logo
China sharpens rare earth controls in trade war strategy

China sharpens rare earth controls in trade war strategy

The Sun19 hours ago

BEIJING: China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise.
The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war.
Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system.
Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles.
'China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime,' said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations.
'China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort.'
After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been 'straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things'.
He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences.
China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors.
In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences.
That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing.
The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax.
Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally.
'Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose,' said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank.
'But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control.'
China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing.
Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned.
Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations.
For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing.
'It's sharpening China's scalpel,' said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity.
'It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America.'
DECADES IN THE MAKING
Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute.
As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, 'The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths.'
Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data.
China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies.
In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power.
But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said.
Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December.
In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries.
Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call.
'It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way,' said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The lesson Asean must draw from the Trump-Musk quarrel
The lesson Asean must draw from the Trump-Musk quarrel

New Straits Times

time32 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

The lesson Asean must draw from the Trump-Musk quarrel

THE public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk should be viewed with detached clarity by Asean policymakers and observers. It is neither a signal of a shift in American foreign policy nor does it foreshadow a major realignment in the global tech landscape. In his second term, Trump has doubled down on his view that the US must be ruled not by institutions but by personalities. He has no patience with those who challenge his centrality. Musk, once an object of Trump's admiration, has become a rival personality. The former's influence spans multiple domains — space, artificial intelligence, electric vehicles and digital media. In the eyes of Trump, this influence must be subordinate to political loyalty. Musk's criticism of Trump, whether on policy, personality or principle, has thus drawn an inevitable response. Yet Musk is no innocent bystander. His relentless need to comment, provoke and insert himself into the political arena has increasingly eroded the neutrality that once insulated Tesla and SpaceX from partisan warfare. Since acquiring Twitter — renamed X — Musk has made the platform a personal amplifier of his views, often blurring the line between corporate strategy and personal vendetta. Just as Trump cannot resist attacking, Musk cannot help but respond. The result is a digital 'blood sport'. At a deeper level, Musk's recent provocations may be to deflect attention from his growing troubles. Tesla, long seen as the undisputed champion of electric vehicles, is now steadily losing global market share to China's BYD. Despite Musk's early-mover advantage, the Chinese EV juggernaut has surpassed Tesla in both unit sales and technological innovation, especially in markets across Asia and the Global South. This shift is not just commercial — it is geopolitical. China's industrial policy, from lithium refining to battery standardisation, has enabled firms like BYD to undercut and outpace American competitors. Tesla, by contrast, faces domestic regulatory scrutiny, investor fatigue and inconsistent leadership. Musk, who once rode the wave of futuristic optimism, is now increasingly seen as a mercurial figure whose ventures are overextended and reactive. While American media and pundits obsess about this feud, Asean must resist being distracted. The region is entering a critical decade in which its ability to lead on green transition, artificial intelligence governance and maritime security will define its global role. Whether Musk and Trump call each other names or trade blows on social media is irrelevant to the Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, or to the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Moreover, if there is a lesson to draw from this spectacle, it is the danger of personalising power. Asean's strength has always rested in its ability to temper egos through consensus and consultation. That is not a flaw but a survival mechanism. The bloc should be wary of importing political styles rooted in personality cults, where institutions are hollowed out in favour of personal charisma and performative leadership. Musk and Trump are both creatures of the same American pathology: the belief that individual willpower, when fused with wealth or fame, is enough to override complex systems. But Asean is different. The region's success depends not on dominant personalities but on the patient weaving of trust, rules and interdependence. Ultimately, Asean must tune out the noise. There are far more pressing issues to confront — from resolving the Myanmar crisis and addressing climate-induced migration, to strengthening regional supply chains and ensuring cybersecurity. The Musk-Trump bust-up may dominate headlines in Washington, but it is only a sideshow to the real geopolitical currents shaping Asia's future.

Greenpeace steals Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest
Greenpeace steals Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Greenpeace steals Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest

Greenpeace activists on Monday stole a wax figure of President Emmanuel Macron from a Paris museum and placed it in front of the Russian embassy as part of a protest against French economic ties with Moscow in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine. According to a police source, two women and a man entered the Grevin Museum posing as tourists and, once inside, changed their clothes to pass for workers. The activists slipped out through an emergency exit with the wax work, estimated to be worth 40,000 euros (RM193,644), which they had covered up. The museum said that the activists had called to promise that the statue would be returned "unharmed". "They had clearly done their research very thoroughly," a museum spokeswoman told AFP. According to the spokeswoman, the activists distracted a security guard by asking a question about a disabled access lift, while some of them donned maintenance coats. After making away with the Macron wax figure, the Greenpeace activists placed it in front of the Russian embassy in a protest against the economic ties between France and Russia in the gas, chemical fertilizer and nuclear sectors. Greenpeace activists set up a wax statue of Macron - allegedly taken from the Grevin Museum - outside the Russian Embassy in Paris on June 2, protesting France's gas and fertilizer imports from Russia. Photo: AFP The action in front of the embassy lasted only a few minutes. The activists unfurled a Russian flag behind the Macron statue, while one man held up a yellow placard reading "Business is business". The activists also threw fake banknotes around. "For us, France is playing a double game," said Jean-Francois Julliard, head of Greenpeace France. "Emmanuel Macron embodies this double discourse: he supports Ukraine but encourages French companies to continue trading with Russia," Julliard said. Julliard said Greenpeace targeted Macron because he had a particular responsibility, adding that the French president "should be the first" among European leaders to end trade contracts with Russia. France has been one of the most vocal supporters of Kyiv since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Macron has taken the lead in seeking to forge a coordinated European response to defend Ukraine, after US President Donald Trump shocked the world by directly negotiating with Russia. The wax figure of Jacques Chirac was stolen from the Grevin Museum in 1983, when he was mayor of Paris. The statue was found a few days later at the Vincennes Zoo. The statue of Valery Giscard d'Estaing was stolen by angry motorcyclists during his term at the Elysee Palace between 1974 and 1981. - AFP

Nepal's US trade preference at risk amid growing tariff tensions
Nepal's US trade preference at risk amid growing tariff tensions

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Nepal's US trade preference at risk amid growing tariff tensions

KATHMANDU: New tariff tensions could further undermine the modest gains of least developed countries (LDCs), small island developing states (SIDS) and landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), according to a recent report. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, in its May publication titled 'Sparing the Vulnerable: The Cost of New Tariff Burdens', warns that these vulnerable economies could face some of the highest new US tariffs. This could lead to a decline in critical exports and pose substantial risks to their long-term development prospects. The report defines 'vulnerable economies' as LDCs, SIDS, and LLDCs—nations already struggling with structural economic and geographic disadvantages. 'US President Donald Trump is creating tariff uncertainty as a bargaining tactic in trade negotiations,' said Purushottam Ojha, a former commerce secretary. 'There is uncertainty in US tariff policy, with new tariffs being imposed, suspended, and then reinstated without predictable patterns.' Ojha noted that Nepal's trade benefits under the Nepal Trade Preference Programme are set to expire this year, potentially creating new hurdles for exporting goods to the US market. 'This tariff uncertainty increases the cost of trade, which can have a wider impact on economies that heavily rely on imports,' he said. 'The erratic US tariff policy is not a healthy sign for global trade.' The US recently increased tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 per cent to 50 per cent and imposed 45–50 percent tariffs on products from several countries, though these have been temporarily suspended for 90 days. According to Ojha, one silver lining is that the tariff differential between Nepal and other countries has temporarily improved the competitiveness of Nepali goods. 'But with the implementation of new US tariffs still unclear, it's hard to rely on this advantage.' In the last fiscal year, Nepal recorded a trade deficit of Rs2.16 billion (US$15.8 million) with the US. According to the Department of Customs data, Nepal exported goods worth Rs17.31 billion to the US while imports totalled Rs19.48 billion. Top Nepali exports to the US included carpets, dog chew, felt goods, readymade garments for men and women, ceramic goods, pashmina, essential oils, musical instruments, handmade paper and cotton bags. Meanwhile, Nepal imported items such as soybeans, coal, oil cake, aircraft and helicopter parts, printed software manuals, artificial filament tow of cellulose acetate, laboratory and diagnostic equipment, wood pulp and almonds from the US. The US introduced the Nepal Trade Preference Programme after the April 2015 earthquake, granting duty-free access to 77 items to support economic recovery. However, trade experts say the preferential treatment has failed to significantly boost exports. The programme applies to 77 tariff lines: 56 textile products, ten footwear items, nine clothing goods and two fodder-related products. According to reports, as of Thursday (June 5), the average effective US tariff rate stands at 15.1 per cent, up sharply from the 2.5 per cent rate before the recent rounds of tariff increases. This rise results from ongoing trade disputes and retaliatory measures, contributing to a highly complex and volatile trade environment. Despite special provisions under multilateral trade rules, the participation of vulnerable economies in global trade remains minimal. They make up less than 0.5 per cent of total US imports and contribute insignificantly to US tariff revenue or trade deficits. According to the report, the least developed and landlocked developing countries account for only 1.3 per cent of global exports—a figure that has largely remained unchanged over the past three decades. This stagnation persists despite the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of significantly increasing the export share of developing countries, with a particular aim of doubling LDC exports by 2020. Instead, export growth for these nations has moved at a 'snail's pace' over the last 30 years, the report says. Though the US market is critical for the exports of these vulnerable economies, their footprint remains small. The report states that LDCs account for 8.9 per cent of total US exports and just 0.9 per cent of US imports. Similarly, LLDCs buy 2.1 per cent of US exports while supplying 0.2 per cent of imports. Regarding trade deficits, LDCs contribute 1.5 per cent to the US deficit, while LLDCs have a negative contribution of 0.2 per cent, meaning the US runs a trade surplus with them. The report emphasises that newly imposed US tariffs, which are layered and vary by the country, represent an added burden for these countries. Under new US tariffs announced between January and mid-May 2025, a ten per cent tariff has been applied across the board, excluding Canada, Mexico, and China. In 2023, the US imports from landlocked developing countries amounted to US$6.2 billion. Of this, 59 per cent of goods were subject to country-specific tariffs, while 41 per cent enjoyed exemptions. Imports from least developed countries stood at US$27.4 billion, with 93 per cent falling under country-specific tariffs and only seven per cent exempt. The exemptions mainly apply to primary goods such as vegetable products, footwear, foodstuffs, and headgear. The report warns that LDCs will bear the brunt of these new tariff policies. The trade-weighted average tariff the US applies to imports from LDCs is 43.9 per cent—far higher than the 7.3 per cent tariff those countries impose on US exports. For LLDCs, the US applies an average tariff of 17.1 per cent, compared to a 5.2 per cent tariff on US exports. The report concludes that shrinking preferential tariff margins threaten to erode export viability for dozens of vulnerable countries, potentially setting back years of slow but hard-earned progress in trade and development. - The Kathmandu Post/ANN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store