Drawn-out minority talks after state's snap election
The incumbent Liberals (14) claimed more seats than Labor (nine) in Saturday's snap election but neither can reach the 18-seat mark required for majority.
Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, whose refusal to resign after losing a no-confidence vote sparked the poll, has been given "first crack" at forming government by Labor leader Dean Winter.
However, Mr Winter hasn't ruled out trying to get the numbers to govern if Mr Rockliff is unable to form a working government.
It could be weeks for three in-doubt seats to be confirmed via preferences, and any formal minority agreements might not be arranged until after the numbers are settled.
Mr Rockliff on Sunday said he had reached out to independents on the cross bench, pledging to work collaboratively.
The Liberals' failure to keep the cross bench onside in minority resulted in an early election in March 2024 as well as the successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff in June.
Mr Rockliff will have to mend bridges and deal with several crossbenchers who are against the Liberals' stadium plan and don't like Liberal-backed salmon farming and forestry.
Two of the four elected independents, Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, voted for the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff and have been critical of Tasmania's ballooning debt.
Mr Winter, however, has ruled out doing a deal with the five-seat Greens to form government, despite needing their votes, but has reached out to independents.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff urged Mr Winter to pick up the phone again on Sunday and potentially form an alliance.
Mr Rockliff said the Liberals would not walk away from their pet project $945 million AFL stadium, or their support for traditional industry.
STATE OF PLAY AND NEW FACES
* Seats: Liberal 14, Labor nine, Greens five, independent four, in doubt three
* Bridget Archer (Liberal): The former federal MP was successful in the northern electorate of Bass just a few months after losing her federal seat
* Gavin Peace (Liberal): Another former federal MP who jumped on board to help the party
* Marcus Vermey (Liberal): A third-generation butcher and first-term MP who picked up the most votes for his party in the Hobart-based seat of Clark
* Peter George (Independent): Anti-salmon farming activist coming off a strong campaign at the federal election
Tasmania faces a protracted period of political limbo as election votes are counted and major parties court the cross bench.
The incumbent Liberals (14) claimed more seats than Labor (nine) in Saturday's snap election but neither can reach the 18-seat mark required for majority.
Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, whose refusal to resign after losing a no-confidence vote sparked the poll, has been given "first crack" at forming government by Labor leader Dean Winter.
However, Mr Winter hasn't ruled out trying to get the numbers to govern if Mr Rockliff is unable to form a working government.
It could be weeks for three in-doubt seats to be confirmed via preferences, and any formal minority agreements might not be arranged until after the numbers are settled.
Mr Rockliff on Sunday said he had reached out to independents on the cross bench, pledging to work collaboratively.
The Liberals' failure to keep the cross bench onside in minority resulted in an early election in March 2024 as well as the successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff in June.
Mr Rockliff will have to mend bridges and deal with several crossbenchers who are against the Liberals' stadium plan and don't like Liberal-backed salmon farming and forestry.
Two of the four elected independents, Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, voted for the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff and have been critical of Tasmania's ballooning debt.
Mr Winter, however, has ruled out doing a deal with the five-seat Greens to form government, despite needing their votes, but has reached out to independents.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff urged Mr Winter to pick up the phone again on Sunday and potentially form an alliance.
Mr Rockliff said the Liberals would not walk away from their pet project $945 million AFL stadium, or their support for traditional industry.
STATE OF PLAY AND NEW FACES
* Seats: Liberal 14, Labor nine, Greens five, independent four, in doubt three
* Bridget Archer (Liberal): The former federal MP was successful in the northern electorate of Bass just a few months after losing her federal seat
* Gavin Peace (Liberal): Another former federal MP who jumped on board to help the party
* Marcus Vermey (Liberal): A third-generation butcher and first-term MP who picked up the most votes for his party in the Hobart-based seat of Clark
* Peter George (Independent): Anti-salmon farming activist coming off a strong campaign at the federal election
Tasmania faces a protracted period of political limbo as election votes are counted and major parties court the cross bench.
The incumbent Liberals (14) claimed more seats than Labor (nine) in Saturday's snap election but neither can reach the 18-seat mark required for majority.
Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, whose refusal to resign after losing a no-confidence vote sparked the poll, has been given "first crack" at forming government by Labor leader Dean Winter.
However, Mr Winter hasn't ruled out trying to get the numbers to govern if Mr Rockliff is unable to form a working government.
It could be weeks for three in-doubt seats to be confirmed via preferences, and any formal minority agreements might not be arranged until after the numbers are settled.
Mr Rockliff on Sunday said he had reached out to independents on the cross bench, pledging to work collaboratively.
The Liberals' failure to keep the cross bench onside in minority resulted in an early election in March 2024 as well as the successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff in June.
Mr Rockliff will have to mend bridges and deal with several crossbenchers who are against the Liberals' stadium plan and don't like Liberal-backed salmon farming and forestry.
Two of the four elected independents, Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, voted for the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff and have been critical of Tasmania's ballooning debt.
Mr Winter, however, has ruled out doing a deal with the five-seat Greens to form government, despite needing their votes, but has reached out to independents.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff urged Mr Winter to pick up the phone again on Sunday and potentially form an alliance.
Mr Rockliff said the Liberals would not walk away from their pet project $945 million AFL stadium, or their support for traditional industry.
STATE OF PLAY AND NEW FACES
* Seats: Liberal 14, Labor nine, Greens five, independent four, in doubt three
* Bridget Archer (Liberal): The former federal MP was successful in the northern electorate of Bass just a few months after losing her federal seat
* Gavin Peace (Liberal): Another former federal MP who jumped on board to help the party
* Marcus Vermey (Liberal): A third-generation butcher and first-term MP who picked up the most votes for his party in the Hobart-based seat of Clark
* Peter George (Independent): Anti-salmon farming activist coming off a strong campaign at the federal election
Tasmania faces a protracted period of political limbo as election votes are counted and major parties court the cross bench.
The incumbent Liberals (14) claimed more seats than Labor (nine) in Saturday's snap election but neither can reach the 18-seat mark required for majority.
Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, whose refusal to resign after losing a no-confidence vote sparked the poll, has been given "first crack" at forming government by Labor leader Dean Winter.
However, Mr Winter hasn't ruled out trying to get the numbers to govern if Mr Rockliff is unable to form a working government.
It could be weeks for three in-doubt seats to be confirmed via preferences, and any formal minority agreements might not be arranged until after the numbers are settled.
Mr Rockliff on Sunday said he had reached out to independents on the cross bench, pledging to work collaboratively.
The Liberals' failure to keep the cross bench onside in minority resulted in an early election in March 2024 as well as the successful no-confidence vote against Mr Rockliff in June.
Mr Rockliff will have to mend bridges and deal with several crossbenchers who are against the Liberals' stadium plan and don't like Liberal-backed salmon farming and forestry.
Two of the four elected independents, Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, voted for the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff and have been critical of Tasmania's ballooning debt.
Mr Winter, however, has ruled out doing a deal with the five-seat Greens to form government, despite needing their votes, but has reached out to independents.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff urged Mr Winter to pick up the phone again on Sunday and potentially form an alliance.
Mr Rockliff said the Liberals would not walk away from their pet project $945 million AFL stadium, or their support for traditional industry.
STATE OF PLAY AND NEW FACES
* Seats: Liberal 14, Labor nine, Greens five, independent four, in doubt three
* Bridget Archer (Liberal): The former federal MP was successful in the northern electorate of Bass just a few months after losing her federal seat
* Gavin Peace (Liberal): Another former federal MP who jumped on board to help the party
* Marcus Vermey (Liberal): A third-generation butcher and first-term MP who picked up the most votes for his party in the Hobart-based seat of Clark
* Peter George (Independent): Anti-salmon farming activist coming off a strong campaign at the federal election
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
23 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Total failure': Israel's return to war has heaped ruin on Gaza and done little for Israelis
Israel's blockade of food from March until May led to a rise in hunger across the territory. Since ending some restrictions in late May, Israel has largely reconstituted the way that food is distributed. In doing so, Israel made it more dangerous for Palestinians to get that food. Hundreds have been shot and killed by Israeli soldiers along the routes to new distribution sites. The outcome has resulted in a rare level of censure from Israel's allies. Key partners such as Britain and Germany called for the war to end. France said it would recognise a Palestinian state. The secretary-general of the United Nations, António Guterres, called the situation 'a moral crisis that challenges the global conscience.' Loading Before Israel started the blockade and broke the truce, Palestinians in Gaza were already suffering some of the worst conditions in a century of conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. A vast majority of the population was displaced, and most of the buildings in the territory were damaged, according to the United Nations. Then the resumption of war felt as if someone had 'shut off the last source of life,' said Karam Rabah, a civil servant in central Gaza. 'We thought we'd survived the worst, then it got even worse.' The truce from January to March had brought some respite, said Rabah, who is paid by the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority, a rival of Hamas. 'Children went back to some kind of learning; families returned to their homes,' he said. Then the fighting restarted, and 'homes that had survived were suddenly gone, and even food became scarce,' he added. 'I never thought that I would fight for a kilogram of flour for my kids.' As Palestinians suffer on one side of the border, Israelis on the other side are questioning what has been achieved through the return to war. As in earlier phases of the conflict, the war's protraction has allowed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to keep his ruling coalition intact, extending his tenure. A New York Times investigation has found that Netanyahu has dragged out the war partly for political reasons, in order to avoid upsetting key far-right partners who threatened their resignation if the war ended. Netanyahu denies the accusation, saying he has continued the war in the Israeli national interest. But his critics say the war's extension is at odds with the interests of Israeli hostages. It brings added risk to Israeli soldiers, who are still regularly killed in Gaza in service of a strategy that, to many, feels fruitless. It is a strain on reservist soldiers, who are repeatedly called up from their day jobs. And it has heightened the risk to Israelis travelling overseas, who increasingly report hostility from the people they meet, in addition to the criticism levelled at Israel from foreign governments and officials. 'There's a diplomatic tsunami against Israel like nothing anyone has ever seen,' said Shira Efron, a Tel Aviv-based analyst for Israel Policy Forum, a research group in New York. During a recent work trip to Washington, Efron said, she detected an unusual level of frustration in meetings with officials and analysts usually supportive of Israel. 'It was very clear from American politicians on both sides of the aisle – even Republican politicians and affiliated national security experts – that there is complete disapproval of the images coming from Gaza,' she said. 'Even those who think Hamas was at fault for the situation thought that Israel needs to change its position. Whether you're Republican or Democrat, you don't want to see children starve.' Even Israelis who broadly support the government's return to war say that the approach has not achieved its goal. Their solution, however, is different: In their view, Israel should have attacked far harder than it did in the past months and must do so now. For months, the Israeli military has largely stayed away from the most densely populated areas of Gaza, where the remaining Israeli hostages are believed to be held. Right-wing Israelis say that Israel should invade and occupy those areas, even if it endangers the hostages. 'We need to stop everything, occupy the strip from end to end,' Moshe Saada, a lawmaker from Netanyahu's party, said in a television interview on Monday. Others say that Israel was right to break the truce in March, but wrong to do so without a clearly communicated plan for how Gaza would be governed in the future. 'Israel needs to fight until Hamas is defeated,' said Jonathan Conricus, a former Israeli military spokesperson. It is failing to do so, Conricus said, because of 'an incoherent Israeli strategy, tremendous international and regional pressure against Israel, and Hamas's willingness to leverage the suffering of the civilian population for its own cynical benefit'. Israel needs to 'strategically regroup, formulate a plan to defeat Hamas and provide a regionally and internationally acceptable solution for the future of the Gaza Strip,' said Conricus, an analyst for the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a research group in Washington.
The Age
23 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Total failure': Israel's return to war has heaped ruin on Gaza and done little for Israelis
Israel's blockade of food from March until May led to a rise in hunger across the territory. Since ending some restrictions in late May, Israel has largely reconstituted the way that food is distributed. In doing so, Israel made it more dangerous for Palestinians to get that food. Hundreds have been shot and killed by Israeli soldiers along the routes to new distribution sites. The outcome has resulted in a rare level of censure from Israel's allies. Key partners such as Britain and Germany called for the war to end. France said it would recognise a Palestinian state. The secretary-general of the United Nations, António Guterres, called the situation 'a moral crisis that challenges the global conscience.' Loading Before Israel started the blockade and broke the truce, Palestinians in Gaza were already suffering some of the worst conditions in a century of conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. A vast majority of the population was displaced, and most of the buildings in the territory were damaged, according to the United Nations. Then the resumption of war felt as if someone had 'shut off the last source of life,' said Karam Rabah, a civil servant in central Gaza. 'We thought we'd survived the worst, then it got even worse.' The truce from January to March had brought some respite, said Rabah, who is paid by the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority, a rival of Hamas. 'Children went back to some kind of learning; families returned to their homes,' he said. Then the fighting restarted, and 'homes that had survived were suddenly gone, and even food became scarce,' he added. 'I never thought that I would fight for a kilogram of flour for my kids.' As Palestinians suffer on one side of the border, Israelis on the other side are questioning what has been achieved through the return to war. As in earlier phases of the conflict, the war's protraction has allowed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to keep his ruling coalition intact, extending his tenure. A New York Times investigation has found that Netanyahu has dragged out the war partly for political reasons, in order to avoid upsetting key far-right partners who threatened their resignation if the war ended. Netanyahu denies the accusation, saying he has continued the war in the Israeli national interest. But his critics say the war's extension is at odds with the interests of Israeli hostages. It brings added risk to Israeli soldiers, who are still regularly killed in Gaza in service of a strategy that, to many, feels fruitless. It is a strain on reservist soldiers, who are repeatedly called up from their day jobs. And it has heightened the risk to Israelis travelling overseas, who increasingly report hostility from the people they meet, in addition to the criticism levelled at Israel from foreign governments and officials. 'There's a diplomatic tsunami against Israel like nothing anyone has ever seen,' said Shira Efron, a Tel Aviv-based analyst for Israel Policy Forum, a research group in New York. During a recent work trip to Washington, Efron said, she detected an unusual level of frustration in meetings with officials and analysts usually supportive of Israel. 'It was very clear from American politicians on both sides of the aisle – even Republican politicians and affiliated national security experts – that there is complete disapproval of the images coming from Gaza,' she said. 'Even those who think Hamas was at fault for the situation thought that Israel needs to change its position. Whether you're Republican or Democrat, you don't want to see children starve.' Even Israelis who broadly support the government's return to war say that the approach has not achieved its goal. Their solution, however, is different: In their view, Israel should have attacked far harder than it did in the past months and must do so now. For months, the Israeli military has largely stayed away from the most densely populated areas of Gaza, where the remaining Israeli hostages are believed to be held. Right-wing Israelis say that Israel should invade and occupy those areas, even if it endangers the hostages. 'We need to stop everything, occupy the strip from end to end,' Moshe Saada, a lawmaker from Netanyahu's party, said in a television interview on Monday. Others say that Israel was right to break the truce in March, but wrong to do so without a clearly communicated plan for how Gaza would be governed in the future. 'Israel needs to fight until Hamas is defeated,' said Jonathan Conricus, a former Israeli military spokesperson. It is failing to do so, Conricus said, because of 'an incoherent Israeli strategy, tremendous international and regional pressure against Israel, and Hamas's willingness to leverage the suffering of the civilian population for its own cynical benefit'. Israel needs to 'strategically regroup, formulate a plan to defeat Hamas and provide a regionally and internationally acceptable solution for the future of the Gaza Strip,' said Conricus, an analyst for the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, a research group in Washington.
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
YouTube to be captured by social media ban
YouTube will be captured by Labor's world-leading social media ban for under 16s, the Albanese government has confirmed. The videostreaming giant was initially set to be exempt, with the Albanese government arguing it could be educational. But the online safety watchdog has since advised YouTube should be included, warning it causes the most harm to kids. 'Our government is making it clear – we stand on the side of families,' Anthony Albanese said in a joint statement with Communications Minister Anika Wells. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says social media firms 'social responsibility'. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire Echoing the Prime Minister, Ms Wells said it would give 'kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind'. 'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' she said. 'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing. 'The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support.' Last month, the brains tasked with finding a way to enforce the ban said it is possible but that there is no 'silver bullet' and firms would need to use a range of measures. One option, according to the project's chief, is successive validation – a series of tests designed to firm up a user's age. With the advice saying enforcement is possible, Ms Wells noted in the joint statement that there are 'heavy penalties for companies who fail to take reasonable steps to prevent underage account holders onto their services'. Communications Minister Anika Wells says 'there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children'. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire Those penalties include a fine of up to $49.5m. 'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children,' Ms Wells said. The decision to include YouTube in the ban comes after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant warned kids were using YouTube more than any other social media platform. 'It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media,' she said last month, speaking to the ABC. 'By far the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube. 'And when we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube – almost 37 per cent. 'This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation.' The Albanese government has confirmed YouTube will be captured by its social media ban. Picture: Aaron Francis / NewsWire The decision to include YouTube in the ban comes after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant warned kids were using YouTube more than any other social media platform. 'It's almost ubiquitous that kids are on social media,' she said last month, speaking to the ABC. 'By far the most prevalent social media site they're on is YouTube. 'And when we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube – almost 37 per cent. 'This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation.' The Coalition also called for YouTube's inclusion, with opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh saying it is 'a logical thing to do'. The social media ban is set to come into force in December. While other countries have mulled similar actions, Australia is the first to make the leap, receiving both praise and criticism.
