
GOP tax bill would shrink incomes for low earners: Analysis
Many different think tanks and legislative analysts in Washington have been sounding an alarm that the GOP tax-and-spending cut bill has greater advantages for wealthier taxpayers than it does for working Americans.
But one group is projecting that lower earners will not only receive smaller benefits from the bill but will actually be financially worse off when the individual rate cuts and benefit reductions are taken together.
The analysis from Penn Wharton found that people in the second income quintile, making between $17,000 and $51,000 per year, will see a net reduction in their incomes of $705 as a result of the GOP tax package.
The effects for that income group get worse over time. The average 1.5 percent income reduction in 2016 expands to a 2 percent reduction by 2033 for a net income reduction of $1,200.
That's compared to an $845 gain in 2026 for people making midrange incomes of between $51,000 and $93,000 per year. For people in the top quintile of the income spectrum, the total gains in 2026 are more than $468,000.
While more comprehensive than the distributional breakdown of the GOP tax package from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), the Penn Wharton analysis is in keeping with the JCT's official score, which is limited to the tax effects of the package and excludes the monetary benefits of federal social programs.
People in the second income quintile in the JCT analysis will see a $24 billion reduction in their taxes while middle-quintile earners will get a $50 billion reduction, fourth quintile earners will get a $106 billion reduction, and the top fifth of earners will get a $385 billion reduction.
Since people at the lower end of the income spectrum make greater use of social programs like food stamps and federal health care, which are on the GOP chopping block, than those at the upper end, the result is a net decrease in income for lower earners as opposed to simply a smaller share of benefits, the Penn Wharton analysis appears to show.
Other analytical groups in Washington have been making similar points about the benefits of the package being skewed to the rich.
'House Republicans' budget and tax proposals would lead to nearly 14 million people losing health care coverage by 2034 and would raise costs for millions of working families,' the Center for American Progress wrote on Tuesday.
Economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic Policy Research noted to The Hill the legislation's continuation of the so-called carried interest loophole, which benefits hedge fund and private equity managers.
'They left the carried interest deduction in place, an absolutely unjustifiable tax break to some of the richest people in the country, that even Trump wanted changed,' he said.
Millions are set to lose public health insurance as a result of the GOP bill, with 7.1 million people projected to lose Medicaid/CHIP access in 2028 alone. Millions more are expected to lose coverage as a result of codified changes to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the failure to extend ACA subsidies.
Americans will also lose access to food stamps as a result of the legislation, which seeks to put work requirements on some people who are enrolled in the program. Previous estimates for the effect of work requirement proposals — which critics often describe as paperwork requirements more than actual work requirements — showed reductions of between 3 million and 3.5 million people from food stamps, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The Republican bill is far from a done deal. Deficit hawks on the Budget Committee voted down their portion of the bill on Friday, demanding steeper cuts and incurring the ire of President Trump.
'We don't need 'GRANDSTANDERS' in the Republican Party. STOP TALKING, AND GET IT DONE!' Trump wrote online.
Five Republicans voted no on the measure. They were Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), Chip Roy (R-Texas), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) and Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.). Smucker said he hoped to resolve the disagreement quickly and have another vote Monday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wall Street Journal
15 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
10-Year Treasury Yield Heads Toward Largest Decline Since April 14
1316 ET — The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note is headed toward its biggest one-day decline since April 14 after a pair of lackluster reports on the U.S. economy. Yields, which fall when bond prices rise, began sliding early in the session after the ADP's National Employment report showed that 37,000 jobs were created in May, the slowest pace of private-sector hiring in two years. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal projected hiring would increase by 110,000 new jobs. Yields extended their decline after an ISM services report, which suggested that activity among service firms fell unexpectedly in May. The survey's index for new orders and inventories both sank into contraction, with respondents reporting difficulty in planning due to uncertain tariff policies. The 10-year yield recently traded near 4.36%, down from 4.46% Tuesday. ( 0841 ET – An ominous sign from the U.S. labor market triggers a rush to Treasury bonds, driving yields sharply lower. ADP says only 37,000 jobs were created by private employers in May, the lowest since March 2023. Economists surveyed by WSJ expected 110,000. ADP revises the April figure to 60,000 from 62,000 and says hiring is losing momentum while pay growth remained at robust levels. The report may reflect businesses reluctance to hire amid tariffs uncertainty. Trump cites the report to call on the Fed to lower rates. Friday, payrolls are expected to slow a little from April. The 10-year is at 4.419% and the two-year at 3.931%. ( @ptrevisani)
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold Turns Higher on Increased Uncertainty
Gold prices gain as comments from President Trump instill some new economic worries heading into the summer. Trump posted on his Truth Social account that China's President Xi was "extremely hard to make a deal with," and also demanded Fed Chair Jerome Powell lower interest rates.


The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Doug Ford urges Canada's leader to ramp up tariffs on US
Ontario Premier Doug Ford is pressuring Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney to ramp up tariffs against the United States after President Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum earlier this week. 'I highly recommended to the prime minister directly that we slap another 25 percent on top of our tariffs to equal President Trump's tariffs on our steel,' Ford said during his Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'Situation Room.' 'He has to, he has to start looking around the world at China and other locations that are taking Chinese steel and really stop the flow of steel. That's the problem,' Ford told host Wolf Blitzer. 'Canada is not the problem. Again. We purchased 30 billion, with a 'B,' of steel off the US, and that's going to come to an end real quick.' Trump signed the executive order to hike the tariffs on Tuesday. The measure went into effect on Wednesday and would levy steel and aluminum tariffs on almost all imports to the U.S.. The United Kingdom is exempt as it inked a trade deal with Washington last month. Canada has retaliated against the U.S. previously, slapping a 25 percent reciprocal tariff on U.S. aluminum and steel products. Carney, who met with Trump at the White House in early May, did not express readiness to implement Ford's suggestion. 'We will take some time, not much, some time because we are in intensive discussions right now with the Americans on the trading relationship,' Carney said to reporters on Wednesday, according to Politico. 'Those discussions are progressing. I would note that the American action is a global action. It's not one targeted in Canada, so we will take some time, but not more,' the prime minister said. Ontario is open to imposing its own countermeasures, according to Ford. When asked on Wednesday if willing to bring back the electricity surcharge, he told reporters that 'everything's on the table.' Ontario implemented a 25 percent extra charge on the electricity Canada exports to three U.S. states after Trump threatened to double tariffs on steel and aluminum. Ford eventually spoke to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and later suspended the tax impacting Michigan, New York and Minnesota.