Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
Karen Read defense attorney Robert Alessi moved for a mistrial again Monday over special prosecutor Hank Brennan's handling of John O'Keefe's hoodie during cross-examination of a defense expert witness.
"Your honor, the defense moves for a mistrial with prejudice Based upon intentional misconduct that just occurred before the court and before the jury," Alessi said.
He said the motion came in response to representations Brennan made while questioning Dr. Daniel Wolfe, a crash reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA.
Brennan, while cross-examining Wolfe about damage to O'Keefe's hoodie, showed him the actual piece of clothing, which had a series of holes in the back.
Jury Skepticism Of Experts Could Determine Outcome In Karen Read Murder Trial: Former Judge
Alessi contended that the holes were created by a criminologist during lab testing and that they did not exist when police took the sweatshirt.
Read On The Fox News App
Read is accused of killing her boyfriend O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, by clipping him with her 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV on Jan. 29, 2022, and leaving him to die on the ground in a record-setting blizzard.
Before jurors arrived, Judge Beverly Cannone heard motions regarding rebuttal testimony and to preclude or limit expert witnesses.
WATCH: Karen Read defense moves for a mistrial again
She said she would hold an additional evidentiary hearing to determine what Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a Rhode Island forensic pathologist and professor at Brown University, can testify in front of jurors.
David Yannetti, one of Read's defense lawyers, told the court that her legal team believes O'Keefe was "placed" on the ground near a flagpole outside 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts. Laposata is expected to discuss O'Keefe's injuries and how and where he could have suffered them.
The home is about 20 miles south of Boston. Read, O'Keefe and others went there for an after-party on Jan. 28, 2022.
Dr. Daniel Wolfe, the reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA, testified last week that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with the type of impact that prosecutors allege left O'Keefe dead early the following morning.
'Cannon' Test Boosts Karen Read's Defense, Showing Taillight Damage Consistent With Thrown Bar Glass
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub
But on cross-examination, he conceded that flying fragments of a taillight could have been the source of injuries to O'Keefe's face and nose before he suffered a fractured skull from what prosecution experts testified was a backward fall.
Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, drunken driving manslaughter and leaving the scene.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter
Her defense maintains that her vehicle never struck O'Keefe and that his injuries were caused in some other manner after she left.
Read could face life in prison if convicted of the top charge. Jurors deadlocked at her first trial last year on the same charges.Original article source: Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Proof is in the pudding': Trump DOJ tells court it will seek dismissal of Abrego Garcia case
The Trump administration on Tuesday said it plans to seek the dismissal of a civil case ordering them to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the U.S., arguing in a new court filing that the case is now "moot," given that he is now back in U.S. custody. In the filing, lawyers for the Trump administration told U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis that they plan to submit an official motion to dismiss the case on "mootness grounds" by June 16. Justice Department officials said they have "done exactly what plaintiffs asked for and what this court ordered them to do" – that is, to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. from El Salvador, where he was deported under the Alien Enemies Act in March in what Trump officials acknowledged was an administrative error. But the filing is likely to do little to quell the mounting legal fight surrounding Abrego Garcia's detention and efforts to secure his return from Salvadorian custody. Federal Judge James Boasberg Finds Probable Cause To Hold Trump In Contempt Over Deportation Flights Upon being returned to the U.S., Abrego Garcia was immediately sent to Tennessee to face federal charges related to transporting undocumented immigrants in the U.S., stemming from an arrest years earlier. Read On The Fox News App Court documents show the Justice Department filed the charges against Abrego Garcia on May 21 – prompting a flurry of fresh questions as to when the investigation and impaneling of a grand jury would have taken place. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia described the timing of his return from Salvadorian custody as "pure farce," and told Xinis in a filing of their own late last week that they plan to file a sanctions motion against the government by Wednesday. Trump's Remarks Could Come Back To Bite Him In Abrego Garcia Deportation Battle They noted that lawyers for the Trump administration were continuing to tell the court, even six days after he was indicted, that they did not have the power to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. They also noted that, in their view, a contempt charge and sanctions against the government were warranted – reminding Xinis that the Maryland court still has jurisdiction over the civil case. Xinis, for her part, suggested last month that the Trump administration could be held in contempt for their refusal to comply with the court – describing their lack of candor in the discovery proceedings as beating a "frustrated and dead horse." Justice Kagan Snaps At Trump Lawyer In Major Case: 'Every Court Has Ruled Against You' Trump administration lawyers sought to dispel the notion that they intentionally flouted the court on Tuesday, describing plaintiffs' characterization of their actions as "desperate and disappointing." "To be sure, the parties have had pointed disagreements on discovery issues, including because defendants could not share state secrets and other protected materials that would have demonstrated their good-faith compliance with the court's orders," the administration said Tuesday. Click To Get The Fox News App "But the proof is in the pudding – defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do." Xinis, an Obama appointee, previously criticized the administration for failing to comply with her court's requests for information in the case, and accused officials in a blistering eight-page order of submitting "vague, evasive and incomplete" responses that she said demonstrated "willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations."Original article source: 'Proof is in the pudding': Trump DOJ tells court it will seek dismissal of Abrego Garcia case
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read Retrial Wrapping Up As Defense Prepares to Call Final Witness
Karen Read Retrial Wrapping Up As Defense Prepares to Call Final Witness originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Testimony in the Karen Read retrial - which has made national headlines - continued Tuesday with testimony from a defense expert who says Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe likely smashed his skull during a fall backward, but did not die from hypothermia as a medical examiner previously retaking the stand, Elizabeth Laposata, a forensic pathologist and former medical examiner who is now a professor at Brown University, told jurors she believes O'Keefe fell unconscious immediately after hitting his head on a ridged object and was bitten and scratched by an animal, based on an analysis of his injuries."By looking at the body, I could tell that there was no evidence of impact from a vehicle," Laposata told the jury. 'He landed on something that had a ridge on it, to cause the laceration in the scalp. And then with a little bit of movement those vertical scratches were caused by some kind of pebbly-like surface.' Her testimony directly contradicts the government's assertion that Read, 45, backed into her boyfriend in a blinding snowstorm outside another Boston cop's home in Canton, Massachusetts and left him to die after a night of heavy drinking. Her defense insists that O'Keefe got into an altercation inside the home of now-retired Boston Police Sergeant Brian Albert and was attacked by the Albert's family dog, a German Shepherd named Chloe. The case has raised serious questions about the investigative techniques utilized by Massachusetts State Troopers in the Norfolk County District Attorney's office, where the case against Read was initiated. The lead investigator in the initial probe, Michael Proctor, was fired for misconduct in March, weeks before Read's retrial began, based on text messages he sent about Read in a chain that included his MSP superiors. In one he wrote that she was a "wack job cunt" with "no ass" and reported he had not found any "noodz" on her phone after it was seized. The Norfolk County D.A. Michael Morrissey hired a private defense attorney, Hank Brennan, who was a lawyer for notorious Boston gangster and longtime FBI informant James "Whitey" Bulger, to work as a special prosecutor in the hired a team of attorneys that includes high-profile Los Angeles defense lawyer Alan Jackson, and his partner Elizabeth Little, along with former Boston prosecutor David Yanetti and white shoe lawyer Robert Alessi from New York City. Her first trial ended in a hung jury. The defense could call its last witness in the trial, now in its eighth week, with Tuesday marking 30 days of testimony, today or tomorrow. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Delusional' Hillary Clinton savagely mocked for LA riots response: 'Only leftists disable comments'
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was brutally mocked by critics over a "delusional" X post describing the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles as "peaceful demonstrations" while pinning blame on President Donald Trump for sowing "chaos" in southern California. "Comments off lol. She can't handle the ratio. This is what Hillary Clinton calls 'peaceful demonstrations,'" popular conservative X account Libs of TikTok posted, referring to how comments on Clinton's post were restricted to only permit ones from accounts Clinton follows on the social media platform and accompanied by footage of the destruction in LA. The message was in response to Clinton posting her first and only comment as of Tuesday morning regarding the Los Angeles riots, describing them as "peaceful demonstrations" before Trump mobilized the National Guard over the weekend. "California Governor Newsom didn't request the National Guard be deployed to his state following peaceful demonstrations. Trump sent them anyway," Clinton posted on X. "It's the first time in 60 years a president has made that choice. Trump's goal isn't to keep Californians safe. His goal is to cause chaos, because chaos is good for Trump." Watch: Dem, Media Outlets Insist La Anti-ice Riots Are 'Peaceful' Despite Violence, Injured Cops The comment sparked widespread backlash among critics, who repeatedly urged the former first lady to "shut up" and accused her of turning off comments to the post amid the backlash. Read On The Fox News App "Ever notice that only leftists disable comments?" California Republican Liberty Caucus chair John Dennis posted in response to Clinton. Social media users were able to respond to Clinton through quote engagements, but not through direct replies as of Tuesday morning. "These are not peaceful Hillary," Florida Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna posted to X. "A public figure and a fraud like herself shouldn't be able to lock her replies, @elonmusk," one person responded on X, tagging X owner Elon Musk. Musk Does Immediate 180 On Trump As Soon As La Riots Rage "Hey @ElonMusk, can you make it so that government officials and former government officials cannot turn off their replies," another user posted. "Accusing the National Guard of causing chaos is a serious allegation that requires serious proof. I see none," one social media commenter posted. "Hillary Clinton is delusional if nothing else," another posted in response to footage of a fire raging as rioters waved a Mexican flag. Riots broke out in the left-wing city Friday evening after federal law enforcement officials converged on Los Angeles to carry out immigration raids as part of Trump's vow to deport illegal aliens who flooded the nation under the Biden administration. Local leaders such as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, however, quickly denounced the raids in public statements while offering words of support for illegal immigrants in the state. Protests over the raids soon devolved into violence as rioters targeted federal law enforcement officials, including launching rocks at officials, with videos showing people looting local stores, setting cars on fire and taking over a freeway. Newsom's Political Future 'Practically Nonexistent' As La Devolves Into Riots, Social Media Critics Predict Trump announced Saturday that he was deploying 2,000 National Guard members to help quell the violence, bypassing the governor, who typically activates the National Guard. California subsequently filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for efforts to allegedly "federalize the California National Guard." As the riots continued raging on Monday, the Trump administration deployed hundreds of U.S. Marines to respond to anti-immigration chaos. "Approximately 700 Marines with 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division will seamlessly integrate with the Title 10 forces under Task Force 51 who are protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area," U.S. Northern Command said in a Monday statement. Trump defended in a Truth Social post early Tuesday morning that if he "didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now." "Much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. do to an incompetent Governor and Mayor – Incidentally, the much more difficult, time consuming, and stringent FEDERAL PERMITTING PROCESS is virtually complete on these houses, while the easy and simple City and State Permits are disastrously bungled up and WAY BEHIND SCHEDULE! They are a total mess, and will be for a long time. People want to rebuild their houses. Call your incompetent Governor and Mayor, the Federal permitting is DONE!!!" Trump continued, referring to the thousands of homes that burned in southern California wildfires that gripped the Los Angeles area in January. Fox News Digital reached out to Clinton's office for comment on the social media post, but did not immediately receive a article source: 'Delusional' Hillary Clinton savagely mocked for LA riots response: 'Only leftists disable comments'
