Donald Trump Suffers Quadruple Legal Blow Within Hours
President Donald Trump suffered a series of legal setbacks on Wednesday in the form of four separate court rulings.
Trump came into office on the pledge that he would carry out mass deportations on "day one," impose sweeping tariffs on countries he claims have taken advantage of the U.S, implement hiring freezes and mass layoffs to downsize the government in the name of efficiency, eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies and more.
But the administration has run up against judicial pushback on virtually every major agenda item that Trump championed on the campaign trail and since he took office. In May, according to one analysis, the Trump administration suffered more than two dozen defeats at the district court level from judges appointed by Democrats and Republicans, including Trump.
The four legal setbacks on Wednesday were announced within hours of each other.
A U.S. judge on Wednesday temporarily stopped the Trump administration from moving ahead with an effort to eliminate Job Corps, the largest U.S. job training program for low-income youth.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter issued a restraining order preventing the Labor Department from terminating contracts or halting operations until further review. The plaintiffs argue the department is overstepping its authority by trying to dismantle a federally mandated program without congressional approval. Job Corps, established in 1964, provides education and vocational training to disadvantaged youth but has been criticized by the Labor Department for poor outcomes and safety issues. A court hearing is scheduled for June 17.
A federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration's bid to lift a lower court's injunction blocking the president's executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ruling, which requires the department to reinstate over 1,300 employees who were terminated as part of a mass layoff aimed at shutting down the agency.
The lawsuit was brought by Democratic-led states, school districts, and teachers' unions, who argued that the firings—announced just before Trump signed the executive order to eliminate the department—violated the law by attempting to bypass Congress, which created the department in 1979. The Trump administration maintained that the cuts were lawful and part of a broader effort to reduce government size.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun previously ruled that the layoffs were effectively an attempt to dismantle the department without congressional approval. The appeals court agreed, noting the agency would be unable to perform its core functions if the firings proceeded. Trump has proposed transferring the department's responsibilities to other agencies.
The administration is expected to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration illegally deported nearly 140 Venezuelan men to El Salvador under a rarely used wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act, but stopped short of ordering their return to the United States.
In a 69-page decision issued Wednesday, Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found the men—who were flown out of the U.S. just hours after Trump invoked the 1798 law on March 15—were denied due process and unlawfully sent to El Salvador's notorious CECOT megaprison. Trump said the men were members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, but Boasberg wrote that evidence suggests many had no gang ties at all.
"Significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those entombed in CECOT have no connection to the gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations," Boasberg wrote.
Boasberg gave the administration one week to propose how the detainees might pursue legal challenges in U.S. courts but said he would not yet order any specific government action, citing national security concerns. The judge had previously tried to block the deportation as the planes were in the air, but they did not turn back, prompting contempt-of-court proceedings—now paused by an appeals court.
The Supreme Court later said that individuals deported under the Alien Enemies Act must be given enough time to seek legal relief, though it ruled 5–4 that Boasberg's court was not the correct venue for the original case.
Legal experts and civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), hailed Boasberg's latest ruling as a critical rebuke of Trump's handling of mass deportations. "The Trump administration must fix its blatant constitutional violations and cannot simply choose to leave these individuals in a foreign gulag-type prison," said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, Politico reported.
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to halt deportation proceedings against the wife and five children of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the Egyptian national charged with firebombing a pro-Israeli demonstration in Boulder, Colorado. U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher issued the ruling to ensure the family's constitutional rights are protected, after they were taken into custody by immigration officials earlier this week. None of the family members have been charged with any crime.
Soliman, who authorities say confessed to the attack, faces federal hate crime and attempted murder charges after allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails at demonstrators while shouting "Free Palestine." Fifteen people were injured in the attack, which authorities say was motivated by antisemitism. Soliman had a pending asylum application. His wife, a network engineer, has a pending EB-2 visa application and is listed with their children as dependents on his asylum application.
The Department of Homeland Security defended the family's detention, arguing their immigration status warranted removal. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also stated that federal authorities were investigating whether the family had any prior knowledge of the planned assault. Soliman and his wife have both said the family was unaware of his actions, according to authorities.
"The punishment of a 4-year-old child for something their parent allegedly did...should outrage Americans, regardless of their citizenship status," one of the family's attorneys, Eric Lee, told The Associated Press.
Soliman remains in custody on a $10 million bond and is due in state court on Thursday.
Trump is appealing the Department of Education case, and new court dates have been set for the Boulder attack deportation and the Jobs Corp cases.
Related Articles
Elon Musk Wasted Thousands Trying to Stop Trump Targeting Tesla in Tax BillIran to Counter US Nuclear Offer as Trump Sends New WarningTrump Set to Square Off With New German Chancellor Merz on Trade, UkraineWelcome to the Age of Dumb Kissinger | Opinion
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
NEW YORK (AP) — The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for NASA, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, 'Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass.' Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. 'For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable.' Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. A spokesman for NHTSA said the probe was ongoing and that the agency 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50% in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14% amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4%. 'Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm,' said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. 'Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative.' One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. Meanwhile, one analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas 'in a meaningful way.' But he's now less hopeful. 'There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments,' TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, 'and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts.' Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for NASA and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the U.S. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later — in a reply to another X user — he said he wouldn't do it. A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40% of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an 'illegal boycott' and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. Now advertisers may have to worry about a different danger. If Trump sours on X, 'there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands,' said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an 'exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends.' ___ Associated Press Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.


Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
'The Five' touts need for 'transparency' following Biden's doctor being subpoenaed
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage MOMENTS AGO: Trump takes questions as Abrego-Garcia faces human trafficking charges


CNN
34 minutes ago
- CNN
Proud Boys members suing Justice Department for January 6 prosecutions
Members of the Proud Boys who were convicted by a jury on several counts related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack – each of whom were later pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Donald Trump – are now suing the Justice Department for what they say was a 'political prosecution.' The individuals, including several former leaders of the group, say the prosecution in the case amounted to an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' Four of the five men – Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the group; Joseph Biggs; Ethan Nordean; Trump Zachary Rehl; and Dominic Pezzola – were convicted of seditious conspiracy and each received lengthy sentences prior to Trump's absolution. The group wants the government to pay $100 million in restitution for the criminal prosecution and has asked for a jury trial in the matter. In the wake of Trump's election for a second term, the administration granted full clemency to hundreds of people convicted of felony crimes like destroying property and assaulting police on January 6. Trump's reelection also brought with it a complete about-face on investigations into those who attacked the Capitol that day, effectively ending the largest ever investigation conducted by the FBI. Trump's Justice Department also recently announced it had reached a settlement in the lawsuit brought by the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by an officer on January 6 after attempting to breach the Speaker's Lobby near the House chamber. CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment. Republicans and Trump allies have long argued that the hundreds of cases brought against people who participated in the January 6 attack often amounted to political persecution from Joe Biden's Justice Department because they targeted Trump supporters. The lawsuit filed Friday could either force the administration to defend its prosecution of the Proud Boys or settle with the men. One of the men suing the Justice Department, Dominic Pezzola, was the first rioter to break open a window at the Capitol, allowing scores of protestors to enter the building, prosecutors said during the trial. Prosecutors argued that the other four men were leaders of the group and helped coordinate and helm elements of the attack. 'Now that the Plaintiffs are vindicated, free, and able to once again exercise their rights as American citizens, they bring this action against their tormentors for violations of their Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights,' the lawsuit says. The lawsuit argues that prosecutors went after the five men despite knowing they never organized or coordinated the events of January 6. Prosecutors, the lawsuit alleges, invented 'a whole new legal theory,' stacked the jury and breached attorney-client communications.