Councils consider legal action over asylum hotels after Epping ruling
Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage indicated the 12 councils where Reform UK was the largest party would consider legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Farage said the local authorities would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead.'
He added: 'The good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.'
Writing on X, Farage also said: "This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets."
"This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country."
"Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported."
"I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country."
On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12.
The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month.
A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel.
The High Court ruling is said to have angered the Home Office who fear the verdict will interfere with immigration policy and their obligations to house asylum seekers.
Migrants must be removed from hotel in Epping after council wins injunction
Could the Epping asylum hotel injunction set a precedent for other councils?
ITV News' Paul Brand said that sources within the Labour party feel that councils are going to waste taxpayers' money fighting a government that is already working to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers.
The Home Office has insisted it has reduced the number of asylum seeker hotels from 402 to 210.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately,' while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town.'
He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.'
The area saw thousands of people turn out in protest about the housing of migrants in the Bell Hotel.
The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'.
Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel.
In a post on Facebook, Broxbourne Council said: 'Broxbourne Council will now take legal advice as a matter of urgency about whether it could take similar action.'
Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route.
Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use.
Two men have been arrested and charged in connection with a protest in July outside the hotel in Diss, which houses more than 40 children.
Cllr Elmer told the PA news agency: 'We make a big play about integration, and to replace families who have children in the local school system and have integrated into the local community would make no sense.'
He added: 'If we can punish people who have put up sheds in their gardens without permission, then we can take action against hotels being converted into hostels without planning consent.'
Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'.
She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.'
Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'.
Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights.
In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12.
He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
37 minutes ago
- ITV News
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. Gavin Millar KC The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scotland takes on record levels of asylum seekers – amid calls for migrant hotel crackdown & protests loom
Glasgow's administration committee met to seek a solution to the mounting crisis 'BREAKING POINT' Scotland takes on record levels of asylum seekers – amid calls for migrant hotel crackdown & protests loom Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A RECORD number of asylum seekers are now staying in Scots hotels, it has been revealed. The Home Office said 6,107 people are bidding for refugee status, double the total a decade ago. And 1,573 are in taxpayer-funded hotels. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 A record number of asylum seekers are now staying in Scots hotels Credit: Andrew Barr 7 Susan Aitken told how a 'rainy day' fund used to cope with the surge had now run dry Credit: Les Gallagher 7 Council chiefs in Scotland's biggest city admit they're buckling under the pressure Credit: PA 7 Hampton by Hilton in Westhill now caters for refugees whose claims are being assessed Credit: Newsline Media Council chiefs in Scotland's biggest city admit they're buckling under the pressure of being the UK's asylum seeker capital — and have begged for extra funding. Residents in Glasgow face council tax rises and cuts to public services to plug a £60million budget shortfall as they struggle to accommodate a surge of new refugees. Home Office figures released show asylum applications across the UK in the 12 months to this June hit an all-time high of 111,084. And 3,884 of them were seeking permission to remain in Glasgow, far outstripping the likes of Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester. The stats sparked concern the city is now a magnet for migrants who gain refugee status down south and are then kicked out of their accommodation. Susan Aitken, leader of the SNP-run council, told how a 'rainy day' fund used to cope with the surge for two years had now run dry. Now senior figures are demanding extra support from both Holyrood and Westminster. Ms Aitken said: 'Glasgow is not only dealing with demand from the UK's largest dispersed population by far but a sizeable number of additional refugees who can't access support elsewhere in the UK.' She added: 'There are people out there who'd seek to exploit this, and indeed are. We see this happening in our communities in front of us.' Glasgow's administration committee met today to seek a solution to the mounting crisis. Migrants to be kicked out of hotel at centre of protests in landmark ruling after asylum seeker's 'sex attack' A source said the local authority will have little option but to raise tax and cut public services to meet a shortfall of more than £60million if the Home Office and Scottish Government do not step in. Deputy leader Ricky Bell said: 'If we don't have a solution, we are facing a very, very difficult budget position for next February.' And chief exec Susanne Millar, who is pleading for Home Office help, said: 'About 94 per cent of the asylum seekers in Scotland are accommodated in Glasgow.' But the threat of cuts to services was slammed by opposition politicians. Tory MSP Annie Wells said: 'SNP councillors in Glasgow need to accept reality. 7 Tory MSP Annie Wells said SNP councillors in Glasgow "need to accept reality" Credit: Getty 7 The Cladhan Hotel in Falkirk was the scene of recent protests Credit: Andrew Barr 7 Protesters from Save Our Future & Our Kids Future demonstrate against uncontrolled immigration Credit: Getty 'Their cash-strapped authority cannot afford to continue with this increasingly expensive policy. 'Citizens are fed up with pothole-plagued roads and filthy streets. They don't want to pay even more in council tax, to get less in return. 'This is after a housing emergency was declared in the city more than 18 months ago.' Ex-Tory councillor Thomas Kerr, who defected in January to Reform UK, hit out: 'Enough is enough. 'Glasgow is at breaking point, the numbers prove it. SNP and Labour have sold out our own people and put others first time and again.' The city received 1,050 homeless applications in 2024/25 from migrants granted leave to remain in the UK. That was up 51 per cent on the previous year. There are now 4,386 mostly migrant households in temporary homeless accommodation in Glasgow, with 1,850 of them in bed and breakfast or hotel accommodation. Elsewhere in the UK, new refugees have 56 days to leave asylum pads if they can't secure onwards lodgings. But many are encouraged to head north by a Scottish Government pledge to accommodate all homeless people. Top 10 UK Councils for Asylum Seekers Source: Home Office figures for June 2025 Glasgow - 3,844 Birmingham - 2,755 Hillingdon - 2,481 Liverpool - 2,361 Manchester - 1,997 Hounslow - 1,775 Belfast - 1,760 Coventry - 1,733 Sandwell - 1,671 Leeds - 1,659 Across Scotland, the number of asylum seekers in taxpayer-funded hotels hit a record 1,573. They have rooms in 10 local authority areas. Those bidding for refugee status have doubled in a decade to 6,107. The three-star Hampton by Hilton in Westhill, Aberdeenshire, now caters exclusively for refugees whose claims are being assessed. One local said: 'We were never consulted on this. It's all men and they stick out as it's a small town.' Plans to change the hotel's use were shrouded in secrecy before the new guests moved in two years ago. It emerged up to 173 males aged 18 to 40 would be put up there. Another town resident said: 'I think if we had any choice in the matter then the community would have rejected this.' In nearby Aberdeen, what was once the city's only beachfront hotel now houses only migrants. The former Doubletree by Hilton has been the site of several protests in recent months. But one local said: 'It has made me feel sorry for the guys. They are not causing anyone any bother.' In Edinburgh's posh west end, residents have voiced concerns over a range of issues at the 62-bed Learmonth Hotel, which is currently used to house asylum seekers. One man, who didn't want to be named, said there should be more communication from operator Mears. He added: 'It can be quite intimidating walking past when there are 20 or 30 young men standing outside having cigarettes. 'There's a lot of litter and a lot of drinking now, unfortunately.' A UK Government spokeswoman said: 'We are working to make sure individuals have the support they need following an asylum decision to help local authorities better plan their assistance with homelessness. 'We have doubled the move-on period to 56 days and mobilised liaison officers to support asylum seekers in Glasgow.' And a spokesman for the Scottish Government said: 'UK Government decisions about the asylum system are creating significant pressures across the UK. We support the call from Glasgow City Council for them to provide adequate funding to support newly recognised refugees and communities."
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Hotels braced for a wave of protests: Up to 30 targeted as residents turn up heat to follow Epping precedent
A wave of protests are set to sweep the country this weekend targeting migrant hotels. Anti-immigration campaigners are looking to ride on the back of this week's landmark judgment that saw the High Court order the removal of migrants from a hotel in Epping, Essex. Protests at up to 30 hotels are believed to be planned as communities seek to replicate the ruling for The Bell Hotel, which, pending an appeal, must be closed within weeks. The hotel had been at the centre of protests after an asylum seeker living there was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl, which he denies. Hotels in Cannock, Chichester and Tamworth are among those expected to be targeted by demonstrations, with anti-racism groups already organising counter-protests in 15 locations across the three-day Bank Holiday weekend. They are prepared to turn up tonight in the likes of Bournemouth, Portsmouth, Leicester, Leeds, Orpington, Perth, Aberdeen and Altrincham. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has used Epping as a rallying cry, saying: 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside hotels and put pressure on councils to go to court to try to get illegal immigrants out.' On Tuesday, a judge granted a temporary injunction against migrants being housed at The Bell Hotel after Epping Forest council argued that it was necessary for 'the safety of nearby residents' and to reduce the threat of 'violent protests'. As it tried, unsuccessfully, to intervene in the case at the eleventh hour, the Home Office argued that granting Epping's application 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. The ruling threatens to collapse Labour's asylum system as protesters take to the streets and councils across the country prepare to hit the Home Office with copycat litigation over the use of hotels in their areas. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has written to all Conservative councils pledging support for any legal action, while Reform UK's leaders have encouraged people to protest at their local asylum hotels. But anti-racism groups have warned the ruling sets a 'dangerous precedent', with Stand Up To Racism saying that it will 'embolden the far-Right to call more protests outside hotels housing refugees'. Labour grandee Lord Falconer urged the Home Office to appeal against the Epping judgment on Thursday as he admitted the ruling 'causes great problems' for the Government. The peer, who served as justice secretary under Sir Tony Blair and as Sir Keir Starmer's shadow attorney general, said it 'gives rise to the expectation that some asylum hotels can be closed'. Lord Falconer said the ruling presents Labour with a 'very troublesome issue, namely does demonstrations outside these hotels lead to it being more likely that they will be closed'. Urging the Government 'very strongly' to appeal, he told Radio 4's Today programme: 'It puts the courts and the politicians in a difficult position. 'There should be clarity on that and the authority in relation to that can only come from the Court of Appeal.' The Home Office still could not say whether or not it plans to appeal on Thursday. But pressure was mounting on the Government as all Tory councillors were sent a draft motion, produced by the Conservative Research Department and the Conservative Councillors' Association, 'strongly urging' them to follow Epping's example. It included instructions on how to influence their local authorities. Stevenage became the latest Labour-run council to say it would consider taking legal action over an asylum hotel in the Hertfordshire borough as the internal revolt grew. The council had already warned a Novotel hotel it must stop housing asylum seekers or face planning enforcement action, and on Thursday said it was 'actively investigating alleged breaches' as it considered legal action similar to Epping's. Ministers were scrambling to find contingency plans to house migrants, with officials looking at houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), empty tower blocks, disused teacher training colleges and old student accommodation as alternatives. The asylum minister, Dame Angela Eagle, told the Commons home affairs committee in June that the Government had shifted its focus from old military barracks to smaller locations such as tower blocks. However, the Guardian reported officials are still considering placing people removed from hotels in the RAF Wethersfield base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. Meanwhile, it was also reported that asylum accommodation contractors working for the Home Office have contacted property specialists, seeking 5,000 residential units in towns and cities to house migrants. But a Government minister could not answer when quizzed on where asylum seekers should go instead of hotels on Thursday. Asked 'where will they go?', schools minister Catherine McKinnell said: 'Well, I mean, that's a big question.'
