&w=3840&q=100)
Human antibiotic use polluting rivers, fuelling drug resistance: Study
Millions of kilometers of rivers around the world are carrying antibiotic pollution at levels high enough to promote drug resistance and harm aquatic life, a new study warns.
The study estimated the scale of global river contamination from human antibiotics use. Researchers calculated that about 8,500 tons of antibiotics -- nearly one-third of what people consume annually -- end up in river systems around the world each year even after in many cases passing through wastewater systems.
Published in PNAS Nexus, the study is the first to estimate the scale of global river contamination from human antibiotics use.
"While the amounts of residues from individual antibiotics translate into only very small concentrations in most rivers, which makes them very difficult to detect, the chronic and cumulative environmental exposure to these substances can still pose a risk to human health and aquatic ecosystems," said Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, a post-doctoral fellow in geography at McGill and lead author of the study.
The research team used a global model validated by field data from nearly 900 river locations.
They found that amoxicillin, the world's most-used antibiotic, is the most likely to be present at risky levels, especially in Southeast Asia, where rising use and limited wastewater treatment amplify the problem.
"This study is not intended to warn about the use of antibiotics -- we need antibiotics for global health treatments -- but our results indicate that there may be unintended effects on aquatic environments and antibiotic resistance, which calls for mitigation and management strategies to avoid or reduce their implications," said Bernhard Lehner, a professor in global hydrology in McGill's Department of Geography and co-author of the study.
The findings are especially notable because the study did not consider antibiotics from livestock or pharmaceutical factories, both of which are major contributors to environmental contamination.
"Our results show that antibiotic pollution in rivers arising from human consumption alone is a critical issue, which would likely be exacerbated by veterinarian or industry sources of related compounds" said Jim Nicell, an environmental engineering professor at McGill and co-author of the study.
"Monitoring programs to detect antibiotic or other chemical contamination of waterways are therefore needed, especially in areas that our model predicts to be at risk," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
19-05-2025
- India Today
Is 5G harmful to humans? Scientists finally test it by blasting human cells with 5G waves
There are many conspiracy theories. And one of them is that 5G is harmful to birds, and if it is harmful to birds then it is probably harmful to humans and their brain. Now, a recent study is giving a clear answer to this question. Do 5G signals pose danger to human health? The answer is: no, they do at Germany's Constructor University recently conducted research and came to conclusion that '5G-exposed human skin cells do not respond with altered gene expression and methylation profiles'. advertisementDuring this research the scientists directly exposed human skin cells to high-intensity 5G electromagnetic waves. And the results were reassuring. Published in PNAS Nexus, the study puts an end to the ongoing debate over the potential health risks of 5G see the impact of 5G waves, researchers used two types of human skin cells — fibroblasts and keratinocytes — and exposed them to frequencies of 27 GHz and 40.5 GHz, which fall within the higher-end spectrum of 5G signals. These higher frequencies are part of the millimetre-wave bands expected to be widely deployed in the near future. According to the study, "even under worst-case conditions, no significant changes in gene expression or methylation patterns are observed after exposure."'We wanted to simulate worst-case exposure conditions,' the researchers were quoted as saying in reports. They also deliberately applied electromagnetic fields significantly stronger than what is permitted under international safety guidelines. According to the study, the exposure times ranged from two to 48 hours, simulating both short-term and prolonged contact with 5G the research points out that there were no detectable alterations in gene expression or DNA methylation. Notably, both gene expression and DNA are key indicators of cellular health and function. According to the study, frequencies up to 3 GHz can penetrate about 10 millimetres into the skin, while those at or above 10 GHz barely reach beyond 1 millimetre. This according to the researchers makes any deep biological interaction extremely is to be noted that researchers have already found that high-intensity radio frequencies can cause tissue heating. However, this research was conducted in a controlled environment to rule out temperature-induced effects. The conclusion: if there is no heating, there is no harm. The study challenges the claim that 5G exposure might cause non-thermal biological effects. 'Our data casts fundamental doubt on the existence of non-thermal biological effects from 5G exposure,' noted the research this study, the researchers hope to 'close this debate' with hard evidence and help the public better understand how electromagnetic radiation works within safe parameters. However the broader concerns about screens and wireless devices still remain, as these can impact mental and physical well-being in more subtle ways.
Hindustan Times
14-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
The antibiotics we take are entering our rivers and helping breed resistance
You take an antibiotic. A few days later, you feel better and move on. But the medicine doesn't just enter your body and completely disappear. It passes through your body and enters the environment. Some antibiotics end up in rivers, where they alter microbial life. Given that microbes are everywhere, including inside us, this eventually affects us. A startling new study published in PNAS Nexus lays this out in global detail. Each year, over 8,500 tonnes of antibiotics consumed by humans are flushed into rivers worldwide. And this number is only from medical use. It does not include antibiotics dumped by pharmaceutical factories or those used in farms to fatten animals. These are well-known sources of environmental contamination, which I discussed in detail in When the Drugs Don't Work: The Hidden Pandemic That Could End Modern Medicine. In the new study, researchers from McGill University used computer models to trace how the 40 most-used antibiotics move through wastewater systems and surface waters. They found that even with sewage treatment, large quantities of these drugs escape into the environment. When rivers run low, for example, under low-flow conditions during hot, dry months, residues concentrate to dangerous levels across six million kilometers of waterways. It should not surprise anyone familiar with antibiotic resistance that India ranks near the top. We already knew India is one of the world's highest consumers of antibiotics. Now, the new paper estimates that 87 percent of our rivers have antibiotic levels above safe limits, affecting 677,000 kilometers of waterways. Many Indian cities don't treat all their sewage. In smaller towns and rural areas, most waste flows untreated into open drains, streams, or lakes. Even where treatment plants exist, they rarely remove drug residues completely. Antibiotics like amoxicillin (71 percent of which is excreted unchanged), cefixime (100 percent excreted), and ceftriaxone are routinely prescribed in India. All are now being detected in rivers. Cefixime alone contaminates more than 80 percent of India's affected rivers. Once antibiotics enter the environment, they do not just float passively. They keep exerting pressure. Antibiotics do not kill all bacteria outright. In rivers, where countless microbes live and interact, low concentrations act as a filter. Susceptible bacteria are eliminated. Resistant strains survive and pass on to their genes, both to their offspring and to other bacteria. The process is invisible, but bacteria reproduce fast, and resistance spreads quickly. Also Read: 13-year-long study finds resistance for last-resort antibiotics In When the Drugs Don't Work, I wrote that resistance does not only emerge in people. It begins in the environment, in river sediment, in sewage bacteria, in the microbial sludge of drains. Once superbugs take hold, they can reach humans through contaminated water, food, poor hygiene, or hospital surfaces. The study estimates that 750 million people live within 10 kilometers of rivers with the highest levels of antibiotic contamination. In India alone, the study estimates 315 million people live near the most contaminated rivers. The researchers calculate that someone drinking two liters a day from our most polluted rivers could consume enough antibiotics to exceed safe health limits. Even low-level, chronic exposure can disrupt the gut microbiome and raise the risk that resistant bacteria take hold silently. The researchers compared their model with real-world measurements from 877 sites. In some Indian and Pakistani rivers, they found over ten different antibiotics, each one exceeding safe levels. If all sources were included, the risk would be even higher. And this is only the tip of the iceberg. This paper included only human antibiotic use. It left out veterinary antibiotics, which exceed human consumption, as well as aquaculture and pharmaceutical waste. We have already seen resistance spread through water. In well-documented studies over the past fifteen years, researchers have found deadly superbugs in rivers and in water from drains and public taps in major Indian cities, including in New Delhi. The link between resistance and environmental contamination is real. It is growing. It is underappreciated. This new study should be a wake-up call. The antibiotics that treat us do not just vanish. Unless we rethink how we use, dispose, and treat them, we will continue to drown in antibiotics. Anirban Mahapatra is a scientist and author, most recently of the popular science book, When The Drugs Don't Work: The Hidden Pandemic That Could End Medicine. The views expressed are personal.
Business Standard
13-05-2025
- Business Standard
Human antibiotic use polluting rivers, fuelling drug resistance: Study
Millions of kilometers of rivers around the world are carrying antibiotic pollution at levels high enough to promote drug resistance and harm aquatic life, a new study warns. The study estimated the scale of global river contamination from human antibiotics use. Researchers calculated that about 8,500 tons of antibiotics -- nearly one-third of what people consume annually -- end up in river systems around the world each year even after in many cases passing through wastewater systems. Published in PNAS Nexus, the study is the first to estimate the scale of global river contamination from human antibiotics use. "While the amounts of residues from individual antibiotics translate into only very small concentrations in most rivers, which makes them very difficult to detect, the chronic and cumulative environmental exposure to these substances can still pose a risk to human health and aquatic ecosystems," said Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, a post-doctoral fellow in geography at McGill and lead author of the study. The research team used a global model validated by field data from nearly 900 river locations. They found that amoxicillin, the world's most-used antibiotic, is the most likely to be present at risky levels, especially in Southeast Asia, where rising use and limited wastewater treatment amplify the problem. "This study is not intended to warn about the use of antibiotics -- we need antibiotics for global health treatments -- but our results indicate that there may be unintended effects on aquatic environments and antibiotic resistance, which calls for mitigation and management strategies to avoid or reduce their implications," said Bernhard Lehner, a professor in global hydrology in McGill's Department of Geography and co-author of the study. The findings are especially notable because the study did not consider antibiotics from livestock or pharmaceutical factories, both of which are major contributors to environmental contamination. "Our results show that antibiotic pollution in rivers arising from human consumption alone is a critical issue, which would likely be exacerbated by veterinarian or industry sources of related compounds" said Jim Nicell, an environmental engineering professor at McGill and co-author of the study. "Monitoring programs to detect antibiotic or other chemical contamination of waterways are therefore needed, especially in areas that our model predicts to be at risk," he added.
