
Expert tips Irish expertise as civilisation's best bet to avoid collapse
It makes him a bit nervous when it turns to the subject of, 'so what do you do?'.
That's a hazard of the job when your life's work is studying the end of the world as we know it.
Kemp works at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge University in the UK.
His daily routine is spent researching the end of days, and the risks that could cause today's highly interconnected society to break apart and collapse – taking with it everything we know and love.
When this column previously spoke to him, he had just published a paper titled 'Climate Endgame' which studied the eerie similarities between the collapse of former civilisations and the pathway that our own is speeding along.
His latest project is unlikely to improve his line in small talk. Luke Kemp from the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, at Cambridge University in the UK
In a new book - 'Goliath's Curse' - he appears to have grown even less optimistic about the likelihood that humanity will choose to avoid doomsday.
But he does give us one last hope. A throw of the dice with an idea that, as it happens, Ireland has shown itself to be a world leader at.
But first the bad news.
Having spent seven years studying 400 societies from the past 5,000 years, the Australian-born academic found ringing indicators of collapse all around us.
The biggest one? Inequality. It has gone hand in hand with the downfall of all civilised societies in history.
In our case it is being supercharged by what Kemp calls a 'dark triad' of characteristics among our ruling elite: narcissism, psychopathy and manipulation.
"The three most powerful men in the world are a walking version of the dark triad: Trump is a textbook narcissist, Putin is a cold psychopath, and Xi Jinping came to rule [China] by being a master Machiavellian manipulator," he outlined in a recent interview with the Guardian.
"Our corporations and, increasingly, our algorithms, also resemble these kinds of people. They're basically amplifying the worst of us."
Three other 'tells' in the ruins of previous civilisations have been arms races, landgrabs and ecological disasters.
"As elites extract more wealth from the people and the land, they make societies more fragile, leading to infighting, corruption, immiseration of the masses, less healthy people, overexpansion, environmental degradation and poor decision making by a small oligarchy. The hollowed-out shell of a society is eventually cracked asunder by shocks such as disease, war or climate change."
All sounding familiar yet?
The biggest problem in today's world is that any collapse will be on global scale with no region spared such is our interconnectedness. Reliance on technology also means there is no fallback Plan B.
Kemp uses the term 'Goliaths' to describe the rise of past societies such as the Roman empire or Chinese dynasties, and refers to our current globalised capitalism system as the 'Global Goliath'.
About now you might be asking, so what about that last hope you mentioned?
Perhaps surprisingly to some it's not a techno fix. The hope lies in an idea. Something called democracy – although not the kind we are used to, one that has been bought and paid for by billionaires and oligarchs.
Kemp identifies citizens' assemblies and juries of the people as perhaps the only hope to save the world as we know it.
It so happens that we in Ireland have been recognised as a world leader in the field.
The citizens' assemblies that repealed the 8th amendment, legalised gay marriage and still form the framework of Ireland's climate action plan are held up around the world as the standard in this exercise of 'deliberative democracy'. Supporters react outside Dublin Castle following the announcement of the result of the same-sex marriage referendum in Dublin on May 23, 2015. (Image: AFP)
Kemp explains: "If you'd had a citizens' jury sitting over the [fossil fuel companies] when they discovered how much damage and death their products would cause, do you think they would have said: 'Yes, go ahead'?"
But of course Goliath is not going to be felled too easily...
"It's always been easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of Goliaths. That's because these are stories that have been hammered into us over the space of 5,000 years," the researcher says.
"But even if you don't have hope, it doesn't really matter. It's about doing the right thing, fighting for democracy and for people to not be exploited. And even if we fail, at the very least, we didn't contribute to the problem."
Maybe that's the conversation we need to be having over the dinner table. A good way to begin is to read this important book from a writer who spends his life in the ruins of other people's civilisations.
Goliath's Curse by Luke Kemp is published by Viking Penguin.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Revealed: Israeli military's own data indicates civilian death rate of 83% in Gaza war
Figures from a classified Israeli military intelligence database indicate five out of six Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza have been civilians, an extreme rate of slaughter rarely matched in recent decades of warfare. As of May, 19 months into the war, Israeli intelligence officials listed 8,900 named fighters from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as dead or 'probably dead', a joint investigation by the Guardian, the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call has found. At that time 53,000 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli attacks, according to health authorities in Gaza, a toll that included combatants and civilians. Fighters named in the Israeli military intelligence database accounted for just 17% of the total, which indicates that 83% of the dead were civilians. That apparent ratio of civilians to combatants among the dead is extremely high for modern warfare, even compared with conflicts notorious for indiscriminate killing, including the Syrian and Sudanese civil wars. 'That proportion of civilians among those killed would be unusually high, particularly as it has been going on for such a long time,' said Therése Pettersson from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, which tracks civilian casualties worldwide. 'If you single out a particular city or battle in another conflict, you could find similar rates, but very rarely overall.' 8,900 — Named fighters listed as dead or 'probably dead' in Israeli database as of May 2025 In global conflicts tracked by UCDP since 1989, civilians made up a greater proportion of the dead only in Srebenica – although not the Bosnian war overall – in the Rwandan genocide, and during the Russian siege of Mariupol in 2022, Pettersson said. Palestinians check the destruction after Israeli military strikes in a tent camp for displaced people near Al-Aqsa Hospital, in Deir al-Balah, Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) Many genocide scholars, lawyers and human rights activists, including Israeli academics and campaign groups, say Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, citing the mass killing of civilians and imposed starvation. The Israeli military did not dispute the existence of the database or dispute the data on Hamas and PIJ deaths when approached for comment by Local Call and +972 Magazine. When the Guardian asked for comment on the same data, a spokesperson said they had decided to 'rephrase' their response. A brief statement sent to the Guardian did not directly address questions about the military intelligence database. It said 'figures presented in the article are incorrect', without specifying which data the Israeli military disputed. It also said the numbers 'do not reflect the data available in the IDF's systems', without detailing which systems. A spokesperson did not immediately respond when asked why the military had given different responses to questions about a single set of data. The database names 47,653 Palestinians considered active in the military wings of Hamas and PIJ. It is based on apparent internal documents from the groups seized in Gaza, which have not been viewed or verified by the Guardian. Multiple intelligence sources familiar with the database said the military viewed it as the only authoritative tally of militant casualties. The military also considers the Gaza health ministry toll reliable, Local Call has reported, and the former head of military intelligence appeared to cite it recently, even though Israeli politicians regularly dismiss the numbers as propaganda. 52,928 — Gaza health ministry's overall death toll as of 14 May 2025 Both databases may underestimate casualty numbers. The Gaza ministry of health lists only people whose bodies have been recovered, not the thousands buried under rubble. Israeli military intelligence are not aware of all militant deaths or all new recruits. But the databases are the ones used by Israeli officers for war planning. Israeli politicians and generals have variously put the number of militants killed as high as 20,000, or claimed a civilian-to-combatant ratio as low as 1:1. The higher totals cited by Israeli officials may include civilians with Hamas links, such as government administrators and police, even though international law prohibits targeting people not engaged in combat. They probably also include Palestinians with no Hamas connections. Israel's southern command allowed soldiers to report people killed in Gaza as militant casualties without identification or verification. An Israeli soldier stands on the top of a tank parked on an area near the Israeli-Gaza border, as seen from southern Israel, Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Maya Levin) 'People are promoted to the rank of terrorist after their death,' said one intelligence source who accompanied forces on the ground. 'If I had listened to the brigade, I would have come to the conclusion that we had killed 200% of Hamas operatives in the area.' Itzhak Brik, a retired general, said serving Israeli soldiers were aware that politicians exaggerated the Hamas toll. Brik advised the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, at the start of the war and is now among his most strident critics. 'There is absolutely no connection between the numbers that are announced and what is actually happening. It is just one big bluff,' he said. Brik commanded Israel's military colleges, and said he kept in touch with serving officers. He described meeting soldiers from a unit identifying Palestinians killed in Gaza, who told him 'most of them' were civilians. Even though much of Gaza has been reduced to ruins and tens of thousands of people killed, the classified database lists nearly 40,000 people considered by the army to be militants and still alive. This satellite photo from Planet Labs PBC shows Gaza City, Gaza Strip, Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025. (Planet Labs PBC via AP) Casualty estimates from Hamas and PIJ members also indicated Israeli officials were inflating the militant toll in public statements, said Muhammad Shehada, a Palestinian analyst. By December 2024 an estimated 6,500 people from the military and political wings of both groups had been killed, members told him. 'Israel expands the boundaries so they can define every single person in Gaza as Hamas,' he said. 'All of it is killing in the moment for tactical purposes that have nothing to do with extinguishing a threat.' The ratio of civilian casualties among the dead may have increased further since May, when Israel tried to replace UN and humanitarian organisations that had fed Palestinians throughout the war. Israeli forces have killed hundreds of people trying to get food from distribution centres in military exclusion zones. Now starving survivors, already forced into just 20% of the territory, have been ordered to leave the north as Israel prepares for another ground operation that is likely to have catastrophic consequences for civilians. Palestinians mourn over the bodies of people killed either by Israeli military strikes or while trying to reach aid trucks, outside Shifa Hospital, in Gaza City, Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) The scale of the killing was partly owing to the nature of the conflict, said Mary Kaldor, professor emeritus at the LSE, director of the Conflict Research Programme and author of New Wars, an influential book about warfare in the post-cold-war era. International humanitarian law was developed to protect civilians in conventional wars, in which states deploy troops to face each other on the battlefield. This is still largely the model for Russia's war in Ukraine. In Gaza Israel is fighting Hamas militants in densely populated cities, and has set rules of engagement that allow its forces to kill large numbers of civilians in strikes on even low-ranking militants. 'In Gaza we are talking about a campaign of targeted assassinations, really, rather than battles, and they are carried out with no concern for civilians,' Kaldor said. This satellite photo from Planet Labs PBC shows the northern reaches of Gaza City and Jabaliya in the Gaza Strip Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025. (Planet Labs PBC via AP) The ratio of civilians among the dead in Gaza was more comparable to recent wars in Sudan, Yemen, Uganda and Syria, where much of the violence had been directed against civilians, she said. 'These are wars where the armed groups tend to avoid battle. They don't want to fight each other, they want to control territory and they do that by killing civilians,. 'Maybe that is the same with Israel, and this is a model of war [in Gaza] that is about dominating a population and controlling land. Maybe the objective always was forced displacement.' Israel's government says the war is one of self-defence after the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023, which killed 1,200 people. But political and military leaders regularly use genocidal rhetoric. The general who led military intelligence when the war began has said 50 Palestinians must die for every person killed that day, adding that 'it does not matter now if they are children'. Aharon Haliva, who stepped down in April 2024, said mass killing in Gaza was 'necessary' as a 'message to future generations' of Palestinians, in recordings broadcast on Israeli TV this month. Palestinians mourn over the body of Ibrahim al-Maghribi, 19, who was killed while trying to reach aid trucks, before his funeral outside Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) Many Israeli soldiers have testified that all Palestinians are treated as targets in Gaza. One stationed in Rafah this year said his unit had created an 'imaginary line' in the sand and fired at anyone who crossed it, including twice at children and once at a woman. They shot to kill, not to warn, he said. 'Nobody aimed for their legs'. Neta Crawford, a professor of international relations at Oxford University and co-founder of the Costs of War project, said Israeli tactics marked a 'worrisome' abandonment of decades of practices developed to protect civilians. In the 1970s public revulsion about American massacres in Vietnam forced western militaries to shift how they fought. New policies were imperfectly implemented but reflected a focus on limiting harm to civilians that no longer appeared to be part of Israel's military calculus, she said. 'They say they're using the same kinds of procedures for civilian casualty estimation and mitigation as states like the United States. But if you look at these casualty rates, and their practices with the bombing and the destruction of civilian infrastructure, it is clear that they are not.' — The Guardian


Sunday World
6 hours ago
- Sunday World
Politician's wife jailed for racist tweet during anti-immigration riots to be released
Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it Lucy Connolly spent more than nine months behind bars after admitting to sending the inflammatory post on X in the wake of the Southport attacks in July last year. The mother-of-three, who is also the wife of Tory councillor Ray Connolly, was handed a 31-month sentence in October having pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. Connolly, who was working as a childminder at the time, had shared the post after false rumours circulated online that the Southport murderer was an asylum seeker. He was later named as UK-born teenager Axel Rudakubana. The post, which was later deleted, read: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' Today's News in 90 Seconds - August 21st An application to have her sentence reduced was rejected in May, but according to the Daily Mail, Connolly is due to be released from HMP Peterborough later today. Connolly's X post was sent just hours after Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder ten others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, 2024. Connolly was arrested on August 6 in the wake of nationwide unrest, with several people jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. By that point she had deleted her social media account but other damning messages were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. She was later sentenced to 31 months in prison in October after pleading guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court. Lucy Connolly In May, she had an appeal against her sentence refused by three Court of Appeal judges at the Royal Courts of Justice. In a written judgement, Lord Justice Holroyde said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' Connolly argued she had been 'really angry' after the Southport attacks. She also said that news of the Southport murders had triggered her anxiety from when her baby son, Harry, died as the result of a hospital blunder 13 years earlier. However, hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say and deleted it. Read more When asked by Adam King, representing Connolly at her appeal case, if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or 'murder any politicians' she replied: 'Absolutely not'. At the time Mr Connolly told of the pain of his wife's long imprisonment, saying: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl.' Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants. Connolly's case later became international news, with a US State Department spokesman later confirming they were 'monitoring this matter' over concerns about infringements on freedom of expression. Mother-of-three Lucy Connolly is also the wife of Tory councillor Ray Connolly Connolly's sentence was also compared to that recently handed down to a man who abused a first class cabin crew member on a flight from London Recruitment tycoon Salman Iftikhar (37) was jailed for just 15 months for abusing Virgin Atlantic staff on a flight from London Heathrow to Lahore in his homeland of Pakistan. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the sentence was evidence of 'two-tier justice' given Connolly was jailed for more than double his sentence. Axel Rudakubana Mr Philp told the Mail last month: 'Iftikar was sentenced to only 15 months in prison last week for threatening an air stewardess with gang rape and for racially aggravated harassment. Iftikhar has multiple previous convictions. 'Yet Lucy Connolly got 31 months for a far less serious offence - a prosecution Lord Hermer personally authorised. 'This is two-tier justice in action.' Rupert Lowe, who was an MP for Reform at the time, described her as a "political prisoner" in a Facebook post and said "jailing a young mother over a social media post is not fair play". However, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the sentencing earlier this year, addressing Connolly's case in May after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an "efficient or fair use" of prison, Sir Keir said: "Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. "I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. "But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe."


RTÉ News
18 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Why do wind farms attract so much misinformation and conspiracy?
Analysis: Conspiracy thinking is a stronger predictor of opposition to wind farms than age, gender, education or political leaning When Donald Trump recently claimed, during what was supposed to be a press conference about an EU trade deal, that wind turbines were a "con job" that "drive whales loco", kill birds and even people, he wasn't just repeating old myths. He was tapping into a global pattern of conspiracy theories around renewable energy – particularly wind farms. (Trump calls them "windmills" – a climate denier trope.) Like 19th century fears that telephones would spread diseases, wind farm conspiracy theories reflect deeper anxieties about change. They combine distrust of government, nostalgia for the fossil fuel era, and a resistance to confronting the complexities of the modern world. And research shows that, once these fears are embedded in someone's worldview, no amount of fact checking is likely to shift them. A short history of resistance to renewables Although we've known about climate change from carbon dioxide as probable and relatively imminent since at least the 1950s, early arguments for renewables tended to be seen more as a way of breaking the stranglehold of large fossil-fuel companies. The idea that fossil companies would delay access to renewable energy was nicely illustrated in a classic epidode of The Simpsons when Mr Burns builds a tower to blot out the sun over Springfield, forcing people to buy his nuclear power. Back in the real world, similar dynamics were at play. In 2004, Australian prime minister John Howard gathered fossil fuel CEOs help him slow the growth of renewables, under the auspices of a Low Emissions Technology Advisory Group. Meanwhile, advocates of renewables – especially wind – often found it difficult to build public support wind, in part because the existing power providers (mines, oil fields, nuclear) tend to be out of sight and out of mind. Public opposition has also been fed by health scares, such as "wind turbine syndrome". Labelled a "non-disease" and non-existent by medical experts, it continued to circulate for years. The recent resistance Academic work on the question of anti-wind farm activism is revealing a pattern: conspiracy thinking is a stronger predictor of opposition than age, gender, education or political leaning. In Germany, the academic Kevin Winter and colleagues found that belief in conspiracies had many times more influence on wind opposition than any demographic factor. Worryingly, presenting opponents with facts was not particularly successful. From RTÉ Brainstorm, What can you do with used wind turbine blades? In a more recent article, based on surveys in the US, UK and Australia which looked at people's propensity to give credence to conspiracy theories, Winter and colleagues argued that opposition is "rooted in people's worldviews". If you think climate change is a hoax or a beat-up by hysterical eco-doomers, you're going to be easily persuaded that wind turbines are poisoning groundwater, causing blackouts or, in Trump's words, " driving the whales loco". Wind farms are fertile ground for such theories. They are highly visible symbols of climate policy, and complex enough to be mysterious to non-specialists. A row of wind turbines can become a target for fears about modernity, energy security or government control. This, say Winter and colleagues, "poses a challenge for communicators and institutions committed to accelerating the energy transition". It's harder to take on an entire worldview than to correct a few made-up talking points. What is it all about? Beneath the misinformation, often driven by money or political power, there's a deeper issue. Some people – perhaps Trump among them – don't want to deal with the fact that fossil technologies which brought prosperity and a sense of control are also causing environmental crises. And these are problems which aren't solved with the addition of more technology. It offends their sense of invulnerability, of dominance. This " anti-reflexivity", as some academics call it, is a refusal to reflect on the costs of past successes. It is also bound up with identity. In some corners of the online "manosphere", concerns over climate change are being painted as effeminate. Many boomers, especially white heterosexual men like Trump, have felt disorientated as their world has shifted and changed around them. The clean energy transition symbolises part of this change. Perhaps this is a good way to understand why Trump is lashing out at "windmills".