WildEarth Guardians: Oil and gas spills in New Mexico amount to a 'deluge'
New Mexico oil and gas operators averaged a spill every seven hours in the beginning months of 2025, according to a recent report released by a local environmental group.
Santa Fe-based nonprofit WildEarth Guardians compiled the spill data reported between January and March 2025 by oil and gas operators to the state's Oil Conservation Division, and found 75,000 barrels of liquids had spilled across six counties in the San Juan, Bravo Dome and Permian basins.
The report concludes these spills, mostly from active wells, 'threaten drinking water aquifers, soil health, air quality and the well-being of frontline communities and ecosystems.'
'We want to make sure that the public and policymakers are aware that this is an environmental crisis hiding in plain sight,' Rebecca Sobel, a campaign manager at WildEarth Guardians, told Source. 'These spills are happening as the regular cost of doing business, they're not exceptions — they're the rule for oil and gas operations in New Mexico.'
Of the 75,858 barrels of liquid spilled, operators lost about 10% of the waste into the environment.
'That loss means it's spilled and not recoverable from the environment,' Sobel said. 'That's permanent contamination.'
A spokesperson for the New Mexico Energy Minerals and Natural Resources Department, which oversees the state's Oil Conservation Division, said in a written statement that the department would not comment on specifics in the report.
'We cannot speak to the specifics of the Wild Earth Guardians report,' EMNRD spokesperson Sidney Hill wrote. 'However, the Oil Conservation continues to enforce its rules requiring operators to report and properly remediate all releases on land under its jurisdiction. The OCD also issues violation notices and fines when operators fail to properly remediate a release.'
The report urged state and federal regulators to 'issue meaningful fines, deny permits for repeat violators,' and publicly report the outcomes for violations around spills.
Nearly two thirds of the spills were of produced water — the wastewater from oil and gas fracking — which can contain radioactive materials, cancer-causing or toxic chemicals, heavy metals. Produced water also contains unknown chemicals used in the fracking process which do not have to be disclosed to the public or regulators under trade secrets protections.
'It's hard to do any kind of remediation or cleanup when you don't know what you're cleaning up,' Sobel said.
Additionally, 90 of the spills included crude oil — which contains cancer-causing components such as benzene and metals such as nick, arsenic and mercury. Finally, 28 spills contained condensate, the entrapped liquid hydrocarbon mixtures, and a byproduct of oil and natural gas production, which contains benzene, as well as emissions that can cause health effects.
About half of the spills' causes — 152 — were listed as 'equipment failure,' followed by 66 incidents of 'corrosion' and 29 'human error' spills.
Nearly 90% of the spills happened in the state's southeast corner, split nearly evenly between Eddy and Lea Counties in the Permian basin. Next highest were San Juan and Rio Arriba counties in the San Juan. Finally, one spill each occurred in Harding and Union counties in the Bravo Dome basin.
The majority of spills were listed on federal public lands at 199 spills, followed by 66 incidents on private land and 65 releases on state trust land.
This is the first of quarterly reports WildEarth Guardians expects to release this year.
'Our hope is that by tracking these spills, making them publicly available and accessible, folks start to take them seriously and regulators enact meaningful enforcement and regulation,' Sobel said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
China Navy and Coast Guard Ships Collide During Dispute With US Ally
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Chinese coast guard and navy destroyer collided during a dramatic confrontation with Philippine government forces in the South China Sea. Footage released by Manila captured the accident, which severely damaged the coast guard cutter. Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry via email for comment. Why it Matters The clash occurred near Scarborough Shoal. The rich fishing ground lies in the Philippines' maritime zone and is one of the most hotly contested features in a territorial dispute that last year led to the hospitalization of several Philippine sailors. China asserts sovereignty over most of the busy South China Sea, putting it at odds with overlapping claims by Manila and several other neighbors. A Hague-based arbitral tribunal rejected these sweeping claims in a 2016 ruling Beijing says is invalid. What To Know The Chinese ships had been attempting to block a joint Philippine Coast Guard–fisheries bureau mission to deliver supplies to local fishermen near Scarborough Shoal, known in the Philippines as Bajo de Masinloc and in China as Huangyan Island. The collision occurred 10.5 nautical miles (12 miles) east of the shoal as Chinese Coast Guard vessel CCG 3104 and guided-missile destroyer Guilin sought to drive away the much smaller Philippine Coast Guard patrol vessel BRP Suluan. A damaged Chinese coast guard ship is seen after accidentally colliding with a Chinese navy vessel while chasing a Philippine fisheries boat near Scarborough Shoal on August 11, 2025. A damaged Chinese coast guard ship is seen after accidentally colliding with a Chinese navy vessel while chasing a Philippine fisheries boat near Scarborough Shoal on August 11, 2025. Philippine Coast Guard via AP Video shows CCG 3104 in hot pursuit, deploying its water cannons, before turning starboard, right into the oncoming 7,500-ton destroyer, leaving the bow of the smaller ship visibly crumpled and twisted. "CCG 3104, which was chasing the BRP Suluan at high speed, performed a risky maneuver from the Philippine Coast Guard vessel's starboard quarter, leading to the impact with the People's Liberation Army Navy warship," Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson Jay Tarriela wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "This resulted in substantial damage to the CCG vessel's forecastle, rendering it unseaworthy." Tarriela said that immediately following the collision, the Philippines side offered "assistance with man-overboard recovery and medical aid for any injured CCG crew members." The other Philippine coast guard ship involved in the mission, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, escorted the dozens of Filipino fishermen waiting nearby to a secure location so the supplies could be distributed, the official added. The Chinese coast guard, in its own statement, accused the Philippine ships of intruding "under the pretext of delivering supplies to fishing boats." "The China coast guard, in accordance with the law, took necessary measures to drive them away, including tracking and monitoring from the outside, blocking, and controlling," the agency added, without mentioning the collision. What People Are Saying Brent Sadler, a retired U.S. Navy captain and senior research fellow with The Heritage Foundation, on X: "What comes next will be important as to how tensions play out... there was already an unusual flotilla of Chinese ships headed to Philippine islands to the north of Luzon (south of Taiwan)." Beijing-based think tank the South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative, in a July report: "The South China Sea dispute is not simply a test of maritime law—but of whether international law can evolve beyond its colonial and Eurocentric foundations to accommodate a genuinely pluralistic global order." What Happens Next It's unusual for a Chinese warship to interact directly with Philippine forces, and Guilin's actions are being viewed by analysts as an escalation. It remains to be seen whether the incident marks the beginning of heavier PLAN involvement in the dispute or whether China will escalate further. The Philippines is expected to continue challenging Chinese maritime incursions into its exclusive economic zone, with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. reiterating last week his pledge not to yield "one square inch" of Philippine-claimed waters.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘Unfortunately, it's the trees or Zozobra': Battle over Siberian elms puts Zozobra in jeopardy
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – It's a major ultimatum from Zozobra organizers, who said they won't hold their event if a group of trees in and around Fort Marcy Park aren't removed. While the idea has some support, others said it's not worth it for the one-day event. Story continues below New Mexico Strange: When prophetic dreams come true: New Mexico local speaks on visions of 9/11 Food: Traditional, glamourous, casual: A look at Albuquerque's tea rooms News: VIDEO: Albuquerque officers catch suspect who thought he was meeting an underage girl Trending: Cicada killer wasps spotted in Albuquerque. Here's what to know Less than a month away from its 101st burning, this year's Zozobra is in limbo. 'Unfortunately, it's the trees or Zozobra,' said Zozobra event chairman, Ray Sandoval. The Kiwanis Club of Santa Fe announced at a neighborhood meeting Tuesday night, 12 trees have to go for Old Man Gloom to go up in flames. Sandoval showed KRQE News 13 the trees in question, including nine Siberian elms in the arroyo and three more along the path at nearby Magers Field. 'The thought of cutting down a lot of nice trees for an extremely short window opportunity to view something is shortsighted,' said concerned neighbor, Bill West. Sandoval said it's more than just improving the viewing experience, citing safety concerns that could cost the event its insurance. 'What happens is we have a jumbotron in the corner, and so as soon as the lights go off, everybody crowds this bridge,' said Sandoval. While the 90-foot concrete bridge can handle a heavy load, it's still a risk. 'We understood that if we had an emergency situation that we were going to hurt people just in terms of trampling,' said Sandoval. Some say they'd rather see the trees go than lose out on tradition, but not everyone is on the same page. KRQE News 13 heard from multiple neighbors who didn't want to go on camera. They said one of their biggest concerns is that while it's only 12 trees now, there's no guarantee that more won't come down in the future. 'I bring my grandkids here to play, as do a lot of other people, and it's part of the attractiveness to this particular park,' said West. When asked if it could be put in writing that only 12 will come down, Sandoval said no. 'Before anything else, my goal is that people go home safe that night, and if safety requires that I go in front of people and they get mad at me and they yell at me, that's part of the responsibility of running a safe event,' said Sandoval. KRQE News 13 reached out to the City of Santa Fe to see when they will make their decision on the issue, but have not heard back yet. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A dozen trees at Fort Marcy Park cut down ahead of 101st Zozobra burning
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – Residents near a park in Santa Fe are mourning the loss of a dozen trees that organizers said had to go before this year's burning of Zozobra. Some neighbors said they're outraged, while Zozobra organizers said it lays the groundwork for something better. Story continues below News: New Mexico Chile Association: Crop looks good but there were challenges Trending: New Mexico Department of Game and Fish to sell nearly 500 leftover deer licenses New Mexico News Insiders: What Happens When The Rio Grande Runs Dry? Community: KRQE Cares Shoes for Kids is raising money to put new shoes on kids at selected Title 1 schools Nearby residents near Fort Marcy Park in Santa Fe said they visit the park almost every day. And for decades, they say a dozen trees stood tall. But on Tuesday, those trees came down. 'It makes me really sad, it's old-growth trees, they won't be back in our lifetime,' said Shelley Bachicha as she watched the trees being cut down. Throughout the afternoon, people walked up to a fence to watch the work being done. One resident even pointed out a few of the dirt patches at the edge of the grass area, saying that's where trees used to stand. This comes nearly a week after the Kiwanis Club of Santa Fe said the trees had to go, for Old Man Gloom to go up in flames for the 101st burning in just under a month. Event organizer Raymond Sandoval said the state legislature granted the city of Santa Fe $200,000 for the project, which includes replanting the trees. 'We believe this is a good compromise for the safety of the event, but it also allows us to now go back and provide shade in parts of the park,' said Sandoval. Sandoval said the community will get to help make the next decisions when it comes to replanting or additional shade structures. Without the change, Sandoval said, Zozobra's insurance was in jeopardy, since the poor sightlines were pushing visitors to crowd a nearby bridge, which was also an evacuation route. 'We have to do what we can to make Fort Marcy the safest that we possibly can,' said Sandoval. He also cited a study showing other Santa Fe venues would not be able to accommodate the event. Some community members said they weren't notified about the problem or asked for input. 'No one's against Zozobra, but the way this was conducted was really, really unfair to this community,' said David Cortez. But Sandoval said they sent out postcards to every mailbox in the area a month before they announced the proposal at a neighborhood meeting, saying, 'We were transparent about exactly what we were doing.' There will be a meeting on August 21 at the Fort Marcy Gazebo at 5:30 p.m. for the community to discuss what the money will be used for, and how it may include new trees and shade structures. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword