logo
Ukraine's Transformation Into A Military Powerhouse

Ukraine's Transformation Into A Military Powerhouse

Miami Herald01-04-2025

"Thanks to its defense industries," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky remarked back in October, "Ukraine is set to become one of the key global contributors to security and a very strong player in the global arms and defense technology market."
That is certainly Kyiv's vision for its future. "We can be one of the biggest producers of sophisticated weaponry," Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs and a member of Zelensky's party, told Newsweek.
"Ukrainian technologies are going to be required by the world," Kyiv's strategic industries minister, Herman Smetanin, told Newsweek on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference in Germany in mid-February.
There are many unknowns about what post-war Ukraine will look like, with much depending on how U.S.-backed ceasefire negotiations play out.
One of Russia's conditions for considering inking an agreement is a limit on Ukraine's military might. The Kremlin said in March that Russia wanted to stop military mobilization in Ukraine, and the re-equipping of Kyiv's military.
Meanwhile for Ukraine, exporting its technology to its allies is one of the eventual goals, but officials are clear that defending country's borders comes first. "We need weaponry to survive," Merezhko said.
Ukraine needs a strong defense industry and advanced weapons to make sure it cannot be invaded again, Smetanin said.
It took a matter of weeks in early 2022 for Ukraine to morph into what could be termed a "European major power," slotting advanced Western equipment into its mobilized military, said David Blagden, an associate professor of international security and strategy at the U.K.'s University of Exeter.
The war has become an "intense crucible of technological innovation," Blagden told Newsweek.
While Kyiv has leaned heavily on Western support to prop up its war effort, it has been Ukrainian personnel collecting battlefield experience and operating cutting-edge technology that Kyiv's backers have never had to use in a similar way.
While most militaries had waded into developing various types of drones prior to 2022, Russian and Ukrainian use of uncrewed surface, ground and aerial vehicles has revolutionized how this type of technology is used in combat.
The world's armed forces have watched on closely as Kyiv and Moscow have vied to be the most effective at deploying cheap, throwaway explosive drones and longer-range systems able to strike targets hundreds of miles away from their pilots.
Ukraine also now has ample expertise in large-scale land operations and how to maintain an extensive air defense network that European NATO states do not have, Blagden said.
European countries and the U.K. have trained Ukrainian personnel across the military, including tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers through the London-led initiative known as Operation Interflex.
But British and European soldiers training in eastern Romania throughout February, as part of NATO's largest exercises this year, said they modeled their training exercises on Ukraine's experiences, their tactics informed by how Kyiv fought. British soldiers were among those winding their way around trenches in Romania with designs lifted from the battlefields of Ukraine.
A "huge amount" has been taken onboard from the war in Ukraine, British Army Lieutenant Colonel Harry Waller told Newsweek in eastern Romania.
"Fighting a peer conflict against Russia is what NATO trains for above all else and this is something Ukraine has done for over three years now," said William Freer, a research fellow in national security at the U.K.-based Council on Geostrategy think tank.
Through the more than three years of full-scale war, Ukraine has collected "invaluable" battlefield experience, said Merezkho. "We'll be a huge asset for NATO and for the European Union."
Ukraine, through ramping up its defense industry, has managed to lessen some of its reliance on Western aid. Kyiv's defense industry has increased its capabilities thirty five-fold since February 2022, Smetanin said.
Ukraine now produces at home more than half of its military hardware, while it gets roughly a quarter of its military supplies from Europe and a fifth from the U.S.
Speaking in early October, Zelensky said Ukraine had produced 25 times more ammunition for artillery systems and mortars than it pumped out in all of 2022. The Ukrainian leader has said Ukraine could now produce at least 15 new units of its Bohdana howitzers each month.
Europe has struggled to source enough military hardware—especially artillery—for Ukraine, depleting its own stockpiles while struggling to produce replacement equipment or make enough ammunition.
The demand for 155mm shells far outstrips supply. The European Union pledged to deliver 1 million shells by March 2024, but fell far short of this target.
The U.S., which has maintained higher levels of military spending while many of its European allies invested elsewhere, has a much more powerful military-industrial complex. But for Europe, there is the possibility that the continent could look to Ukraine to help replenish its drained stocks.
Ukraine is able to build military equipment at a fairly low cost and on a large scale, Freer told Newsweek.
Ukraine said at the start of the year that it would ramp up its long-range drone and missile programs, buying at least 30,000 drones able to fly hundreds of miles over 2025. Over the year, Kyiv is also planning on having 3,000 cruise missiles and drone-type missiles roll off its production lines, prime minister Denys Shmyhal said in January.
Ukraine is actually capable of producing more than 30,000 of these deep-strike drones, Smetanin told Newsweek in Munich in February. It is also on track to hit a production target of over 10,000 ground drones, Smetanin said.
"We have some more missiles coming that are currently being tested," Smetanin added, speaking via an interpreter.
Ukraine unveiled a raft of new technology at the end of 2024, including sets of missile-drone hybrids. Kyiv debuted its Peklo missile — or "hell," in Ukrainian — and the Ruta, able to travel up to 300 kilometers, according to Ukrainian media reports.
Ukrainian engineers use all the information available to "develop the best missiles we can," Smetanin said.
"Nobody in the world has such experience that our defense and weaponry manufacturers really have right now," Smetanin added.
"They've developed all this expertise and production capacity for these technologies," Blagden added. "If the Europeans want to access that expertise, then it's an obvious place to go."
But there are several obstacles in Kyiv's way. The war has taken an excruciating toll on Ukraine's economy, distended to prop up the war effort at the expense of swathes of spending across the war-torn society.
Ukraine's "economic situation is now unfortunately tough," Blagden said. Much of the workforce will have spent years in the military, and many of Ukraine's best and brightest will have become war casualties, he said.
Others have settled abroad in areas away from Ukraine.
While it is not yet clear how a ceasefire agreement would come together, it has appeared increasingly likely that Russia may retain its grip on parts of Ukraine that it has captured in the war. As it stands, Moscow controls the vast majority of the eastern Luhansk region and a significant part of neighboring Donetsk, which together are collectively referred to as the Donbas.
The Donbas was Ukraine's industrial heartland, the hub for the country's iron and steel industry prior to 2014, when Russia seized Crimea to the south of mainland Ukraine and backed separatist movements in Luhansk and Donetsk.
Ukraine's defense industry, while hoovering up expertise and refining designs, is still less capable of pumping out some of the most complex equipment, Freer said.
How Ukraine has fought Russia fundamentally clashes with how NATO nations would battle Moscow.
At varying points, Ukraine adopted parts of NATO warfighting strategy, only to run into snags or revert to the more familiar, Soviet-style tactics.
"The Ukrainians have fought the Russians in a very different manner to how NATO would do so, the lack of Ukrainian airpower being the single most important factor," Freer said.
At its heart, NATO doctrine relies on firm air superiority over an opponent, which Ukraine has never enjoyed over Russia.
But NATO is setting foot in a new era, one where the U.S.'s contribution under President Donald Trump has been thrown into doubt as it has not been in many decades. The U.S. is the most significant single contributor to NATO, including with its formidable air force.
Without American airpower, Europe might be able to take more lessons from Ukraine's way of fighting, Blagden argued. While countries like the U.K., France or Germany might have an advantage in the air over Russia in a hypothetical conflict, other NATO members cannot rely on it, he said.
For Poland or its Baltic neighbors within touching distance of Russia, "learning how Ukraine fights Russia is going to be, in some ways, much more relevant than learning how the U.S. would fight Russia," Blagden said.
Related Articles
US Rejects Putin's Proposal for Third Party Control of UkraineNATO Ally Calls Ukraine Air Strikes 'An Attack on Our Sovereignty'Map Shows Russian Advances: Ukraine War Update March 31Russian Artillery Losses Pass Grim Milestone
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU targets Russia with sanctions, lower oil price cap
EU targets Russia with sanctions, lower oil price cap

UPI

time30 minutes ago

  • UPI

EU targets Russia with sanctions, lower oil price cap

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen (R) and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas briefed the press Monday on the 18th package of sanctions against Russia, in Brussels, Belgium. Photo by Olivier Matthys/EPA-EFE June 10 (UPI) -- The European Commission on Tuesday unveiled its latest in a series of sanctions against Russia targeting energy exports, infrastructure and finances. "Oil exports still represent one-third of Russia's government revenues," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said at a news conference in Brussels, Belgium. "We need to cut this source of revenues," she added. The measures aimed to put pressure on Moscow to end Russia's war in Ukraine include a proposal to lower the current $60 oil price cap to $45 per barrel and bans use of the Nord Stream pipelines between Germany and Russia. At least nine individuals and 33 companies will be slapped with asset freezes. And the EU will consider adding another 77 boats part of Russia's "shadow fleet" banned in European ports of entry, part of at least 300 other barred Russian vessels. In addition, at least 22 Russian banks will be cut off from the SWIFT international banking system and the Russian Direct Investment Fund. Von der Leyen called the sanctions "robust" and "hard-biting" and added that Russia's economy has already been bowing to past pressure. "Russia continues to bring death and destruction to Ukraine," she said Monday at the press conference with Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat. "Our message is clear: This war must end." Kallas called Russia's military invasion of Ukraine "outright illegal." She said it was "clear that Russia does not want peace," adding it is "cruel, aggressive and a danger to us all." It arrived ahead of this weekend's G7 summit in Alberta, Canada where the new oil price caps will be discussed. "With this package, we step up pressure on Russia," stated von der Leyen. "Our objective is very clear: We are reiterating the call for a full, unconditional ceasefire of at least 30 days," she said.

In African universities, Russia's war against Ukraine finds new supporters
In African universities, Russia's war against Ukraine finds new supporters

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

In African universities, Russia's war against Ukraine finds new supporters

The halls of academia have long been considered sanctuaries of critical thinking, intellectual discourse, and the pursuit of truth. Universities across the globe pride themselves on fostering environments where diverse perspectives can be examined, debated, and understood through the lens of scholarly rigor. However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine has exposed a troubling trend within certain African academic institutions: a marked bias toward Russian narratives that undermines the very principles of academic integrity and intellectual honesty that universities claim to uphold. This bias is not merely an abstract concern about geopolitical alignment; it represents a fundamental betrayal of the educational mission that universities exist to fulfill. When academic institutions abandon objectivity in favor of political positioning, they fail their students, their communities, and the broader pursuit of knowledge that defines higher education. The stakes could not be higher as universities shape the minds of future leaders, policymakers, and citizens who will navigate an increasingly complex global landscape. When African academics present papers at international conferences that uncritically repeat Russian talking points, they undermine their own credibility and that of their institutions. Across various African universities, a concerning pattern has emerged since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Rather than maintaining the scholarly distance necessary for objective analysis, numerous institutions have embraced narratives that closely align with Russian state propaganda. This manifests in multiple ways: academic conferences that present one-sided perspectives on the conflict, research publications that uncritically amplify Moscow's justifications for the war, and classroom discussions that frame the invasion through the lens of Western imperialism rather than examining it as a clear violation of international law. Read also: Ukraine must look beyond the EU for its agricultural future The roots of this bias are complex and multifaceted. Historical ties between the Soviet Union and various African nations during the Cold War era have created lingering sympathies that some academics appear unable to separate from contemporary realities. Additionally, legitimate grievances about Western colonial history and ongoing concerns about neocolonialism have been exploited to create false equivalencies between Russian aggression and Western influence. Some academics have conflated criticism of Western policies with support for Russian actions, creating a dangerous intellectual blind spot. Economic factors also play a role. Russian investment in African educational infrastructure, scholarship programs, and research partnerships have created institutional relationships that some universities appear reluctant to jeopardize through objective analysis of Russian actions. This economic dependence has compromised academic freedom, creating situations where financial considerations override scholarly integrity. The influence of Russian state media and disinformation campaigns cannot be overlooked. RT (formerly Russia Today) and Sputnik have specifically targeted African audiences with sophisticated propaganda operations designed to shape public opinion. Unfortunately, some academics have proven susceptible to these narratives, either through genuine belief or through a misguided sense that amplifying Russian perspectives represents intellectual diversity. When universities abandon objectivity, the consequences extend far beyond the ivory tower. Students who receive biased education are ill-equipped to understand complex global issues, make informed decisions as citizens, or contribute meaningfully to policy discussions. They graduate with skewed worldviews that may influence their professional and personal choices for decades to come. The credibility of African scholarship suffers when institutions are perceived as politically motivated rather than academically rigorous. This damages the reputation of African universities in international academic circles, potentially limiting collaboration opportunities, research partnerships, and the mobility of African scholars. When African academics present papers at international conferences that uncritically repeat Russian talking points, they undermine their own credibility and that of their institutions. True intellectual independence requires the courage to analyze situations objectively, regardless of political pressures or historical sympathies. Perhaps most importantly, bias in academia contributes to the broader information warfare that authoritarian regimes wage against democratic values and international law. Universities that should serve as bastions of critical thinking instead become unwitting participants in propaganda campaigns designed to undermine global stability and human rights. The situation becomes particularly problematic when considering the humanitarian dimensions of Russia's war against Ukraine. Hospitals, schools, and civilian infrastructure have been deliberately targeted by Russian forces, creating a refugee crisis that has displaced millions of people. When universities fail to acknowledge these realities or attempt to justify them through geopolitical frameworks, they implicitly endorse violence against civilians and violations of international humanitarian law. African universities must recommit to their fundamental mission of pursuing truth through rigorous scholarship rather than serving as vehicles for political propaganda. This transformation requires several concrete steps. First, universities must establish clear guidelines for faculty regarding the difference between legitimate academic analysis and political advocacy. While scholars should be free to examine controversial topics from multiple perspectives, they must do so within frameworks that respect evidence, logic, and established principles of international law. Second, African universities must diversify their funding sources and partnership arrangements to reduce dependence on any single country or ideological bloc. The current situation, where some institutions appear reluctant to criticize Russian actions due to financial relationships, represents an unacceptable compromise of academic independence. Read also: Hiding in plain sight — how Russia's cultural centers continue to operate in US, Europe despite espionage claims Third, universities must invest in media literacy and critical thinking education for both faculty and students. The susceptibility of some academics to Russian disinformation campaigns reveals significant gaps in the ability to evaluate sources, identify propaganda techniques, and distinguish between credible and manipulated information. Fourth, African universities must strengthen their commitment to international academic standards and peer review processes. When scholars publish work that fails to meet basic standards of evidence and argumentation, it reflects poorly on the entire African academic community. Rigorous peer review can help ensure that African scholarship maintains the quality necessary for international respect and collaboration. The pro-Russian bias evident in some African universities represents more than just a misguided political position; it constitutes a surrender of intellectual independence to foreign propaganda. This is particularly ironic given that many of these same institutions pride themselves on their commitment to African independence and self-determination. True intellectual independence requires the courage to analyze situations objectively, regardless of political pressures or historical sympathies. It means acknowledging uncomfortable truths about allies while maintaining the ability to critique opponents fairly. Most importantly, it means refusing to sacrifice scholarly integrity for political convenience. African universities have a proud tradition of intellectual leadership, from their role in anti-colonial movements to their contributions to post-independence development. This legacy is endangered when institutions abandon their commitment to truth in favor of political positioning. The current moment represents a critical test of whether African higher education will live up to its historical role as a force for enlightenment and progress. The stakes extend beyond the immediate question of how to analyze Russia's war against Ukraine. Universities that compromise their integrity on this issue signal their willingness to subordinate academic standards to political considerations more broadly. This has implications for everything from scientific research to economic analysis to social policy development. African universities stand at a crossroads. They can continue down the path of political bias, sacrificing their integrity for short-term political or economic gains, or they can lead by example by recommitting to the principles of scholarly objectivity and intellectual honesty that define higher education at its best. The choice is not merely about how to analyze one particular conflict; it is about the fundamental purpose and character of African higher education. Universities that choose bias over objectivity risk becoming irrelevant to serious academic discourse and ineffective in their mission to educate future leaders. The world needs African universities that can contribute meaningfully to global conversations about complex issues. This requires institutions that maintain high scholarly standards, resist political pressure, and commit themselves to the pursuit of truth regardless of where it leads. Read also: Can South Africa lead the charge for nuclear safety in Ukraine? Submit an Opinion Editor's Note: The opinions expressed in the op-ed section are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Kyiv Independent. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

INTC Plunges 35% in the Past Year: Should You Dump the Stock?
INTC Plunges 35% in the Past Year: Should You Dump the Stock?

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

INTC Plunges 35% in the Past Year: Should You Dump the Stock?

Intel Corporation INTC has plunged 35.1% over the past year against the industry's growth of 12.3%, lagging its peers Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. AMD and NVIDIA Corporation NVDA. While NVIDIA stock is up 16.4%, Advanced Micro has declined 27.5% over this period. Much of Intel's underperformance is attributable to the severe financial difficulties and operational challenges as it plays a catch-up game with its rivals. One-Year INTC Stock Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While most of the competitors evolved with the changing demand patterns, Intel fell behind others as it hung on to its legacy products. For example, despite making significant inroads in AI (artificial intelligence) chips, Intel lagged NVIDIA on the innovation front with the latter's H100 and Blackwell graphics processing units (GPUs) being runaway successes. This offered a competitive advantage to NVIDIA, with leading technology companies reportedly piling up NVIDIA's GPUs to build clusters of computers for their AI work. Moreover, Intel has been facing challenges due to the disruptive rise of over-the-top service providers in this dynamic industry. Price-sensitive competition for customer retention in the core business is expected to intensify in the coming days. Aggressive competition is likely to limit the ability to attract and retain customers and affect operating and financial results. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research An accelerated ramp-up of AI PCs has significantly affected Intel's short-term margins, as it shifted production to its high-volume facility in Ireland, where wafer costs are typically higher. Margins were also adversely impacted by higher charges related to non-core businesses, charges associated with unused capacity and an unfavorable product mix. Competitive pricing pressure from rivals has further dented its accounted for more than 29% of Intel's total revenues in 2024, making it the single largest market for the company. However, the communist nation's purported move to replace U.S.-made chips with domestic alternatives significantly affected INTC's revenue prospects. The directive to phase out foreign chips from key telecom networks by 2027 underscores Beijing's accelerating efforts to reduce reliance on Western technology amid escalating U.S.-China trade and tariff Washington tightens restrictions on high-tech exports to China, Beijing has intensified its push for self-sufficiency in critical industries. This shift poses a dual challenge for Intel, as it faces potential market restrictions and increased competition from domestic chipmakers. In addition, weaker spending across consumer and enterprise markets, especially in China, resulted in elevated customer inventory levels. Earnings estimates for Intel for 2025 have moved down 40.8% to 29 cents over the past year, while the same for 2026 has declined 31.2% to 77 cents. The negative estimate revision depicts bearish sentiments for the stock. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Intel is investing to expand its manufacturing capacity to accelerate its IDM 2.0 (Integrated Device Manufacturing) strategy. Interim management is committed to keeping the core strategy unchanged despite efforts to drive operational efficiency and agility. The company is emphasizing the diligent execution of operational goals to establish itself as a leading foundry. Its latest Xeon 6 processors with Performance-cores (P-Cores) can support large AI workloads across diverse sectors. With industry-leading capabilities in AI processing, the Xeon 6 family delivers the industry's best CPU for AI at a lower total cost of ownership. Intel's innovative AI solutions are set to benefit the broader semiconductor ecosystem by driving down costs, improving performance and fostering an open, scalable AI environment. The company has received $7.86 billion in direct funding from the U.S. Department of Commerce for its commercial semiconductor manufacturing projects under the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act. The funds will support Intel in advancing critical semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging projects in Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon, likely paving the way for innovation and remains on track with its 5N4Y (five nodes in four years) program to regain transistor performance and power performance leadership by 2025. Intel Xeon platforms have reportedly set the benchmark in 5G cloud-native core with substantial performance and power-efficiency improvements, additional power-saving capabilities and easy-to-deploy software. This has triggered healthy demand trends from major telecom equipment manufacturers and independent software vendors to optimize and unleash proven power savings for a more sustainable future. Intel's innovative AI solutions hold immense promise for the broader semiconductor ecosystem. By addressing the challenges of scalability, performance and interoperability, it is paving the way for widespread AI adoption across enterprises worldwide. Management is focusing on simplifying parts of its portfolio to unlock efficiencies and create value. However, the recent product launches appear 'too little, too late' for Intel. In addition, margin woes amid strict export restrictions, unfavorable product mix and elevated customer inventory levels weigh on its bottom line. Declining earnings estimates remain an overhang. With a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), Intel appears to be treading in the middle of the road, and investors could be better off if they exercise caution and stay invested for long-term gains. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Intel Corporation (INTC) : Free Stock Analysis Report Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store