Racing drivers prompt safety concerns on west Lancashire by-pass
Owens said: "It's a relatively straight road, there are roundabouts so they have sections, they can time themselves, have races along those sections and that's what they've been doing."The councillor said residents had raised concerns about the issue and appealed for any drivers who want to race to do so safely at a dedicated track."Go to Oulton Park, go to one of the racetracks that we've got in the North West and do it safely and professionally on a proper racetrack," he said.Lancashire Constabulary said: "We always take reports of speeding and anti-social driving seriously and will carry out speed checks and have patrols in areas where concerns are raised."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The law change that could transform toxic workplaces
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) were created to stop sensitive commercial information being shared. But the MeToo movement – and the crimes of Harvey Weinstein – shone a light on how the contracts were being used to silence victims of workplace abuse. Zelda Perkins was Harvey Weinstein's PA. When she broke the NDA that stopped her from talking about her terrible experiences with the film mogul she helped galvanise the MeToo movement. Since then she has been campaigning against the use of NDAs, which she says have helped cover up abuse in the workplace and allow powerful people to escape the consequences of their actions. Alexandra Topping tells Nosheen Iqbal how widespread the use of NDAs has become in British workplaces and how a change in the law could help put an end to them being misused. She explains how allowing employees to speak out could help change workplace culture for the better.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
The BBC must react more decisively to scandal
Gregg Wallace subjected programme staff to sexually explicit language over a prolonged period JEFF SPICER/GETTY IMAGES N o one could accuse the British Broadcasting Corporation of being undermanaged. In the year 2023-24 there were 88 senior executives commanding salaries of £178,000 or more, up 21 from 2022-23. Layer upon layer of lavishly remunerated executives, courtesy of the licence payer. All, presumably, capable of spotting potholes in the road; all able to anticipate trouble and deal with it before it becomes an issue. Well, no actually. If there is one thing the BBC can be depended upon to do it is to allow a problem to fester for years without tackling it, or to fail in a basic area of responsibility such as ensuring journalistic neutrality. The results of this systemic failure were on show on Monday when the national broadcaster released the results of reviews into two scandals. One involved the MasterChef presenter Gregg Wallace, who was found to have subjected programme staff to sexually explicit language over a prolonged period, without obvious challenge from above. The other involved the failure of those overseeing a documentary on Gaza to realise that its child presenter was the son of a Hamas minister. Different situations, but the product of the same neglect. • Gregg Wallace: I never set out to harm or humiliate Dame Melanie Dawes, head of the media regulator Ofcom, said at the weekend that the BBC was guilty of 'own goals', explaining: 'What frustrates me and others is that when these things go wrong it can take a long time for the BBC to see that something's happened, when everybody else was there within a matter of hours. So I would say to the BBC: they need to get a grip quicker, get these reports and investigations concluded sooner, otherwise there is a real risk of a sort of loss of confidence in the BBC.' Dame Melanie is correct. Even when the most serious crimes have been involved the corporation has previously displayed a lamentable lack of curiosity about the off-screen behaviour of its 'talent'. In 2016 Dame Janet Smith, author of a report on the crimes of Jimmy Savile, spoke of a 'climate of fear' at the BBC that prevented staff from speaking out in case it resulted in the loss of their jobs. The organisation, she said, needed to reassess its attitude to big stars. Fear of harming the BBC's reputation trumped concern even about the safety of children. This instinctive corporate circling of the wagons is still the order of the day. After the BBC's transmission of the Glastonbury act Bob Vylan calling for the deaths of IDF soldiers, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, asked why no one had been sacked for airing the documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, giving voice to a narrator linked to Hamas. On Monday, however, Ms Nandy declined to repeat her call for deputy heads to roll, saying the broadcaster had made 'big strides' to ensure that such fiascos could not be repeated. It is true that first-hand reporting from Gaza by news organisations has been blocked by Israel, but that does not allow the BBC to lay most of the blame on the independent production company that made the documentary. It was the duty of BBC bosses to ensure it adhered to the corporation's editorial standards as rigidly as any in-house production. Ms Nandy may be confident that the BBC has finally got a grip on itself. History is not encouraging, but it must be hoped that this is the case. There is a danger that once the heat has died down, the innate complacency of the BBC bureaucracy will reassert itself. That would only result in more scandal, more obfuscation and more loss of trust.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Benn says ‘no choice' but to repeal NI legacy act as veterans stage protest
Hilary Benn has said that 'only one soldier' has been convicted over a Troubles-related death since 1998 as he sought to justify Labour plans to repeal the Northern Ireland Legacy and Reconciliation Act. The Northern Ireland secretary, speaking at a debate in Westminster Hall, argued that of the 250,000 British military veterans who had served in the country, 'the number being prosecuted for offences has been very, very small'. Benn said he recognised 'the very real fears that many veterans have' and that the government took 'those concerns very seriously' – but he said Labour had no choice but to repeal and rewrite the legislation because it had been deemed incompatible with human rights law. Citing research by the Centre for Military Justice, Benn said the law firm 'records that only one soldier has been convicted since the Good Friday agreement' – a case in which a veteran received a suspended sentence for manslaughter. Benn was responding to a general debate brought after more than 176,000 people signed a petition demanding Labour not make any changes to the law. Before it began, a couple of hundred veterans staged a noisy protest at the Cenotaph in Whitehall and in Parliament Square with the support of the Conservatives, who passed the legislation in 2023. Veterans at the protest said they believed a simple repeal of the legacy act would lead to a reopening of investigations and prosecutions against them, in a gradual process that would take several years. David Holmes, an RAF veteran who did two tours in Northern Ireland, said that 'what's being proposed would be a return to inquests, that would lead to prosecutions, vexatious prosecutions that would be long, drawn-out'. Holmes, one of the leaders of the protest, said that although 'the chances of getting a prosecution are very slim, the veteran who is under prosecution will be punished for five to seven years' while the investigation took place. Dennis Hutchings died in 2021, aged 80, before he could be put on trial for attempting to murder John Pat Cunningham, who was shot in the back and killed as he ran from an army patrol in 1974. The prosecution had been begun six years earlier, in 2015. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Mick Curtis, 76, who served with the Royal Horse Artillery in Northern Ireland between 1969 and 1971, said he believed 'the rules were being changed in retrospect' and that ordinary soldiers who were given rules of engagement that permitted opening fire in certain circumstances were no longer considered to have acted legitimately. The Legacy Act halted all but the most serious investigations into Troubles-related killings by soldiers and paramilitary groups – a compromise that also meant that inquiries into the deaths of 202 soldiers and 23 veterans were among those halted last year when the law took effect. Labour said it would repeal the act because it was opposed by many victims' families and Northern Ireland's political parties, as well as having been deemed by a court to be incompatible with human rights legislation. It has not yet decided exactly what to replace it with. The shadow defence minister, Mark Francois, one of those supporting the protest, said 'we think the government are beginning to hesitate now that the anger of veterans is becoming apparent'. A repeal of the law would open up former soldiers to 're-investigation endlessly', he said.
