Karen Read's true-crime documentaries may impact second trial: court docs
Karen Read's out-of-court statements, including in popular true-crime TV programs, will play a key role in her second murder trial in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe, according to new court filings.
Read is accused of backing her Lexus SUV into O'Keefe just after midnight on Jan. 29, 2022, then leaving him to die on the ground as a blizzard swept through New England.
They had argued that morning, then spent hours drinking together and were allegedly involved in a fight outside another officer's house where an after-party was underway. She pleaded not guilty, and jurors couldn't agree by the end of her first trial last year, clearing the way for a new trial.
Hank Brennan, a prominent Massachusetts defense attorney who was brought in to take charge of the case after the first trial ended in a mistrial, had previously requested subpoenas for unpublished transcripts of interviews with Read that included her statements, including remarks left on the cutting room floor for both TV and print publications.
Watch 'Karen Read, Killer Or Convenient Outsider?' On Fox Nation
"The defendant has made numerous statements to witnesses, first responders, medical providers, family members, and journalists, as well as recorded statements on John O'Keefe's cellphone," prosecutors wrote in a court filing unveiled Monday. "These statements range from the defendant's immediate impressions and state of mind in the minutes and hours surrounding John O'Keefe's death to crafted narrations, sometimes in the presence of counsel that recount for the defendant's version or impressions of events months and years after the murder."
Read On The Fox News App
Read made waves with multiple public interviews after the jury deadlocked last July, giving a magazine writer access to her former home for a weekend and sitting for multiple local and national TV interviews in which she alleged that she was being framed for O'Keefe's death by his law enforcement colleagues. More recently, she said she would've "cheered" the O.J. Simpson verdict if it were handed down today.
Critics, including the relatives of the lead investigator who Massachusetts State Police fired over misconduct allegations stemming from her case, call her media tour an "unrelenting propaganda" campaign and an attempt to draw attention away from evidence against her.
A separate discovery filing shows some of the Read elements that Brennan's team has turned over to her defense: They include "Dateline" and "20/20 episodes", a transcript of Read's interview for "A Body in the Snow" on HBO Max and interviews with her parents for the same true-crime docuseries.
Brennan's team turned over 41 audio or video clips of interview statements but did not go into specific details about each one.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
Prosecutors also included a copy of the recent audit of the Canton Police Department, resumes for expert witnesses and other discovery documents.
Read the three filings in one PDF:
Defense Lawyers Urged To Reexamine Convictions Led By Fired Karen Read Detective
Both sides have agreed not to call a Boston Magazine editor to the witness stand, even though her reporting may be introduced at trial. This would exempt her from rules sequestering witnesses before they testify and allow her to continue covering the trial.
She has a petition before the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to toss two of the three charges against her, arguing that while jurors never announced a verdict at the end of her first trial, they had cleared her of both second-degree murder and leaving the scene of an accident but got stuck on the third, manslaughter.
Read faces up to life in prison if convicted on the top charge she currently faces. Jury selection continued Monday, and opening statements could happen any day once the full 12 jurors and six alternates are chosen.
As of the end of the day on Monday, two spots were open.Original article source: Karen Read's true-crime documentaries may impact second trial: court docs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maxine Waters taunts armed agents after feds slam door on her during LA riots: 'You better shoot straight'
Rep. Maxine Waters had a federal building door slammed in her face during the L.A. migrant riots – and was caught on video taunting armed agents, asking if they planned to shoot her. Video shows Waters hurrying past graffiti-covered walls of a government building and up the steps to a plywood-shielded doorway where a small crowd had gathered. "Hello, hello, hello," Waters, D-Calif., called out as she saw the California National Guard approaching the door, to enter. "I just came to use my congressional authority to check on David Huerta," she said, referring to the SEIU union leader who was arrested during the weekend's protests. Mccarthy: Maxine Waters Finds 'Value In Violence' The last agent to enter turned to her and said, "Ma'am, our lobby is secure right now to all visitors." Read On The Fox News App But that did not deter the 86-year-old 18-term Democrat. "Excuse me, I need to get in," she said, as the agent told her to "contact our public affairs office," as he closed the door in her face. "I just want to see David Huerta!" she called out. Asked by nearby onlookers about the situation, Waters said she said Huerta was "targeted" but did not know why. "I don't know whether they are going to deport him? I want to report back to my caucus what is happening," she said. Maxine Waters, House Dems Ripped For 'Unhinged' Clash With Security Guard At Education Dept In a statement on the incident, Waters said she went to the Metropolitan Detention Center to visit Huerta – whom the SEIU said was "caught" in one of a series of ICE raids in Los Angeles County the union described as "a violent sweep." Waters also alluded to another viral clip she produced, which showed her taunting armed agents standing in formation in another part of the city. "I pled [sic] with the National Guard, which was heavily armed, not to use their weapons against peaceful demonstrators who were simply exercising their rights to freedom of speech and protest," Waters said in a statement posted to X, formerly Twitter. "All people deserve to be treated with dignity and due process under the law: Peaceful, nonviolent demonstrations are critical to protecting our constitutional rights." "The President of the United States is a cruel, dishonorable human being," she said, adding that he and others would "just as soon" like to see agents "shoot somebody down." "But I don't want that to happen. I want the elected officials to do everything that we can to dissuade them," Waters later told reporters. In the latter case, Waters was seen hollering at the agents, insisting they were letting themselves become unwitting pawns of President Donald Trump: "This is Trump and his outrageous attempt to not only target our sanctuary city, but to frighten us and intimidate us. This is wrong, and I hope that none of you will use those guns to shoot anybody… and allow them to make your service a service when you're killing people," she called out to the troops. Addressing assembled reporters at another opportunity, Waters claimed Trump wants to have an excuse to enact martial law and "goad us into a fight." "This is about how they're going to treat people of color in America… They have all the guns – we know they have all the guns." In another clip, she is seen addressing more troops: "What are you going to do? You're going to shoot some kid?" "You're gonna shoot an elected official? If you shoot me, you better shoot straight." Fox News Digital reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for article source: Maxine Waters taunts armed agents after feds slam door on her during LA riots: 'You better shoot straight'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
Karen Read defense attorney Robert Alessi moved for a mistrial again Monday over special prosecutor Hank Brennan's handling of John O'Keefe's hoodie during cross-examination of a defense expert witness. "Your honor, the defense moves for a mistrial with prejudice Based upon intentional misconduct that just occurred before the court and before the jury," Alessi said. He said the motion came in response to representations Brennan made while questioning Dr. Daniel Wolfe, a crash reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA. Brennan, while cross-examining Wolfe about damage to O'Keefe's hoodie, showed him the actual piece of clothing, which had a series of holes in the back. Jury Skepticism Of Experts Could Determine Outcome In Karen Read Murder Trial: Former Judge Alessi contended that the holes were created by a criminologist during lab testing and that they did not exist when police took the sweatshirt. Read On The Fox News App Read is accused of killing her boyfriend O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, by clipping him with her 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV on Jan. 29, 2022, and leaving him to die on the ground in a record-setting blizzard. Before jurors arrived, Judge Beverly Cannone heard motions regarding rebuttal testimony and to preclude or limit expert witnesses. WATCH: Karen Read defense moves for a mistrial again She said she would hold an additional evidentiary hearing to determine what Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a Rhode Island forensic pathologist and professor at Brown University, can testify in front of jurors. David Yannetti, one of Read's defense lawyers, told the court that her legal team believes O'Keefe was "placed" on the ground near a flagpole outside 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts. Laposata is expected to discuss O'Keefe's injuries and how and where he could have suffered them. The home is about 20 miles south of Boston. Read, O'Keefe and others went there for an after-party on Jan. 28, 2022. Dr. Daniel Wolfe, the reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA, testified last week that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with the type of impact that prosecutors allege left O'Keefe dead early the following morning. 'Cannon' Test Boosts Karen Read's Defense, Showing Taillight Damage Consistent With Thrown Bar Glass GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub But on cross-examination, he conceded that flying fragments of a taillight could have been the source of injuries to O'Keefe's face and nose before he suffered a fractured skull from what prosecution experts testified was a backward fall. Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, drunken driving manslaughter and leaving the scene. Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter Her defense maintains that her vehicle never struck O'Keefe and that his injuries were caused in some other manner after she left. Read could face life in prison if convicted of the top charge. Jurors deadlocked at her first trial last year on the same article source: Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
Cross-examination exposes gaps in defense expert's crash testing for Karen Read
Karen Read's legal team is nearing the end of the case for her defense with crash reconstruction expert Dr. Daniel Wolfe called to the stand Friday. Wolfe testified about a series of testing he performed that he said showed the damage to Read's SUV is "inconsistent" with the type of pedestrian strike that prosecutors say killed her former boyfriend John O'Keefe – and he instead found that the damage to her taillight could have been inflicted by throwing a cocktail glass at the car at a speed of at least 37 mph. But on cross-examination, he conceded that flying fragments of a taillight could have been the source of injuries to O'Keefe's face and nose before he suffered a fractured skull. As part of the prosecution's case, special prosecutor Hank Brennan played a clip of Read telling an interviewer she pulled a "piece of glass" out of O'Keefe's nose. Wolfe also admitted to having to "retake" part of his certification exams and that he used a crash dummy arm that is about 26% lighter than O'Keefe's real arm. He ultimately obtained his certification. "When you're bringing that much more kinetic energy from the vehicle, that's going to overcome any mass that that arm has," he said. "Kinetic energy is equal to one-half times the mass times the velocity squared, so even if you go up a few miles per hour, you're exponentially increasing that amount of kinetic energy from the vehicle." Wolfe denied that the weight difference in the dummy arm would have made an impact on the tests he performed, but he acknowledged that O'Keefe, who stood at 6 feet, 1 inch tall and weighed over 200 pounds, was larger than the crash dummy that is 5 feet, 9 inches tall and 170 pounds. WATCH: Crash expert plays video reconstruction of Lexus SUV on crash dummy There are crash dummy arms weighing around 12 pounds which would have been closer to the real weight of O'Keefe's arm, Wolfe agreed. Brennan questioned the validity of his testing overall and called out Wolfe for swapping out dummy arms and not mentioning that detail in his direct examination. "I'm asking for a third time, name one journal, one paper, one study that supports your proposition that you're relying on the basis for your opinion in front of this jury today," Brennan said. "Name one." "I did not cite any in my report," Wolfe replied. "No." "Can you think of one that you didn't cite?" Brennan followed up. "Not that I'm aware of, no," Wolfe said. Brennan grilled Wolfe about his use of the Signal app to share encrypted messages with the defense and about his inability to produce communications under a court order because his texts were deleted. Earlier, Wolfe played video for the jury that showed multiple recreations of an impact involving a 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV and a crash dummy to simulate that alleged impact of Read's vehicle of the same make and model on O'Keefe, whom she is accused of killing in a drunken hit-and-run. In each simulation, at speeds ranging from 10 to 29 mph, the damage to the vehicle's taillight was "inconsistent" with that damage police recorded on Read's actual taillight. While most of the impacts shattered the outer lens, internal components that were destroyed in Read's vehicle remained intact in multiple test taillights. "Did you reach any opinions or conclusions as to whether the damage to the right rear tail light of the subject vehicle is consistent or inconsistent with an impact to a right arm during a high-speed reversing maneuver?" asked defense attorney Alan Jackson. "It was inconsistent," Wolfe replied. Wolfe also obtained sweatshirts that were the same brand and fabric blend of the one O'Keefe was wearing when he died. Notably, the impacts did not produce similar holes in the cloth. "Do you have an opinion or conclusion as to whether or not the damage that you saw to the hoodie related to John O'Keefe is consistent or inconsistent with an impact from a right rear taillight of the subject SUV?" Jackson asked. "It was inconsistent," Wolfe replied. "And what do you base that opinion on?" Jackson followed up. "Based upon all of the impact testing that we did with the closed ATD arm in the laboratory, as well as the field," Wolfe said, using an acronym that refers to the formal name for crash dummies -- Anthropomorphic Test Device. Judge Beverly Cannone called a midday lunch break around 12:40 p.m. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan was expected to kick off cross-examination when court resumes. Friday marks the 28th day of her retrial on murder and other charges in the death of her former boyfriend, a 46-year-old Boston police officer. Wolfe is the director of accident reconstruction at a firm called ARCCA. Earlier in his testimony, he said ARCCA designed a specialized "cannon" to simulate throwing a cocktail glass at Read's taillight and determined that similar damage could have been caused if someone threw the glass at around 31 mph and 37 mph. "From the 37 mile per hour test, we are getting damage that's generally consistent, and by that I mentioned we have portions of the outer lens missing, the underlying diffuser," he said. "There was also some fracturing on the backside of the assembly. So again we observed damage that was generally consistent with that of the subject taillight." Wolfe said he gave an opinion that the damage Read's SUV was generally consistent with someone throwing that drinking glass at at least 37 mph. In another ARCCA test, the reconstructionists wanted to see if an impact between the taillight and the back of O'Keefe's head could've caused his skull fracture. Wolfe said he tested at 15 mph. Damage to the test taillight was significantly more than Read's taillight at that speed – but it didn't generate enough force to cause a skull fracture. ARCCA obtained sweatshirts from the same company and of the same fabric blend as the one O'Keefe was wearing when he died and also simulated strikes to see if the fabric would puncture in the same way. At 10 and 17 mph, the taillight sustained different levels of damage but the fabric remained undamaged. Prosecutors accused Read, 45, of hitting O'Keefe with her 2021 Lexus SUV and driving away as he died on the ground with a skull fracture during a blizzard. Investigators recovered a broken cocktail glass and a black straw from the scene and found additional glass on Read's bumper. However, experts testified earlier at trial that the bar glass was not a match for the fragments found on her car. The defense denies that she struck him and has called witnesses who have attributed his injuries to other causes, including a dog bite and a potential fistfight with a man Read was flirting with behind his back. GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB Brennan unsuccessfully tried to have Wolfe and a colleague, Dr. Andrew Renstchler, blocked from testifying before the start of the trial. Wolfe testified during the first trial, which ended with a deadlocked jury, that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with a collision involving O'Keefe. Read told reporters outside court Wednesday that her defense could rest as soon as next Tuesday. There was no court on Thursday. She could face up to life in prison if convicted. Her first trial, in which the defense claimed she had been framed, ended with a deadlocked jury last year.
