A Federal Judge Paused A Florida Immigration Law. The Arrests Continued Anyway.
On Wednesday, 20-year-old U.S.-born citizen Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez was arrested in Florida and charged with illegally entering the state as an 'unauthorized alien.' He was detained even after his mother presented his birth certificate and Social Security card in court, a harrowing indication that even citizens are not safe from the Trump administration's anti-immigration agenda.
Although headlines focused on the absurdity of charging a U.S. citizen with illegal entry, there was another potentially unlawful element of his arrest: On April 4, weeks before his arrest, a federal judge paused enforcement of Senate Bill 4-C, the state law used to detain him.
But Lopez-Gomez is not the only person who has been arrested since U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the temporary restraining order. On Friday, lawyers representing the immigrants suing Florida state officials over the constitutionality of the immigration law disclosed that at least 15 people have been arrested since the pause went into effect.
Thirteen of the arrests took place in Leon County, where Lopez-Gomez was detained, Daniel Tilley, the legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union Florida chapter, told HuffPost after the hearing. There was also at least one arrest in Orange County and another in Hillsborough County, the Miami Herald reported, citing the lawyers in the hearing.
Robert Schenck, a lawyer representing the Florida Attorney General's Office, argued in court that the temporary restraining order only applied to the parties listed in the suit, not to individual law enforcement agencies.
'I am astounded and don't understand this argument,' Judge Williams said.
'When I issued the temporary restraining order, it never occurred to me that police officers would not be bound by it,' the judge continued. 'It never occurred to me that the state attorneys would not give direction to law enforcement so that we would not have these unfortunate arrests.'
Williams extended the initial 14-day temporary restraining order until April 29 and clarified that the order applied to anyone tasked with enforcing the law. She warned that arresting people pursuant to a law that had been blocked from being enforced could constitute 'false imprisonment,' Tilley said. It is unclear how many additional arrests have been made throughout the state.
Lopez-Gomez was born in Georgia but spent most of his life in Mexico until returning four years ago, his mother told the Florida Phoenix, which first reported on his case. On Wednesday, while Lopez-Gomez was commuting to work in Tallahassee, Florida Highway Patrol pulled over the driver of the car he was a passenger in for allegedly speeding. Lopez-Gomez, as well as the driver and another passenger, were arrested and charged under S.B. 4-C, which was the subject of Williams' temporary restraining order at the time.
Asked why Lopez-Gomez, a U.S. citizen, was charged with entering Florida as an 'unauthorized alien,' the Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles communication office said in an email that Lopez-Gomez told a Florida state trooper he was not legally authorized to be in the U.S.
Lopez-Gomez, who speaks a Mayan language called Tzotzil and is not fluent in English or Spanish, never said he was 'here illegally,' his lawyer Mutaqee Akbar told CNN.
The arrest report quotes other people in the vehicle stating they were not in the U.S. legally, but does not quote Lopez-Gomez, Akbar told CNN.
Asked why Florida Highway Patrol made arrests pursuant to a law that had been blocked by a federal judge, the highway safety office said, 'Florida Highway Patrol will continue to work willingly with our federal partners to engage in interior enforcement of immigration law.'
Lopez-Gomez spent Wednesday night in the Leon County jail. The Homeland Security Investigations Office in Tampa issued a 48-hour ICE detainer for him on Thursday. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to an email asking why a U.S. citizen was subject to a detainer.
At a court hearing on Thursday morning, Lopez-Gomez's mother produced his birth certificate and his Social Security card as evidence that he is a U.S. citizen. Leon County Judge LaShawn Riggans confirmed the birth certificate was 'authentic' and said she found no probable cause for the charge. Even so, a state prosecutor argued that because ICE had asked the local jail to continue detaining him, the court did not have the authority to grant his release.
Riggans appeared to agree, and Lopez-Gomez remained in jail. He was released later that night after protesters gathered outside the jail where he was being detained.
An ICE detainer is not a judicial warrant, and it is unclear why Riggans, who did not respond to a request for comment, believed she did not have the authority to order his release.
The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly looking into Lopez-Gomez's case, but did not respond to a request for comment about the circumstances of his release.
S.B. 4-C, which was signed into law by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in February, carries stiff penalties. A first violation of 'illegal entry' is a misdemeanor with a mandatory minimum punishment of nine months in prison. A subsequent violation is considered a felony and carries a two-year mandatory minimum sentence.
In early April, the Florida Immigrant Coalition and other immigrant advocacy groups, including the Farmworker Association of Florida Inc., sued state officials, arguing that the law violated the Constitution's supremacy and commerce clauses.
Moreover, 'the law will subject thousands of immigrants who enter Florida, including asylum seekers and immigrants applying for other federal immigration benefits and status, to criminal punishment,' the lawyers representing the plaintiffs wrote in the complaint. The law 'effectively banishes large categories of immigrants whose immigration cases are pending, and to whom the federal government may eventually grant lawful status, permanent residence, and citizenship.'
Although Lopez-Gomez was released after one night in jail, his case represents a rare circumstance in that he was a U.S. citizen and his mother was able to produce proof. For undocumented people arrested under S.B. 4-C, even if the charges are eventually dropped as a result of the federal litigation, they could remain imprisoned as a result of an immigration detainer.
'If they are arrested contrary to the [temporary restraining order], their charges could be dropped, but they will still be held,' Tilley said.
U.S.-Born Citizen Arrested As 'Unauthorized Alien'
Appeals Court Calls Trump's Defiance 'Shocking' In Scathing Ruling
Judge Opens Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Trump Officials
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Major data breach exposes 86 million AT&T customer records, sparking identity theft fears: SSNs among details breached by hackers
AT&T has experienced a massive personal data breach, so if you're one of the more than 100 million people who use the company, you'll want to be on guard. According to a new report from Hack Read, more than 86 million customers have been affected with leaked details ranging from full names to dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses and physical addresses. It's reported that more than 44 million Social Security Numbers were also included in the data leak. While each of these data sets poses privacy risks on their own, together they could create full identity profiles that could be exploited for fraud or identity theft. The stolen data is reportedly fully decrypted and was first posted to a Russian cybercrime forum on May 15 before being re-uploaded on the same forum on June 3. Hackers reportedly accessed data by getting into accounts that lacked multi-factor authentication, and this leak appears to be linked to an original hack by the ShinyHunters group in April 2024. 'It is not uncommon for cybercriminals to re-package previously disclosed data for financial gain,' an AT&T spokesperson told Hack Read in a statement. 'We just learned about claims that AT&T data is being made available for sale on dark web forums, and we are conducting a full investigation.' The original seller of the exposed data claimed that this leak is 'originally one of the databases from the Snowflake breach' — but according to Hack Reads analysis, there are about 16 million more records in this breach than the previous one. The leak reportedly included full names, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses and social security numbers. AFP via Getty Images AT&T also acknowledged the security researchers' doubts that this breach was linked to the original 2024 breach. 'After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web in March 2024,' the company said in a statement. 'Affected customers were notified at that time. We have notified law enforcement of this latest development.' If you're an AT&T customer, it's possible your personal and private data could be part of the new leak. Though if your data was leaked in this hack, it's likely because it was already unprotected in the August 2024 National Public Data breach, which exposed 'three decades' worth of Social Security numbers on the online black market.' 'After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web in March 2024,' AT&T said in a statement. LightRocket via Getty Images To check if your information was leaked in that breach, you can check through Pentester, a cybersecurity firm, by going to and entering your information, which will allow you to see a list of your breached accounts. Security experts are also urging customers to keep an eye on their credit reports.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
DOGE results murky amid Elon Musk's exit
1 of 5 | Elon Musk and President Donald Trump take part in a press conference in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 30. Musk's work in the government has ended after five months and former White House staff have serious doubts about the Department of Government Efficiency self-reported results. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- Elon Musk's work in the government has ended after five months and former White House staff have serious doubts about the Department of Government Efficiency self-reported results. To date, DOGE claims that it has saved the government about $180 billion by slashing the federal workforce, ending contracts, selling assets and cutting grant programs. However, its so-called "Wall of Receipts" is filled with questionable or inaccurate entries, according to Elaine Karmarck, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Karmarck led President Bill Clinton's Reinventing Government Initiative, a program that cut 426,000 civil servants from the federal payroll and cut federal and agency regulations. There are three metrics Karmarck told UPI she uses to measure how effective DOGE is. Some of those metrics will not be available until the next administration takes office on Jan. 20, 2029. The first metric is whether there are fewer people working in the federal government at the end of President Donald Trump's term. There are about 2.2 million federal employees, a number that -- despite narratives claiming the government continues to grow -- has been consistent for decades. In the 1940s, there were as many as 3 million federal employees. In the 1950s, there were about 2.5 million. In the 1980s, the number of federal employees increased back to about 3 million. It has remained between 2 and 3 million since. Federal judges have ruled that some federal employees DOGE advised to be fired must be rehired. Musk also said that it has made mistakes in some layoffs, including laying off employees with the National Nuclear Safety Administration who are responsible for the safekeeping of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The second metric is whether there are fewer government contracts and fewer dollars spent on those contracts. DOGE lists more than 11,000 contract terminations totaling $34 billion in savings. It says more than 15,000 grants have been terminated resulting in about $44 billion in savings. Third is the government's performance as measured by economic markers such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics' unemployment reports as well as people's own experiences receiving government services. "That's a biggie. In other words, you can cut the government but if you have airplanes crashing and you have massive mix ups in Social Security checks, nobody is going to be applauding you for this," Karmarck said. DOGE's goal has been to cut about $2 trillion in federal spending. UPI reached out to the White House Press Office and Tesla's press office for interviews or comments. Neither responded to the requests. About a quarter of the government's budget is discretionary spending, meaning spending that is subject to appropriations by Congress. It amounts to less than $2 trillion. In fiscal year 2024, discretionary outlays totaled about $1.8 trillion. The rest of the budget is mandatory spending, also known as direct spending. This funding goes toward programs like Social Security, Medicare, veterans' benefits and other programs. Jenny Mattingly, vice president of government affairs for Partnership for Public Service, told UPI it would be difficult to reach DOGE's goal without cutting into mandatory spending. "Most of the U.S. budget is this mandatory, non-discretionary spending," Mattingly told UPI. "Just a small portion, comparatively, goes to the federal workforce." While the number of federal employees has remained relatively consistent, Mattingly notes that there are fewer federal employees per capita as the population has grown. "When you look at the U.S. population, that's exploded," she said. "So we actually have fewer federal employees per capita than in the past and they're doing an enormously greater magnitude and scope of work than the federal government did, say 30, 40, 100 years ago. What Congress and administrations have authorized the government to do is far greater and far more complex than it was." Measuring DOGE's progress five months in remains a challenge. The most recent date that DOGE updated its payment statistics or "receipts" was May 13. At that time, less than half of those receipts were itemized. The most cost savings, indicated by DOGE's "Agency Efficiency Leaderboard," have come from the Department of Health and Human Services, followed by the General Services Administration, the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management. "The list they put on the DOGE website turns out to be about 40% inaccurate," Karmarck told UPI. "We can't take their word for it. They were very sloppy. They made no effort at transparency other than a website which just has a list of things." An example of the inaccuracies shared by Karmarck is that DOGE has taken credit for ending contracts that ended before Trump was inaugurated. Faith Williams, director of the Effective and Accountable Government Program for Project on Government Oversight, agrees that DOGE's website cannot be trusted based on its inaccuracies and a lack of transparency. Inaccuracies have been brought to DOGE's attention on social media and it has made some corrections, though questions remain about its transparency. "Transparency has been an issue since day one," Williams told UPI. "This is an example of where DOGE has the power of a cabinet-level agency when it wants to but doesn't have to recordkeep when it doesn't want to. DOGE gets to be whatever is convenient in the moment." Musk's initial role -- as stated by him and Trump -- was to lead DOGE in an effort to tackle waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government for the purpose of making it run more efficiently. The White House later downplayed his direct role with DOGE, referring to him as an adviser to the president. The murkiness of Musk's true role in DOGE underlines why Williams has concerns about its structure, mission and lack of transparency. She has been investigating the office since it began, looking into its structure, who works for DOGE and its potential conflicts of interest. "One thing we learned fairly early on DOGE, its structure was very questionable. It was very opaque and it was opaque by design," Williams said. "That opacity really helped shield it and its actors and its actions from any kind of accountability, whether that's from members of the public or even congressional accountability or even in the courts." "Who led DOGE and worked at DOGE was one thing one day and a different thing on a different day depending on what was advantageous," she continued. Project on Government Oversight filed a lawsuit against DOGE over its lack of recordkeeping made available to the public and accessing sensitive records. DOGE faces lawsuits from other organizations related to its alleged lack of compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. In March, U.S. District Court Judge Casey Cooper ruled that DOGE's records are likely subject to the Freedom of Information Act. This was in response to a lawsuit by the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. There are several more lawsuits against DOGE related to its handling of data, compliance with FOIA and methods of cutting federal workers. In contrast, Karmarck's Reinventing Government Initiative did not face any litigation. "The reason we had no lawsuits is we followed the law," she said. "We passed a buyout bill so we had the congressional authority for buying people out. We simply followed the law." Instead of recommending Congress take actions like laying off federal employees or rescinding funds it has approved, DOGE has taken unilateral actions resulting in lawsuits. Funding approved by Congress requires congressional action to end. DOGE is not a congressionally approved agency, as a president cannot unilaterally create a new agency. He can create a new office, as past presidents have done. The authority of that office to take actions is limited, making it closer to an adviser than a federal agency. Accessing federal data systems and making changes is among the actions DOGE has taken that have raised the greatest concerns. Beth Noveck was the founding director of the White House's Open Government Initiative, a program started under President Barack Obama's administration that focused on using technology and data to modernize and improve government operations. She is currently the director of the Governance Lab and its MacArthur Research Network on Opening Governance at New York University. Noveck told UPI oversight on DOGE is past overdue, due to reports of the data it has accessed or attempted to access, including Medicare and Medicaid payment data, Social Security records, student loan data and the Office of Personnel Management systems. "Who has access and how it is being used is something we need an accounting of," Noveck said. "It's concerning and it seems that we're giving access to the likes of Palantir [Technology] to combine data that will effectuate mass surveillance and control. The risk is not just a failed attempt at cost savings, it's a successful attempt at authoritarian overthrow." The main tenets of DOGE are not new, evidenced by the work Noveck and Karmarck did for past administrations. There are nonpartisan government oversight entities that existed before Trump's current term as well, including the Office of Government Ethics and the inspectors general. However, shortly after Trump returned to office he fired the head of the Office of Government Ethics and 18 inspectors general. Last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., released a report on Musk's 130 days working in the government. The report alleges that Musk used his position to direct lucrative government contracts toward himself and his companies SpaceX, Tesla, Boring Company and Starlink. Amid an online feud with Musk following his departure as a White House Adviser, Trump has threatened to cancel all contracts with his companies. Warren's report also alleges that Musk and DOGE undercut agencies responsible for regulating his businesses and stopped enforcement actions against them.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
China EV company ignites surprising jobs controversy in U.S.
Jim Chapman, newly appointed township supervisor of Green Charter Township in Western Michigan, quickly realized that his responsibilities extended beyond simple governance. His town, a small rural community, had faced economic decline for decades. Many young residents left searching for better opportunities, leaving behind an aging population with limited prospects. But in the summer of 2022, Chapman learned of a potential game-changing investment - a major international electric vehicle battery manufacturer planned to build a factory in town. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter With a price tag of $2.4 billion and the promise of more than 2,000 well-paying jobs, Chapman saw the project as the kind of economic revival the town desperately needed. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy As plans advanced, Chapman discovered that the company behind the factory was Gotion, an American subsidiary of a Chinese electric vehicle battery manufacturer. The company had grown rapidly, benefiting from China's push into the EV market and strategic expansions into the U.S. By 2023, Chapman had facilitated infrastructure improvements, and Gotion secured state subsidies to make the project viable. Initially, he believed concerns about the company's origins were secondary to the economic benefits. He remained committed to bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., seeing it as aligned with broader American economic goals. Opposition emerged when residents learned of the plan through grassroots efforts. Local realtor Lori Brock received an anonymous warning, prompting her and many others to attend township meetings. Crowds packed the venue, and for four hours, townspeople vented their frustration, accusing officials of pushing the project without transparency. Environmental concerns dominated the discourse - citizens worried about water consumption and potential contamination risks. Skeptical of Gotion's assurances, the community feared the factory would permanently alter their way of life. "I listened to four hours of straight public comment ridiculing him (Chapman), just screaming at the whole board, telling them how unethical they were and horrible people and how they were a disgrace," Brock told NPR in an intriguing, lengthy Planet Money report. "I mean, four hours of it, just irate people." More on the U.S. economy: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Residents also questioned whether the promised jobs would resemble the union positions that once defined Michigan's automotive industry. They doubted whether local workers would truly benefit from the factory's presence. As debates intensified, Chapman's vision of economic renewal transformed into a political battleground. What seemingly began as a hopeful opportunity to restore prosperity to Green Charter Township became an emblem of the tensions between globalization and small-town values, exposing deeper concerns about the industries communities want shaping their futures. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong statement on Costco A major issue in the heated debate was Gotion's connection to China. Many residents saw China as a geopolitical adversary and questioned why the U.S. should subsidize a Chinese-owned company. The feared that Gotion could be a Trojan horse for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) fueled outrage, with concerns about potential infiltration of a local cybersecurity program. Gotion's articles of incorporation in China contained standard party activity agreements, but company representatives insisted its U.S. operations were independent. Opponents, known as the No Go movement, accused Chapman and his board of corruption, NPR reported. As tensions mounted, the No Go movement coalesced around a strategy - recalling Chapman and his board members from office. By the fall of 2023, their efforts materialized into a recall election, aiming to take control of the local government and stop the factory's construction. Their campaign was highly organized, featuring door-to-door canvassing, phone banking, and even political advertisements. With support from prominent Republican politicians, No Go activists gained traction. In early 2024, Green Charter Township held its recall vote, resulting in Chapman and his entire board being ousted. The newly elected No Go politicians swiftly moved to block the factory. In response, Gotion sued the township, leaving the project in limbo. Chapman still hopes the plant will open and believes the factory would bring much-needed economic growth, according to NPR, while Brock maintains that manufacturing belongs in the U.S. - just not this factory in this town. Related: Scott Galloway sends bold statement on Social Security, US economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
