DesignRush Reveals the 7 Most Challenging U.S. Cities for Solo Businesses in 2025
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - August 15, 2025) - A new report from DesignRush reveals the seven least profitable U.S. cities for solopreneurs in 2025, exposing where independent founders are most likely to operate at a loss despite the rise of solo work.
[ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10587/262499_14901628e4d3bad2_001.jpg ]
America's Least Profitable Cities for Solo Businesses Ranked
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10587/262499_14901628e4d3bad2_001full.jpg
In some regions, solo founders are losing more than $7,000 annually after expenses.
Using U.S. Census Bureau revenue data and Forbes' 2025 Cost of Living Index, the DesignRush Solopreneur Profitability Report analyzed 385 metro areas to pinpoint where solo businesses are struggling to stay financially afloat.
The 7 U.S. Cities With the Highest Expense-to-Revenue Ratios for Solo Businesses in 2025
[ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10587/262499_14901628e4d3bad2_002.jpg ]
Seven Least Profitable U.S. Cities for Solo Businesses in 2025
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10587/262499_14901628e4d3bad2_002full.jpg
1. Elmira, NY
Elmira ranks highest in the report, with an estimated -$7,796 average annual gap between solo business earnings and cost of living. The city has 4,339 nonemployer businesses.
'We often hear that remote work has leveled the playing field for solo businesses. But this data shows why regional context still matters,' said Gianluca Ferruggia, General Manager at DesignRush.
2. Hinesville, GA
Solo founders here face an average income shortfall of -$6,594 per year. The city hosts 5,734 solo businesses. Living costs are estimated at 121% of average founder income.
'This invaluable asset will serve as a wellspring of innovation and a cornerstone of growth for our community… It is not merely a building; it is a symbol of the city's commitment to fostering local talent.' - Allen Brown,Mayor of Hinesville
3. El Centro, CA
Solo workers in El Centro bring in $46,950/year, which sounds reasonable, until you learn that 113% of it is spent on living costs ($53,171). This means $6,221 in annual losses.
With 10,887 solo founders, this is more than a niche issue. That's $67 million in collective losses every year across El Centro's self-employed workforce.
Local reports say 1 in 3 founders is considering relocation citing high taxes, inflation, and lack of infrastructure.
4. Albany, GA
The average solo business in Albany loses -6,033 per year, spending 118% of their income just to live.
There are 14,323 solo founders in Albany. That's $86.4 million in aggregate solo revenue, but over $86 million in living costs, leaving almost no room for net gain at the city level.
5. Vallejo, CA
Despite sitting near one of the world's most powerful innovation centers, solo founders in Vallejo are losing $5,805 annually. They earn a decent $47,366, but spend $53,171 just to live, or 112% of their income.
'Despite proximity to the tech corridor, Vallejo's solo workforce is facing higher unemployment and declining contract opportunities' - Local Observer Daily
6. Amherst-Northampton, MA
This metro area shows a -$5,020 gap between average solo income and living expenses. It has 14,070 solo-operated businesses.
Many solo workers in the region depend on out-of-market clients to manage local cost pressures, according to local interviews.
7. Watertown-Fort Drum, NY
Watertown ranked the seventh worst U.S. city for solo founders in 2025, as they lose $4,233 every year.
There are just 6,098 solo businesses in the region, and nearly all remain dependent on Fort Drum.
'Approximately 4,600 soldiers and military spouses transition out of Fort Drum each year,' according to North Country Public Radio.
Methodology
The report uses U.S. Census Bureau data on nonemployer business revenue and Forbes' 2025 city-specific cost of living index to calculate the ratio of living costs to average solo business income. The analysis includes 385 metro areas across the U.S.
About DesignRush
DesignRush.com is a B2B marketplace that connects businesses with agencies in branding, digital marketing, development, and consulting. Through original reports and strategic rankings, DesignRush helps businesses scale smarter.
Media Contact:
Anonta Khan
Digital PR Manager, DesignRush
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/262499
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Zuckerberg Squandered His AI Talent. Now He's Spending Billions To Replace It.
At Meta, a chaotic culture and lack of vision have led to brain drain, with rivals saying its AI talent is lackluster. But Zuckerberg's frenzied hiring spree hasn't stopped the departures. M eta was teeming with top AI talent, until it wasn't. Years before Mark Zuckerberg's high-profile shopping spree, the company employed the researchers and engineers that would ultimately depart to start major AI companies: founders of Perplexity, Mistral, Fireworks AI and World Labs all hailed from the Facebook parent's AI lab. And as the AI boom has spurred the build of ever more capable models, others have decamped to rivals like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The brain drain of the last few years has been tough, three former Meta AI employees told Forbes. 'They already had the best people and lost them to OpenAI… This is Mark trying to undo the loss of talent,' one ex-Meta AI employee said. And even as Zuckerberg makes jawdropping offers for top tier AI researchers, the social media giant continues to lose those that are left. Today, when it comes to recruiting high-caliber AI researchers, Meta is often an afterthought. Insiders at some of Silicon Valley's biggest AI companies said that prior to the fresh hiring of the last few months, Meta's talent largely didn't meet their hiring bar. 'We might be interested in hiring some of the new people Mark is hiring now. But it's been a while since we were particularly interested in the people who were already there,' a senior executive at one of the major frontier AI companies told Forbes. 'Meta is the Washington Commanders of tech companies. They massively overpay for okay-ish AI scientists and then civilians think those are the best AI scientists in the world because they are paid so much.' An AI startup founder Google has hired less than two dozen AI employees from Meta since last fall, according to a person familiar with Google's hiring, compared to the hundreds of AI researchers and engineers it hired in that time frame overall. That person told Forbes the 'prevailing belief' is that Meta didn't have much talent left to poach from. Google declined to comment. This has lent an air of desperation to Zuckerberg's attempts to raid the likes of OpenAI and Thinking Machine Labs, the fledgling startup helmed by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, with nine-figure offers and promises of near-unlimited compute. In at least two cases, the Meta CEO has offered pay packages worth over $1 billion spread across multiple years, according to The Wall Street Journal. He reportedly poached at least 18 OpenAI researchers, but many have also turned him down, betting on bigger impact and better returns on their equity. 'Meta is the Washington Commanders of tech companies,' one AI founder told Forbes, referring to the NFL team in its pursuit of free agents. 'They massively overpay for okay-ish AI scientists and then civilians think those are the best AI scientists in the world because they are paid so much.' Meta strongly denied that it has had issues with AI talent and retention. 'The underlying facts clearly don't back up this story, but that didn't stop unnamed sources with agendas from pushing this narrative or Forbes from publishing it," spokesperson Ryan Daniels said in a statement. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has said he's spoken to Anthropic employees who have gotten offers from Meta who didn't take them, adding that his company wouldn't renegotiate employee salaries based on those offers. 'If Mark Zuckerberg throws a dart at a dartboard and hits your name, that doesn't mean you should be paid ten times more than the guy next to you who's just as skilled, just as talented,' he said last month on the Big Technology Podcast. Anthropic declined to comment. Anthropic has an 80% retention rate, the strongest among the frontier labs, according to a May report by VC firm SignalFire. The findings are based on data collected for all full-time roles including engineering, sales and HR, and not AI researchers specifically. In comparison, DeepMind has 78%, OpenAI 67% and Meta trails with 64%. An August report from the firm that focused broadly on engineering talent noted that Meta is aggressively hiring engineers across the company twice as fast as it is losing them. 'Some outbound movement helps explain why Meta is investing so heavily in rebuilding and expanding its technical bench,' said Jarod Reyes, SignalFire's head of developer community. 'It reflects the intensity of competition for senior AI talent and the pressure even top companies feel to backfill experience while scaling new initiatives.' In June, Zuckerberg hired Alexandr Wang, the 28-year-old former CEO of data labeling giant Scale AI and acquired a 49% stake in the company. Wang has been tasked with leading a new lab within Meta focused on building so-called 'superintelligence'— an artificial intelligence system that outperforms humans in a range of cognitive tasks. He was joined by Nat Friedman, a prominent AI-focused investor and former CEO of GitHub, as well as about a dozen top researchers freshly poached from OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic, some of whom had been reportedly offered $100 million to $300 million pay packages spread over four years. (Meta said the size of the offers was being misrepresented.) In late June, Meta hired Daniel Gross, prominent AI investor and former CEO of $32 billion-valued AI startup Safe Superintelligence, which he cofounded with former OpenAI research chief Ilya Sutskevar. The company has moved internal staff to the new team too. Nine staffers from Meta's infrastructure teams were reassigned to the superintelligence unit after some of them received offers from Thinking Machines Lab, the Wall Street Journal reported. 'We're not offering people $2 billion to join. We don't need to. We also don't have $2 billion to offer.' One AI startup founder Zuckerberg has also tried to win back people Meta previously lost, re-hiring the company's former senior engineering director Joel Pobar and former research engineer Anton Bakhtin, who'd left to work at Anthropic in 2023, according to The Wall Street Journal. They did not respond to requests for comment. Meanwhile, people are still leaving the company. In 2024, the Facebook parent was the second most-poached tech giant across all full time roles, with 4.3% of new employees at AI labs coming from the company, according to the May SignalFire report. (Google — excluding its DeepMind unit — was the top-raided tech giant.) Last week, Anthropic hired Laurens van der Maaten, formerly a distinguished research scientist at Meta, who co-led research strategy for the social giant's flagship Llama models, as a member of Anthropic's technical staff. In June, enterprise AI startup Writer recruited Dan Bikel, a former senior staff research scientist and tech lead at Meta, as its Head of AI. At Meta, Bikel led applied research for AI agents, systems that can autonomously carry out specific actions. Cristian Canton, who led Responsible AI at Meta, left the company in May to join public research center Barcelona Supercomputing Center. The company lost Naman Goyal, a former software engineer at FAIR, and Shaojie Bai, a former senior AI research scientist, to Thinking Machine Labs in March. And Microsoft has reportedly created a list of its most-wanted Meta engineers and researchers, and has also mandated matching the company's offers, according to Business Insider. At French AI startup Mistral, at least nine AI research scientists have come directly from Meta since the startup's founding in April 2023, according to LinkedIn searches conducted by Forbes. At Meta, they worked on training early versions of Llama. Two of these hires were made within the last three months. And Elon Musk recently claimed xAI had recruited several engineers from Meta, without shelling out 'insane' and 'unsustainably high' amounts of money on compensation. Since January, xAI has hired 14 Meta engineers, Business Insider reported. A Culture of Chaos In December 2013, Meta started FAIR, its internal lab dedicated to AI. (Launched as Facebook AI Research, it repurposed the F to stand for 'Fundamental' after the company rebranded to Meta in 2021.) Led by renowned NYU professor Yann LeCun, it was regarded at the time as one of the best employers for people looking to build cutting edge AI. The lab contributed to pioneering research on computer vision and natural language processing. Those were the 'golden days of AI research,' said one former Meta research scientist. In February 2023, the company consolidated its AI research under a more product-focused team called GenAI instead of FAIR. While FAIR is still around, it has been 'dying a slow death' within Meta, where it has been allocated fewer compute resources and has suffered from major departures. 'Zuck should never have made FAIR less important,' that research scientist said. Meta denied at the time that FAIR has faded in importance and instead said that it is a new beginning for the lab, where it can focus on more longer term projects. Meta said FAIR and GenAI work closely together, which helps better coordinate across the two teams and make decisions faster. The newly-formed GenAI team was asked to sprint, working late nights and weekends to ship AI products, like Meta's conversational AI assistant and the AI characters that Zuckerberg would later unveil to the world at 2023's Meta Connect, the company's annual product conference, a third former senior researcher said. 'We basically had six months to go from pretty much nothing to shipping,' said that senior researcher, who was plucked from another team to join GenAI, which started with 200 to 300 employees and grew to almost 1,000. 'Llama 4 was a disaster.' A former Meta AI researcher As the AI race intensified, so did the sprint to continue shipping products in 2024 and 2025, they said. 'We went like bananas, working our tails off for the entire year.' But over time, the sprints started to feel more chaotic — senior leaders disagreed on technical approaches like the best way to pretrain models, teams were given overlapping mandates and people fought for credit, two ex-Meta AI employees said. Teams would be formed and disbanded in a matter of weeks, forcing researchers to frequently switch their focus on to different projects. One of the former AI researchers, who spent three years at Meta, said he shuffled through seven managers during his time there. One of the former senior AI researchers said the Metaverse — Zuckerberg's long term vision for a 3D world where people could interact with each others' avatars — was a messy roadblock. Having already drawn billions of dollars and resources, leaders at the company claimed the Metaverse was a priority for the tech giant in late 2022, even as AI grew in prominence. That year, the researcher was reassigned to Meta Horizon, the metaverse's platform for VR games and virtual spaces. 'They didn't really know what to do with all of us, and it was kind of an ill-fated move. And thankfully, the GenAI org formed and we got out of there,' they said. Meta spokesperson Daniels didn't comment on these claims. Got a tip for us? Contact reporters Rashi Shrivastava at rshrivastava@ or rashis.17 on Signal, and Richard Nieva at rnieva@ or RNieva.26 on Signal. Employees had to demonstrate business impact in biyearly performance reviews, like if their datasets were used to train models or if the models they worked on scored highly on specific benchmarks, a fourth former AI researcher told Forbes. Those who couldn't risked losing their jobs. 'People start grabbing scope, making sure that nobody else works on the projects that they're already working on, so that makes collaboration more difficult,' they said. Daniels said this review process is consistent for employees across the company. Many of these claims are echoed in a recent nine-page essay titled 'Fear the Meta culture' that Tijmen Blankevoort, a former AI research scientist at Meta, posted in the company's internal communication channel for the AI group. Blankevoort wrote in a public Substack post that he felt things at Meta 'were going off the rails.' 'Many people felt disheartened, overworked and confused,' he wrote, saying employees were afraid of being fired, team assignments changed regularly, and leaders had a 'wavering vision.' 'There is a humanity that I think is lost as I listened to candidates really describe the culture inside of the companies that they are leaving.' May Habib, CEO of enterprise AI startup Writer. Blankevoort did not respond to a request for comment, but after the essay leaked, he wrote a follow up post claiming that the document was meant for internal constructive criticism, and not meant to be a 'raging 'mic drop.'' Meta's Daniels said Blankevoort's account 'isn't surprising.' 'We're excited about our recent changes, new hires in leadership and research, and continued work to create an ideal environment for revolutionary research,' he said. Meta's AI reputation took a hit in April when it released Llama 4. The model was seen as a let down, both inside and outside the company, and was widely criticized for poor reasoning and coding skills. To make matters worse, the company was accused of artificially boosting Llama 4's benchmark scores to make its performance look better than it actually was, allegations the company denied. 'Llama 4 was a disaster,' one of the former researchers told Forbes. Now, Meta's flashy new superintelligence lab is raising more questions about where the company's efforts are headed. 'People are wondering where they fit in and they feel like they are being pushed to the side,' the ex-research scientist said. Merceneries versus Missionaires For rivals trying to fend off Zuckerberg's shock and awe financial incentives, the view is that he's appealing to mercenaries available to the highest bidder. The pitch is that they are antithetical to Meta because they attract true believers and 'missionaries.' 'I am proud of how mission-oriented our industry is as a whole; of course there will always be some mercenaries,' OpenAI chief Sam Altman wrote in a July letter to staff. 'Missionaries will beat mercenaries,' he added, noting 'I believe there is much, much more upside to OpenAl stock than Meta stock. But I think it's important that huge upside comes after huge success; what Meta is doing will, in my opinion, lead to very deep cultural problems.' OpenAI has responded to the pressure by reportedly adjusting salaries and giving bonuses of up to millions of dollars to research and engineering teams. 'Big tech has got such a mercenary view right now of this race of the need to control the output of the technology that we are all gunning towards, AGI,' said May Habib, CEO of enterprise AI startup Writer. 'There is a humanity that I think is lost as I listened to candidates really describe the culture inside of the companies that they are leaving.' One AI startup founder described a 'cultural shift' within Meta, saying he's started to see a larger pool of applicants from the company. 'We tend to hire more missionaries than mercenaries. So we're not offering people $2 billion to join. We don't need to. We also don't have $2 billion to offer people salaries,' he said. Facebook, of course, has also dealt with its share of baggage that might make it a difficult sell for newcomers. Over the last decade, the tech giant has limped through controversies related to election interference, radicalization, disinformation, and the mental health and well-being of teens. LeCun, who did not respond to interview requests, has previously acknowledged that those black eyes could impact public perception of the company's research lab as well. "Meta is slowly recovering from an image problem,' he told Forbes in 2023. 'There's certainly a bit of a negative attitude." ForbesBy Richard Nieva ForbesBy Rashi Shrivastava ForbesThwarted By Regulators, Vindicated By Wall Street: Design Startup Figma's CEO Is Now A Multi-BillionaireBy Iain Martin ForbesBy Emily Baker-White
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge Operations Remain Suspended Pending Outcome of CIRB Process
Rolling cancellations now extend to the afternoon of August 17, 2025 MONTRÉAL, August 16, 2025 /CNW/ - Air Canada today said all flights of Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge remain suspended pending the outcome of a Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) process related to a directive by the Government of Canada ordering binding arbitration in the company's contract negotiations with its flight attendants. Customers whose flights are cancelled are being notified of the cancellations and offered options that include a full refund, a future travel credit or rebooking on another airline. Those whose flights are cancelled are strongly advised not to go to the airport unless they have a confirmed booking on a flight by another carrier. In response to a labour disruption by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that led to a strike on August 16, Air Canada has been cancelling flights on a rolling basis. At present, all flights by Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge are cancelled until the afternoon (EDT) of August 17, 2025. Air Canada Express flights operated by Jazz or PAL continue to operate as normal. Air Canada deeply regrets the disruption's impact on customers. Additional customer information, including an FAQ, is available About Air Canada Air Canada is Canada's largest airline, the country's flag carrier and a founding member of Star Alliance, the world's most comprehensive air transportation network. Air Canada provides scheduled service directly to more than 180 airports in Canada, the United States and Internationally on six continents. It holds a Four-Star ranking from Skytrax. Air Canada's Aeroplan program is Canada's premier travel loyalty program, where members can earn or redeem points on the world's largest airline partner network of 45 airlines, plus through an extensive range of merchandise, hotel and car rental partners. Through Air Canada Vacations, it offers more travel choices than any other Canadian tour operator to hundreds of destinations worldwide, with a wide selection of hotels, flights, cruises, day tours, and car rentals. Its freight division, Air Canada Cargo, provides air freight lift and connectivity to hundreds of destinations across six continents using Air Canada's passenger and freighter aircraft. Air Canada's climate-related ambition includes a long-term aspirational goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. For additional information, please see Air Canada's TCFD disclosure. Air Canada shares are publicly traded on the TSX in Canada and the OTCQX in the US. Internet: Read our annual report Here Sign up for Air Canada news: Media Resources:PhotosVideosB-RollArticles SOURCE Air Canada View original content to download multimedia: Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fidelity: In Managing Portfolios, Advisors Are 'Leaning into Growth, But Keeping a Hand on the Brake'
You can find original article here Wealthmanagement. Subscribe to our free daily Wealthmanagement newsletter. In building portfolios for clients, financial advisors are leaning into large cap group domestic equities, developed markets for international equities, high-yield bonds in fixed-income allocations and liquid alternatives as a volatility buffer while increasingly using ETFs as a wrapper for those strategies. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA That's according to the latest analysis from Fidelity's portfolio construction team based on analysis of 3,198 advisor-managed portfolios from April to June 2025. 'For the near-term, fundamentals look strong, such as corporate earnings. The only uncertainties are policy uncertainty as well as the consistent risk of inflation,' said Mayank Goradia, head of portfolio construction at Fidelity Investments. 'It reinforces the need for diversification and discipline and regularly reviewing and understanding what's inside portfolios. ... Advisors are cautiously optimistic. They are leaning into growth but keeping one hand on the brake.' Not surprisingly, ETF usage continues to grow. Overall, Fidelity found 64% of incoming portfolios had some allocation to ETFs, and, on average, nearly 50% of advisor portfolios are allocated to ETFs. Advisors are most heavily relying on ETFs for U.S. equity exposure—with 72% using ETFs for those allocations, nearly equal to 77% that use mutual funds in that asset class. For international equities, however, just 42% of advisor portfolios use ETFs vs. 78% that use mutual funds. In addition, use of active ETFs continues to grow, with 36% of advisors using active ETFs vs. 13% in 2022. The average allocation to active ETFs was around 22%. The majority of flows into active ETFs were in the domestic large-cap space. 'Flows are going to follow the maturity of the products—the track record and the pedigree,' Goradia said. Active ETFs in the domestic large cap space have been around longer than in other categories and have more of a track record. Fixed-income strategies were next in the active ETF development pipeline, and flows are picking up there now as well, Goradia said. Fidelity found that overall average advisor portfolios are 70% allocated to equities. Of that, 79% is allocated to U.S. stocks vs. 21% for international vs. a mix of 73% to 27% in 2021. Within U.S. equity, the average portfolio includes a 65% allocation to large-caps, 22% to mid-caps and 13% to small caps. By style, growth equities came in at 28%, value at 29% and 43% to core. For non-U.S. equities, advisors had 84% of their allocations in developed markets and 16% in emerging markets. Non-U.S. equities have ridden some tailwinds in 2025, including a weakening dollar, stable fundamentals and strong earnings, and a tilt toward monetary easing policies outside the United States. Tariffs, however, represent a headwind to more trade-reliant economies, particularly in emerging markets. Fixed-income allocations stood at 25% of advisor portfolios, according to Fidelity. Of that, 79% is allocated to investment-grade bonds and 21% to high-yield bonds. 'Bonds are back, not just as a stabilizer but as an income-producing engine,' Goradia said. Allocations are also going for shorter duration of late. 'It has to do with talks about when the Fed starts cutting rates. Advisors are underweight fixed-income, but have enough allocation to investment grade and are supplementing it with high-yield and that's cutting into the average duration.' In addition, with higher correlations between bonds and equities, advisors have sought diversification by looking at liquid alternatives. Overall, Fidelity found that 11% of incoming portfolios had an allocation to liquid alts, with the most popular categories including hedge equity and market-neutral products. 'In a world where stocks and bonds move together, alts are the new shock absorbers,' Goradia said. 'We've never seen this much importance given to diversification. Diversification isn't just about spreading risk, but about building resilience and avoiding uncertainty.' In all, Fidelity said that of advisors using its portfolio construction services, about two-thirds come back on a periodic cadence, engaging between two and 10 times per year. 'They come back ever three months or six months to make sure they still feel good about their exposures.' Sign in to access your portfolio
