Jugging suspect followed Caldwell County resident home from Austin bank: sheriff
The Brief
Caldwell County law enforcement investigating jugging incident
Suspect followed resident home from an Austin bank, stole cash from their car
Anyone with any information is asked to contact the Caldwell County Sheriff's Office
CALDWELL COUNTY, Texas - A jugging suspect followed a Caldwell County resident home from Austin to burglarize their car, says the sheriff's office.
What we know
The incident happened on Friday, April 25.
CCSO says that investigators determined that a 2021-2023 gray Nissan Rogue followed someone from a Wells Fargo bank in Austin to their home in the 100 block of Davis Mountain Drive, off Borchert Loop and TX 142.
After they went inside, the suspect got out of the Nissan and broke into the victim's driver-side window and stole an envelope which contained cash the victim had recently withdrawn from the bank.
The suspect is described as Black or Hispanic and was wearing shorts and a dark-colored hoodie.
What you can do
Anyone who has information on this incident, including the identity of the suspect or vehicle, is asked to contact Det. Salazar at 512-359-4519 or michael.salazar@co.caldwell.tx.us.
CCSO is also urging residents to be aware of their surroundings and report any suspicious activity to local law enforcement.
Dig deeper
"Jugging" is a form of theft where a suspect follows their intended victim from a bank to their next location and then robs them or burglarizes their vehicle or home.
The Source
Information in this report comes from the Caldwell County Sheriff's Office and previous reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
30 minutes ago
Judge dismisses murder charges against officer in shooting of unarmed man in closet
ATLANTA -- A federal judge has thrown out murder charges against a former Atlanta police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man hiding in a closet. U.S. District Judge Michael Brown ruled Tuesday that Sung Kim, a 26-year veteran of the Atlanta police department, acted in self defense and shouldn't face charges in the 2019 killing of 21-year-old Jimmy Atchison. 'The evidence for self-defense is so overwhelming it is hard to understand how Georgia could have brought these charges in the first place, much less continued with them over the two-and-a-half years since," Brown wrote in his ruling. 'Defendant's shooting of Mr. Atchison was textbook self-defense.' Kim was indicted in state court in 2022, but moved his case to federal court because he was assigned to an FBI fugitive task force when the shooting happened and thus was a federal officer. Atlanta activists have cited Atchison's death as an example of unjustified police violence against Black people. His name was often chanted by Atlanta protesters during Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020. The shooting also sparked policy changes. The Atlanta Police Department withdrew its officers from federal task forces because task force members weren't allowed to wear body cameras, meaning there is no video of Atchison's shooting. Officers returned after federal agencies began allowing local task force officers to wear cameras. Atchison was killed on Jan. 22, 2019, after Kim and other task force members tried to arrest him on charges that he stole a woman's purse and cellphone in an armed robbery. Kim retired from the Atlanta Police Department several months later. A Fulton County grand jury indicted Kim on charges that included felony murder and involuntary manslaughter. Officers forced their way into an apartment, prompting Atchison to jump out of a window, run through a second building and hide beneath a mound of clothes in a closet in another apartment. In his ruling, Brown rejected claims by a state witness that officers violated generally accepted police practices by entering the other apartment and the bedroom where Atchison was hiding. Testimony showed Kim shot Atchison in the face after Kim either yelled for Atchison to not move or show his hands. Atchison suddenly moved his hands from under the clothes. Family members say Atchison was raising his hands to surrender when Kim shot him in the face. Kim and other officers testified that they believed Atchison's move was threatening, as if he had a gun. Brown ruled that fear was reasonable and justified a shooting in self-defense. 'Nothing required defendant to hold off shooting until he literally saw a gun in Mr. Atchison's hand,' the judge wrote. 'He had a reasonable belief Mr. Atchison was armed and was going to shoot him. That is all that matters.' Nabika Atchison, Jimmy Atchison's sister, said in a statement that relatives are 'deeply disappointed' by Brown's decision, 'but with today's climate surrounding police brutality, I can't say we are surprised.' Tanya Miller, a Democratic state House member and lawyer representing the Atchison family, said the decision is a 'painful subversion of justice.' 'This decision underscores the troubling gap in accountability when local officers operate on federal task forces — a no-man's land where they can violate their own department's policies, the Constitution, take a young life, and still avoid standing trial,' Miller wrote in a text message. Don Samuel, a lawyer for Kim, said via email that the ruling was correct. 'It is hard to celebrate when a young man died," Samuel wrote, "but there is no doubt that the decision of the Fulton County DA's office to compound the tragedy by prosecuting Sung Kim was an inexcusable abuse of prosecutorial discretion." The Georgia state conference of the NAACP called on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to appeal the ruling, saying it unjustly shields officers from accountability when they kill unarmed people. 'This ruling is not just a blow to the Atchison family's pursuit of justice — it's a threat to civil rights and public safety across the nation,' said Gerald Griggs, president of the Georgia NAACP.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge dismisses murder charges against Atlanta officer in 2019 shooting of unarmed man in closet
ATLANTA (AP) — A federal judge has thrown out murder charges against a former Atlanta police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man hiding in a closet. U.S. District Judge Michael Brown ruled Tuesday that Sung Kim, a 26-year veteran of the Atlanta police department, acted in self defense and shouldn't face charges in the 2019 killing of 21-year-old Jimmy Atchison. 'The evidence for self-defense is so overwhelming it is hard to understand how Georgia could have brought these charges in the first place, much less continued with them over the two-and-a-half years since," Brown wrote in his ruling. 'Defendant's shooting of Mr. Atchison was textbook self-defense.' Kim was indicted in state court in 2022, but moved his case to federal court because he was assigned to an FBI fugitive task force when the shooting happened and thus was a federal officer. Atlanta activists have cited Atchison's death as an example of unjustified police violence against Black people. His name was often chanted by Atlanta protesters during Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020. The shooting also sparked policy changes. The Atlanta Police Department withdrew its officers from federal task forces because task force members weren't allowed to wear body cameras, meaning there is no video of Atchison's shooting. Officers returned after federal agencies began allowing local task force officers to wear cameras. Atchison was killed on Jan. 22, 2019, after Kim and other task force members tried to arrest him on charges that he stole a woman's purse and cellphone in an armed robbery. Kim retired from the Atlanta Police Department several months later. A Fulton County grand jury indicted Kim on charges that included felony murder and involuntary manslaughter. Officers forced their way into an apartment, prompting Atchison to jump out of a window, run through a second building and hide beneath a mound of clothes in a closet in another apartment. In his ruling, Brown rejected claims by a state witness that officers violated generally accepted police practices by entering the other apartment and the bedroom where Atchison was hiding. Testimony showed Kim shot Atchison in the face after Kim either yelled for Atchison to not move or show his hands. Atchison suddenly moved his hands from under the clothes. Family members say Atchison was raising his hands to surrender when Kim shot him in the face. Kim and other officers testified that they believed Atchison's move was threatening, as if he had a gun. Brown ruled that fear was reasonable and justified a shooting in self-defense. 'Nothing required defendant to hold off shooting until he literally saw a gun in Mr. Atchison's hand,' the judge wrote. 'He had a reasonable belief Mr. Atchison was armed and was going to shoot him. That is all that matters.' Nabika Atchison, Jimmy Atchison's sister, said in a statement that relatives are 'deeply disappointed' by Brown's decision, 'but with today's climate surrounding police brutality, I can't say we are surprised.' Tanya Miller, a Democratic state House member and lawyer representing the Atchison family, said the decision is a 'painful subversion of justice.' 'This decision underscores the troubling gap in accountability when local officers operate on federal task forces — a no-man's land where they can violate their own department's policies, the Constitution, take a young life, and still avoid standing trial,' Miller wrote in a text message. Don Samuel, a lawyer for Kim, said via email that the ruling was correct. 'It is hard to celebrate when a young man died," Samuel wrote, "but there is no doubt that the decision of the Fulton County DA's office to compound the tragedy by prosecuting Sung Kim was an inexcusable abuse of prosecutorial discretion." The Georgia state conference of the NAACP called on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to appeal the ruling, saying it unjustly shields officers from accountability when they kill unarmed people. 'This ruling is not just a blow to the Atchison family's pursuit of justice — it's a threat to civil rights and public safety across the nation,' said Gerald Griggs, president of the Georgia NAACP.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Jasmine Crockett can bring the Democratic Party back from the brink
It's hard to walk a mile in America's political-media industrial complex these days without someone asking me about Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett. Whenever I write about the future of the Democratic Party (often), my inbox inevitably fills with enthusiastic Democrats urging me to watch compilations of Crockett's most viral comments, some of which boast view counts in the millions. The TV-ready former public defender exploded onto the national scene this year as one of Democrats' rawest and most watchable communicators. Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg went so far as to declare her the future of the Democratic Party. On Sunday, Fox News anchor Trey Gowdy devoted an entire segment to denouncing her rise to prominence. At a moment when voters are increasingly tuning out politicians, Crockett is still breaking through. Democrats are about to blow millions of dollars on an almost certainly futile effort to build a 'liberal Joe Rogan' when they should be studying how Crockett's unlikely path to Washington shaped her hugely popular message. As one of the few party figures who can speak with authenticity to the millions of voters who lost faith in the Democratic Party after 2024, Crockett should be playing a lead role in reshaping the party's 2026 message. Do Democrats see what they have? Crockett's brashness may strike some Beltway stiffs as rude or disrespectful, but it's actually a powerful reflection of the alienation millions of Democratic voters feel, including the 7 percent of Black men and nearly 10 percent of nonwhite young people who gave up on the party after the last election. To those voters, Crockett's passion doesn't look disrespectful — it looks appropriate to a moment where most Americans are paying more for everything from groceries to medicine while Donald Trump's Department of Justice tears away civil rights protections root and branch. 'We have transitioned into a space where authenticity is valued so much more than people being proper or polite,' Crockett told Roll Call in January. 'If my raw emotions get the better of me, most people take it just as that, and are happy to know there's somebody who's here because she is very passionate about the work and really believes in it.' One reason institutional Democrats struggle to understand Crockett is because she came to politics not through political triangulation but by channeling the party's simmering grassroots discontent. Instead of traditional party channels, Crockett partnered with candidate recruitment organization Run for Something for her first state political campaign in 2020. That her campaign evolved outside the Texas Democratic Party's political ecosystem still rankles some Texas Democrats. When I tweeted about working on this article, two state party insiders reached out to share their concerns about Crockett's effectiveness. If recent candidate recruitment data from Run for Something is any indication, rank-and-file Democrats don't share those insiders' concerns. Amanda Litman, founder and president of Run For Something, tells me that 'Crockett's name has come up organically in conversation with candidates and potential candidates,' adding that Crockett's 'energy for the work' has played a role in convincing more political novices to run for office in their communities. After months honing her populist message, Crockett is riding high on a political moment she helped mainstream. A new Demand Progress survey found that nearly six in 10 Democrats preferred populist economic arguments over more traditional centrist proposals. That's obvious enough on the ground, where over 30,000 Coloradans packed a populist rally earlier this year hosted by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Even moderate Democrats are trying out their own economic populist talking points. Crockett's fluency in the language of populist frustration allows her voice to carry in spaces and among communities where conventional Democratic talking points are normally filtered out. For Litman, the perfect candidate for our modern political era is one who isn't so concerned about being perfect. 'Voters are no longer looking for candidates who embody the perfect politician or those who play with the same old political playbook — they want someone who understands the stakes through lived experience,' Litman said. 'Crockett embodies all of this. She clearly knows who she is and what she believes.' Now Crockett and the Democrats who have rallied around her have an even more challenging goal: reminding go-along, get-along Democrats that they used to believe in things, too. Crockett has built a powerful national brand by telling Democrats that it's OK to pick a fight when that fight is worth having. Millions of voters agree. Max Burns is a veteran Democratic strategist and founder of Third Degree Strategies. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
