MP's office picketed over equity bill
Protesters in Oamaru have made their feelings known over changes to workplace regulations.
The Pay Equity Amendment Bill passed through all stages in Parliament, after being rushed through under urgency last week.
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced moves to raise the threshold for proving work has been historically undervalued to support a claim.
She said changes made in 2020 had created problems.
Ms van Velden said any current claims would be stopped and would need to restart under the new threshold, to show "genuine" gender discrimination and make sure the comparators were right.
Opponents of the controversial legislation have said it would make it harder for women in female-dominated industries to make a claim.
Judith Stanley, of Oamaru, said the group protesting outside the office of Waitaki MP Miles Anderson last Friday, were there to support the repeal of the Pay Equity Amendment Act
"There was no consultation ... It was a stitched-up deal before it hit the benches in Parliament," she said.
Annah Evington, of Oamaru, said the legislation was a "war on women" and would make it almost impossible for women to claim pay equity.
"They've thrown hundreds of thousands of women and men, lower paid men, under the bus.
"People have been working towards this for years and are now being told they're back to square one."
She said essential workers were the most at risk.
Mr Anderson said it was "essentially not true" that the legislation changes would affect essential workers, and it was about the comparability of various occupations.
He alleged the opposition and unions were using this as a great opportunity to stir up a profile on the government, for themselves.
"The sky isn't falling and people will still be able to take pay equity claims to court.
"It's nothing to do with those on minimum wage, it is to do with comparison between occupations, and those discussions around gender-based discriminations in our workforce, they are still able to take claims to court," he said.
Mr Anderson said different systems, for nurses or for office administrators, revealed "real complexity" and past claims had dragged on in court for too long.
"It's a direct comparison between occupations and the need to make sure equal pay is not being scrapped," he said.
The protest was organised by Roy Hill who said the group hoped to address their concerns with Mr Anderson.
Mr Anderson was in a conference in Rotorua at the time of the Waitaki protest, but said he was "always available" for consultation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
US needs to walk the talk
When new neighbours move in just down the street there is always a frisson of interest in what they are going to be like. Will they fit in well with the neighbourhood? How many people will be coming and going? Will they play loud music at all hours? Wellington, and New Zealand, have this week seen the arrival of someone different enough to get the net curtains twitching and set the tongues clacking. No less than the FBI, the United States' venerable law enforcement and criminal investigation agency, is in town. The first question which might spring to mind is, why would the US's domestic intelligence and security service want to have an office in New Zealand? That might quickly be followed by: what specifically are they going to be doing here? Do we need to be worried? The opening of the permanent legal attache FBI office at the US Embassy and the visit of FBI director Kash Patel were surrounded in secrecy, just as one might expect. Until now, New Zealand's links with the FBI through the Five Eyes intelligence partnership went through its office in Canberra. The new office in the capital has been established to investigate all threats to these countries and this geopolitical region, including cybercrime, terrorism, the narcotics trade and gun-running, child exploitation and money laundering. Mr Patel's visit was exposed when a sharp-eyed Newstalk ZB journalist recognised him in the basement of Parliament. There were other clues too for amateur sleuths — a US Department of Justice aircraft at Wellington Airport and a large group of American officials and New Zealand police gathering outside a downtown hotel. The US Embassy resorted to the old refusal to confirm or deny trick when asked. By the time Mr Patel put out a statement on Thursday afternoon explaining he was here to open the new office, he had already met with Police Minister Mark Mitchell, GCSB and NZSIS Minister Judith Collins, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Police Commissioner Richard Chambers. As University of Otago professor of international relations Robert Patman has pointed out, the move to open an FBI branch in New Zealand has its ironies. It may be good news that the US wants to take a larger role in fighting crime around the Pacific, but he says the Trump administration has shown little willingness itself to adhere to the international rules-based order since coming to power and has actually undermined the rule of law with claims to take over Canada and Greenland. More broadly, Mr Patel's visit and announcement also puts New Zealand and its leaders in a potentially difficult position when it comes to relations with China. While they have been extremely cautious making any comment about China, the FBI director was less tight-lipped, saying it would help to counter China's influence across the Pacific and, in the words of an FBI spokesman, confront threats from "hostile nation-state actors like the Chinese Communist Party". Our government has pushed back at those suggestions. Ms Collins said the office was about countering transnational crime and New Zealand was not going to single out any one country, and it was up to Mr Patel to decide what he wanted to say. Mr Peters said China was not even raised during his meeting with the director. Unsurprisingly, China has bristled, despite Ms Collins saying she did not think it would comment. A Chinese Embassy spokesperson said it opposed "groundless assertions or vilifications" out of a "Cold War mentality" and that it had noted the US assertions and our ministers' remarks to the media. Certainly there are some weird things going on in a world which seems to get stranger by the minute. Granted, an FBI office in New Zealand is not going to be everyone's cup of tea, particularly for those who want the country to pull out of the Five Eyes alliance. But it is certainly a good move if such international crime-busting endeavours are going to make a difference to stopping the awful spread of drugs such as methamphetamine among the most vulnerable people in Pacific nations. We have seen recently how drug smuggling is making many thousands of people's lives there a misery. Far better for us to be on the side of good in the fight against such evils.
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
Govt to rewrite liability provisions in building consents reform
New changes to speed up a "sluggish" consenting system means councils will no longer be left "footing the bill" for major building defects, the Building Minister says. The "joint and several liability" framework for managing building defects will be scrapped in what ministers call the biggest reform to the consenting system in "decades". Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk officially revealed two "major" changes alongside Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at today's post-Cabinet media conference. Penk said the overhaul would "ease the cost burden on ratepayers for defective building work" and be the most significant since the Building Act came into force in 2004. As part of the changes, he said the Government was taking aim at "stalling" productivity in the building sector through cutting red tape and enabling more cost efficiencies. ADVERTISEMENT Row of designed and furnished townhouses next to a road in Auckland. (Source: "[The] sluggish consenting system is delaying projects and driving up costs, making the average standalone house here 50% more expensive to build than in Australia. "We must eliminate system blockages to speed up the delivery of new homes and infrastructure," the Building and Construction Minister said. What's happening with building defects and consents? Introducing a bill to Parliament early next year, the Government intends to replace the existing "joint and several liability" framework with "proportionate liability," where "each party will only be responsible for the share of work they carried out." "It's time to put the responsibility where it belongs," Penk said, saying the change would "ease the cost burden on ratepayers for defective building work." "Right now, councils are hesitant to sign off on building consents and inspections because they could be held liable for all defects, leaving ratepayers to foot the bill. ADVERTISEMENT Window ledge crack (file image). (Source: "This often happens when one of the parties responsible cannot pay for repairs, for example, if a business goes bust. "Currently, building owners can claim full compensation from any responsible party — and it's often councils, with the deepest pockets and no option to walk away, that end up paying out. "The risk-aversion this creates [from council building consent authorities] leads to frustrating delays and extra cost for builders and homeowners." Penk said this wouldn't mean councils were entirely off the hook as they will still "carry the same share of responsibility they do now for tasks like processing consent applications, carrying out inspections, and issuing code compliance certificates." Govt 'exploring' protections for building owners Penk asserted that building owners would "be protected if things go wrong," and that the Government was "exploring options such as requiring professional indemnity insurance and home warranties, similar to arrangements in Australia." ADVERTISEMENT The Government gave examples of home warranties that already exist here, like the Certified Builders' Halo Guarantee and the Master Builders' 10-Year Guarantee. It said the new regime was similar to what some Australian states had used since the 1990s. Chris Penk (Source: 1News) Penk also announced today that it would allow councils to voluntarily consolidate their building consent authority functions with each other. "It is ridiculous that builders, designers and homeowners must navigate 66 different interpretations of the Building Code, because of the number of council building consent authorities across the country," Penk said. "Builders can be rejected on paperwork that would be accepted by a neighbouring authority simply because each building consent authority applies the rules differently. "Many councils have asked for this and I expect they will seize the opportunity to consolidate, share resources like building inspectors and IT systems, and pass the savings on to ratepayers." Today's changes are part of a broader reform programme for building and consents, which the Government argues will make it easier and more affordable to build. ADVERTISEMENT Building Consent Approvals is promising faster approvals for 'low-risk' house-building projects. (Source: 1News) Earlier this month, Penk announced homeowners would soon be able to build small structures like garden sheds, sleepouts and garages closer to their property boundaries without requiring building consent. Cabinet agreed to remove the minimum distance required between single-storey buildings under 10sqm and a property boundary or other residential building, and reduce it to one metre for buildings between 10 and 30 square metres. Other recent changes included exempting "granny flats" from consenting rules, allowing trusted building companies to build without consents, and enabling approved plumbers and drainlayers to self-certify their own work. 'Positive step': Industry reacts to shake-up Master Builders chief executive Ankit Sharma said the reforms represented a "positive step" towards a more consistent, efficient and balanced system. "Builders have long faced duplication, delays, and inconsistent decisions across more than 60 different building consent authorities. The proposal to consolidate building consent authorities and introduce common data standards has the potential to reduce compliance costs, improve consistency across regions, and speed up approvals. These are practical solutions that, if implemented well, could drive meaningful productivity gains for the sector." ADVERTISEMENT Addressing liability settings was just as important, he said. "The current joint-and-several system has meant councils carry a disproportionate share of risk, which has made them overly cautious and slowed down consenting. Moving to proportionate liability has the potential to create a fairer and more balanced system, provided it is paired with strong consumer protections such as home warranties and appropriate practitioner insurance." The group representing councils, Local Government New Zealand, also welcomed the changes. President Sam Broughton said the Government's proposals would help speed up building consenting on new homes. "We strongly believe it will have an instant and positive impact on housing growth; councils will be in a better position to consent more efficiently, with less legal risk borne by local government — and therefore less risk for ratepayers."
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Pay equity: Five unions to take government to court over law changes
Pay equity protesters voice their opinions outside Parliament in May. Photo: RNZ/Marika Khabazi Five unions are taking the government to the High Court over changes to pay equity laws. The sudden and controversial changes cancelled existing claims from mostly female-dominated jobs and made it harder for new claims to succeed . Workplace Minister Brooke van Veldengave a figure of 33 current claims that would be stopped, as the legislation was put through under urgency in May. The Nurses Organisation, Tertiary Education Union, Educational Institute, Post-Primary Teachers' Association, and Public Service Association argued the new rules breached the Bill of Rights Act. "The legal challenge argues the coalition government's legislation breaches three fundamental rights: freedom from gender-based pay discrimination, the right to natural justice, and the right to fair legal process," the unions said in a joint statement. "The case gives workers who have been denied their right to challenge gender-based pay discrimination a chance to challenge the government in court. If successful, a Parliamentary Select Committee must consider the declaration of inconsistency and a Parliamentary debate must occur. The government is then required to formally respond." The claim would be formally lodged on 29 August at the High Court in Wellington following a rally by women whose pay equity claims had been cancelled, the unions said. A spokesperson for the office of Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told RNZ: "The Bill was considered for consistency with the Bill of Rights Act before introduction, and the Acting Attorney-General concluded the Bill appeared to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act". Public Service Association national Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government avoided proper scrutiny, bypassing consultation. "We are asking the High Court to declare that the government's actions are inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 because of the discrimination New Zealand women will face as a result of the government's action," she said. "The government silenced women but we know the High Court will listen to our claims. This is just the start of our campaign for pay equity for New Zealand women and we will be leaving no stone unturned to achieve pay equity. "The decision to cancel claims that were about to be heard by the Employment Relations Authority is inconsistent with the constitutional foundations of New Zealand which do not provide for the government to interfere with the judicial system in this way." Educational Institute national secretary Stephanie Mills said the government did not follow a democratic process. "The scrapping of the teachers claim without consultation and under urgency was a kick in the guts for our teacher members after years of blood, sweat and money getting the claim moving," she said. "We'd had five years of work on it with hundreds of interviews with members about their work, and it was a genuinely joint process with the Ministry of Education and their pay equity team." NZNO delegate and Plunket nurse Hannah Cook said nurses and care workers were devastated by the scrapping of their pay equity claims. "Plunket nurses were so close to finally having our hard work recognised. Nurses and care workers are the backbone of a caring society and the coalition government needs to value us. These changes don't just impact us. They impact our families, our livelihoods and our quality of life," she said. "The coalition government has shown it doesn't value us nurses and those of us in women dominated workforces. It is 2025 for goodness sake. We shouldn't still be paid less than those in male dominated occupations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
