logo
Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking

Court D-Day arrives for Antoinette Lattouf over ABC sacking

News.com.au6 hours ago

Journalist Antoinette Lattouf will today learn her fate after she sued the ABC over their decision to take her from the air in the wake of a series of pro-Palestine social media posts.
Ms Lattouf sued the ABC in the Federal Court after she was sent home for the final two days of a five-day stint on ABC Radio's Sydney Mornings program in the lead up to Christmas in 2023.
Ms Lattouf was called up as a fill-in host for five shifts starting on Monday, December 18, but was told not to come in for the final two shows.
She had claimed she was unlawfully dismissed after sharing a post on social media by Human Rights Watch reading: 'HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war.
'The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a weapon of war in Gaza'
She says that she was sacked after sharing the post about the Israel-Gaza war and as a result of a flurry of emails from pro-Israel supporters.
Justice Darryl Rangiah is due to hand down his findings in the Federal Court on Wednesday morning.
The ABC argued that Ms Lattouf's employment was not terminated and that when she was told that she was not required to appear on air on Thursday, December 21 and Friday, December 22, it was not motivated by her political opinions.
Ms Lattouf's legal team argued that she was rendered 'pretty much unemployable' as a result of the saga having been accused of misconduct by the ABC.
She argues that she suffered 'significant pain, hurt, humiliation and distress as a result of the egregious treatment meted out to her by the ABC' and that her 'reputation was sullied'.
Ms Lattouf was asking the court for $100,000 to $150,000 for non-economic loss.
In the Federal Court her legal team alleged former ABC chair Ita Buttrose, then-managing director David Anderson and head of content Chris Oliver-Taylor made the decision to axe her after receiving a host of complaints about her pro-Palestinian politics.
During the blockbuster trial, the court heard that Ms Buttrose fired off an email to managing editor David Anderson on Tuesday, December 19.
'Has Antoinette been replaced. I am over getting emails about her,' Ms Buttrose said in the email.
During her evidence, Ms Buttrose denied that this was proof that she wanted Ms Lattouf fired.
'If I wanted somebody removed, I'd be franker than that,' Ms Buttrose told the court at the time.
The court heard that Mr Anderson replied: 'Antoinette will finish up on Friday. It's a managed exit given the situation. I can explain more tomorrow.'
Ms Buttrose followed it up with another email at 9.59pm: 'I have a whole clutch more of complaints. Why can't she come down with flu? Or Covid. Or a stomach upset? We owe her nothing, we are copping criticism because she wasn't honest when she was appointed.
'Managed exit. Really.
'I don't like emailing you late but I am wrapping present. We should be in damage control not managed exits David.'
Much of the case centred on what Ms Lattouf was told in a telephone conversation with her boss, then ABC Radio Sydney content director Elizabeth Green, on the afternoon of Monday December 18 – the day of the first of her five shifts.
Ms Green told the court that she told Ms Lattouf: 'Obviously as an ABC presenter, you need to be impartial, that includes on social media. I wouldn't give anyone any ammunition for complaints, so would be best if you don't post anything related to the Israel/Palestine situation on social media while you're with us.'
While Ms Lattouf told the court that she was told by Ms Green: 'It's probably best that you keep a low profile on Twitter and maybe don't tweet anything.'
The court heard that following the discovery of some of Ms Lattouf's social media posts, Mr Oliver-Taylor texted Mr Anderson on Wednesday, December 20 saying that Ms Lattouf had: 'breached our editorial policies while in our employment.
'She also failed to follow a direction from her producer not to post anything while working with the ABC. As a result of this, I have no option but to stand her down.'
Ms Lattout was paid for all five shifts.
'On Wednesday, 20 December 2023, Ms Lattouf was advised that she would not be required to present on Thursday, 21 December 2023 and Friday, 22 December 2023, being the last two shifts of the engagement,' the ABC's lawyers said in its submissions to the court.
'That is, the ABC altered the work that Ms Lattouf was required to undertake on the last two shifts by not requiring her to undertake any work – as it was contractually expressly entitled to do.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SBS News in Filipino, Wednesday 25 June 2025
SBS News in Filipino, Wednesday 25 June 2025

SBS Australia

time34 minutes ago

  • SBS Australia

SBS News in Filipino, Wednesday 25 June 2025

119 Australians and their family members have been successfully evacuated from Israel on an Australian Defence Force-assisted flight from Tel Aviv. Liberal leader Sussan Ley is to reveal a plan today to resurrect the coalition from the ashes of its election loss. The first batch of 31 overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) arrived in the Philippines on Tuesday night after being repatriated from the Middle East amid rising regional tensions. A 6.3 magnitude quake struck the southern part of the Philippines on Tuesday. The Filipino community in Sydney will come together this weekend for FiloFomo Fest, marking the culmination of celebrations for the 127th Philippine Independence Day. LISTEN TO THE PODCAST SBS Filipino 25/06/2025 06:53 Filipino 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino 📲 Catch up episodes and stories – Visit or stream on Spotify , Apple Podcasts , Youtube Podcasts , and SBS Audio app.

NSW Premier, Police Minister staffers to front Dural caravan inquiry after arrest threat
NSW Premier, Police Minister staffers to front Dural caravan inquiry after arrest threat

News.com.au

time42 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

NSW Premier, Police Minister staffers to front Dural caravan inquiry after arrest threat

NSW Premier Chris Minns has slammed the threat of arrest for five political staffers as a 'dangerous precedent' after he refused to front an inquiry into the Dural caravan bomb plot. Five staffers for Mr Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley risked the possibility that a warrant would be issued for their arrest after they failed to attend the third hearing of the inquiry last Friday into the relationship between the caravan plot in Sydney's northwest and the passing of strict anti-hate laws. Independent MLC and inquiry chairman Rod Roberts confirmed the staffers had since agreed to attend a special hearing of the committee on Friday during an interview with 2GB's Ben Fordham on Wednesday morning. 'As a result of the (Legislative Council) president Ben Franklin seeking legal advice from Bret Walker, one of the eminent silks in relation to constitutional law, he has ruled that the Legislative Council is in their rights … to seek arrest warrants for these people that didn't comply with the summonses,' he said. 'But, the government has capitulated now overnight (and) waved the white flag and we're going to make arrangements for a committee hearing on Friday for these five to attend.' Mr Roberts said he had received an 'undertaking' from the five staffers that they would attend the inquiry 'at this stage'. He described it is a 'very big backdown' from Mr Minns and that it was 'unprecedented that a Premier would take it to that level'. 'I don't know where he got his advice from – his legal advice – but, it's been reaffirmed by the leading constitutional lawyer in Australia that we are within our rights,' Mr Roberts said. Asked about the reversal, Mr Minns said he was 'disappointed about the circumstances' that led to his staff being summoned. 'Don't take my word for it. Listen to the chair of the committee who said the reason they're being called in is because I won't appear before the committee. 'So, in a punitive way, pulling in staffers to this upper house inquiry. 'I think that the very troubling information that staff would be arrested and held potentially overnight via police custody is a massive overreach.' Mr Minns said staff would 'make up their own minds' about whether to attend, and he was offering them support as their employer. He went on to slam the committee as 'unleashing extraordinary powers of police or the courts' on what was 'close to a kangaroo court'. 'That's a breach or a step that no one has taken in the parliament's history, and there's very good reason for that,' he said. 'Does anyone truly believe that the members of that committee, given everything that they've said prior to the committee's opening hearing, are going to be soberly assessing the information before them and making a non-political decision? 'I think they've already shown inherent bias in their approach to all of these inquiries, and they don't follow due process. 'So, I think it's a dangerous precedent for the state, but at the end of the day, we are where we are.' Mr Minns went on to accuse the committee of pushing the 'common understanding' that all anti-Semitic incidents in Sydney were related to the Dural caravan plot. Appearing later on 2GB, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said he was 'glad' about the reversal. 'It shouldn't have come to this,' he said. 'There shouldn't have been the threat of warrants and arrests, but this is a premier and a government (that) think they're above the law. 'Just imagine if witnesses subpoenaed to court gave the bird sign to the court.' After receiving a letter on Friday afternoon regarding the staffers, Mr Franklin instructed the clerk to seek legal advice. 'This morning, I have met with Mr Brent Walker SC who has given me the benefit of his verbal advice on the matter,' he said on Tuesday. 'On the receipt of his advice in written form, I intend to table it in the House given the significance of this issue. 'In the meantime, I am considering his advice and its implications, as I tend to make a statement to the House later this week on my intended action.' The inquiry was established to determine who not what and when about the explosives-laden caravan, which police later claimed was not a terrorism plot and instead part of a criminal conspiracy. It has so far heard evidence from leading figures in NSW Police as well as government staff.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store