The controversial case of Peter Ellis, Christchurch childcare worker - A Moment in Crime
One child said his belly button was removed with pliers.
Later, there were allegations of 'Asian men dressed as cowboys' abuse at Masonic lodges, cemeteries, the Park Royal Hotel and private houses that were all a significant distance from the creche.
And then there was the circle incident – perhaps the most discussed and most controversial allegation of the Ellis case.
It was claimed that a group of children were taken to an address on the other side of Christchurch and forced to stand naked in a circle while adults danced around them.
The adults encouraged the children to kick each other in the genitals.
Ellis denied all of the charges but in 1993, after a six-week trial, a jury found him guilty on 16 counts of child sexual abuse involving seven children at the creche.
He seven years in prison before being released in 2000.
Ellis maintained his innocence throughout and battled through numerous unsuccessful appeals and applications for pardons.
In 2019, the Supreme Court agreed to hear his final appeal, based on the fairness of his trial.
Ellis passed away from bladder cancer several months later.
In 2022 – for the first time in New Zealand history – the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to proceed posthumously.
A panel of senior judges unanimously found that Ellis had suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice due to inadmissible expert evidence and the risk of contamination in the children's testimonies.
They ruled that during the trial the evidence from the Crown's expert witness lacked balance.
Further, the jury was not adequately informed about the risk of contamination in the memories of young children.
The case of Peter Ellis is one of the most controversial court cases and arguably one of the most outrageous miscarriages of justice in our country's legal history.
Advertise with NZME.
In today's episode of A Moment In Crime, host and senior journalist Anna Leask discusses the story of Peter Ellis – who he was, how he came to be at the centre of a national sex abuse scandal and why he was finally exonerated.
Episodes of A Moment In Crime are usually released monthly and, so far, Leask has covered more than 60 cases, including the murders of Grace Millane, Scott Guy, Austin Hemmings, Carmen Thomas, Karen Aim; the deaths of the Kahui twins; the Christchurch mosque attack and the historic Heavenly Creatures murder; the case of Lauren Dickason who was jailed for murdering her three young daughters soon after emigrating to New Zealand; and the massacres at Raurimu and Aramoana.
In 2023, the podcast published a three-part special covering the case of rich-lister and philanthropist James Wallace, who was convicted of sexually assaulting three men.
He was jailed and had his knighthood stripped from him.
And to mark the 30th anniversary of the Bain family murders, Leask produced a two-part special reflecting on the atrocious loss of life and legal saga that followed.
Since 2019, A Moment in Crime has produced over 50 episodes and has been downloaded over 1 million times, with listeners in over 170 countries. It was nominated for Best True Crime Podcast at the 2024 Radio and Podcast Awards.
Anna Leask is a Christchurch-based reporter who covers national crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2008 and has worked as a journalist for just under 20 years with a particular focus on family and gender-based violence, child abuse, sexual violence, homicides, mental health and youth crime. She writes, hosts and produces the award-winning podcast A Moment In Crime, released monthly on nzherald.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
By John Kruzel , Reuters Photo: 123RF The US Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the US Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins vs Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. US President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top US judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked. - Reuters
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Triple murder accused takes stand in poisonous mushroom trial
A handout sketch received from the Supreme Court of Victoria shows Erin Patterson, an Australian woman accused of murdering three people with a toxic mushroom-laced beef Wellington. Photo: AFP / PAUL TYQUIN The Australian trial involving death cap mushrooms in a beef wellington has captured the world. This week triple murder accused Erin Patterson took the stand for the first time. The prosecution says she deliberately went searching for poisonous mushrooms which she cooked and served to her four in-laws. Her defence team says it was a terrible accident. The ABC's Kathleen O'Connor has been covering events this week and speaks to Susie from Melbourne.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Security status block to prison programmes
A man who committed a violent armed robbery of a Clinton dairy is yet to access any programmes behind bars because of his maximum-security status. Caleb Neil Fleming, 24, is serving a term of more than five years' imprisonment, imposed in 2023 — his third stint in jail. At a hearing last month, the Parole Board heard the Auckland Prison inmate had been waitlisted for drug treatment and a medium-intensity group programme but because of Corrections rules he was unable to start that treatment until his security status dropped. Fleming had been responsible for "unrelenting misconducts" the board previously heard, and in his most recent report panel convener Judge Geoffrey Ellis pointed to 20 recent incidents logged by prison staff. Fleming came to Dunedin seeking a fresh start in 2021 and a chance meeting at the library led to him being offered a bed at a family home. But after just five days of hospitality, he stole the car of the Good Samaritans and drove to Food For Thought in Clinton. The court at sentencing heard Fleming covered his face and armed himself with a tyre iron before entering the store. When staff refused to hand over cash and cigarettes, he smashed the till, a pie warmer and damaged a microwave. On his way out, Fleming robbed a shopper of $30. Police quickly tailed him on the way to Balclutha and, after the chase was abandoned for safety reasons, they found the driver had smashed into a sign outside a hotel. Fleming was arrested after a short foot pursuit. He was later convicted in relation to an unrelated burglary in which he damaged a property, and there had been another violent incident while he was at the Otago Corrections Facility. Fleming was found with two shanks made from shards of glass and engaged in a 20-minute struggle with Corrections staff as they attempted to restrain him. The Parole Board heard the prisoner had worked with a psychologist for a couple of months last year but the sessions had ended when he failed to show up. Fleming, though, said he was getting a lot out of the appointments and was keen to continue them. Given his apparent enthusiasm, Judge Ellis directed a follow-up by psychological services to determine whether they could resume treatment. While Fleming got a positive report from a kaupapa Maori practitioner with whom he was working, and his behaviour in prison had improved in the last month, the board said he remained an undue risk of release. "Mr Fleming still has some serious work to do to reduce his risk of re-offending," Judge Ellis said. Fleming's next parole hearing was set for February and though the board said he would have unlikely completed the necessary rehabilitative work it would be an opportunity to review his progress. His sentence expires in July next year.
