Janet Jackson Takes Victory Lap On Network That Tried To Destroy Her Career
The legendary Janet Jackson started her acceptance speech at the 2025 American Music Awards with an implausibly modest statement.
'I am so, so honored — I'm so grateful. I mean no disrespect in any way, but I don't consider myself an icon,' she said while holding the ICON Award onstage at the ceremony on Monday. 'My family, myself, our dream was to … it wasn't ever to be famous. We weren't raised like that. We always had a special love for music, dancing and singing — and fame came with the result of hard work and dedication.'
Unsurprisingly, Katherine Jackson's youngest child offered us her trademark humility in her sweet whisper. But for her fans, including myself, I couldn't believe she made this statement as if she is not the Janet Damita Jo Jackson, our dancing diva who is the lady of the 'Butterfly' and the '8-Count.' She's the visionary behind some of the greatest music videos, tours and performances in pop music. She is the template of success for the generations of artists who have followed her.
'I'm excited to see Janet. I haven't seen her in years, and I'm glad that she's being celebrated, too,' said Jennifer Lopez, who hosted the show and once danced for Jackson.
As much fuss has rightfully been made about Jackson's American Music Awards moment being her first TV performance in seven years, not nearly enough has been said about this being the first time she blessed CBS with a performance since her 2004 Super Bowl halftime show, which included the infamous 'Nipplegate' incident. (You can watch her American Music Awards performance here.)
Jackson's fans always felt that the controversy was overblown, and more importantly, that she disproportionally received more backlash than Justin Timberlake, the other participant in that situation.
It wasn't until 2018 that there was real evidence of an effort to blacklist the groundbreaking pop star. That year, Yashar Ali reported for HuffPost that Les Moonves, the former CEO and chairman of CBS, became obsessed with Jackson's career for years afterward. Moonves ordered CBS' sister properties VH1 and MTV, along with all Viacom-owned radio stations, to stop playing Jackson's songs and music videos.
This incident derailed the sales of 'Damita Jo,' released in March 2004, one month after the Super Bowl. That album had some bops, particularly 'I Want You,' 'All Nite (Don't Stop)' and 'Strawberry Bounce,' which I recommend playing during a hike or while trying to finish the rest of your time on the stairmaster if you're into the sort of thing.
In that same piece, Ali noted that upon realizing that Jackson was able to publish a book under a publisher then owned by Viacom, Moonves said, 'How the fuck did she slip through?'
If not for Tyler Perry casting her in films, record producer Jermaine Dupri's hits, her most dedicated fans and the legacy of the artist who has twice secured the largest recording contract in history, her fame might have completely faded.
Jackson never received a public apology from CBS for any of it. (In 2021, Timberlake apologized in an Instagram post.) In 2023, she came close when the Grammys wanted to give her their Global Impact Award before bowing out. Part of the problem was a scheduling conflict for a pre-Grammys event, but the real snag was that CBS and its parent company had not acknowledged or apologized for the Nipplegate response.
'Our sources say Janet's team and Grammy organizers began talking about ways CBS could either apologize or figure out a way to acknowledge how she was treated by the network, but things just got too complicated and talks ended,' TMZ reported at the time.
Now that we have reestablished how nasty CBS was to Jackson and how lucky they are that she even showed up at the American Music Awards, I'll finish stanning a bit and acknowledge that Jackson is still stellar more than 40 years into her career.
She is 59 years old and still putting on incredible performances. I recently turned 41 and have been exhausted by millennials who complain about how old they are and how much everything hurts. Look at Janet Jackson, shut up, stretch and believe in yourself.
While I hate to be superficial (not really), look at her face and hair. None of us can go back in time, but whatever Jackson is doing has gotten her as close to her 1993 self as possible. The styling is also top-notch, and, whew, I'm so glad she's out of her covered-all-up-in-black era.
Lastly, I loved that she chose to perform 'Someone To Call My Lover,' which has been surging in streams and sales after going viral on TikTok, and 'All For You,' her biggest hit of the 2000s.
It's no coincidence that those are songs from the album released before the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show and its aftermath. It's a testament to the mainstream appeal of her music when not met with interference.
Ultimately, it's also a testament to her legacy; no matter what gets in her way, she will continue to thrive.
Actor Lauren Weedman Was Diagnosed With Bell's Palsy. Then, Hollywood Showed Up In The Most Unexpected Way.
Mara Brock Akil Continues Her Black Love Legacy With 'Forever'
Toxic Famous Men Deserve What's Coming To Them
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk said DOGE 'became the whipping boy' for all government problems
Elon Musk said the White House DOGE office was treated unfairly by its critics and became a "whipping boy for everything." Musk was speaking to CBS in an interview that aired on Sunday when he was asked about the backlash he faced over his work at the cost-cutting outfit. "It was a bit unfair because, like, DOGE became the whipping boy for everything," Musk said. "So, if there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE. I've had people think that, like, somehow DOGE is gonna stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue," he continued. The Trump administration said in March that it "will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits." This clarification came after Musk called Social Security " the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" in an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience," which aired in February. Musk told CBS he is a "proponent of smaller government, not bigger government." President Donald Trump announced in November that Musk would co-lead DOGE with Vivek Ramaswamy. Musk became the sole leader of DOGE after Ramaswamy left the cost-cutting outfit in January. Musk served as DOGE's leader from January to May. He announced his departure from DOGE on Wednesday, concluding his 130-day stint as a special government employee. During his tenure, DOGE tried to slash government spending by shutting down foreign aid programs and laying off thousands of federal workers. The cuts sparked boycotts and protests against Tesla, Musk's EV company. The blowback Musk faced alarmed investors as well, who repeatedly told him to focus on Tesla. Last month, Musk told investors in a Tesla earnings call that he would be scaling down his involvement with DOGE to spend more time on Tesla. Musk, however, told CBS that he will still be working on DOGE, albeit on a part-time basis. "DOGE is going to continue, just as a way of life, and I will have some participation in that. But as I've said publicly, my focus has to be on the companies at this point," Musk said.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Scott Bessent dismisses Jamie Dimon's debt concerns, saying none of his past predictions have been right
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday that he doesn't agree with Jamie Dimon's prediction that the bond market will crack. "I've known Jamie a long time and for his entire career he's made predictions like this. Fortunately, none of them have come true. That's why he's a banker, a great banker. He tries to look around the corner," Bessent said in an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation." Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, told attendees at the Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday that the US "massively overdid" spending and quantitative easing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dimon predicted this will lead to a "crack in the bond market." "It is going to happen," Dimon said on Friday. "I just don't know if it's going to be a crisis in six months or six years, and I'm hoping that we change both the trajectory of the debt and the ability of market makers to make markets," he added. Bessent said the government is working on shrinking its deficit, and the administration intends to "leave the country in great shape in 2028." "So the deficit this year is going to be lower than the deficit last year, and in two years it will be lower again. We are going to bring the deficit down slowly. We didn't get here in one year, and this has been a long process," Bessent told CBS. Last month, House Republicans passed President Donald Trump's " big beautiful bill." The bill, in its current form, is expected to raise the deficit by $2.5 trillion over the next 10 years, per the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The bill is now with the Senate, and GOP lawmakers hope to have it on Trump's desk by July 4. Dimon isn't the only one who has raised concerns about the US deficit. Last week, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said in an interview with "CBS Sunday Morning" that he was " disappointed to see the massive spending bill." A clip from Musk's interview was released on Tuesday. The full interview aired on Sunday. "I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk said. Musk was the leader of the White House DOGE office from January to May. He announced his departure from the Trump administration on Wednesday. "I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful. But I don't know if it could be both," Musk told CBS.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
China accuses U.S. of violating trade truce, vows "forceful measures"
China has accused the U.S. violating the trade deal that the world's two largest economies signed last month and vowed to take "resolute and forceful measures," per a briefing on Monday morning local time. Why it matters: It's the latest sign of deteriorating relations between the two nations since their Switzerland meeting led to a May 12 deal to lower tariffs on each other fo 90 days while they negotiated on trade. President Trump accused Beijing on Friday of violating the agreement, one day after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described negotiations as " a bit stalled." Driving the news: A Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said Beijing "firmly rejects these unjustified accusations," per translations of the comments that were carried by state media. The spokesperson alleged the U.S. had "seriously undermined" and "violated" the trade agreement by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software (EDA) to China, and announcing the r evocation" of visas for Chinese students. "If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," unnamed official added, without elaborating further. The other side: While Trump didn't go into details on his claims that Beijing had "totally violated" the trade deal, administration officials have pointed to delays in sending critical minerals to the U.S., which are needed for American auto, electronics and defense industries, that formed part of the agreement. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said during a Sunday interview on CBS News ' "Face the Nation." What we're watching: U.S. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday he expects Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jingping will hold a phone call this week as part of negotiations. Bessent said on CBS he's "confident" that the two sides' issues "will be ironed out" once Trump and Xi have spoken. "But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional," he told CBS' Margaret Brennan. "We'll see after the president speaks with [Xi]." Beijing had not commented on any plans for a call between the two leaders as of late Sunday.
