Trump and Putin in Alaska: How a strange relationship took shape
Trump
and Vladimir
Putin
has taken many bizarre turns from the last time they were alone in a room together without witnesses.
Their first summit meeting in seven years kicks off with the surprising and symbolically significant choice of Alaska as the venue for talks between the US and Russian presidents. As they meet to discuss ending the war in Ukraine, the Kremlin's suggestion to hold it in a US state that once belonged to Russia hints at Putin's sly strategy to appeal directly to Trump's real-estate instincts and seal a grand bargain cutting others out.
Over the years, Putin has been the object of fascination for Trump, who praised his 'genius' when Russia invaded its neighbor in 2022. The two appear to enjoy an easy, even playful rapport (Putin often refers to his American counterpart simply as 'Donald').
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Undo
In his first term, Trump made no secret of his admiration for the strongman leader and has spoken to him at least six times since returning to the White House. "Putin went through a hell of a lot with me," he told Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskiy
in their infamous Oval Office clash.
For his part, Putin is known for switching from mischief to menace in a flash. After his 'little green men' annexed Crimea in 2014, his answer to a pensioner asking him to take Alaska back was typical of his trolling style: 'Why would you need Alaska?' he said. 'It's cold out there as well. Let's not get worked up about it.'
Live Events
The world has changed dramatically since the calamitous 2018 summit in Helsinki, when Trump sided with Putin against his own officials on Russian election meddling in the 2016 presidential vote. Second-term Trump is a visibly more confident president and he's grown frustrated with Putin's delay tactics. Putin has been in power for more than a quarter of a century but the protracted conflict in Ukraine has dented his air of invincibility.
If the memorable moments from their past encounters are any measure, Friday's summit promises compelling political drama whatever the outcome. Here are some of the highlights.
Hamburg, Germany: Group of 20, July 2017
The biggest issue hanging over Trump and Putin's first major meeting was the role Russia played in interfering with the 2016 election that polls showed Hillary Clinton was favored to win. US intelligence agencies saw evidence of a Russian disinformation campaign aimed at boosting Trump, who was irritated that the legitimacy of his victory was being questioned. Moscow officials said Trump accepted Putin's denial of any Russian role.
Russia's incursions into Ukraine, which at the time were confined to Crimea and the eastern part of the country, were a minor topic in a bilateral that lasted more than than two hours.
Things took an unusual turn at the dinner for leaders and their spouses at the Elbphilharmonie concert hall on the banks of the Elbe River. At the end of the meal, Trump walked over to Putin and the two spoke informally for an hour. No notes. No aides.
The only record of this conversation came from the Kremlin's Russian interpreter. Trump later criticized reports that characterized this second encounter as secretive, although it was only disclosed after other dinner participants recounted what they observed.
Da Nang, Vietnam: APEC, November 2017
Putin's main motivation for traveling to Vietnam — rather than sending a lower ranking official — was to sit down with Trump. The Kremlin only found out on arrival that Trump had decided to cancel the meeting. The US president later agreed to meet 'on the fly.' Putin bristled at the slight.
He blamed the failure of a more robust chat on a scheduling conflict and sent a warning. 'This had to do with Mr. Trump's schedule, my schedule and certain protocol formalities which our teams, unfortunately, failed to coordinate,' Putin said. 'They will be punished for that.'
In Moscow, some pointed the finger at Trump's team for trying to make up for the political fallout from the controversial dinner in Hamburg. Others recognized that Trump was under pressure not to appear too accommodating to Putin as US lawmakers and intelligence agencies continued to investigate Russian influence in the 2016 election.
Helsinki, Finland: Summit, July 2018
After speaking with Putin for roughly two hours, Trump shocked even members of his own party by saying he believed Putin over his own intelligence agencies in their assessment of Russian election influence.
He returned home to nearly universal rebukes of his performance. Republican Senator John McCain said 'no prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant.' There was bipartisan pressure to tighten US sanctions on Russia.
Moscow, on the other hand, cheered both the tone and the outcome of the talks. Putin said the two leaders had 'begun the path toward positive changes.' During the meeting, Putin secretly offered Trump a proposal to hold a referendum in the parts of eastern Ukraine held by Russian separatists. Trump later rejected the idea publicly, although Putin went ahead anyway after his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 when Trump was no longer in office.
In Helsinki, Trump also invited Putin to Washington later that fall. That meeting, however, never happened.
Paris, France: WWI Armistice Ceremony, November 2018
There was rampant speculation about whether Trump and Putin would have a substantive meeting on the sidelines of an international commemoration of the 1918 armistice that ended World War I. John Bolton, then Trump's national security adviser, said the two did plan to meet. The Kremlin publicly played down the possibility of talks with Trump, even though Putin had met with Bolton several weeks earlier.
It was a rainy weekend. Trump and Putin took their own motorcades, skipping the soggy and somber walk to the Arc de Triomphe with other world leaders. When Putin arrived for the group photo, he first shook the hand of French President Emmanuel Macron, then German Chancellor Angela Merkel — then he shook Trump's hand, with a brief thumbs-up.
Trump declining to meet separately with Putin was seen in Russia as a slight, but forgivable snub.
Buenos Aires, Argentina: G-20, November 2018
With no trip to Washington and no bilateral in Paris, Putin was confident that he would see Trump in Buenos Aires. Trump confirmed that plan, but then he canceled the meeting via a social media post from the plane, citing Russia's capture of Ukrainian ships and sailors near Crimea.
Russian officials were taken aback by Trump's affront – his second nixed meeting with Putin in less than a month – with one describing it as 'really bad.' Publicly, Putin's foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov insisted there was 'no offense taken,' even after the Kremlin had previously talked up the Argentina meeting.
Osaka, Japan: G-20, June 2019
Putin would have to wait until the following year's G-20 summit in Japan for his next sit-down with Trump on a day the US leader also met with four other heads of state. Speaking with reporters before the meeting, Putin noted that they hadn't met since Helsinki. Trump lauded past meetings and said 'we've had a very, very good relationship.'
This meeting came just two months after US Special Counsel Robert Mueller released his 448-page report on Russian election interference. He indicted two dozen Russians for social media activity and hacking Democrats. Mueller said hecouldn't charge a sitting president with a crime, according to Justice Department policy.
When asked in Osaka if he would tell Putin not to meddle in the 2020 US election, Trump said, 'Yes, of course I will.' He grinned and pointed at the Russian leader and gave a light-hearted warning: 'Don't meddle in the election.' Putin played along. They also joked about fake news, with Putin smilingly telling Trump in English: 'Yes, we have it too.'
Putin invited Trump to Moscow to mark the 75th anniversary of the Allied victory in World War II in 2020. That meeting never happened.
By the time 2020 came, the world was locking down as the Coronavirus pandemic took hold. Trump was voted out of office and Putin went into deep isolation, emerging with a much more hostile view of the West.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump rates meeting with Putin a ‘10 out of 10'
US President Donald Trump rated his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on an interview with Fox News on Saturday a '10' out of 10, calling it 'a very warm meeting' that showed 'very good progress' toward peace in Ukraine. The two leaders met in Alaska in a bid to advance efforts toward ending the war in Ukraine. Speaking aboard Air Force One ahead of the summit, Trump said his goal was to 'save a lot of lives.' Following the talks, Trump described the discussions as 'extremely productive,' while acknowledging that 'we're not there yet' on reaching a final deal. 'There were many, many points that we agreed on… A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said, as reported by Fox News. Putin echoed this sentiment, saying the meeting took place in a 'constructive atmosphere of mutual respect.' Both the leaders have made progress on unspecified issues after holding nearly three-hour talks. However, none of them detailed the specifics. Standing alongside US President Donald Trump after their first meeting since the latter returned to power, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he believed the war in Ukraine would never have begun had Trump remained in the White House after the 2020 election. 'Today, when President Trump says that if he was president back [in 2022], there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be. I can confirm that,' Putin said, according to the BBC. Looking ahead, Trump said the next steps involve further discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other NATO leaders. During the interview he said that he would advise Zelenskyy to 'make a deal.' 'They're fighting a big war machine, and we, I think, are close to a deal, but I don't like saying it… I always say 50-50 because so many things can happen,' Trump said. 'But I think President Putin would like to solve the problem.' Trump also mentioned being presented with a book containing the names of 'thousands of people, prisoners, that will get released' as part of potential agreements. (With inputs from Fox News, BBC)
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia ‘lost oil client' India: Trump claim on whether tariffs brought Putin to table in Alaska
US President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that Russia lost an "oil client", India, when asked if "there is an economic side" to Russian President Vladimir Putin agreeing to hold a meeting in Alaska. In an interview with Fox News, Trump was asked, "Would you sense that Putin comes to this table maybe in an economic pinch? Maybe the things you've already done have put him in an economic pitch. Is there an economic side to this as Russia hoping to open up?" Trump responded by saying, "Well, he [Putin] lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40% of the oil." 'China, as you know, is doing a lot [ of oil trade with Russia]...,' he said. Trump had earlier threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to 'in two or three weeks.' "…if I did what's called the secondary sanction or a secondary tariff, it would be, you know, very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it," Trump said. Trump's comments came ahead of his meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday. The two leaders held three-on-three meeting on Friday to discuss Ukraine war. After the summit, Trump was asked if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. He said, "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well.' Earlier this month, Trump threatened buyers of Russian energy with additional tariffs as a means of pressuring Putin into peace talks with Ukraine. The US president already doubled duties on Indian products to 50 percent starting August 27 over its purchases of oil from Moscow. But raising tariffs on China would risk breaking a trade truce that Trump on Monday agreed to extend for another 90 days. That agreement saw Washington and Beijing lower duties on each others' goods that reached astronomical levels in the spring, which spooked global markets. China has defended its imports of Russian oil as lawful and necessary for its energy security.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
New US Air Force policy denies transgender troops discharge hearings
The Air Force says in a new memo that transgender airmen ousted under a recent Trump administration directive will no longer have the chance to argue before a board of their peers for the right to continue serving their country. The memo dated Tuesday says military separation boards cannot independently decide whether to keep or discharge transgender airmen and instead must recommend separation of the member if the airman has a diagnosis of gender dysphoria when a person's biological sex does not match up with their gender identity. Military legal experts who have been advising transgender troops told The Associated Press that the new policy is unlawful, and while they were not aware of the other services releasing similar memos, they fear it could serve as a blueprint across the military. Advocacy groups say the change threatens to weaken trust in the military's leadership. It is the second policy change the Air Force has taken in recent weeks to crack down on transgender service members. The Associated Press reported last week that the Air Force would deny transgender troops early retirement benefits and was moving to revoke requests already approved. The Air Force declined to answer questions about the policy and its legal implications. The service provided a statement saying the new guidance is consistent with and responsive to Department of Defense policy regarding Service members with a diagnosis of, or history of, or exhibiting symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria. How the boards usually work The boards traditionally offer a quasi-legal hearing to determine if a service member set to depart is still of value to the military and should stay on. Fellow service members hear evidence of whatever wrongdoing occurred and about the person's character, fitness and performance. The hearings are not a formal court, but they have much the same structure. Service members are often represented by lawyers, they can present evidence in their defense and they can appeal the board's findings to federal court. The Pentagon's policy on separating officers notes that they are entitled to fair and impartial hearings that should be a forum for the officer concerned to present reasons the contemplated action should not be taken. This impartial nature means that the boards can sometimes reach surprising conclusions. For example, the three active-duty Marines who were part of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were retained. The commanding officer of the USS McCain, a destroyer that collided with an oil tanker in the Pacific in 2017, killing 10, was not recommended for separation in 2019. Military lawyers decry the Air Force change Priya Rashid, a military lawyer who has represented service members before hundreds of separation boards, said she has never seen an order like this. I've seen people with three DUIs retained, I've seen people that beat their wives retained, I've seen all kinds of people retained because the board is empowered to retain anyone for any reason if they feel it's in the best interest of the service, she said. Rashid said she and other lawyers working with transgender troops view the guidance as telling the boards to automatically order separation based solely on a diagnosis or symptoms of gender dysphoria. She said that constitutes an unlawful command by the Air Force and upends impartiality. This instruction is essentially saying you will not make a determination of whether somebody has future potential in the service, Rashid said. The new Air Force guidance also prohibits recording the proceedings. Rashid said the lack of an independent transcript would not only prevent Air Force leaders from reviewing the hearings to ensure they were conducted appropriately but would undercut any meaningful chance to appeal. Stepped-up efforts to oust transgender troops Pentagon officials say 4,240 troops have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which the military is using as an identifier of being transgender. The Pentagon got the green light from Supreme Court in May to move forward with a ban on all transgender troops. It offered two options: volunteer to leave and take a one-time separation payout or be discharged at a later date without pay. Some transgender troops decided to fight to stay by turning to the boards. Senior Master Sgt. Jamie Hash, who has served in the Air Force since 2011, said she wanted to face an objective board to be evaluated on my years of proven capability. I wanted the board to see the assignments overseas and at the Pentagon, the deployments to different Combatant Commands, the service medals and the sustained operational and mission effectiveness, she said in an interview. But now, she said, that the path ahead feels more uncertain than it ever has. Logan Ireland, a master sergeant in the Air Force with 15 years of service that includes a deployment to Afghanistan, was planning to retire early until his request was denied last week. After that, he decided he would take a stand at the separation board. I chose the involuntary route because I believed in the promise of a fair hearing judged on my service, my record and the facts, he said. Now that promise is being ripped away, replaced with a process designed to decide my fate before I even walk in the room, he said, adding that all I'm asking for is the same fairness and justice every service member deserves. Both Ireland and Hash said they have yet to hear from their immediate superiors on what the new policy will mean for them. Lawyers are worried it will set a precedent that will spread throughout the military. Rashid said both the Army and Navy are going to look at what the Air Force is doing as a standard of law is this the minimum standard of law that we will afford our service members. Transgender troops warn the policy could have wider implications Col. Bree Fram, a transgender officer in the Space Force who has long been seen as a leader among transgender troops, argued that the policy is a threat to other service members. In an online post, Fram said it swaps judgment for automation. Today it's gender dysphoria; tomorrow it can be any condition or class the politics of the moment calls for, she argued. If the new policy is allowed to sideline evidence of fitness, deployment history, awards, and commander input the very material boards were built to evaluate, Fram said, it sends a message that performance is no longer relevant to staying in the military. Cathy Marcello, interim director for Modern Military Association of America, said the change adds to a growing loss of trust because outcomes are determined by politics, not performance. The organization advocates for LGBTQ+ service members, military spouses, veterans, their families and allies. It's a signal that identity, not ability or achievement, determines who stays in uniform and who gets a fair shot, she said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
