Redskins and Indians and Obama (Oh, my): How Trump is deflecting from his Epstein Files bungle using MAGA greatest hits
Ahead of a trip to Scotland this week, Trump is desperate to move the news cycle off of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and a declaration by the Justice Department that a list of the convicted pedophile's co-conspirators did not exist within the files of the DOJ's investigation — despite his dutiful Attorney General Pam Bondi having said she had such files 'sitting on my desk.'
What happened next was a wildfire that engulfed the president's online MAGA base and even spread into the broader podcasting 'manosphere.'
As explanations from his supporters ranged from confusion to outright accusations of a cover-up, the president fumed privately and in a since-deleted Truth Social post that his 'PAST' supporters refused to move on from the issue.
Epstein was known to cultivate relationships with powerful men and institutions, and speculation has swirled online for years around whether any of those men (including Trump, former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew) knew of his crimes or participated themselves during excursions to his private island or other properties.
Donald Trump reignited battles with Barack Obama, Rosie O'Donnell and the Washington Commanders to distract from his Epstein files flop (AFP via Getty Images)
No public evidence exists definitively linking anyone besides Epstein and his society-girl lover Ghislaine Maxwell to the crimes, though evidence of his close friendships with Trump and others is extensive.
Epstein's death was ruled a suicide after he was found in a New York City jail cell on Aug. 10, 2019, sparking further cries in MAGA circles of a mass conspiracy.
On Thursday, the picture of that relationship between the president and a man who would later be found hanged in his jail cell awaiting trial for sex trafficking of minors and women changed considerably.
The Wall Street Journal, a Rupert Murdoch-owned publication, published an article revealing the stomach-churning contents of a supposed 50th birthday card Maxwell curated for her boyfriend in 2003.
The card included messages from friends of Epstein including, according to the WSJ, Donald Trump. The paper reports that Maxwell 'collected' a letter from Trump for the card, which alluded to a hidden 'secret' shared by the two men, concluding with Trump allegedly wishing Epstein a happy birthday — all done on top of a marker-drawn bawdy image of a naked woman.
The White House and the president directly denied all parts of the Journal's report, including the authenticity of the note. But the president also redoubled his efforts at misdirection, and launched a slew of new efforts to that aim.
Trial evidence image shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and financier Jeffrey Epstein aboard his private jet. Epstein was found to have died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 -- during Trump's first term -- after being charged with child sex trafficking. Maxwell was later convicted of those crimes and is serving 20 years in prison. (US District Court for the Southern District of New York)
First came the lawsuit against Murdoch and the Journal — as well as other independent reporters who circulated the story. This was unquestionably where the president saw the most success in the immediate term: turning the issue into a Trump vs. the media fight provides a unifying bogeyman for the right.
Supporters including Steve Bannon dialed back their calls for Trump to provide transparency as the reaction to the Journal's reporting clarified that Democrats and Trump's critics see the issue as a political opportunity.
Second was the resumption of Trump's war with Barack Obama, who more than any other Democrat has long held the president's political focus.
His entrance into national politics during the Obama era began with a racist campaign aimed at questioning the birthplace of the nation's first Black president, and after his first election victory in 2016 Trump accused his predecessor of directing the FBI to spy on his campaign.
Trump reignited those accusations this week, with the aid of Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence.
Gabbard published a memo accusing the Obama administration of changing intelligence assessments to support political conclusions, but the crux of her own declaration was centered around a false conflation of the intelligence community's (IC) conclusion that Russia had not attempted to hack directly into voting systems with what the IC actually did conclude: that Russia used bot farms and other means including materials stolen during the verified hack of the Democratic National Committee's servers to influence public opinion.
Not satisfied with picking one old fight, Trump picked two others.
On Sunday, the president declared on Truth Social that he may attempt to gum up the approval process for the Washington Commanders stadium in the nation's capital if the team did not return to its old name, abandoned for its racist connotations about Native Americans in 2020.
He likely does not have any power to actually carry out that threat, given that federal funding isn't involved in the stadium deal.
The same could be said about his resumption of hostilities with another nemesis: comedian Rosie O'Donnell. Trump threatened in a separate Truth Social post to strip her citizenship, something the president legally cannot do.
All of this is to say: Trump is throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks in a very obvious manner. On Monday, there were signs that many on the right were still unconvinced by the bluster.
Donald Trump is seen at a party with Jeffrey Epstein in 1992. (NBC News)
'So…the Democrats left all the files implicating themselves in Russia Gate but destroyed all the Epstein Files?' one conservative influencer, Kelly McCarty, snidely asked on X.
A number of Democrats have rallied behind a resolution with bipartisan support aimed at forcing the release of the DOJ's entire investigation into Epstein.
Those members were undeterred on Friday when Attorney General Pam Bondi moved to ask a court to unseal grand jury testimony regarding Maxwell and Epstein, which they note is just a small part of the evidence collected by federal law enforcement.
It also remains the case that much of the uproar was fueled by the Trump White House itself.
MAGA supporters and others in the chorus of voices calling for evidence including the 'client list' to be released point to how right-wing influencers were summoned to the White House to receive 'phase 1' of 'The Epstein Files' in February.
Vice President JD Vance, before that, fueled the speculation in repeated appearances on Theo Von's podcast, including during the 2024 election.
Months later, no one else has faced accountability for associations with Epstein and the extent of his crimes remains unknown to the public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration sues New York City over its ‘sanctuary city' policies
The Justice Department on Thursday announced a lawsuit against New York City's so-called sanctuary city policies, days after the Trump administration blamed those policies for the shooting of an off-duty US Customs and Border Protection officer in Manhattan. The lawsuit mirrors one filed against Los Angeles last month and is part of the administration's widespread crackdown on undocumented immigrants in the US. Similar lawsuits have also been filed against New York state, Colorado, Illinois, the city of Rochester, New York, and several New Jersey cities, the Justice Department said in a statement. The department argues New York City's policies 'are designed to impede the Federal Government's ability to enforce the federal immigration laws' and have allowed criminals in the country illegally to evade detainment and deportation. 'New York City has released thousands of criminals on the streets to commit violent crimes against law-abiding citizens due to sanctuary city policies,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in the Justice Department statement. 'If New York City won't stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will.' New York City Mayor Eric Adams said the city will review the lawsuit. 'Keeping New Yorkers safe also means making sure they feel safe, and we have been clear: no one should be afraid to dial 911, send their kids to school, or go to the hospital, and no New Yorker should feel forced to hide in the shadows,' Adams said in a statement. He added that while he supports 'the essence of the local laws,' he believes 'they go too far when it comes to dealing with those violent criminals on our streets,' and urged the city council to reexamine the policies 'to ensure we can effectively work with the federal government to make our city safer.' 'Sanctuary city' is a broad term used to describe jurisdictions that have policies designed to limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration officials. The general goal is to protect undocumented immigrants who are not involved in criminal activity from deportation. 'Just this week, New York City's sanctuary policies have reaped tragic consequences,' the Justice Department's lawsuit said, pointing to the shooting of the off-duty CBP agent over the weekend in an apparent robbery gone wrong. The agent, who was not in uniform at the time, was expected to survive and there is no indication he was targeted because of his employment, New York police said. The two suspects in the incident – Miguel Mora and Cristian Aybar Berroa – are undocumented immigrants and had criminal histories, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said. 'Both aliens entered the United States illegally and were repeatedly arrested for criminal behavior since,' the lawsuit said. '(Mora) was arrested four different times in New York City, and because of the mayor's policies and sanctuary city policies, was released back to do harm to people and to individuals living in this city,' Noem said Monday. Noem called on leaders of sanctuary cities nationwide to change their policies. When asked what policies would have prevented the shooting, Noem did not provide specifics. In its lawsuit against Los Angeles, the Justice Department claimed the city's sanctuary policies led to the protests against deportation actions that prompted President Donald Trump to federalize the National Guard and send Marine's to patrol the city. CNN's Lauren Mascarenhas, Jeff Winter, Gloria Pazmino and John Miller contributed to this report.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock
The return of sanctions, known as a 'snapback' mechanism, 'remains on the table,' according to a European diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks. 'A possible delay in triggering snapback has been floated to the Iranians on the condition that there is credible diplomatic engagement by Iran, that they resume full cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and that they address concerns about their highly-enriched uranium stockpile,' the diplomat said. European leaders have said sanctions will resume by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran's nuclear program. Advertisement Tehran, meanwhile, has said the U.S., which withdrew from the 2015 deal during President Donald Trump 's first term, needs to rebuild faith in its role in negotiations. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran's engagement was dependent on 'several key principles' that included 'rebuilding Iran's trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States.' In a social media post Thursday, he also said the talks shouldn't be used 'as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action.' Gharibabadi insisted that Iran's right to enrich uranium 'in line with its legitimate needs' be respected and sanctions removed. Advertisement Iran has repeatedly threatened to leave the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which commits it to refrain from developing nuclear weapons, if sanctions return. Friday's talks were being held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The identity of the E3 representatives were not immediately clear but the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner was thought to be attending. The U.K., France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal, alongside the U.S., Russia and China. When the U.S. withdrew in 2018, Trump insisted the agreement wasn't tough enough. Under the original deal, neither Russia nor China can veto reimposed sanctions. Since the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran, which saw American B-52 bombers hit three nuclear sites, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations while supporting Israel's attacks. Against the backdrop of the conflict, which saw Iran respond with missile attacks on Israel and a strike on a U.S. base in Qatar, the road ahead remains uncertain. While European officials have said they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out. Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the IAEA. A central concern for Western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to over 400 kilograms (882 pounds). Advertisement In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and reiterated that its nuclear program will continue within the framework of international law while adding the country had no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons. A spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said Thursday the country's nuclear industry would 'grow back and thrive again' after the recent attacks by Israel and the U.S. Vahdat reported from Tehran, Iran. Associated Press writer Stephanie Lichtenstein in Vienna contributed to this report.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Gaza Talks Stall as Israel, US Pull Negotiators
00:00 Earlier this week, there was some optimism that maybe we'd get a breakthrough on these ceasefire discussions. But there was no break for it. And in fact, it seems as though the talks once again have collapsed. So tell us the latest and why we think these these negotiations were not successful Yes, I think this definitely is a setback for these talks. There was a lot of optimism that if we weren't going to get a ceasefire announced this week, then then at least there would be a big breakthrough. And Donald Trump's main U.S. main envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, traveled to Europe. And the expectation or the hope, at least among many people, was that he would travel to Qatar, where the key the key negotiators for Israel and Hamas are. And if he did, that would be a sign that a ceasefire was imminent. But he hasn't gone there. And then last night, Israel said it was recalling its negotiators in the U.S. with doing the same. It's a little bit unclear, but obviously what what happened was that Israel studied Hamas's latest response, which came on Wednesday, and it wasn't satisfied. And some Israeli media are saying that Hamas upped its demands for the number of Palestinians that must be released from Israeli jails as part of the 60 day truce that they're negotiating. So that could have been a stumbling block. We did have one person involved in the mediation tell us that this doesn't mean the talks have collapsed completely. And we also had an Israeli official expressing some optimism that they could still go on. But clearly, this this you know, this is yet another instance of these of these talks stalling. Yeah, a setback Yesterday, the French President Macron made a big statement saying that France will move to recognize Palestinian statehood as soon as September over in the UK. The Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, is also under pressure to do the same. Why? Why now? What is it with this timing in particular? It's it's a good question. I think the bigger picture is that there's growing anger among world powers, especially in Western Europe. Well, in places like Western Europe and the Arab world over the continuation of the of the war in Gaza and the worsening humanitarian situation there, we had roughly 25 to 30 countries, including the UK and France and Japan and Norway and Australia, putting out a joint statement on on Monday in which they called for Israel to end the war immediately. And they said that the situation regarding supplies of food and and medicine to Gazans was and was horrific. And that's starvation was was growing. So that's the bigger picture. I think there's a lot of frustration in the rest of the world. Israel's relations with a lot of European countries have been severely damaged in recent months because because of all this and when it comes to Emmanuel Macron, he has been sort of among, let's say, key world powers, sort of at the forefront of saying he wants to recognize a Palestinian state and he's putting pressure on Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister, to do the same for Israel in the U.S. This is that very kind of frustrated by this move and they say it will threaten Israel's security.
