Putin says Ukraine ‘not serious about peace', tells Trump retaliation coming
MOSCOW, June 5 — Russian President Vladimir Putin told US President Donald Trump on Wednesday that he would have to respond to Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet, while also describing peace talks with Ukraine as 'useful.'
The war in Ukraine is intensifying after nearly four months of cajoling and threats to both Moscow and Kyiv from Trump, who says he wants peace after more than three years of the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War Two.
After Ukraine bombed bridges and attacked Russia's fleet of bombers deep in Siberia and Russia's far north, Putin on Wednesday said he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace.
Shortly after Putin discussed the attacks with top ministers in Moscow, Trump said he had spoken by telephone with Putin for one hour and 15 minutes, and that they had discussed the Ukrainian attacks and Iran.
'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace,' Trump said on social media.
Russia has unleashed several massive aerial attacks on Ukraine over recent weeks.
'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump said.
A foreign policy aide to Putin, Yuri Ushakov, said the Russian leader told Trump on the call that ceasefire talks between Moscow and Kyiv have been productive, despite what he termed attempts by Ukraine to 'disrupt' them.
'Let me stress that our president described in detail the content of the talks and that these talks on the whole were useful,' Ushakov said.
Memorandums outlining peace plans were exchanged and will be analysed, Ushakov said, 'and we hope that afterwards the two sides will be able to continue their talks.'
Ushakov confirmed the two presidents discussed other international issues, particularly the Middle East conflict and how Russia could help deal with Iran and its nuclear programme.
On Iran, Trump said he believed Putin agreed with Washington that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon,' and accused Tehran of 'slowwalking' decisions regarding the talks.
Trump has been unusually silent on the Ukrainian attacks on the Russian bombers — one of the three pillars of Russia's nuclear arsenal — though Moscow demanded that the United States and Britain restrain Ukraine.
The Kremlin said Trump had told Putin that Washington was not informed in advance of the Ukrainian attacks. Trump's Ukraine envoy said the risk of escalation from the war in Ukraine was 'going way up' after the strikes.
Russia and the United States are by far the world's biggest nuclear powers: together they hold about 88 per cent of all nuclear weapons.
Each has three ways of nuclear attack — strategic bombers, land-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles — and any attack on any part of the 'triad' is considered a grave escalation.
War or peace?
In some of his most hawkish remarks in recent months on the outlook for peace, Putin on Wednesday said the bridge attacks had been directed against civilians and accused Ukrainian leadership of being a 'terrorist organisation' supported by powers who were becoming 'terrorist accomplices.'
'The current Kyiv regime does not need peace at all,' Putin said at a meeting with senior officials. 'What is there to talk about? How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?'
Ukraine has not commented on the bridge attacks. It denies it targets civilians, as does Russia, though civilians have been killed by both sides.
Kyiv has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously wanting peace, citing as evidence Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia says certain conditions must first be met.
Putin, in his public remarks, did not mention the bomber attacks, which came just before Russia and Ukraine met for direct peace talks in Istanbul where Moscow set out what the United States has called 'maximalist' aims.
Before Putin spoke, other Russian officials said military options were 'on the table' for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them.
'We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation,' Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying. Ryabkov oversees relations with the US and arms control.
British and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. The White House has said Trump was not informed of Ukraine's drone attack before it unfolded. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
29 minutes ago
- Barnama
Gold Futures End Lower Amid Positive US-China Developments
By Danni Haizal Danial Donald KUALA LUMPUR, June 6 (Bernama) -- The gold futures contract on Bursa Malaysia Derivatives ended lower today, as the gold market eased slightly following a promising phone call between United States President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, said an analyst. The call, which signalled improving diplomatic engagement between the world's two largest economies, helped calm investor nerves over potential trade and geopolitical tensions. According to SPI Asset Management managing partner Stephen Innes, the development reduced demand for safe-haven assets such as gold, contributing to the price easing. 'The Trump-Xi call has reduced safe-haven demand for US assets, keeping gold within a tighter trading range. 'Additionally, despite the positive tone of the Trump-Xi conversation, the precious metal remains closely tied to the movement of the US dollar, with traders hoping that an earlier-than-expected US Federal Reserve rate cut will weaken the greenback,' he told Bernama. The spot-month June 2025 contract fell to US$3,371.80 per troy ounce from US$3,400.90 yesterday, while the July 2025 contract dropped to US$3,380.30 from US$3,409.40. The August, September and October 2025 contracts decreased to US$3,393.80 per troy ounce from US$3,422.90 yesterday. Trading volume increased to 109 lots from 38 lots on Thursday, while open interest rose to 122 contracts from 62 contracts.
Focus Malaysia
an hour ago
- Focus Malaysia
Putin's MH17 endgame is to get Russia off the hook
WHEN Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim raised the MH17 issue with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he received only cold comfort. In his recent visit to Russia, he had to broach the subject in the wake of a United Nations (UN) aviation agency report that found Russia responsible for the 2014 downing of Flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine. All 298 individuals including 44 Malaysian passengers on board were killed. The memory of this tragic incident still burns bright in the minds of the relatives of the victims, and ever since then they have been waiting for answers as to who was to be solely blamed. Eleven years later, Putin could only convey condolences to the families of the victims in his meeting with Anwar, dashing hopes that compensations were on the plate in response to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) council ruling. The horror of the air disaster will never go away as long as there is no final closure to the case. Once it is conclusively proven that Moscow must take the full blame, and must make reparations for this senseless act of violence, the matter can hopefully rest in peace. The UN aviation body—the ICAO—has ruled that Russia is to be held accountable for the shooting down of the MAS passenger jet over the troubled region. After much deliberation, the ICAO governing council voted that the Russian Federation had violated international air law by 'resorting to the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight'. Although Russia is an ICAO member (there are 193-member states), it was not elected to the ICAO council, the main governing body comprising 36-member countries, which is mainly responsible for recommending practices related to air navigation, among other varied duties. Subsequently, Russia halted its participation in the investigation last year, claiming allegations that Moscow had a direct hand in the disaster were 'fake allegations'. The current 36 members, elected in 2022 to serve for three years, handed down the ruling after the Australian and the Netherlands governments brought the case against Moscow in 2022. Malaysia is also a member of the council. But Putin promptly poured cold water on the ruling because he believes the report is politically tainted and is biased against his country. In short, Russia's hand is not soiled with the blood of the innocent victims. By rejecting the findings of the report, the Russian leader is questioning the very legitimacy of the ICAO, which was established in 1947 to 'enhance global civil aviation safety'. By failing to uphold international air law, Moscow does not believe in 'sharing the skies' for the safety of air travellers. Putin has laid out starkly his imperious demand: he wants a thorough, detailed, independent, comprehensive, and exhaustive investigation. Putin must be aware that Malaysia has also cast its vote against Russia and when he met Anwar, he was ready to hand down his own ruling. There was nothing the prime minister could do except to listen meekly as his host sternly spoke his mind. Perhaps, the ICAO thought Anwar could carry the message directly to Putin but Moscow sees it in a different light. According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the publication of the ruling 'was timed to cast a shadow on Anwar's visit to Russia'. But it was Putin who cast a shadow on Anwar: the Russian leader gave neither space for the prime minister to discuss the findings nor gave face to Malaysia's position in the important UN aviation agency. Many of the 36-member states are heavyweights in the aviation industry such as the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and Japan and Putin sees all of them as Western allies ganging up against the Russian Federation. If Russia had been elected to the ICAO council in 2022 (it fell short of the votes to get elected), it would have vehemently denied responsibility and would have probably staged a walk-out in protest. But how does Putin propose to conduct an independent investigation into the MH17 tragedy? Does this mean he wants a new slate of ICAO council members to deliberate again on the matter? Or does he want the investigative body to be a totally new setup outside the framework of the ICAO, with members sympathetic to Russia? Which ever way one looks at it, an independent probe into the incident will not be independent because Russia will most certainly play a dominant, aggressive, and intrusive role in the deliberations. One can say rightly that Putin will only be interested in one conclusion and, that is, Russia must not be found guilty of the horrendous crime. Put the whole blame on Ukraine. And if Ukraine, which is now battling the Russian invaders, is annexed, Putin can turn around and say, with the demise of the Ukraine statehood, the case is closed for good. ‒ June 5, 2025 Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Reuters
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
China sharpens rare earth controls in trade war strategy
BEIJING: China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war. Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system. Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles. 'China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime,' said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations. 'China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort.' After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been 'straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things'. He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors. In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences. That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing. The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax. Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally. 'Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose,' said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank. 'But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control.' China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned. Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations. For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing. 'It's sharpening China's scalpel,' said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity. 'It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America.' DECADES IN THE MAKING Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute. As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, 'The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths.' Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data. China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies. In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power. But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said. Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December. In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries. Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call. 'It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way,' said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China.
