'Inappropriate spending': Northern Beaches locals fume as council hikes rates by 25 per cent as meeting dominated by Gaza debate
The Northern Beaches Council (NBC) has voted largely in favour to hit residents with a 25 per cent rate increase to ease its tightening budget while much of the meeting was dominated by debate over the conflict in the Middle East.
On Tuesday night, the council held a meeting and voted 11-4 in favour of the rate rise which will inject $50 million into the budget over the next two years.
The rate increase alone equated to an expected $168 extra ratepayers will have to fork out in the next financial year based on the recommended 12.1 per cent increase.
An additional $13 waste charge increase was also recommended, with no increase to the storm water charge, bringing the total rate increase to $181 to be shouldered by the ratepayer.
Dozens of angry locals protested outside the Dee Why council chambers in a last stand demonstration to sway councillors.
However, the Northern Beaches People Voice's months-long dissent against the council was unsuccessful.
Before the vote, Northern Beaches People Voice founder Stuart Gold demanded the council to 'eliminate costly non-essential services', to manage funds 'more efficiently' and to minimise 'inappropriate spending'.
'Why can't council find more ways to reduce costs? I think I can think of a few… executive salaries, 111 positions costing $25.8 million,' he said.
'Cut executive positions by one third and you save $8.5 million, throw in some executive cars and you save over $11 million straight off the bat.'
The vote came six months after the Northern Beaches Council sought permission to jack up rates by close to 40 per cent.
The council voted 8-7 in favour of the rate hike which would increase its budgets incrementally over the next three years by $57 million if the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) gives the green light.
The IPART rejected the NBC's initial effort to increase rates by 39.7 per cent, instead allowing the council to vote on a 25 per cent increase over the next two years.
The council said it needed extra income from the 'special rate variation' – which allows NSW councils to increase their general revenue above the standard rate peg – in order to sustainably pay for infrastructure and maintenance.
The council also wanted to put funds towards its natural disasters fund, boost its storm water renewal program, as well as other infrastructure projects such as refurbishing the Warringah Aquatic Centre.
If the rate increases did not pass, the council heard the community would face 'critical failures' of its infrastructure and further deterioration.
The meeting included a public forum which was dominated by the conflict in Gaza and Israel.
During the public forum, a proud Israeli made a contribution during which he strived to 'debunk everything' the critics of Israel had said during the hours-long meeting.
On social media, locals blasted the council for entertaining debate about foreign conflicts with some arguing the focus should be on saving ratepayers' money.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
13 minutes ago
- The Age
Terrified Iranians left to fend for themselves, as leaders play songs on TV
As Iran's president gathered his cabinet on Sunday afternoon to praise the armed forces for their performance, Tehran residents were filling their social media feeds with pictures and videos of fresh Israeli airstrikes that had destroyed buildings. It was a dramatic split-screen moment, demonstrating how Iran's government has tried to portray strength since Israel began its attack on the country on Friday morning even as a terrified population has decried the absence of adequate safety instructions and evacuation orders. That President Masoud Pezeshkian convened such a meeting of top officials in a single location – just days after Israeli forces had wiped out much of Iran's top military brass – showed an 'arrogance and lack of adherence to basic security protocol', Mohammad Ali Shabani, an Iranian-born scholar of the Middle East, wrote on X. 'They don't even need to look abroad for lessons at this point, yet refuse to learn,' he wrote. Throughout Sunday and Monday, Iranian state television played clips of pro-government rallies and focused coverage on the damage in Israel wrought by Iran's retaliatory missile barrages. On Sunday, however, Tehran residents began a mass exodus from the capital city for fear of being caught up in the conflict. Even after Israel issued an evacuation warning on Monday for part of Tehran, Iran's state-run television, whose offices are within that zone, continued as normal, airing videos of children singing patriotic songs and images of Iranian missiles hitting Israeli targets – up until the moment an Israeli strike hit the television studio. The news host sprang up from her chair, and a man, expressing defiance, could be heard saying 'God is great' on air. Iranians complained in interviews about the slow, sparse provision of safety protocols and instructions from the government. These Iranians contrasted the government's relative silence on safety measures with its frequent use of text messages to admonish women over insufficiently modest attire. To fill the vacuum, Iranians were turning to social media, friends and family, and foreign-based news outlets for information.
Sydney Morning Herald
14 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Terrified Iranians left to fend for themselves, as leaders play songs on TV
As Iran's president gathered his cabinet on Sunday afternoon to praise the armed forces for their performance, Tehran residents were filling their social media feeds with pictures and videos of fresh Israeli airstrikes that had destroyed buildings. It was a dramatic split-screen moment, demonstrating how Iran's government has tried to portray strength since Israel began its attack on the country on Friday morning even as a terrified population has decried the absence of adequate safety instructions and evacuation orders. That President Masoud Pezeshkian convened such a meeting of top officials in a single location – just days after Israeli forces had wiped out much of Iran's top military brass – showed an 'arrogance and lack of adherence to basic security protocol', Mohammad Ali Shabani, an Iranian-born scholar of the Middle East, wrote on X. 'They don't even need to look abroad for lessons at this point, yet refuse to learn,' he wrote. Throughout Sunday and Monday, Iranian state television played clips of pro-government rallies and focused coverage on the damage in Israel wrought by Iran's retaliatory missile barrages. On Sunday, however, Tehran residents began a mass exodus from the capital city for fear of being caught up in the conflict. Even after Israel issued an evacuation warning on Monday for part of Tehran, Iran's state-run television, whose offices are within that zone, continued as normal, airing videos of children singing patriotic songs and images of Iranian missiles hitting Israeli targets – up until the moment an Israeli strike hit the television studio. The news host sprang up from her chair, and a man, expressing defiance, could be heard saying 'God is great' on air. Iranians complained in interviews about the slow, sparse provision of safety protocols and instructions from the government. These Iranians contrasted the government's relative silence on safety measures with its frequent use of text messages to admonish women over insufficiently modest attire. To fill the vacuum, Iranians were turning to social media, friends and family, and foreign-based news outlets for information.
Sydney Morning Herald
34 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump has the bomb that could destroy Iran's ‘nuclear mountain'. Israel may not need it
With Israel's 1981 attack on an overground Iraqi nuclear facility in mind, Iran buried Fordow's two enrichment halls half a mile inside the mountains. Israel doesn't have any MOP munitions. But the US does. An American B-2 stealth bomber would drop a MOP, but it has never been used in actual warfare. Israel has been blocked by the White House and Pentagon on multiple occasions from getting hold of its own high-powered 'bunker buster'. Israel is also not known to have any heavy bombers capable of delivering such a payload. But this doesn't mean the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) do not have a plan for disabling Fordow, or at least rendering the facility useless, as part of Operation Rising Lion. 'It is hard to imagine that Israel entered this fight with no plan at all to try to mitigate the threat posed by this facility,' Justin Crump, chief executive of geopolitical risk firm Sibylline, told the London Telegraph. 'The heart of Iran's potential nuclear capability lies well buried at Fordow, with many regarding the use of multiple advanced US weapons as the only way truly to neutralise the facility. 'However, in recent months, there has been a growing view that Israel could instead use precision strikes on access points, ventilation shafts, and power supplies to at least heavily impact the use of the facility,' he added. In practice, this more surgical approach could make it virtually impossible for Iran's regime to keep its centrifuges spinning. Coupled with the fact that the IDF killed at least nine of Tehran's most prominent nuclear scientists, there are questions over whether the knowledge will exist to get them turning again. Despite the Israeli operation to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, Fordow appears to have remained largely untouched. The IDF has reportedly cooked up a number of strategies that it could use to render the facility useless, if a decision were made to do so. One plan previously presented to the Obama administration employed transport helicopters to drop Israeli commandos off at the site, let them fight their way in, before rigging it with explosives and bringing it down from the inside. Loading Hugely risky and potentially deadly for those involved, it would take a brave decision by Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, to sanction such an attack, although similar tactics were used against a Hezbollah missile factory in Syria last year. The most logical, and risk-adverse move given Israel's aerial supremacy over Iran, would be to surgically immobilise the facility with strikes on its power supplies, access tunnels and ventilation shafts. While it wouldn't be entirely destroyed, Fordow would at least temporarily cease to be an operable part of Iran's nuclear programme. These are considered Israel's strongest cards without Donald Trump sanctioning US involvement in attacks on the facility. Fallout fear The US president has shown no signs of reversing a decades-long policy of permitting Israeli ownership, or at least use, of its bunker busters. He has also made clear that he will steer clear of joining the military campaign. His fear of nuclear fallout is perhaps another reason for his hesitance to drop a bomb on Fordow: Such a strike could hurl an untold amount of contaminated earth and rock into the atmosphere. The blast at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986, the world's worst radioactive disaster, saw a radiation cloud spread for 77,000 square miles. Loading Trump is said to have nuclear nightmares, stemming from his childhood during the Cold War, when schools would train their students to take cover under classroom desks. He once cited a 'nuclear winter' as the biggest threat to the world in a conversation about climate change with British former prime minister Theresa May. 'It was a terrifying, nightmarish image seared into his mind,' Fiona Hill, a one-time foreign policy aide to the president, previously said.
