Durand Cup 2025: Mohun Bagan And East Bengal To Clash In Quarter-Final
First up, Shillong Lajong FC will host Indian Navy FT who finished top of Group F with seven points. At the same time, Lajong qualified as one of the two best second-placed teams after finishing runners-up in Group E. Meanwhile in Kokrajhar, Bodoland FC who were Group D toppers with a perfect record, will face Group E winners NorthEast United FC, who advanced with two wins and a draw.
At the JRD Tata Sports Complex in Jamshedpur, the home side will host Diamond Harbour FC. The Men of Steel topped Group C and will aim to carry their strong form forward. Diamond Harbour FC, who finished second in Group B behind Mohun Bagan, edged out Namdhari FC on goal difference to qualify ahead of Real Kashmir FC and Indian Army, all of whom ended the group stage with six points.
The Kolkata Derby remains the headline fixture of the round. Both MBSG and East Bengal FC enter the clash unbeaten and carry immense history in the tournament. The Mariners hold a record 17 Durand Cup titles, while East Bengal FC are close behind with 16. Bragging rights and a semi-final spot will be at stake when the two giants collide.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Supreme Court steps in: ISL clubs, AIFF and FSDL face decisive showdown
The Supreme Court has fixed August 22 to hear the dispute between the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) over the renewal of Indian Super League (ISL) contracts. The impasse has left 11 clubs of the league in uncertainty, with the upcoming season hanging in the balance until clarity is case reached the top court after ISL clubs raised alarm in a letter to the AIFF, warning that without renewal of the agreement, the league 'cannot take place' and their operations faced an existential crisis. The clubs also criticised the federation for leaving them out of discussions with FSDL, arguing that player contracts, sponsorships and commercial deals were already under and the AIFF U-turnInitially, AIFF president Kalyan Chaubey suggested that the federation could continue to run the ISL on its own if the deal with FSDL lapsed. But that stance quickly unravelled in court. Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the clubs, reminded the bench that the AIFF constitution itself barred the federation from unilaterally running a commercial league. 'The AIFF constitution makes it clear that it cannot itself run the ISL or any league without the involvement of an authorised entity. Any attempt to do so would be a violation of its statutes,' Sankaranarayanan submission highlighted that Article 19 of the AIFF's statutes requires executive committee approval and alignment with FIFA and AFC rules before sanctioning any competition. Under pressure, the AIFF was forced to retract its earlier position, acknowledging it could not bypass its contractual is at stake for Indian football?For the clubs, the outcome of this standoff could decide not only their financial stability but also the careers of hundreds of Indian players. With training camps delayed and sponsorships in limbo, uncertainty has already seeped into the domestic football standoff also risks harming India's reputation within Asian football circles at a time when the national team's development has been under scrutiny. As the Supreme Court steps in, the verdict will carry consequences far beyond the ISL, potentially shaping the governance and commercial future of Indian football itself.- Ends
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
AIFF Clarifies Flip-Flop On ISL Matter, Says Sports Bill Had To Be Brought To SC's Notice First
The AIFF aimed to inform the Supreme Court about the National Sports Governance Bill before discussing the ISL crisis. On Monday, the All India Football Federation (AIFF) addressed criticism regarding its perceived inconsistency by clarifying that it initially aimed to inform the Supreme Court about the passage of the National Sports Governance Bill before discussing the Indian Super League (ISL) crisis. On August 14, the AIFF stated that it would present this week before the Supreme Court the concerns of the ISL clubs about the delay in the start of the 2025-26 season and the difficulties faced by players and other stakeholders. On Sunday afternoon, the AIFF announced it would bring up the matter before the Court on Monday at 10:30 am. However, by late evening, the federation revised its decision, stating it would not mention the issue on Monday. Late Sunday night, Amicus Curiae Gopal Sankaranarayanan informed that he would mention the case along with fellow Amicus Curiae Samar Bansal on Monday at 10:30 am. 'Based on advice received that the National Sports Governance Bill 2025 had passed both the houses of Parliament, the AIFF's Senior Counsel advised during a briefing meeting on Sunday late evening that this is the first aspect that needs to be brought to the attention of the Hon'ble Supreme Court," the AIFF said in a statement. The AIFF stated that their senior counsel appeared before the Supreme Court, which has reserved its judgment on the draft constitution case, and made oral submissions. When Is Next Hearing At Sumpreme Court For AIFF? The Hon'ble Supreme Court has requested written submissions from the parties before the next hearing on Friday, August 22. 'The Hon'ble Supreme Court has requested written submissions from the parties prior to the next hearing on Friday August 22. 'The AIFF intends to use this opportunity to represent to the Hon'ble Supreme Court the urgent need for commercial continuity and to determine the future structure of its top-tier league, in the interests of players, clubs and other parties all of whose livelihoods are at stake due to the current impasse." Hundreds of Indian and foreign footballers are uncertain as the Masters Rights Agreement (MRA) between Indian Super League organisers Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) and AIFF remains unrenewed. Eleven ISL clubs have warned the AIFF of the real possibility of shutting down entirely if the impasse over the future of the top-tier domestic competition is not resolved promptly. The clubs stated that the crisis from the non-renewal of the MRA has paralysed professional football in India. The crisis emerged after FSDL placed the 2025-26 ISL season on hold on July 11 due to uncertainty over the MRA renewal, causing at least three clubs to either pause first-team operations or suspend player and staff salaries. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 18, 2025, 22:26 IST News sports AIFF Clarifies Flip-Flop On ISL Matter, Says Sports Bill Had To Be Brought To SC's Notice First Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court to hear plea on row between AIFF and FSDL over non-renewal of contracts of ISL clubs
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on August 22 a matter involving a row between the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and FSDL over the fate of 11 Indian Super League (ISL) clubs due to the non-renewal of their contracts with the national federation and the tournament's organisers. The 11 ISL clubs have warned the AIFF that they 'face the real possibility of shutting down entirely' if the ongoing impasse regarding the future of the top-tier domestic competition is not resolved soon. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar agreed to hear the plea after amicus curiae and senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan submitted that during the tenure of the contract, Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) has to honour it by conducting the ISL. 'If it does not, the AIFF should be directed to terminate the contract and float a tender. Otherwise the players suffer and after repeated non-payment, we can be sanctioned by the FIFA,' Sankaranarayanan said. The bench said it would hear the matter on Friday. The clubs wrote a letter to AIFF President Kalyan Chaubey last week, saying the crisis arising out of the non-renewal of the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between the national federation and the ISL organisers, FSDL, has 'paralysed professional football in India'. 'Over the past 11 years, through sustained investment and coordinated effort, clubs have built youth development systems, training infrastructure, community outreach programmes and professional teams that have elevated India's footballing credibility both domestically and internationally,' the clubs wrote in the letter. 'This progress is now in imminent danger of collapse. The current standstill has created immediate and severe consequences. With operations suspended and no certainty on league continuity, several clubs face the real possibility of shutting down entirely,' they said. The crisis surfaced after FSDL, the ISL organisers as well as the AIFF's commercial partner, put the 2025-26 season 'on hold' on July 11 due to uncertainty over the renewal of the MRA, prompting at least three clubs to either pause first-team operations or suspend player and staff salaries. 'The 2025-26 ISL season is at risk of not taking place at all. This is not merely an administrative deadlock — it is an existential crisis for Indian football. We write to you in the gravest of circumstances,' the clubs wrote. The letter was signed by Bengaluru FC, Hyderabad FC, Odisha FC, Chennaiyin FC, Jamshedpur FC, FC Goa, Kerala Blasters FC, Punjab FC, NorthEast United FC, Mumbai City FC and Mohammedan Sporting. Kolkata heavyweights Mohun Bagan Super Giant and East Bengal did not sign the letter. The clubs said the impasse will also impact India's readiness for international matches, adding that 'without a functioning league, our national team will be severely disadvantaged in upcoming AFC and FIFA tournaments'. They also said that without the ISL, they will not be able to play a minimum number of competitive matches for participating in continental competitions, thereby risking the suspension of Indian clubs from Asian Football Confederation (AFC) tournaments. On April 30, the top court reserved its verdict on the issue of finalisation of the AIFF draft constitution prepared by former apex court judge L Nageswara Rao. The draft constitution, prepared by Justice Rao on the top court's directions, proposed some radical changes, including a person holding the office for a maximum period of 12 years during his lifetime, subject to serving a maximum of two successive terms of four years each. While it said a four-year cooling-off period had to be observed after eight years as an office-bearer of the AIFF, it also mentioned that a person cannot remain a member of the sports body after attaining 70 years of age. According to the draft constitution, the executive committee of the AIFF would have 14 members who would be under the age and tenure restrictions. There will be one president, two vice-presidents (a man and a woman), one treasurer and 10 other members, the draft said. Of the 10 other members, five would be eminent players, including two women. The draft constitution also has provisions for the removal of the office-bearers, including the president, through a no-confidence motion, which the existing constitution of the AIFF does not have.
