Concerns over tourism tax impact on Welsh businesses
Already dwindling tourist numbers
The Wales Tourism Alliance (WTA), which represents businesses and organisations across Wales, has voiced concerns that an additional tax would dissuade tourists from coming into Wales and supporting local businesses.
'The tourism industry as a whole is against levies, full stop,' says Rowland Rees-Evans, WTA chair.
'North Wales, Gwynedd, have been driving [the tax] because they've got certain issues at certain times of the year where they just can't move up there. If you've got too many people, you can charge them all. But the rest of the year and the rest of Wales, we could take more people,' says Mr Rees-Evans, emphasising the need for more tourists to be welcomed into South and East Wales.
The same position has been taken by the Welsh Conservative party.
'We need to scrap it' says Gareth Davies, Conservative shadow minister for culture and tourism. Interviewed on-site at a popular South Wales visitor attraction, he explained how the levy will 'eat into profit margins' for businesses, as well as the budgets of those visiting the region.
'It's really going to put people off coming into Wales, where we need to boost tourism numbers which have dropped since covid and haven't been restored.'
The number of overnight trips to Wales by domestic tourists in 2019 was 10.7million. By 2022, this number had fallen to 8.7million. Last year, there were 7.6million.
Monmouthshire, a popular destination for UK domestic tourists, has felt this impact on a local scale. In 2023, total visitor numbers were down -1.8 per cent from 2022.
Popular tourist attractions in Monmouthshire include Chepstow castle, Tintern Abbey and the Old Station at Tintern. The area also welcomes tourists for annual festivals such as the Abergavenny food festival, the Green Man festival and Castell Roc music festival.
Despite many Monmouthshire attractions having a daytime-focus, the country relies on overnight visitors far more, with 25 per cent of visitors who stay overnight generating 77 per cent of visitor spend, according to the 2023 tourism performance report.
This reliance on overnight visitors makes the area more vulnerable to the proposed accommodation levy, as the additional cost may convince visitors to stay fewer nights, or across the border in England.
Hopes of better funding for local services
The tax was proposed on the basis that any funds raised can help respond to the costs of tourism and improve facilities for both locals and visitors, such as toilets, footpaths and visitor centres.
The bill was informed by Dr Linda Osti's research, which demonstrates how a levy has been successful in other countries including Italy and the US.
'In the destinations we analysed, we couldn't see any decline in overnight stays,' says Dr Osti. 'With a levy, Wales can focus more on improving the services for both the local people and the tourists.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
6 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Concerns over tourism tax impact on Welsh businesses
Already dwindling tourist numbers The Wales Tourism Alliance (WTA), which represents businesses and organisations across Wales, has voiced concerns that an additional tax would dissuade tourists from coming into Wales and supporting local businesses. 'The tourism industry as a whole is against levies, full stop,' says Rowland Rees-Evans, WTA chair. 'North Wales, Gwynedd, have been driving [the tax] because they've got certain issues at certain times of the year where they just can't move up there. If you've got too many people, you can charge them all. But the rest of the year and the rest of Wales, we could take more people,' says Mr Rees-Evans, emphasising the need for more tourists to be welcomed into South and East Wales. The same position has been taken by the Welsh Conservative party. 'We need to scrap it' says Gareth Davies, Conservative shadow minister for culture and tourism. Interviewed on-site at a popular South Wales visitor attraction, he explained how the levy will 'eat into profit margins' for businesses, as well as the budgets of those visiting the region. 'It's really going to put people off coming into Wales, where we need to boost tourism numbers which have dropped since covid and haven't been restored.' The number of overnight trips to Wales by domestic tourists in 2019 was 10.7million. By 2022, this number had fallen to 8.7million. Last year, there were 7.6million. Monmouthshire, a popular destination for UK domestic tourists, has felt this impact on a local scale. In 2023, total visitor numbers were down -1.8 per cent from 2022. Popular tourist attractions in Monmouthshire include Chepstow castle, Tintern Abbey and the Old Station at Tintern. The area also welcomes tourists for annual festivals such as the Abergavenny food festival, the Green Man festival and Castell Roc music festival. Despite many Monmouthshire attractions having a daytime-focus, the country relies on overnight visitors far more, with 25 per cent of visitors who stay overnight generating 77 per cent of visitor spend, according to the 2023 tourism performance report. This reliance on overnight visitors makes the area more vulnerable to the proposed accommodation levy, as the additional cost may convince visitors to stay fewer nights, or across the border in England. Hopes of better funding for local services The tax was proposed on the basis that any funds raised can help respond to the costs of tourism and improve facilities for both locals and visitors, such as toilets, footpaths and visitor centres. The bill was informed by Dr Linda Osti's research, which demonstrates how a levy has been successful in other countries including Italy and the US. 'In the destinations we analysed, we couldn't see any decline in overnight stays,' says Dr Osti. 'With a levy, Wales can focus more on improving the services for both the local people and the tourists.'
North Wales Chronicle
6 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Starmer must meet Tory conditions if he wants us to back Welfare Bill
The Tory leader said the Bill does not cut down welfare spending enough or go far enough to get people back to work and called for the Prime Minister to promise no new taxes would be announced in the autumn. Ministers have said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. Sir Keir has said he will 'press on' with the legislation despite the prospect of a major revolt when the welfare Bill comes before the Commons in a vote set for July 1. More than 100 backbenchers – enough to threaten the Prime Minister's majority – have signed an amendment designed to halt the changes. The Tory leader said Labour's MPs are in 'open rebellion' and set out conditions for her party's MPs to back the bill. 'The Government is in a mess, their MPs are in open rebellion. If Keir Starmer wants our support, he needs to meet three conditions that align with our core Conservative principles,' she said. 'The first condition is that the welfare budget is too high, it needs to come down. This Bill does not do that. 'The second condition is that we need to get people back into work. Unemployment is rising, jobs are disappearing, and even the Government's own impact assessments say that the package in this Bill will not get people back to work. 'The third is that we want to see no new tax rises in the autumn. We can't have new tax rises to pay for the increases in welfare and other Government spending. 'We are acting in the national interest to make the changes the country needs. 'And if Keir Starmer wants us to help him get this Bill through, then he must commit to these three conditions at the dispatch box.' A Labour spokesperson said that they are 'prepared to take on the challenges holding the UK back'. 'We're fixing the abysmal mess the Tories left behind, and MPs can either vote to keep a broken failed welfare system that writes people off, or they can vote to start fixing it,' the spokesperson said.
South Wales Guardian
11 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Welfare rebellion not a confidence vote, PM says as he remains defiant over cuts
Some 108 backbenchers have signed an amendment that would halt the Government's proposed changes – enough to threaten the Prime Minister's majority. But Sir Keir said on Tuesday he would 'press on' despite the prospect of a major revolt when the welfare Bill comes before the Commons in a vote set for July 1. Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch said the Tories would lend the Government votes but only if Labour rules out tax rises in the autumn budget as well as reducing unemployment and lowering the welfare budget. Speaking in the Hague, where he is attending the Nato summit with toher world leaders, Sir Keir told reporters there was a 'clear moral case' for reforming the system. 'It's not a confidence vote. It's a vote about reforming our welfare system,' he told Sky News. 'It isn't working. It doesn't help people into work. Quite the contrary, it actually makes it harder for people to go into work. I think most colleagues do accept the case for reform, we've got to get on and make that reform.' The amendment was published on Tuesday's order paper and calls for a pause allowing for further scrutiny of the Bill and for support to be in place before any further cuts are made. The size of the revolt is enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs sided with rebels. Tory leader Mrs Badenoch said her party would offer support for the Bill but on the condition that the Government agree to take steps that 'align with our core Conservative principles'. She claimed the welfare budget would need to be slashed further, unemployment would need to come down and 'no new tax rises in the autumn'. Asked whether he would consider pausing his plans in light of the rebellion, the Prime Minister told reporters travelling with him to the Netherlands: 'We were elected to change what is broken in our country. 'The welfare system is broken and that's why we will press ahead with our reforms.' Today, I have co-signed an amendment with over 100 of my colleagues that would stop the welfare reform proposals from becoming law. I want to be clear this is not a decision I have taken lightly. In eight years as a councillor and almost a year as an MP, I have not broken the… — Josh Fenton-Glynn MP (@JoshFG) June 24, 2025 Sir Keir said: 'The additions to Pip each year are the equivalent of the population of a city the size of Leicester. 'That's not a system that can be left unreformed, not least because it's unsustainable and therefore you won't have a welfare system for those that need it in the future.' The Prime Minister earlier told his Cabinet 'we will reform welfare' because the Government must take 'hard, honest choices,' according to Downing Street, which declined to say whether any minister had expressed concern over the Bill. The Cabinet 'collectively' supports the Government's agenda, a Number 10 spokesman said. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, is locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the plans. Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including Treasury committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier and work and pensions committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams. Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed, while Labour London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan added pressure by coming out against the plans on Tuesday afternoon. The mayor said: 'Having looked at the analysis of the Government's plans, the impact on London will be substantial, and for too many disabled Londoners it will destroy their financial safety net. 'The Government must urgently think again.' (1/2) With a heavy heart, I have written to the Prime Minister to tender my resignation as a whip. Whilst I will continue to support the government in delivering the change the country so desperately needs, I cannot vote in favour of the proposed reforms to disability benefits. — Vicky Foxcroft 💙 (@vickyfoxcroft) June 19, 2025 Under the proposals in the Bill, eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, will be limited along with the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). However, the legislation published last week will give existing claimants a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, in what was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion-a-year. Downing Street declined to explicitly rule out offering further concessions when asked on Tuesday what would be done to reassure uneasy backbenchers before a vote scheduled for next week. 'We'll talk to them over the next week but the Government believes this is a good package of reforms,' a Number 10 spokesman said. 'We hope that colleagues will engage positively over the next few days.' Number 10 said the Government recognised the 'strength of feeling' surrounding the issue but rejected suggestions the plans were 'dead on arrival'. It refused to say whether it was confident that the Bill would make its way through Parliament when asked by reporters on Tuesday. 'We are focused on delivering last week's Bill and engaging, talking to colleagues … as to why this reform is so important,' the spokesman said.
