Artists who represented Australia at Venice Biennale call for Khaled Sabsabi to be reinstated
Some of Australia's most distinguished living artists, including Imants Tillers, Mike Parr, Susan Norrie, Fiona Hall, Judy Watson, Patricia Piccinini and Tracey Moffat have signed the petition, as has the estate of Howard Arkley who represented Australia in Venice more than a quarter of a century ago.
'As artists who have represented Australia at the Venice Biennale, we strongly protest the removal of Khaled Sabsabi and Michael Dagostino as the artistic team for the 61st Venice Biennale in 2026,' the open letter states.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'The Venice Biennale is a rare and critical platform for Australian artists. Being selected is an extraordinary honour, and to strip the chosen artistic team of this opportunity is unacceptable.
'Indeed it signals a fundamental disregard for the role of artists in our society – especially by the very institution meant to defend them.'
That institution, the Australian government's principal arts investment and advisory body, Creative Australia, is scheduled to appear before a Senate estimates hearing on Tuesday.
However, it will be up to the Greens and independents to interrogate Creative Australia's chief executive Adrian Collette, over allegations the body came under political pressure to rescind the Venice contract.
It was a Coalition senator, Claire Chandler, who first raised objections to Sabsabi's selection as Australia's representative almost two weeks ago during question time, on the grounds the Lebanese-born Australian artist represented former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, Osama bin Laden, and depictions of the 11 September terrorist attacks in earlier artwork.
The Labor senators Jenny McAllister and Tim Ayres will be expected to answer questions about who knew what and when, as both the arts minister, Tony Burke, and Labor's special envoy for the arts, Susan Templeman, are in the House of Representatives.
Burke has admitted he called Collette immediately after question time, but has insisted he played no role in pressuring Creative Australia's board, which met a few hours later, to disendorse Sabsabi and Dagostino.
'I made clear to Adrian Collette, who I have known for more than a decade, I said to him whatever you decide, I will support you and I will support Creative Australia,' Burke said last Monday.
Collette has not responded to repeated requests from the Guardian to comment but told an all staff meeting last Thursday that Sabsabi and Dagostino would not be reinstated, sources said. The Guardian understands Collette indicated he did not believe his role had become 'untenable'.
One of the art works at the centre of the controversy, a 2007 video work called You, features images of the former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed last year.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Hezbollah was not listed as a terrorist group until 2021, although the Australian government had listed its External Security Organisation military wing as a terrorist organisation in 2003.
Late on Friday, Sydney's Museum of Contemporary Art, which owns You, said Creative Australia's backflip had damaged Australia's international reputation and undercut the principle of freedom of expression, the Australian Financial Review reported.
Another question Collette is expected to be asked on Monday is why under the government's new national cultural policy Burke has instituted music and literature boards, yet there remains no board to represent Australia's visual arts.
There is only one visual arts representative on Creative Australia's board – Lindy Lee – who resigned the day after the board met, posting on social media that her board's vote to rescind Sabsabi's contract had left her feeling 'deeply conflicted'.
'I could not live the level of violation I felt against one of my core values – that the artist's voice must never be silenced,' she said.
'We live in very fractured, broken times. There is a lot of hurt out there. More than ever the artist's voice is needed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Rachel Reeves is eyeing up inheritance tax changes – what you can do NOW to protect your finances
RACHEL Reeves is rumoured to have set her sights on changes to inheritance tax as a way to fill the £50billion blackhole in finances. Parents could be stopped from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids, under proposed plans. Currently you can give away unlimited amounts of cash to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. The Chancellor is reportedly also considering changing the tapered rate at which the tax is charged, according to The Guardian. Plus, inheritance tax will be charged on pension pots for the first time - a change that was announced in last year's Budget. Rachel Reeves said today that any decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget - but what can YOU do now to protect your finances and how does inheritance tax affect your wallet? What is inheritance tax? IHT is a 40% tax on your estate when you die. Currently, your estate includes your house, cash savings and any other possessions. Your pension is exempt. You can pass on up to £325,000 in assets before any IHT is due, or up to £500,000 if you pass your property to your children or grandchildren. There is also no IHT due between spouses, and you can leave them your IHT exemption when you die, so they could pass on up to £1million. However, from April 2027, pensions will become part of your estate, which means they will also be liable for IHT. This week Labour also confirmed it will charge inheritance tax on workers' retirement pots even if they die before they reach the minimum pension age, which is currently 55. And from 2026, agricultural and business relief, which protects farms and businesses from IHT, will only apply up to £1million of assets. After this, 20% tax will be due. These changes could see people inheriting large pensions, farms or businesses being pulled into the net. What are the rules on gifting? YOU can currently give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. If you pass away within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate. For example, gifts that were given three years before you pass away are subject to 40% inheritance tax. But those that are handed over five years before your death are subject to inheritance tax at 16%. How many people does IHT affect? IHT is a big concern for many families, but figures suggest Brits hugely overestimate how many people are affected. A YouGov poll in 2023 found that 31% of people thought their assets would be subject to IHT, while 28% said they weren't sure. In reality, around 5% of estates are impacted, according to HMRC. 'A lot of people are concerned about it when it probably won't affect their family,' said Charlene Young, senior pensions and savings expert at AJ Bell. 'In 95% of cases, no IHT is due whatsoever.' However, the upcoming changes could see more people owing the tax, which has sparked fresh concerns. The number of estates owing IHT is set to double to 10% by 2030, according to government estimates, with around 1.5% more estates impacted because of pension rule changes. Matt Smith, chartered financial planner at Buckingham Gate, said: 'We are seeing people being pulled into the net now who don't feel wealthy, they just see themselves as normal people who have saved diligently.' Who is likely to be affected most by the changes? The people most likely to be impacted by the IHT changes are those inheriting large businesses, farms or pension pots. Mr Smith explained: 'People who have most of their assets in their pension will go from having no liability to having a chunky liability. 'Farms are particularly likely to be affected as they often have expensive assets such as land, machinery and livestock, even if they don't have much actual cash." If you have a modest-sized pension and a typical home, your estate is still not likely to be impacted, particularly if you are planning to leave most of your assets to your spouse or children. For example, if your home is worth £268,000 - the average UK house price, according to Zoopla - and you have a private pension worth £111,700, which is the average pot size, according to Hargreaves Lansdown, you would have £379,700 of assets to pass on. If you left this to your spouse or kids, your estate would still be well below IHT thresholds. 'While plenty of people might be worried about the changes - particularly those who have worked hard to build up big pensions – most people will still remain unaffected,' Ms Young said. Tips and tricks to avoid paying IHT If you, your parents or your grandparents are concerned about IHT, there are a number of steps you can take to protect your assets. Make a will First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young. 'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill. 'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.' Check how to make one in our guide. Get financial advice If you're worried it could be worth speaking to a financial adviser specialising in estate planning. They will ensure you have used all of your allowances and aren't paying more tax than you should. You can find one using - but remember, you will pay a fee. Utilise gifting allowances Until recently, pensions have been used as a way to harbour money to pass it on to loved ones, but experts say it may be more sensible to gift the money now if that was your plan. If your in retirement and income is more than you spend, then consider setting up a plan for utilising gift-free allowances. 'The 'annual exemption' lets you give away a total of £3,000 each year, either to one person or split between several, and you can bring forward unused annual exemption for one year,' Ms Young said. 'Unlimited 'small' gifts of up to £250 per person can also be made, if you haven't already used your annual exemption on the same person.' You can also gift up to £5,000 to a child tax-free or £2,500 for a grandchild if they are getting married. However, families with modest pensions and assets likely won't be affected by the changes, so don't give away any money unless you are sure you can afford to. Get life insurance Another way to ensure your family does not foot an IHT bill is to take out a life insurance policy. Mr Smith said you could use any extra income to pay the premiums, and this will pay out a lump sum to cover your IHT bill when you die. "You basically pay it at a discount, as what you pay in premiums is usually only 40% to 60% of what your beneficiaries would pay in IHT," he explained. If you're got children or grandchildren, then you could invest for their future. You can save up to £9,000 a year tax-free into a Junior Isa - they will thank you for this in the future. A £50 a month investment could grow to almost £18,000 in 18 years - a nice chunk of cash for your loved ones.
Economist
2 hours ago
- Economist
Lebanon's government is taking on a weakened Hizbullah
Last week Lebanese soldiers retrieved the bodies of six of their comrades from the smouldering ruins of an arms depot near the Israeli border. It was the army's deadliest day since the country was drawn into a regional war on October 8th 2023. But they were not killed by enemy fire. They died attempting to secure a cache of weapons believed to belong to Hizbullah, the Iranian-backed militia that has dominated Lebanon for years.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Coalition compares Labor's economic summit to Willy Wonka's golden tickets as it criticises ‘privileged talkfest'
The Coalition has likened next week's economic reform roundtable to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, as they challenge Labor to reject proposals which would increase taxes or make it harder to run a business. The shadow treasurer, Ted O'Brien, the opposition's sole representative at the event, will use a speech to a Liberal-aligned thinktank to dub the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, 'Australia's candy man' – a reference to Willy Wonka, Roald Dahl's famous character who awards golden tickets for a visit his factory. Sign up: AU Breaking News email O'Brien will tell the Menzies Research Institute on Friday that Labor needs to show economic leadership to spur growth and lift living standards. He will seize on leaked Treasury advice which showed the government has prepared pre-determined outcomes for the summit, including new AI rules and a pause on changes to the National Construction Code. Reforms designed to clear a backlog of 30,000 housing approvals held up by consideration under environmental laws are also outlined in the cabinet document, reported by the ABC. 'It looks like the roundtable has been engineered to rubber stamp a doubling down on Labor's failed tax and spend strategy,' O'Brien will say. 'Let me be crystal clear: the Coalition will be no such rubber stamp. And we reject any suggestion Labor has a mandate to hike taxes.' Despite taking part, O'Brien calls the meetings a 'privileged talkfest'. 'We in the Coalition have already started our own process of formulating a new economic agenda to take to the next election, and we will take the time to get it right,' O'Brien will say. Anthony Albanese has sought to manage expectations, warning the roundtable meeting 'isn't a substitute for government decision-making' and that the only tax policies Labor would implement in this term were modest changes put to voters before the 3 May election. The prime minister said the event was about considering ideas which could inform next year's federal budget or future legislation. 'If you think you're the smartest in the room, you're in the wrong room,' Albanese said during a visit to Queensland on Thursday. 'We're awaiting the forum, and ideas will then come through normal government processes. That's how good policy happens.' The Greens have also made demands, urging Labor to make commitments on universal childcare. The early childhood education spokesperson, Steph Hodgins-May, wrote to Chalmers on Thursday calling for all families to be able to access affordable and high-quality early learning. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The Victorian senator said such a move would improve living standards, boost workforce participation and strengthen economic resilience. 'A shift to a universal, low-cost, high-quality early learning system would be a gamechanger for families, children and the economy,' she said. 'The childcare subsidy model and market-driven approach make early learning inaccessible and unaffordable for many families, and clearly fails to guarantee safety or quality.' Guardian Australia revealed this week Labor has commissioned consulting firm Deloitte to help design a universal childcare system, launching a two-year study of demand and costs. It could lead to the introduction of a $10 flat fee for childcare services. Work by the Productivity Commission suggests such a move would increase the total hours of work by single parents and secondary earners with young children by nearly 3% – the equivalent of about 17,000 additional full-time workers. The childcare subsidy will cost the budget about $16.2bn this financial year, and is slated to rise to $18.4bn by 2028-29. With growth of about 5.5%, it is one of the big budget measures growing faster than nominal GDP. The teal independent Allegra Spender said a reduction in income taxes on wages was badly needed, to help younger Australians get ahead. She proposed a dual income tax system, where income from labour would be taxed separately to income from investments. 'Australia's focus on income tax from wages means that people are contributing the bulk of their lifetime tax at precisely the moment when they have the most expenses: saving for or paying down a record-high mortgage, putting children through childcare and school, while also trying to save for a retirement,' the Wentworth MP said. 'As Ken Henry said, if you wanted to design a tax system to punish young people, you'd arrive at something pretty similar to what we have now.'
