Health Talk: Funding crisis threatens global HIV response, public health efforts
The recent red flag has been raised by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), which leads and inspires the world in achieving universal access to HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) services.
Its recent report — 2025 Global AIDS Update: AIDS, Crisis and the Power to Transform — shows that a historic funding crisis is threatening to unravel decades of progress unless countries can make radical shifts in HIV programming and funding.
The report highlights the impact that sudden, large-scale funding cuts from international donors are having on countries most affected by HIV.
'Despite marked progress in the HIV response in 2024, the weakening aid consensus and significant and abrupt funding shortfalls in the HIV response in 2025 have triggered widespread disruption across health systems and cuts to front line health workers — halting HIV prevention programmes and jeopardising HIV treatment services,' the report said.
Also Read: India's patent policies: Lifeline for HIV/AIDS treatment worldwide
Figures shared in the report stated that at the end of 2024, US$18.7 billion was available for the AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) response in low- and middle-income countries — 17% below the US$21.9 billion needed annually by 2030 to stay on track to end AIDS as a public health threat.
The report added that in 2025, the HIV financing architecture has undergone unprecedented changes — most notably, the freeze and uncertainty surrounding the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)'s funding commitments. If PEPFAR does not return to its 2024 funding level, the current 17% funding gap could widen significantly, jeopardising progress toward the 2030 global targets.
This is not the only programme impacted.
Also Read: HIV infections fall 22%, HIV-related deaths 40% globally: Study
According to a statement issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in May, insufficient levels of predictable funding of the UN health body have hindered its ability to carry out long-term projects and support its global operations to promote health for all. Additionally, overreliance on funding from a small set of traditional donors was identified as a major organisational challenge as part of WHO's transformation initiative launched in 2017.
'The US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) has not updated its bi-weekly bird flu (H5N1) situation summary since 17 January – even if it finally published a limited edition of its Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (MMWR) on Thursday, 6 February. In the wake of the CDC information flow shutdown and the US withdrawal from WHO, Dr Lynn Goldman, dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health, spoke with Health Policy Watch about how public health communications and global health collaboration remains all the more critical,' Health Policy Watch reported on February 7.
Also Read: Empowering India's youth: Key to HIV prevention
Not to mention the grant cuts by the US government to some of its prominent universities, including Harvard and Columbia.
These are just some of the examples that highlight the crisis the world is currently facing, which is likely to impact scientific research, academic work, and several healthcare initiatives — particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries in the long run.
It's a rough patch, and the only solution that one can see is other resourceful countries stepping up to fill the funding gap.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Top 10 cleanest countries in the world 2024: Estonia, Luxembourg, and Norway score highest in cleanliness index
Top 10 cleanest countries in the world: Life expectancy is closely linked to cleanliness. Access to clean air and water, effective waste disposal, and proper sanitation can help people live longer, healthier lives. In countries where pollution levels are high, there are more deaths from non-communicable diseases. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), these diseases are responsible for 74 per cent of all deaths worldwide. Right now, it is important to reduce all types of pollution to improve people's quality of life. The information here comes from the 2024 Environmental Performance Index (EPI). Yale University, Columbia University, and the World Economic Forum collaborated to produce the EPI. It assesses the cleanliness and environmental friendliness of 180 nations. The index, which focuses on three primary objectives—preserving ecosystems, combating climate change, and improving environmental health—is based on 58 indicators in 11 categories. These include things like biodiversity, the preservation of natural habitats, sustainable practices, air quality, and water and sanitation. The world is still a long way from being entirely sustainable, but certain nations have made significant strides. From the cleanest to the most polluted, each nation is assigned a score, providing governments with a means of gauging the effectiveness of their environmental policies and monitoring their advancements towards a healthier, cleaner future. Source: Environmental Performance Index Estonia tops the list with outstanding results in air purity, ecosystem care, and climate initiatives. The country is well-known for promoting renewable energy, managing forests responsibly, and running carbon-neutral public transport. It combines modern digital advancements with a strong commitment to protecting nature. Small in size but big in environmental achievements, Luxembourg performs exceptionally in water quality (90.6) and sanitation (99.8). More than half of its land is under environmental protection, and it ranks high in biodiversity (84.8) thanks to strict EU environmental rules. Germany achieves full wastewater treatment coverage with a strong score of 89.1 and does well in biodiversity protection (82.4). The country proves that industrial power can coexist with green spaces and well-planned conservation programs. Finland earns perfect marks in sanitation, safe drinking water, and controlling heavy metal pollution. Its air remains clean, forests are well protected, and environmental care is deeply woven into everyday living. With over 30 per cent of its oceans protected, the UK is unique in its efforts to conserve its maritime areas. While pursuing aggressive environmental and climatic goals, it has reduced greenhouse gas emissions by about a third over the last ten years. Renowned worldwide for clean energy use and low carbon emissions, Sweden excels in air purity, sanitation, and heavy metal pollution control. It also maintains healthy forests and works to reduce pollution from farming. With excellent anti-pollution measures, Norway receives a perfect score of 100 for managing heavy metals and 82.9 for air quality. It remains at the forefront of green energy leadership since nearly all of its electricity originates from renewable sources. Austria enforces tight controls on pesticides, fertilizers, and pollutants, earning a sanitation score of 96.0. With two-thirds of its land covered in forests and meadows, the country keeps its landscapes lush and well-preserved. In terms of cleanliness, heavy metal control, and clean drinking water, Switzerland achieves flawless outcomes. Known for its stunning landscapes, it also upholds stringent environmental regulations to safeguard its abundant wildlife. Denmark is a leader in reducing heavy metal pollution and makes significant investments in organic farming, renewable energy, and environmentally conscious travel. Even if it has recently slowed its rate of emission reduction, it is still a global sustainability model.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
War-Ravaged Gaza Grapples With Deadly Surge In Antibiotic-Resistant Disease
Last Updated: Researchers analysed over 1,300 samples collected from al-Ahli hospital, which hosts one of the few remaining functional microbiology laboratories in the territory The situation in Gaza shows no sign of easing, as the region now faces a growing public health crisis with the rapid spread of antibiotic-resistant infections, raising fears of increased deaths from common illnesses. According to new research published on Tuesday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, this is the first study since the conflict began in October 2023 to show the widespread presence of multi-drug-resistant bacteria in Gaza, The Guardian reported. Researchers analysed over 1,300 samples collected from al-Ahli hospital, which hosts one of the few remaining functional microbiology laboratories in the territory. They found that nearly two-thirds of the samples contained bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics. 'This will mean longer and more serious illnesses and a high risk of transmission to others. It means an increased risk of death from really common infections. It means more amputations," said Krystel Moussally, an epidemiology adviser with Médecins Sans Frontières. 'It's a horrible picture." Experts warn that the spread of drug-resistant disease is worsened by Gaza's collapsed healthcare system, the lack of clean water and sanitation, and severe shortages of medicine. Hunger and malnutrition among the 2.3 million people living in Gaza have made many more vulnerable to infection. Co-author Bilal Irfan, a researcher with Harvard's Brigham and Women's Hospital, said the findings are 'particularly alarming" and stressed that the true scale of the crisis remains unknown due to the destruction of labs and deaths of medical staff. Gaza has long struggled with antibiotic resistance due to repeated conflicts and an Israeli blockade in place since 2007. However, experts say the current situation is unprecedented. The World Health Organization (WHO) had urged Israel to allow more medical aid into Gaza. 'We want to stock up, and we all hear about more humanitarian supplies are allowed in – well it's not happening yet, or it's happening at a way too low a pace," said Rik Peeperkorn, WHO's representative in the Palestinian territories. According to the WHO, only 50% of hospitals and 38% of primary healthcare centres in Gaza are partially functioning, with bed occupancy reaching 300% at some facilities. Israel's Ministry of Defence said it has sent over 45,000 tonnes of medical supplies to Gaza and helped set up 13 field hospitals. It also stated it will continue to allow medical aid in, while preventing its misuse by Hamas. Meanwhile, the Palestinian health ministry said 89 people were killed and over 500 injured in Israeli strikes across Gaza in the last 24 hours, bringing the death toll since October 2023 to 61,599. view comments Location : Palestine First Published: August 13, 2025, 19:20 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Dwindling Development Assistance by OECD for Healthcare: Africa could Tap Indian Partnership
Traditional donor countries have been downsizing development partnership commitments. The US, by far the largest donor of Official Development Assistance (ODA) for over six decades, is on its way to eliminating up to 90 per cent of its foreign aid contracts. The US administration, in early 2025, initiated freezing of foreign development assistance financing. The other donors of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) are also reducing aid commitments and increasingly channelling their economic assistance bilaterally through issue-specific earmarked funds. The leading DAC donors are reported to be slashing their aid budgets from 25 to 40 per cent by 2027. Development financing channeled bilaterally or multilaterally by the donor countries for long-term development or short-term humanitarian purposes include ODAs in the form of grants, interest free or low-interest loans - referred to as 'aid', technical assistance, other debt instruments, and in-kind support, for development in other countries. The beneficiaries of such ODAs have been traditionally the developing countries in the Global South. Foreign aid has played a critical role in addressing challenges in development of vital infrastructure and public services in resource constrained countries, one of the predominant areas being Healthcare . At the same time, there is a growing consensus among the aid recipient countries that foreign aid is an inadequate driver for growth in development sectors due to its inherent nature of being unpredictable and unsustainable. Recent years have seen the rise of South-South cooperation with increasing private sector involvement in this space. China, Japan, Turkey and India have emerged as significant development partners in Sub-Saharan Africa , South and East Asia. Diminishing aid-environment has raised concern in the aid recipient countries, especially in Africa, about looming uncertainties in resource availability affecting progress in healthcare. Despite significant progress in addressing mortality rate, mother and child health and tackling communicable diseases, lack of adequate healthcare infrastructure including workforce, rising healthcare costs, shrinking healthcare budgets of the Governments and their inability to achieve universal health coverage, continues to plague the African Healthcare. According to the WHO and a recent AfDB report, Africa currently has 1.3 hospital beds per 1000 people (compared to 6.1 in Europe), and only one intensive care bed for every 100,000 people (compared to seven in India). Africa has on an average 1.55 healthcare workers (including physicians, nurses and midwives) to 1000 people, with only four countries equating the global average of 4.45 per 1000 people. This gap is wider with diagnostic capacity, with only 0.7 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners for every 1,000,000 of its population (compared to 4.8 in China and 37 in the USA), demonstrating limited diagnostics capabilities and lack of medical technicians. Africa is today faced with dual challenges in healthcare both with communicable diseases, such as malaria, HIV, Ebola and other parasitic outbreaks, and with economic progress, rising non-communicable diseases ( NCD ), such as diabetes, hypertensive heart diseases etc. This calls for urgency in adapting healthcare infrastructure and services, accordingly. Experts tracking the global developments on intensified geopolitical competition and dwindling aid from traditional multilaterals, sees non-traditional partner, China as the front runner in filling the void by expanding its 'Health Silk Road' under its signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which gained momentum during Covid 19 pandemic and remained mostly confined to partnering with the national healthcare capacities. Countries in the African region views development cooperation, as not just providing financial resources but delivering value and technical expertise and working collaboratively with the governments and the civil society. India has an advantage here in unlocking its potential as a collaborative healthcare provider to Africa. India has been steadily strengthening its development partnership in the African region since the mid-2000s, blending development instruments and active private sector participation. Historically, India has been the affordable pharmacy to Africa, and health has figured prominently in the India-Africa partnership through several initiatives, such as the Pan-Africa e-Network Project (PANeP) facilitating telemedicine; announcement of an India-Africa Health Fund in 2015; the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) collaboration with the African Union (AU) under the India-Africa Health Sciences Collaborative Platform (IAHSP); and medical tourism in India. India under its Lines of Credit (LOC), providing concessional loans for development projects, have the largest number of credit lines extended to Africa. However, utilisation of these LOCs for Healthcare accounts for only around 1.28 per cent. With Indian healthcare companies increasingly venturing in the African region, with interests in healthcare services, including innovative financing strategy to provide low-cost treatment, fostering an Africa-India health cooperation under a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model can be path breaking in the India-Africa relation, also strengthening India's position as a development partner in healthcare for the Global South. Manoeuvring this cooperation, Africa can explore leveraging the LOC mechanism for funding healthcare infrastructure in Africa, both in primary and tertiary care, undertaking PPP route wherein, African Governments could engage with Indian healthcare companies in delivering healthcare services and developing diagnostic infrastructure, besides developing policy and regulatory framework in healthcare delivery. The mechanism can also be leveraged for refurbishing existing public and private healthcare infrastructures in Africa. Seeking funds for developing hard infrastructure under the LOC can mitigate the risk in implementing cross border PPP. Further, the cooperation may also facilitate medical goods and services imports by Africa from India. African patients account for around 20 per cent of travel under medical tourism in India and is the largest. Travel for health has limitations of equity of access, as it privileges mostly the high-net-worth Africans. This is further challenged by post recovery follow ups, which is often undertaken through emails and telemedical consultations and identified as a major reason for treatment failure. The cooperation while may continue to give an impetus to medical tourism in India from Africa for tertiary care but also ease post recovery challenges back in Africa. The article is written by Ms. Sumana Sarkar and Mr. David Sinate (Economists with India Exim Bank) (DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and does not necessarily subscribe to it. shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly)
