillance while on campus," Mr Unni said. "It is very stressful."The halt on visa interviews is the latest in a series of policies tightening immigration rules for students. A few weeks ago, the US warned that students who drop out or miss classes without proper notification risk having their visas revoked, and could be barred from future decisions have come around the time of the year when 70% of student visas are issued, or renewed, sparking great unease among Indian students. "No student wants to go to a country and then have the visa policy suddenly change," Chris R Glass, a professor at Boston College told the BBC. "They need stability and options." The uncertainty will have long-term consequences - both for the aspirations of Indian students, but also for the US's future as a coveted higher education hub - says Prof Glass. Foreign student enrolment in US universities was slowing even before Trump's latest salvo. According to The Indian Express newspaper, the US denied 41% of student visa applications between the fiscal years 2023 and 2024, the highest rejection rate in a decade, and nearly doubling from from Student and Exchange Visitor Information Systems (SEVIS), which tracks foreign students' compliance with their visas, showed a nearly 10% drop in international student enrolments as of March this year compared with the same period in 2024. International students are a financial lifeline for many US colleges, especially regional and state universities offering STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) and other master's programmes. These students pay significantly higher tuition fees than US citizens. In the 2023–24 academic year alone, foreign students contributed $43.8bn to the US economy, according to Nafsa, an association of International educators. They also supported over 375,000 jobs. "This really isn't about a short-term disruption of tuition revenue. This is about a long-term rupture in a strategic relationship that benefits both countries," Prof Glass said. For decades the brightest Indian students have depended on an American education in the absence of top quality Indian universities or a supportive research ecosystem. In turn they've helped plug a skills gap in the US. Many land highly sought-after jobs after they finish their courses - in particular, representing a significant pool of skilled professionals in sectors like biotechnology, healthcare and data science - and have even gone on to lead iconic companies. Everyone from Google's Sunder Pichai to Microsoft's Satya Nadella went to the US as students. While this has often led to concerns of a "brain-drain" from India, experts point out that India is simply unable to solve the problem of quality and quantity higher education in the immediate future to provide a domestic alternative to these say it will be a lose-lose situation for both countries, unless the cloud of uncertainty lifts soon. Additional reporting by Divya Uppal, BBC India's YouTube team, in Delhi. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.