logo
Ukraine's Transformation Into A Military Powerhouse

Ukraine's Transformation Into A Military Powerhouse

Miami Herald01-04-2025

"Thanks to its defense industries," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky remarked back in October, "Ukraine is set to become one of the key global contributors to security and a very strong player in the global arms and defense technology market."
That is certainly Kyiv's vision for its future. "We can be one of the biggest producers of sophisticated weaponry," Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs and a member of Zelensky's party, told Newsweek.
"Ukrainian technologies are going to be required by the world," Kyiv's strategic industries minister, Herman Smetanin, told Newsweek on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in Germany in mid-February.
There are many unknowns about what post-war Ukraine will look like, with much depending on how U.S.-backed ceasefire negotiations play out.
One of Russia's conditions for considering inking an agreement is a limit on Ukraine's military might. The Kremlin said in March that Russia wanted to stop military mobilization in Ukraine, and the re-equipping of Kyiv's military.
Meanwhile for Ukraine, exporting its technology to its allies is one of the eventual goals, but officials are clear that defending country's borders comes first. "We need weaponry to survive," Merezhko said.
Ukraine needs a strong defense industry and advanced weapons to make sure it cannot be invaded again, Smetanin said.
It took a matter of weeks in early 2022 for Ukraine to morph into what could be termed a "European major power," slotting advanced Western equipment into its mobilized military, said David Blagden, an associate professor of international security and strategy at the U.K.'s University of Exeter.
The war has become an "intense crucible of technological innovation," Blagden told Newsweek.
While Kyiv has leaned heavily on Western support to prop up its war effort, it has been Ukrainian personnel collecting battlefield experience and operating cutting-edge technology that Kyiv's backers have never had to use in a similar way.
While most militaries had waded into developing various types of drones prior to 2022, Russian and Ukrainian use of uncrewed surface, ground and aerial vehicles has revolutionized how this type of technology is used in combat.
The world's armed forces have watched on closely as Kyiv and Moscow have vied to be the most effective at deploying cheap, throwaway explosive drones and longer-range systems able to strike targets hundreds of miles away from their pilots.
Ukraine also now has ample expertise in large-scale land operations and how to maintain an extensive air defense network that European NATO states do not have, Blagden said.
European countries and the U.K. have trained Ukrainian personnel across the military, including tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers through the London-led initiative known as Operation Interflex.
But British and European soldiers training in eastern Romania throughout February, as part of NATO's largest exercises this year, said they modeled their training exercises on Ukraine's experiences, their tactics informed by how Kyiv fought. British soldiers were among those winding their way around trenches in Romania with designs lifted from the battlefields of Ukraine.
A "huge amount" has been taken onboard from the war in Ukraine, British Army Lieutenant Colonel Harry Waller told Newsweek in eastern Romania.
"Fighting a peer conflict against Russia is what NATO trains for above all else and this is something Ukraine has done for over three years now," said William Freer, a research fellow in national security at the U.K.-based Council on Geostrategy think tank.
Through the more than three years of full-scale war, Ukraine has collected "invaluable" battlefield experience, said Merezkho. "We'll be a huge asset for NATO and for the European Union."
Ukraine, through ramping up its defense industry, has managed to lessen some of its reliance on Western aid. Kyiv's defense industry has increased its capabilities thirty five-fold since February 2022, Smetanin said.
Ukraine now produces at home more than half of its military hardware, while it gets roughly a quarter of its military supplies from Europe and a fifth from the U.S.
Speaking in early October, Zelensky said Ukraine had produced 25 times more ammunition for artillery systems and mortars than it pumped out in all of 2022. The Ukrainian leader has said Ukraine could now produce at least 15 new units of its Bohdana howitzers each month.
Europe has struggled to source enough military hardware—especially artillery—for Ukraine, depleting its own stockpiles while struggling to produce replacement equipment or make enough ammunition.
The demand for 155mm shells far outstrips supply. The European Union pledged to deliver 1 million shells by March 2024, but fell far short of this target.
The U.S., which has maintained higher levels of military spending while many of its European allies invested elsewhere, has a much more powerful military-industrial complex. But for Europe, there is the possibility that the continent could look to Ukraine to help replenish its drained stocks.
Ukraine is able to build military equipment at a fairly low cost and on a large scale, Freer told Newsweek.
Ukraine said at the start of the year that it would ramp up its long-range drone and missile programs, buying at least 30,000 drones able to fly hundreds of miles over 2025. Over the year, Kyiv is also planning on having 3,000 cruise missiles and drone-type missiles roll off its production lines, prime minister Denys Shmyhal said in January.
Ukraine is actually capable of producing more than 30,000 of these deep-strike drones, Smetanin told Newsweek in Munich in February. It is also on track to hit a production target of over 10,000 ground drones, Smetanin said.
"We have some more missiles coming that are currently being tested," Smetanin added, speaking via an interpreter.
Ukraine unveiled a raft of new technology at the end of 2024, including sets of missile-drone hybrids. Kyiv debuted its Peklo missile — or "hell," in Ukrainian — and the Ruta, able to travel up to 300 kilometers, according to Ukrainian media reports.
Ukrainian engineers use all the information available to "develop the best missiles we can," Smetanin said.
"Nobody in the world has such experience that our defense and weaponry manufacturers really have right now," Smetanin added.
"They've developed all this expertise and production capacity for these technologies," Blagden added. "If the Europeans want to access that expertise, then it's an obvious place to go."
But there are several obstacles in Kyiv's way. The war has taken an excruciating toll on Ukraine's economy, distended to prop up the war effort at the expense of swathes of spending across the war-torn society.
Ukraine's "economic situation is now unfortunately tough," Blagden said. Much of the workforce will have spent years in the military, and many of Ukraine's best and brightest will have become war casualties, he said.
Others have settled abroad in areas away from Ukraine.
While it is not yet clear how a ceasefire agreement would come together, it has appeared increasingly likely that Russia may retain its grip on parts of Ukraine that it has captured in the war. As it stands, Moscow controls the vast majority of the eastern Luhansk region and a significant part of neighboring Donetsk, which together are collectively referred to as the Donbas.
The Donbas was Ukraine's industrial heartland, the hub for the country's iron and steel industry prior to 2014, when Russia seized Crimea to the south of mainland Ukraine and backed separatist movements in Luhansk and Donetsk.
Ukraine's defense industry, while hoovering up expertise and refining designs, is still less capable of pumping out some of the most complex equipment, Freer said.
How Ukraine has fought Russia fundamentally clashes with how NATO nations would battle Moscow.
At varying points, Ukraine adopted parts of NATO warfighting strategy, only to run into snags or revert to the more familiar, Soviet-style tactics.
"The Ukrainians have fought the Russians in a very different manner to how NATO would do so, the lack of Ukrainian airpower being the single most important factor," Freer said.
At its heart, NATO doctrine relies on firm air superiority over an opponent, which Ukraine has never enjoyed over Russia.
But NATO is setting foot in a new era, one where the U.S.'s contribution under President Donald Trump has been thrown into doubt as it has not been in many decades. The U.S. is the most significant single contributor to NATO, including with its formidable air force.
Without American airpower, Europe might be able to take more lessons from Ukraine's way of fighting, Blagden argued. While countries like the U.K., France or Germany might have an advantage in the air over Russia in a hypothetical conflict, other NATO members cannot rely on it, he said.
For Poland or its Baltic neighbors within touching distance of Russia, "learning how Ukraine fights Russia is going to be, in some ways, much more relevant than learning how the U.S. would fight Russia," Blagden said.
Related Articles
US Rejects Putin's Proposal for Third Party Control of UkraineNATO Ally Calls Ukraine Air Strikes 'An Attack on Our Sovereignty'Map Shows Russian Advances: Ukraine War Update March 31Russian Artillery Losses Pass Grim Milestone
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What UK's Strategic Defense Review means for Ukraine
What UK's Strategic Defense Review means for Ukraine

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What UK's Strategic Defense Review means for Ukraine

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on June 2 that the United Kingdom is moving to "warfighting readiness," in large part in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the threat Russia poses to Europe. He made the comment as his government unveiled its latest Strategic Defense Review, which U.K. General Richard Barrons, one of the review's authors, described as the "most profound" change in U.K. defense in 150 years. The review sets out ambitious new targets, including at least 12 new attack submarines, fleets of drones and autonomous vehicles, as well as 7,000 new long-range weapons. Yet it also comes with urgent warnings. The review reveals that the U.K.'s Armed Forces are currently unprepared to fight adversaries such as Russia or China, nor could they conduct high-intensity warfare in a war like that in Ukraine. Insufficient munition stockpiles, low troop numbers, and ageing equipment are just a few of the weaknesses underpinning its assessment. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. is capable of." But as well as committing to bolstering its own defense capabilities, the U.K. must also manage the commitments already made to Kyiv, which it has vowed to support with a "100-year partnership." The U.K. has been one of Kyiv's closest supporters since the start of the full-scale invasion, and the review reiterates long-term support for Ukraine, committing 3 billion pounds ($4.06 billion) annually in military aid. "The bottom line is that all of this is about defending the U.K. after the conflict moves on from Ukraine primarily," Keir Giles, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, a U.K.-based think tank, told the Kyiv Independent. "Whether it's positive, negative, or catastrophic, either way, that's when the U.K. and its allies need to be ready for Russia's next move." The U.K. wants to create a more flexible procurement process, as demonstrated by that developed by Ukraine throughout the full-scale invasion, a dynamic it says would be vital should the U.K. deploy troops in support of a ceasefire. The review urges deeper defense industrial collaboration, including joint ventures and helping Ukraine access global markets, as well as rebuilding and sustaining its defense sector. This could include helping Ukraine service Soviet-era equipment still used abroad. The U.K. also aims to learn from Ukraine's experience in modern warfare, particularly in land combat, drones, and hybrid threats. However, the review highlights challenges — U.K. stockpiles of weapons such as Storm Shadow long-range missiles have been depleted through its support to Ukraine, and years of underinvestment have weakened domestic defense capacity. The U.K. has announced that it will build six new munition factories. This indicates a significant attempt to address one of the key criticisms of European defense, which is its lack of industrial base and reliance on U.S. support. While U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey has said that "we should expect to see new factories opening very soon," it is not clear how quickly this will translate into meaningful battlefield assistance for Ukraine's Armed Forces. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. are capable of, the best-case outcome for Ukraine would just be sending the money there to build stuff," Giles said. When asked how Ukraine could be best supported outside of the recommendations in the review, Giles said the "maximum support" should be given to Ukraine, without the hesitancy about doing damage to Russia." We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

NATO secretary general: Russia may attack NATO within five years
NATO secretary general: Russia may attack NATO within five years

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NATO secretary general: Russia may attack NATO within five years

Russia is building up its military capabilities and will be ready to use military force against NATO states within five years. Source: European Pravda; NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a speech at Chatham House in London on 9 June Quote: "Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years. Russia has teamed up with China, North Korea and Iran. They are expanding their militaries and their capabilities. Putin's war machine is speeding up, not slowing down. Russia is reconstituting its forces with Chinese technology and producing more weapons faster than we thought," Rutte explained. The NATO secretary general said that Russia produces as many munitions in three months as all NATO countries produce in a year. "And its defence industrial base is expected to roll out 1,500 tanks, 3,000 armoured vehicles and 200 Iskander missiles this year alone. Let's not kid ourselves. We are all on the eastern flank now. The new generation of Russian missiles travel at many times the speed of sound. The distance between European capitals is only a matter of minutes. There is no longer east or west. There is just NATO," Rutte said. Background: Andrius Kubilius, European Commissioner for Defence and Space, shared the assessment of Western intelligence that a Russian attack on EU states could occur within the next few years. The German Federal Intelligence Service believes that Russia sees itself in a systemic conflict with the West and is preparing for a major war with NATO. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Russia sentences 2 Azov fighters to over 20 years in prison
Russia sentences 2 Azov fighters to over 20 years in prison

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia sentences 2 Azov fighters to over 20 years in prison

A Russian court has sentenced two Ukrainian soldiers of the Azov Brigade to more than 20 years in prison for allegedly killing civilians in the city of Mariupol in Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast, Russia's Investigative Committee announced on June 9 on Telegram. Russia has held a number of sham trials with Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) over the past years, focusing in particular on Azov fighters captured during the war. Azov has been demonized by Russian propaganda for years. Russian authorities accuse sniper Ruslan Orlov and paramedic Artem Novikov of shooting three civilians in Mariupol in April 2022. The Russian court sentenced Orlov to 26 years in a strict regime colony, and Novikov to 24 years. Ukraine has not yet commented on the Russian Investigative Committee's statement. Russia's months-long siege of Mariupol between February and May 2022 reduced the port city to a landscape of rubble and killed thousands. In the meantime, the Azovstal Steel Plant in Mariupol became a symbol of Ukrainian resistance at the onset of the all-out war, as Ukrainian soldiers valiantly defended the plant under the Russian siege. On May 16, 2022, Azovstal defenders were ordered to surrender to the encircling Russian forces after nearly two months of constant bombardment of the besieged plant. The evacuation from Azovstal ended on May 20, 2022, with Ukrainian soldiers transferred to a penal colony in Russian-occupied Olenivka, Donetsk Oblast, now infamous as the site of the mass killing of Azov fighters. On July 28, an explosion killed 54 Ukrainian prisoners of war and injured over 150 at the Olenivka penal colony. Many of them were members of Azov. While hundreds of Azov fighters have been released since 2022, hundreds more remain in captivity. Read also: War's unseen isolation: A Ukrainian officer's story of survival and hope We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store