logo
Putin's Whole Trump Strategy Is in Tatters After Epic Drone Humiliation

Putin's Whole Trump Strategy Is in Tatters After Epic Drone Humiliation

Yahoo2 days ago

Vladimir Putin might have thought he had succeeded in persuading Donald Trump that the Ukrainians had already lost the war against Russia. But an ingenious sneak attack targeting Putin's most prized military assets proves otherwise and has dealt a blow to Russia's nuclear deterrent.
Using small quadcopter drones, the Ukrainian intelligence service SBU simultaneously struck multiple strategic bombers and early warning aircraft at four separate airbases across the vast Russian landmass on Sunday.
The surprise attack is a military disaster and an embarrassment for the Russian president as he looks to pressure the U.S. and others to give up on Ukraine.
The nature of the clandestine operation would not go amiss in a later Tom Clancy novel. Codenamed 'Operation Spider-Web,' the SBU drones were hidden in unattended cargo containers near the bases and began launching themselves one after another at Russian planes, including Soviet-era strategic bombers.
Footage posted to social media showed the cheap drones crashing into Russian aircraft, some of which were already ablaze. Ukrainian officials released a statement claiming that '34 percent of strategic cruise missile carriers at the main airfields of the Russian Federation were hit.'
Videos taken outside the base showed thick columns of smoke—and many of those planes, including Soviet-era TU-95 and TU-22M bombers, looked to be beyond repair.
Russia's bomber fleet serves several purposes. Since 2022 it has been one of the main tools for Russian missile strikes at Ukrainian cities.
The bombers also serve a more vital purpose for Russia: as one of the main components of Russia's nuclear deterrent alongside their nuclear missiles and submarines.
Until now, Ukraine has only managed to down a few bombers. The reported loss of 40 or more planes in a single day does not amount to the destruction of Russia's entire bomber fleet, but it is a significantly larger blow to their inventory, and their pride.
Ukraine has struck nuclear-related early warning radar installations before, but Russia's nuclear capabilities have never been called into question at this scale since the full-scale Russian invasion of 2022.
Just as important is the claim that the attack struck one or more of Russia's A-50 early warning aircraft. These planes, while unarmed, are equipped with powerful radars that serve as the eyes and ears of the Russian air force, similar to the U.S. AWACS planes.
Worse still, Russia likely only has five such aircraft operational after Ukraine reportedly shot down two of them in early 2024. If any of them are even temporarily unavailable, it could change Russia's air operations and reduce their awareness of Ukrainian air defense and their ability to find targets for the air force to bomb.
The strike, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said was 18 months in the planning, is a disaster for Russia as it seeks to promote a sense of strength ahead of another round of negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul beginning Monday.
Putin had a lot to brag about in theory: The new U.S. administration is seemingly scared of punishing Russia for its attacks on civilians, his forces are pushing to take more Ukrainian territory, and he has dramatically increased the scale of drone attacks against Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities.
Now, the narrative of the conflict has temporarily shifted to Ukraine's side. Even if an operation as complex as 'Spider's Web' cannot be replicated in the near term, Russia will still need to plan for contingencies and contend with Ukraine's long-range drones, which routinely target Russian airfields.
How Russia will respond to the attack is an open question. Russian media is attempting to downplay or ignore the damage, but footage of the attacks is already widely available on social media.
Historically, the way Russia regains the narrative in the war is to punitively bomb Ukrainian civilians. The very first drone attack on Ukraine's cities came after Kyiv successfully bombed the Russian-built bridge connecting Crimea to Russia.
Russia has already been scaling up its drone attacks on Ukrainian towns and cities, but Putin may opt to launch an even larger large salvo of missiles and drones to show the Russian bomber fleet is not entirely out of the fight.
Politically, Putin could try to use the strike to drive a deeper wedge between the U.S. and Ukraine, but it's unlikely to work.
The White House claimed that they were not warned of the attack, but the mood in the White House has also seemingly shifted from blaming Ukraine to pleading with Russia to cease bombing Ukraine and work towards peace.
These factors make it more likely that the U.S. will prove indifferent to the strike.
For Russia, there is no silver bullet to protect its airbases from future acts of sabotage. The Kremlin cannot simply move all of its aircraft out of range—one of the bases struck was thousands of miles from the Ukrainian border.
They could redouble their efforts to build hardened shelters for their aircraft, but those will still take a while to finish. Or they could increase the number of air defense systems and jammers at their bases, at the risk of disrupting operations and diverting sorely needed counter-drone systems from the front line.
Whatever course the Russian military takes, they will have now to deal with the constant fear that Ukrainian drones will be over their heads.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian strike kills 5 in Ukraine, including a 1 year old

time29 minutes ago

Russian strike kills 5 in Ukraine, including a 1 year old

KYIV, Ukraine -- At least five people, including a one-year-old child, were killed in a Russian drone strike on the northern Ukrainian city of Pryluky overnight, regional governor Viacheslav Chaus said Thursday. The attack came just hours after Donald Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to Trump, Putin 'very strongly' said that Russia will retaliate for Ukraine's weekend drone attacks on Russian military airfields. Six more people were wounded in the attack and have been hospitalized, Chaus said. According to him, six Shahed-type drones struck residential areas of Pryluky early Thursday morning, causing severe damage to residential buildings. Hours later, seventeen people were wounded in a Russian drone strike on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv early Thursday, including children, a pregnant woman, and a 93-year-old woman, regional head Oleh Syniehubov wrote on Telegram. At around 1:05 a.m., Shahed-type drones struck two apartment buildings in the city's Slobidskyi district, causing fires and destroying several private vehicles. 'By launching attacks while people sleep in their homes, the enemy once again confirms its tactic of insidious terror,' Syniehubov wrote on Telegram.

Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced
Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Commentary: Outrage over Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced

Electric car subsidies are heading for the chopping block. A tax bill recently passed by House Republicans is set to stop billions in taxpayer cash from being spent on electric vehicle purchases. If embraced by the Senate and signed into law by President Donald Trump, the bill would gut long-standing government handouts for going electric. The move comes on the heels of another climate policy embraced by Republicans. Earlier this year, Trump announced plans to roll back burdensome rules that effectively force American consumers to buy electric, rather than gas-fueled, cars. The Environmental Protection Agency has called that move the 'biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.' Not everyone sees it that way. Jason Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, assailed Trump's efforts, noting that his 'administration's ignorance is trumped only by its malice toward the planet.' Other similarly aligned groups have voiced similar sentiments arguing that ending these rules would 'cost consumers more, because clean energy and cleaner cars are cheaper than sticking with the fossil fuels status quo.' Backtracking on EV purchasing mandates seems to have hit Trump haters particularly hard. That mandate — established by President Joe Biden — would have pushed U.S. automakers to sell more EVs. Millions more. Electric cars currently account for 8% of new auto sales. Biden ordered— by presidential fiat — that figure to climb to 35% by 2032. If you believe the hype, the result would be an electric nirvana, one defined by cleaner air and rampant job creation. I'm not convinced. For one thing, cleaner air courtesy of electrification requires that EVs replace gas-powered autos. They're not. In fact, study after study suggests that the purchase of EVs adds to the number of cars in a household. And two-thirds of households with an EV have another non-EV that is driven more — hardly a recipe for climate success given that EVs must be driven (a lot) to deliver climate benefits. Fewer miles driven in an EV also challenges the economic efficiency of the billions Washington spends annually to subsidize their purchase. Claims of job creation thanks to EVs are even more questionable. These claims are predicated around notions of aggressive consumer demand that drives increased EV manufacturing. This in turn creates jobs. A recent Princeton University study noted, 'Announced manufacturing capacity additions and expansions would nearly double U.S. capacity to produce electric vehicles by 2030 and are well sized to meet expected demand for made-in-USA vehicles.' Jobs would be created if there were demand for EVs. Except that's not what's happening. Rather, consumer interest in EVs has effectively cratered. In 2024, 1.3 million EVs were sold in the United States, up from 1.2 million in 2023. This paltry increase is even more worrying given drastic price cuts seen in the EV market in 2024. Tesla knocked thousands of dollars off its best-selling Model 3 and Model Y. Ford followed suit by cutting prices on its Mach-e. So did Volkswagen and Hyundai. Despite deep discounts, consumer interest in electrification remains — to put it mildly — tepid at best. So, when people equate electrification with robust job creation, I'm left wondering what they are going on about. Even if jobs were created, EV advocates are coy about how many of those jobs would benefit existing autoworkers. Would all these workers — currently spread across large swaths of the Midwest — be guaranteed jobs on an EV assembly line? If not, how many workers should expect to receive pink slips? For those who do, will they be able to find new jobs that pay as much as their old ones? Touting job creation for political expediency is one thing. Fully recognizing its impact on hardworking American families today, another. Some Americans may decry Trump's actions on climate, but they have only themselves to blame. Many of the pro-climate policies enacted, particularly during the Biden era, deliver little in the way of climate benefits (or any benefit for that matter) while making a mockery of the real economic concerns businesses and consumers have about climate action. No more. In justifying climate rollbacks, the president says many of his predecessor's policies have hurt rather than helped the American people. He's right and should be commended for doing something about it. ____ Ashley Nunes is a senior research associate at Harvard Law School. ___

Editorial: Ukraine hits back hard — Drone strikes show Russia's got plenty to lose
Editorial: Ukraine hits back hard — Drone strikes show Russia's got plenty to lose

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Ukraine hits back hard — Drone strikes show Russia's got plenty to lose

Helmets off to the Ukrainians for giving the Russian aggressors a humiliating black eye and the loss of $7 billion in military hardware using 117 relatively cheap drones. Yes, war is hell and that pain should be felt by the instigators of war (like Vladimir Putin) and not just the victims (like Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy). What the Ukrainians did was smuggle the drones into Russian territory to strike at some 40 Russian bombers, about a third of that nation's strategic cruise missile carriers. This is no Pearl Harbor sneak attack or some manner of terrorism. A state of war has existed since Russia's February 2022 invasion because of Putin's imperialist designs. This strike, as far east as Siberia and as far north as the Arctic, was only a surprise insofar as Ukrainian security forces cleverly organized it in a way that the Russians could not effectively counter. Unlike a terrorist attack, Ukrainian forces did not kill any civilians in this operation; in fact, so far there are no reports even of Russian service members dying in the drone bombings. It was surgically designed to affect exclusively Russian military hardware, hardware of the sort that Russia has been using to mount its own strikes on Ukraine, far less scrupulously aware of civilian casualties. On Sunday, Russia used its own drones to attack Ukrainian territory in retaliation, including the city of Zaporizhzhia, reportedly killing and injuring dozens of civilians. Some might claim that this is a misguided move just ahead of another round of peace talks that began in Istanbul, potentially derailing the conversations before they got underway. Yet, Ukraine says that this operation was in the works for about a year and a half, and it can't well let supposed peace talks — talks to which Putin himself seems only ambivalently committed — block what it must do to safeguard its territorial integrity and people. Every wrecked Russian war plane is one that can't go on bombing runs over Ukrainian cities. In any case, this helps strengthen Ukraine's position going into the conversations. Zelenskyy and his generals have once more demonstrated that, in the face of the Kremlin's significant raw military advantage, they are capable of utilizing strategy, technology, creativity and general willpower to even the scales far more than Putin had ever expected when he launched the war, thinking he'd be appointing a governor in Kyiv within a week. The Russian tyrant has now cost his country hundreds of thousands of lives and huge portions of its military capability. Perhaps this will be on Russian negotiators' minds as they meet their Ukrainian counterparts this week. Who knows what else Russia might lose fighting this grinding war of attrition, imperiling its economy, its population and its own defensive capabilities. We understand that what Putin wants most of all is to be able to say that he won, that he is returning Russia to some imagined former glory. Yet what he risks is ending up with a Russia that is far more isolated and far weaker than it was when he started. Even longtime admirer President Donald Trump, who once spoke approvingly of the despot's incursion into his smaller neighbor, has come around to the idea that Putin must be reined in. It's time for Putin to end this war, not with Ukraine's subjugation but with its territory kept out of Putin's hands. _____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store